Cop 30 Climate Summit probable change of venue…

By Nicholas Beelzebub Lucifer I was a bit disappointed not to be invited…

COP29 comes with low expectations, but every step…

RMIT University Media Release COP29, the UN’s yearly Climate Change Conference, is currently…

Risk of PTSD 20 times higher for people…

UNSW Sydney Media Release Researchers at UNSW uncover evidence of the negative psychiatric…

Open Letter urges Tasmanian Premier to resist opposition…

By Tess Lawrence Chief advocate for the Alliance for Gambling Reform, Tim Costello…

Global carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels continue…

CSIRO News Release Global carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from fossil fuels have reached…

They Were There First: Election Denialism, the Democratic…

The scene is memorable enough. November 2016. The Twin Peaks Tavern, Castro…

Latest government health workforce audit shows continuing disparities…

National Rural Health Alliance Media Release The recently released audit of the Australian…

Minns Government shames Albanese Government on police pay,…

Australian Federal Police Association The NSW police wage deal, which properly recognises and…

«
»
Facebook

Short-term relief in Budget; but no long-term plan

If Labor delivered a Budget like we’re seeing portrayed from the Coalition Government in Australia the media would proclaim they were ‘irresponsibly’ ‘spending like drunken sailors’. But when the Conservatives are trying to revive their electoral fortunes the Melbourne Herald-Sun proclaimed “Hip Pocket Rocket” and “Millions Win”. In fact this is a Budget that effectively increases tax over the medium and long-term, however. And much of the much-mooted ‘generosity’ is illusory. More on that later.

Fuel excise will be cut with an anticipated 22c per litre drop in petrol prices. Also, interestingly the Government points to low unemployment; which is largely because of stimulus created by JobKeeper – albeit badly targeted stimulus. Does this mean they’ll admit they’re wrong on contractionary Budgets more broadly? Probably not. Wage subsidies, tax offsets and cash payments figure significantly (for instance a once-off $250 payment for pensioners); but over the longer term this will not properly compensate stagnating wages and depressed pension and JobSeeker payments. Indexation of pensions will continue, but this is merely ‘treading water’. By default pensions increase as a proportion of average wages; which means if inflation continues to grow it may continue to outstrip pension indexation.

Frydenberg believes low unemployment will drive wages. This is possible because there is reduced supply relative to demand. But there are no guarantees: Without strong labour organisation and leadership form Fair Work Australia stagnation could well continue. And wage growth will probably not keep pace with inflation. In any case the Coalition are lukewarm on wages; and are just trying to weaken Labor’s narrative. There will also be a $10 billion investment in the Australian Signals Directorate over 10 years, but there is little in the way of new initiatives in aged care, education or child care for instance (except for some subsidies for initial study in aged care). Previously announced improvements to aged care funding will continue, but this is but a fraction of what was demanded by the Royal Commission.

The Conservatives have had their chance to respond to the Aged Care Royal Commission and are doing not nearly enough. We need to know that Labor will commit the necessary resources to implement quotas – which means more time on washing and dressing, more individual attention with feeding, and more time to interact and get to know residents. Also, Labor needs to put a registered nurse in every home 24/7; improve wages and conditions for all workers (min $30/hour); and implement quality of life and happiness benchmarks that go beyond the basics to deliver happiness and quality of life as much as possible. All residents also need access to pleasant surrounds such as gardens, and more to do than be sat in front of a television in a common room all day. Also prompt at home care for all who have the need and meet requirements with minimal waiting time. And phase out the user pays model by providing for high quality public, and subsidised not-for-profit and community based care. This will require several billion in new funding.

In the Budget there will be over $350 million in subsidies for apprentices and employers will be rewarded with $120 for every $100 spent training their workforce and other incentives for investment in technology.

Encouragingly, pensioners will gain on the medicine front; with the number of scripts necessary before the ‘safety net’ kicks in reduced by twelve. While a relatively small measure this is perhaps the most progressive announcement made by the government here.

Over $800 million will address ‘telecommunications blackspots’; while there will be a $480 public investment in NBN speed and reliability. This is necessary because the NBN was never done properly by the Conservatives in the first place. $600 million will support growth in agriculture, while $3.7 billion will fund faster regional rail. Subsidies will also support regional manufacturing; including the development of export markets.

Schemes will continue which enable 50,000 first home buyers to enter the market with a 5 per cent deposit. But there is little for public, social or affordable housing – which could be crucial in any attempt to make housing more affordable by increasing affordable supply. The government’s policies do not address the fact that increasing interest rates could provide a massive shock to personal and household budgets, sending mortgage repayments skyrocketing. This could lead to another financial crisis and a recession.

Importantly many of the cash payments benefiting low and middle income Australians will be a short-term splurge; designed to win an election. Improvements for low income earners and pensions will not be sustained over the long term. Indeed, while it will be increased for its final year, the low- and middle-income earner tax offset will be phased out in the following year and onwards; hitting low and middle income earners hard over the longer term. Long after the short-term handouts fade into memory this could cost low income earners $700 a year. Somehow most of the mainstream media didn’t see fit to mention this. So in fact this is a ‘smoke and mirrors’ Budget that tries to convince us of its generosity while hitting us hard into the future. It is no accident that low and middle income earners will be hit, while tax cuts for the wealthy will be pushed through.

Overall, this budget provides a boost over the short term, but does little to address cost of living over the longer term; and leaves wages ‘to the market’. Structural improvements are necessary for JobSeeker and pensions. And the tax system needs to be adjusted to benefit low- and middle-income earners relative to high income earners and the wealthy more generally. Means tests could be eased, also, to make it more attractive for disability pensioners to enter the workforce; and more could be done to help those people gain experience to ameliorate gaps in resumés.

Again, the Budget delivers some relief over the short-term but does little long-term about poverty, wages stagnation, and cost of living pressures. Labor needs to do much better on aged care, public and social housing, progressive tax system restructure, structural increases to pensions, and initiatives to get disabled Australians into fulfilling work – with an easing of means tests for fairness. Medicare dental could also feature, and Labor could begin the process of winding back user pays in education by reducing student debts and significantly increasing debt repayment thresholds. Victoria is also significantly short-changed on infrastructure; and the government will have to find money from elsewhere to pay for transport infrastructure, especially roads. Some problems never seem to go away; such as state school class sizes and over-worked teachers. But this seems to have ‘slipped off the radar’ in recent years.

Labor needs a long-term plan, with immediate reforms that are ‘locked in’ and hard to reverse. This Budget will convince some; but over the longer term so many questions remain unanswered.

 

This article was originally published on ALP Socialist Left Forum.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

10 comments

Login here Register here
  1. craig robson

    If a herd of kangaroos is a mob,
    A shoal of fish a school,
    What’s the name for a pack of lying corrupt arseholes? The Coalition of course,
    Morrison Frydenberg Dutton Taylor Joyce, don’t have the personality to be embarrassed or remorseful let alone ashamed

  2. pierre wilkinson

    what can I say? a short term sugar hit – not really, even blind Freddy’s cat can tell you that a one off payment of $250 is absolutely welcome but far too small a bonus to swing anybody to their side,
    meanwhile the hubris of Morrison continues to turn even rusted on Liberals away from this corrupt incompetence of a government.
    If it wasn’t for the pathetic press extolling virtues where none exist this budget would be seen for the abject failure that it is.

  3. RosemaryJ36

    I am not wealthy, but my $250 will be donated to the ASRC. They help people who are desperate – and ignored or tortured by Coalition policies.

  4. New England Cocky

    ”$3.7 billion will fund faster regional rail.”

    Uhm in New England thining Australian voters are campaigning for the re-opening of the Great Northern Railway (GNR) between Armidale and Wallangarra on the Queensland border. The cost is estimated by experienced persons as about $44 MILLION. However, Beetrooter cannot see the value in having the GNR re-opened and indeed is working to have it ripped up so that it cannot compete against John Anderson’s pet project, the notorious Northern Inland Railway (NIR) being built at an estimated cost of $14 BILLION with an NIR business case that acknowledges that the initial funding will NOT be recovered for about 50 years.

    New England has missed out on all the Nazional$ funding largesse because the unelected political hacks of the Nazional$ regard it as a ”safe electorate” again. perhaps the NIR passing about 20 km from his two Pilliga Scrub properties thought to be above CSG deposits owned by SANTOS may influence this attitude.

  5. Terence Mills

    I watched Question Time today, probably the last QT this government will face and they certainly didn’t change their form on relevance and avoidance.

    The Speaker is hopeless and they just ignore him.

    A question about the Attorney General’s department working on the Liberal Party appeal on the pre-selection debacle in NSW was avoided to the point of evasion – we still don’t know why the Attorney General and her department are doing Liberal party business and they won’t answer and the Speaker lets it go.

    Would the media please pick up on this.

  6. Tristan Ewins

    What’s important is that low and middle income earners are actually losing money from the tax offset after the first year ; and a lot of money at that. The press is selling this as a generous Budget ; either they just don’t know what they’re talking about ; or they’re deliberately avoiding the truth.

  7. Michael Taylor

    Tristan, I think it’s the latter. But not just avoiding the truth; they also ignore it.

    I don’t have much faith in the press. After all, they’ve successfully predicted 25 of the last two housing slumps. 😉

  8. corvusboreus

    Re media uncompetance/complicity,
    A good summary comparing febrile media coverage of rumours around the Kitching/’mean girls’ saga to the disinterest shown to coaltion senator Fierraventi-Wells’ specific allegations abour Scott Morrison.

    It is also worth noting that in the general media reporting of scomo’s mate Brian Houston being booted from Hill$ong for sleazy conduct, they fail to note that it us that this the same B Houston who is currently on trial over charges of concealing child rape.

  9. Max Gross

    I don’t know why anyone would call the LNP COALition “conservatives”. They are a pack of dangerous extremists.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page