Media Alert - Refugees Say "Fair Go, Albo"

A protest vigil will be held for 4 days at the electoral…

The Voice reveals the urgent need for truth…

The fact that Elon Musk has just halved his election integrity team…

Desperate refugees hold their ground

In Melbourne, there have been rolling protests by refugees outside the electoral…

Flagging Support: Zelenskyy Loses Favour in Washington

Things did not go so well this time around. When the worn…

Manus, Nauru way worse than Pezzullo texts

By Jane Salmon All the hyperbole about Pezzullo's fall from grace is…

From my "To read" list comes nothing but…

Now, how do I tackle this? Do I use the information in…

Cruel Prerogatives: Braverman on Refugees at the AEI

Suella Braverman has made beastliness a trait in British politics. The UK…

Dictator Dan Quits And Victoria Is Free...

With the resignation of Dan Andrews, Victorians can once again go to…


Let’s hope the polls are right this time

And so, the second leader’s debate on 9News has come and gone. At times it was unedifying and robustly undignified. It lacked moderation and structure and demonstrated how much of a bully our Prime Minister is. And I might add how amateurish commercial TV can be. Sure, both combatants gave as much as they got, but the continual interruptions of Albanese’s answers by the panel and the Prime Minister became tedious. It mostly led to the responses of both being indecipherable at times.

The two troopers asked the best questions to each other. Morrison asked Albanese about tax. He wanted to remind the viewers about negative gearing and franking credits.

Albanese asked the Prime Minister about the workplace. Should anyone be paid less than the minimum wage?

His answer came down to two words: “It depends.”

9News should have given more thought to the rules and presentation of the debate. Maybe they wanted a dog fight. If that’s the case, that’s what they got.

As one who is deeply concerned about the state of our democracy, its discourse, and the media’s part in it, I found the whole thing a regrettable waste of time. I concluded that Albanese won, but only because he cared more about the future than the Prime Minister.

Others, like Chris Uhlmann of 9News had this observation:

“I have been engaged in these things before when the leaders would look straight ahead and give short speeches and not at any stage take any chance,” he said.

“I thought Anthony Albanese, who is clearly leading at this stage, might go risk-free, and in fact he initiated the banter between the two of them, and at some stages he really did it quite willingly.”

While Katharine Murphy from The Guardian made this point:

“I think Morrison blamed either international factors or Albanese for most things. There was a particularly surreal exchange about the federal integrity commission when the prime minister (who had point-blank refused to introduce legislation giving effect to his own election promise) berated his opponent for not having any legislation from opposition, when Morrison (still in Government, last I looked) could have put his own legislation in the parliament for a vote.”

The results

As unscientific as they are, the viewing audience scored the debate a draw, but Labor came out on top on other questions.

Decided or not, which are you more likely to vote for?

  • Coalition – 44%
  • Labor – 50%
  • Other – 6%

Choosing only between the two major parties, which are you more likely to vote for?

  • Coalition – 47%
  • Labor – 53%

The Polls

Knowing that some polls were due to be released the same evening, I sneaked a look at The Poll Bludger around 10 pm for further revelations. I was surprised to find that, contrary to the usual expectation, the polling wasn’t contracting in favour of the incumbent as it usually does.

Newspoll had Labor ahead 54/46, Ipos had Labor on 50, and the Coalition 35 with 15 undecided. I would be surprised if the Essential Poll tomorrow showed anything different.

At this stage, Labor’s lead is much more significant than it was in 2019. So, to win, the Liberals need a more substantial error than that which occurred in 2019.

These figures show that all the current polls have moved toward Labor, and if they hold up into next week, the Coalition is looking at an electoral shellacking on 21 May.

Other observations from the week that was

1 An enormous amount of talk about housing as we draw closer to 21 May. Mortgages and rents are all rising. Housing affordability has undoubtedly become an election issue.

2 Last Thursday, at his morning presser, the Opposition leader couldn’t remember his party’s six-point NDIS plan. Albo later gave the media a much-needed serve. I’m told the journalist who posed the NDIS gotcha question to Albanese was reading his question from his phone. Hypocrisy, much?

3 It was only a matter of time before Malcolm Turnbull entered the election in earnest and did so by telling voters to vote for an independent. I’m tipping it won’t be his last. After Morrison unethically disposed of him, payback is not unexpected.

4 Isn’t it interesting that a Coalition exists even though they don’t agree on much. It hardly gives the voter much confidence.

5 On the one hand, Independents with one policy agenda and little else, are hardly fully representative of the community. On the other hand, as was proven by Oakshot and Windsor, in the Gillard Government, they bring a depth of thought outside the mainstream. It has been suggested that 90% of teal preferences will go to the ALP.

6 To satisfy the demands that have their hand out, Labor would either have to raise taxes, cut subsidies or change the way the rich can avoid paying taxes or tax them more.

We live in a failed system. Capitalism does not allow for an equitable flow of economic resources. With this system, a small privileged few are rich beyond conscience, and almost all others are doomed to be poor at some level.

7 A friend tells me that Anthony Green said on the radio last week that the ‘undecided’ section is not any different to any recent election. He also noted that most election campaigns don’t change anything – the vote on the day reflects the split polling revealed at the start of the campaign – however, he did acknowledge that 2019 was the exception to that rule.

8 When he was in parliament, Fred Chaney was one of the most respected men in the halls of power. He is on the record that the liberal party he joined in 1958 was different from today’s party. Today it is more controlled. He intends, like many other former Liberals, to vote independent.

9 In a wide-ranging interview with Guardian Australia on the hustings this week, the Labor leader said all of his colleagues were worthy of their current roles, “… but we are certainly not getting ahead of ourselves.”

10 Amid all the banter, debates, interviews and discussion, I feel that the importance of this election is being lost.

11 I agree with George Megalogenis when he says that under Scott Morrison, Australia has lost credibility on the world stage. The news that Scott Morrison has not spoken to the Solomon Islands prime minister since calling the election condemns him as just an ignorant fool without the skills required for international diplomacy.



12 The prime minister is such a liability in progressive Liberal seats that he ignores them to campaign in marginal Labor seats. Go figure. He is an in-your-face Prime Minister who is on course to lose to an unknown contender without baggage. He is so unpopular that he can only try popular things.

13 Why is Morrison desperately avoiding a debate shown on the National Broadcaster? Well, there isn’t anything in it for him. Not only that, but he is refusing to appear on the ABC’s Q&A. Not a good look when you are behind in the polls.

14 Research by Climate Analytics tells us that the Morrison government’s climate change commitments are consistent with more than 3C of global heating, bordering on 4C. This level would lead to catastrophic damage across the planet.

15 Here are five stark policy differences between the two major parties. Paul Daley writing for The Guardian, answers those who say there is little policy difference between the two parties.

(i) The road to reconciliation.

(ii) Countering corruption.

(iii) Social policy ambitions.

(iv) Caring for the elderly.

(v) Who would best lead a minority.

16 Try as she might, Lisa Millar on ABC News Breakfast, could not extract an answer from Stuart Robert as to why taxpayers are forking out half a million dollars to Alan Tudge’s former staffer Rachelle Miller. It seems Mr Tudge has gone into hiding in case he is asked a question.

17 Kevin Rudd continues his investigation into Murdoch’s monopoly and sets the tone for TV, radio and online news.



My thought for the day

I find it impossible to imagine that the Australian people could be so gullible as to elect for a fourth term a government that has performed so miserably in the first three. Especially when it has amongst its members some of the most devious, suspicious and corrupt men and women, but they could.


Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. New England Cocky

    Never trust the polls except for the final election ballot.

    It was reported in a post on another FB page that the poll counter used during the debate was not working during the first about forty (40) minutes – this would allow disgusted viewers to vent against Scummo without having any impact on the reported results. Therefore the results would better favour Scummo. Never trust the polls except for the final election ballot.

  2. Terence Mills

    The final of the three leaders debates is on Seven tonight : I won’t be watching.

    Last night on Sky they had one of their politics in the pub programs with Paul Murray and an invited audience asking Dorothy Dix questions of Peter Dutton ; Dutton told the small audience that reliable intelligence – that he could not share for national security reasons, but then did – was indicating movement among people smugglers in Indonesia who will launch an armada of boats should Labor win the election. It was clearly a lie and even some of the rusted on audience rolled their eyes.

    It seems that most of the other coalition ministers are in witness protection until after the election and all of them have been told not to speak to the ABC.

    Barnaby Joyce made a one time assessment of Scott Morrison that is proving to be accurate and perceptive :

    “He is a hypocrite and a liar from my observations and that is over a long time,” Joyce said.

    “I have never trusted him, and I dislike how earnestly [he] rearranges the truth to a lie.”

  3. Terence Mills

    A bit more on the polls from Crikey :

    ‘Treasurer Josh Frydenberg will probably lose his blue-ribbon seat to teal independent Monique Ryan, according to a poll from The Australian . The poll included 19,000 voters across all 151 lower house seats — claiming to be the “most comprehensive” poll ever conducted in Australia.
    The poll also found fellow Victorian Liberal Tim Wilson would probably lose in Goldstein — but that the Coalition would hang on to Wentworth, North Sydney, and McKellar.
    Former Liberal turned United Australia Party MP Craig Kelly will probably lose his seat too, the YouGov poll found.

  4. Albos Elbow

    Roy Morgan, which is renowned for being the most accurate political poll in Aus and NZ, still has the ALP ahead, steady on 54.5/45.5 in the two party preferred poll. No Change this week despite Scummo’s increased attacks on Albo and the Labor party.

    Greens have increased their primary vote to 13% and Independents now make up 17% of all primary voters, which is a big slap in the face to the two major parties, ALP 35.5 and COAL-NP 34.

    ABC Election Analyst Antony Green has commented that with no change in 2 weeks the COAL-NP will have great difficulty forming government on the current two party preferred voting margin with only 10 days till the federal election.

    Using Antony’s Election Calculator, a two party preferred score of 54.5% represents a 6.1% swing to Labor with Labor winning 89 seats and the COAL-NP 56.

  5. Albos Elbow

    Barnaby Joyce made a one time assessment of Scott Morrison that is proving to be accurate and perceptive :

    “He is a hypocrite and a liar from my observations and that is over a long time,” Joyce said.

    “I have never trusted him, and I dislike how earnestly [he] rearranges the truth to a lie.”

    I don’t think Barnaby Joyce, Matt Coal Caravan, Michael Pigs and Coal McCormack, Keith Coal Pitt, Bridgette Coal and Pork McKenzie or any of the others can be trusted either.

    No-one in the NATs seriously believes in Net Zero by 2050.
    Like Scummo, they just mouthed it out, to stop the debate about it and the meeting could go on to discuss more important things, like the price of Bulls Bollocks and Shot Guns.

  6. andy56

    Well its on commercial TV because the LNP figure its “their” territory. Commercial TV loves nothing more than a dog fight. SURPRISE.
    The LNP should have been turfed out last election, but the populace as a whole are totally blind stupid fools. Prefering a failed marketing arsehole over a tested leader.
    Allowing realestate prices to spiral so totally out of control does not make for a great country to live in. I for one will vote with my feet and stay out of this third world country.
    Morrison should be warry of throwing hand grenades at Albo, he has his own in the back pocket with no pins.

  7. wam

    a pub vote overwhelming to albo 50% to scummo 25%
    but ch7 spin is yet to come.

  8. Albos Elbow

    Albo certainly won the debate tonight convincingly, according to voters.

    If the pub test results are anything to go on, the COAL-NP are in serious trouble, even in Queensland.
    In WA, voters watching in the seat of Hasluck, currently held by minister Ken Wyatt, returned a deadlocked vote: 44 each and 12 undecideds.

    In NSW’s Macquarie, currently held by Labor MP Susan Templeman, 50 per cent of voters favoured Albanese, while 25 per cent voted for Morrison and the other 25 per cent remained undecided.

    In Victoria, voters in the seat of Chisholm, currently held by Liberal MP Gladys Liu, returned 52 per cent for Albanese, 35 per cent for Morrison, and 13 per cent were undecided.

    In SA, voters in the seat of Boothby, vacated by Liberal MP Nicole Flint, returned 52 per cent of votes for Albanese, 32 per cent for Morrison and 16 per cent undecided.

    In Tasmania, voters in the seat of Bass, held by the Liberals’ Bridget Archer, returned 52 per cent for Albanese, 32 per cent for Morrison, and 16 per cent were undecided.

    In Queensland, voters in the seat of Lilley, currently held by Labor’s Anika Wells, returned 54 per cent for Albanese, 41 per cent for Morrison, and 5 per cent undecided.

    And in the NT’s seat of Solomon, currently held by Labor’s Luke Gosling, 25 per cent of votes were cast in favour of Morrison, 50 per cent for Albanese and 25 per cent were still undecided.

  9. wam

    Two ‘why’, lord,
    Why is Trumbull’s $440m not part of albo’s reef policy?
    Why don’t you stretch your imagination and formulate an hypothesis to answer your query? Could be the cunning change of leaders to give a possible lefty liberal ‘first term status? If you don’t believe in miracles why did people change their minds in 2019?
    For me, the danger day is just 6 away.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: