Ukraine’s Tank Problem

It seems to be a case of little provision for so much…

When culture war games trend lethal

The right-wing ecosphere throws an idiot ball into the civic discourse with…

The year ahead

Most people turn away from politics over the holiday period when the…

Cutting Your Power Bills In Half And Other…

A few years ago there was a scam where people were promised…

Values Based Capitalism: The Imperative of Defining Commitment…

By Denis Bright Editorial insiders at The Weekend Australian (28-29 January 2023)…

A walk in the forest

Bayerischer Wald can be just as hard to get to than it…

An Emergent Premier Chris Minns - Uniting Sydney…

By Denis Bright After more than a decade in Opposition, NSW Labor is…

Forget Australia Day And Celebrate: Rum Rebellion Day…

After pointing out for a number of years that January 26th isn't…

«
»
Facebook

Yet another reason why one should not vote Liberal

By Tracie Aylmer

As many are aware, I relish the International Criminal Court. In my quest to see key politicians accountable for their actions, I decided to research how much money was being paid by Australia – as a member of the Rome Convention – to the International Criminal Court.

I’m not sure if anyone is aware but when a country signs up to a particular international treaty they are bound to pay a type of membership fee each year, depending on the treaty. Australia pays the United Nations the most amount, due to the UN Charter, of around $60 million per year according to the 2013/14 figures on the DFAT website. Many other treaties are paid a lesser amount, and payments are made for various international tribunals. This includes the Rome Statute.

The figure is based upon a Scale of Assessment determined by the United Nations. Australia must pay 2.337% of gross national income for each year from 2016 to 2018. The figure is then recalculated in future years. This is how the amount of $60 million is calculated.

For the ICC, the scale for determining how much is calculated for payment to the ICC each year is the same. Australia is supposed to pay the same percentage of the overall budget to the ICC. There are adjustments that can be made, which usually centre whether a country is helping the UN to pay peacekeepers and the like in other countries.

The ICC is in deep financial trouble. Their budget for 2016 is around $136 million, however the request for funds was around $16 million higher in order for the prosecutor to be more effective. It had to be toned back as some countries aren’t paying, or are paying late. Half of that is paid by the UN. The other half must be paid from the members that signed and implemented the Rome Convention.

In 2013/14, Australia paid the ICC $200,001 into their trust fund. They then paid a further $200,001 into the trust fund for victims. That was the total amount that Australia felt obliged to pay. With so many other countries unable to pay due to being poverty stricken, one would have thought that Australia would have been able to pay the permanent international court of last resort a little bit more. While Australia had paid millions of dollars for UN peacekeeping in unstable areas of the world during that financial year, it would have been reasonable to also pay for the court that would be holding the proceedings against the perpetrators in those unstable areas. The amount Australia has paid, in order for justice to be preserved, is a pittance.

In September 2013, Julie Bishop gained responsibility of the foreign affairs portfolio. She is also the one who pushed John Howard into signing the Rome Statute for the ICC back in 2001/2. One would have thought that she would be a tenacious defender at later dates of the ICC. Barely a whimper has been heard, nor do many people understand it. Not only have we signed up to it at the commencement of the court, but we have domestic legislation detailing the ICC. In addition, our federal Criminal Code Act has been amended, to include genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity in Chapter 8.

So we have signed up for the ICC, and include it in our domestic legislation, yet take the minimum care with it.

Our budget for 2013/14 explains a lot about the direction we would have taken if Labor stepped back into power. The intention for us internationally was complex. On the one hand, we would pay for a nuclear test ban treaty, and on the other we would pay much more for an atomic energy agency. Paying for the Wassenaar Agreement was another thing altogether. I am told that this is not actually a binding agreement, but enables around 41 countries to regulate arms and other war materials. Slightly more information about this agreement is found here. In 2013/14, we paid $73,135 towards it.

Domestically, the 2013/14 budget was slightly fairer to the working or disadvantaged person. Non-government schools would not have been paid more than job seekers. Health was important. Expenses appeared in many ways quite reasonable.

As comparison, I checked the 2016/17 budget. It was an eye opener. Non-government schools have received more than job seekers. Unemployment and underemployment have definitely risen in the past three years with the Liberals at the helm, yet the expense for job seekers has only slightly risen, by not even $1 billion. One would have expected a much higher rise, considering the current environment. Expenses for Indigenous health have decreased, rather than increased. Other areas for disadvantage have also decreased. Considering our population is growing, this is not a good thing. In addition, non-government schools would be paid nearly double of the government school budget.

In addition, other expenses in Table 3 of the budget for 2016/17 have risen by over $15 billion from the budget for 2013/14. Explanations have been that the states and territories need to be handed GST (which is true). However, the states and territories are screaming out for money in order to fund services.

The defence budget has also increased, by more than $5 billion. I have already spoken about where much of defence spending has gone – to Transfeild/Broadspectrum. Page 5 of Transfield’s 2014/15 budget have stated that they will be guaranteed around $17 billion in total. Meanwhile, our defence is actually suffering. I have been told from someone who volunteered for defence that there are actually very few numbers of defence personnel. All other staff were services staff from other organisations, namely Transfield.

For our international budget, payments to international organisations have nearly doubled from the 2013/14 budget to the 2016/17 budget. Considering there is now no information that we can see with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade in relation to later periods of time than 2013/14, one can wonder how such a jump could occur. The fact that these figures are now hidden away from us is telling. My mind wonders if international organisations are being paid off in tens of millions of dollars in a type of bribe. For this government, I wouldn’t be surprised.

Road transport expenses have nearly doubled, adding nearly $4.5 billion to the expenses of 2016/17. This of course would significantly help the major organisations that the Liberal Party are mates with. Indefinite detention has increased the cost, by $871 million. This includes ‘border protection’. The fact that there needs to be such an incredible amount spent in the first place on detention has always confused me. Malcolm Fraser was right in treating the Vietnamese with respect and processing them quickly. It cost his government much less to do so. It costs this government, and therefore us, an amount that could be used for our own services, and the figures show exactly that.

In total, there has been an approximate $50 billion increase in expenses from 2013/14 to 2016/17. The opposition has been correct in saying that there is a spending problem, rather than an income problem. However, it’s how the money has been spent is an even bigger problem for us. Nationalising us is the main agenda, as written by Dr George Venturini. Financially, this proves Dr Venturini’s point about fascism.

The fact that we don’t know exactly where our money is going in relation to some areas should be a scary concept. There is no accountability with this government that wants to rampage against Australians for their own apparent benefit. The figures obviously show a vast difference between the haves and have nots.

Using these budget figures, it’s quite obvious that there won’t be any ‘jobs and growth’ in the near, or far, future.

This is the time to vote for other parties, and leave the Liberal National Coalition in the dust. They have no idea about how to spend taxpayer’s money wisely, other than for their own desires.

 

 396 total views,  2 views today

9 comments

Login here Register here
  1. jim

    But aren’t the LNP better economic masters well the Murdoch media keeps telling everyone they are vote LNP out, please do not be fooled by the lies like most most were in 2013 vote lnp out.

  2. kerri

    Well written Tracey.
    They really do try to justify spending for their own reasons whilst ignoring frugality,morals and common sense

  3. totaram

    kerri: The trouble isn’t the spending – it’s what the spending is on. Spending on investment in Education, Infrastructure and health helps grow the economy and the well-being of the nation. Spending on corporate tax-cuts, crony-capitalist companies in the resource sector, gambling, primary industries like logging etc. don’t really help the nation in the long run, unless they are actually sustainable into the future (which most of them are not).
    Right now the economy needs lots of spending to give it a kickstart (which Rudd did but which was withdrawn too quickly by Wayne Swan who caved in to the howls of “deficit and debt disaster”. The private sector is so deeply in debt it is unwilling to spend, so the govt. must step in with big deficits. Unfortunately, the neo-liberals will howl again about “debt and deficit disaster”. Unless we can put this nonsense to rest we cannot progress as a nation. Every corporation borrows to invest, so why is it wrong for the federal govt to do so? Especially when the govt. cannot default on its debt which is denominated in AUD, which are issued by the RBA.

  4. Salstarat

    I am surprised by the heading of this article …. really, do we need yet ANOTHER reason NOT to vote for the lying, deceiving and totally corrupt grubs in the LNP? I have more than 1,000+ reasons already …. in fact there is an absolute LAUNDRY LIST of reasons for not voting for the psychopaths in the LNP – so many that the List would make the Dead Sea Scrolls look like a piece of confetti! Besides the fact that this is the worst, most criminally inhumane, internationally despised and condemned fascist government in Australia’s history, these pathological lying elitists have not one iota of insight, zero foresight, are the worst environmental vandals in living memory and their short history of inept, diabolically incompetent financial mismanagement has literally TREBLED our national deficit, shut down much of Australia’s once viable industries, put literally thousands of people out of work and defunded our children’s education, did away with the sensible and fair Mining Tax (that would have ensured Australians fair share of mining profits are put back into society), annihilated the NBN, defunded our Medicare and are planning to completely privatise everything including our State schools, jails, health system and utilities! The Lying Nazi Party are beholden ONLY to the top 1% of the greediest, multinational predators as well as the self serving fascists in Murdoch’s IPA who want to destroy EVERY union in the country so that ruthless employers have total control over the wages and working conditions of vulnerable employees. Could they get worse? I seriously doubt it! I would like AIM or SOMEONE to investigate WHERE THE HELL the LNP plan to attain more than $52 BILLION PLUS another $100+ BILLION to purchase and maintain 12 obsolete submarines when they are telling EVERY hard working Australian to pull their belts in?

  5. Michael Taylor

    I had a thousand reasons too, Salstarat, but after reading this article I now have 1,001. ? I’m damn sure the number will grow well before the election.

    But on a serious note, the more we look at the budget . . . the more we find something not right.

  6. Michael Taylor

    I don’t know where they are going to find the $52B. If they kept the mineral resources tax they might have scraped something together. Or they might decide to scrap subsidies to the mining companies and save billions. They might even close the loopholes that see a media giant pay no tax, despite its owner being worth billions. They could even close the gulags that hold the refugees in detention . . . which also cost us billions. They’d also save money if they stopped giving tax cuts to our top wage earners. Cancelling the schools chaplaincy program would help a small bit – maybe enough to pay for half a sub.

    There are plenty of ways. They’ll ignore the lot of them, of course.

  7. Tracie

    They would find it from international sources, where they borrow heavily and then have to pay back the loan plus interest. If they knew how to manage the expenses better, they wouldn’t have to cut anything, and wouldn’t have to borrow quite so much.

    Then there’s the income, which has been written about beforehand (I think), so I didn’t bother looking at that side of the balance sheet.

  8. Salstarat

    Michael, I feel sure that they intend attaining the $152+ BILLION (to purchase and maintain 12 obsolete submarines) with the funds they so stupidly and cruelly attained by DEFUNDING our children’s education, privatising Medicare and increasing and expanding the GST. Each submarine is going to cost EVERY man, woman and child in Australia more than $6,610 per person! All of that money …. billions and billions … on only 12 obsolete weapons of war that would be USELESS in the event of a nuclear war anyway where bombs are launched by the remote push of a button! Once again, the hideous war mongering LNP THRIVE on war, weapons of war, hate filled terror campaigns, the ramped up vilification and marginalisation of minorities and constant attacks on the poorest, most vulnerable people in our society. The dogs in the LNP are ruthless, barbaric cowards who sadistically and cynically make outrageous judgements against the needy whilst sucking off the weeping wound of the taxpayers’ purse like ravenous parasites. One only has to see the OUTRAGEOUS expenditure that the bloated Joe Hockey is continuing to expend in the USA to see just how depraved, self entitled and hypocritical they really are! Hockey’s expenditure has BLOWN OUT of all proportion and he is now on a morally bankrupt plan to refurbish the Australian Embassy which has only recently been refurbished!

    Abbott and the LNP’s scandalous and transparent abuse of our court system in three Royal Commissions, each one costing more than $80 MILLION, was a totally malignant, politically motivated exercise to attempt to discredit high ranking members of the ALP and the union movement. The Royal Commissions ALL failed and the only losers were the Australian taxpayers …. more than $240 MILLION wasted in yet another LNP FAILED scheme to character assassinate and discredit the ALP. If ANY government needs to come under the intensive scrutiny of a Royal Commission, the Abbott/Turnbull Circus is it!

  9. paul walter

    Yes… the last two. these are a good summary from most of the comments, which in turn is fair endorsement for the position.

    All to be wasted on some new idiot casino game like the one that induced the Meltdown? Kenneth Davidson at the Age used to write marvellously on pol economy involving privatisation of wealth/ socialisation of debt memes as part of his scornful critiques on neoliberalism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: