The Angertainer Steps Down: Rupert Murdoch’s Non-Retirement

One particularly bad habit the news is afflicted by is a tendency…

The ALP is best prepared to take us…

There's a myth created by the Coalition as far back as I…

On the day of Murdoch's retirement...

By Anthony Haritos Yes, we were cheap. And we were very nasty. Yes,…

We have failed the First Nations people

These words by Scott Bennett in his book White Politics and Black Australians…

Fighting the Diaspora: India’s Campaign Against Khalistan

Diaspora politics can often be testy. While the mother country maintains its…

The sad truth

Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price's comment that: ... she did not believe there are…

A tax incentive to accelerate diversity in Australia's…

Science & Technology Australia Media Release A new tax incentive to drive diversity…

It was all a con

By Andrew Klein I remember that as a teenager we had to…


The Taliban take Kabul

It unfolded as a story of fleeing. The Afghan president Ashraf Ghani, taking flight to Tajikistan, giving little clue of his intentions to colleagues. The fleeing of the infamous Abdul Rashid Dostum, a warlord assured to to fight another day. The fleeing of tens of thousands of residents out of the city of Kabul, long seen as beyond the reach of insurgents. The fleeing of Coalition embassy personnel, aided by freshly deployed troops from the United States and the UK sent into Afghanistan as a matter of urgency. The Taliban had taken Kabul.

In departing and leaving stranded colleagues to their fate, the bookish Ghani, preferring pen to gun, had time to leave a message on Facebook. One could never accuse the man of having wells of courage. He reflected on either facing armed Taliban fighters or leaving his beloved country. In order to avoid immolating Kabul, which “would have been a big human disaster,” he chose a hasty exit.

Only a few days prior, on August 11, Ghani had flown to Mazar-i-Sharif, in the company of the blood lusty Uzbek Dostum, supposedly to hold the fort against the Taliban with another warlord, the ethnic Tajik Atta Muhammad Noor. Noor had pledged in June to mobilise the citizenry of Balkh province to fight the Taliban. “God forbid, the fall of Balkh,” he declared at the time, “means the fall of the north and the fall of the north means the fall of Afghanistan.”

This was not a move greeted with universal joy. Habib-ur-Rahman of the leadership council of the political and paramilitary group Hizb-e-Islami saw a bit of self-aggrandizing at work, hardly remarkable for a warlord keen to oversee his bit of real estate. “The mobilisation of the people by politicians under the pretext of supporting security forces – with the use of public uprising forces – fuels the war from one side and from the other it affects Afghanistan’s stance in foreign policy.”

The shoring up mission led by Ghani would do little to conceal the historical differences between Noor and Dostum. The former had done battle with Dostum’s troops during the latter’s time as a regional commander in the ailing Soviet-backed Afghan government. Dostum’s defection from the government (one spots the common theme) in 1992 to form the Junbish-e-Milli party presented Noor with a chance to join forces. But the Tajik left Dostum in 1993 citing irreconcilable ideological differences. With the initial defeat of the Taliban, Noor triumphed in several military encounters with the frustrated Uzbek, seizing the Balkh province in its entirety.

The accord reached between the parties on this occasion certainly did not involve agreeing to fight the Taliban. Both had come to the conclusion that scurrying to Uzbekistan was a sounder proposition. Noor subsequently justified the measure by claiming enigmatically that, “They had orchestrated the plot to trap Marshal Dostum and myself too, but they didn’t succeed.” Ghani would soon follow.



Members of Ghani’s imploding government have not taken kindly to the flight of their leader. “Curse Ghani and his gang,” wrote acting defence minister, Bismillah Khan Mohammadi. “They tied our hands from behind and sold the country.”

The head of the High Council for National Reconciliation Abdullah Abdullah also released a video withering in announcing that, “The former president of Afghanistan” had “left the country in this difficult situation.” God, he suggested, “should hold him accountable.” Abdullah, along with former President Harmid Karzai and Hizb-e-Islami leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, are currently in negotiations with the Taliban over the formal transfer of power.

The US and UK have deployed personnel in a hurried panic. Over the weekend, President Joe Biden, in announcing the deployment of 5,000 troops, told the press that they would ensure “we can have an orderly and safe drawdown of US personnel and other allied personnel, and an orderly and safe evacuation of Afghans who helped our troops during our mission and those at special risk from the Taliban advance.” Another thousand have also been added to the complement.

There was much embarrassment in all of this. The US and its allies made the fundamental error that training, money and expertise would somehow miraculously guarantee the stability, continuity and reliability of a ramshackle regime. Biden, in coming up with his own phraseology, had stated that a Taliban victory was “not inevitable.” In July, we were given a nugget of Bidenese that, while he had little trust for the Taliban, he did “trust the capacity of the Afghan military, who is better trained, better equipped, and more re- – more competent in terms of conducting war.”

As the Taliban was securing the capital, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken parried evident parallels with the US withdrawal from Vietnam in 1975. “This is manifestly not Saigon,” he said with little conviction.

Now, the scene was one of grave, turbaned and bearded men, armed to the teeth, overseeing the desk which Ghani previously occupied in the presidential palace. They had survived and outwitted an army better armed and supposedly better trained. They had survived airstrikes launched from within the country and from bases in the Persian Gulf and Central Asia, via heavy bombers and lethal drones. They had survived the forces of the US, NATO and rival militias.

They now find themselves in control of an entity they wish to be recognised as the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. History has come in its full violent circle. A group of insurgents dismissed as fundamentalist mountain savages who would be vanquished before the modernising incentives of the West have shown up, as previous Afghan fighters have, the futility and sheer folly of meddling in their country’s affairs.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. Jo.

    Some claim that the fall of Kabul bore no resemblance to the panicked retreat from Saigon. And it doesn’t.

    The cities are more than 4600 kms between, the locals speak different languages and the cuisines are in different worlds.

    Apart from that …

  2. Phil Pryor

    The USA biggies, utter idiots and defectives in diplomacy, foresight, considered thought, planning, human relations based on ethics, morals, decency, have been initiators, and accomplices, in murder, betrayal, theft, double crossing. A stupidity of tremendous error, a course of wilful futility and aimlessness, all to make the world safe for USA corporations in gas, oil, fat food, arms, putrid and childish media, perverted philosophy and a dream of super Romanesque supremacy, has made our world stink as we all observe the hunnishness and savagery of their involvement. Biden is hardly to blame for much, but has not overseen any decent planning to achieve a result for the innocent, and all because the USA military is so low, ignorant, misled, benighted, confused, errant, perverted, corrupted, confused, misinformed. Nobody in the USA from the Trumpites, heathenish evangelicals, pretentious political types from the top to the encrusted and unwiped bottom, has had a slight idea of what to do and why. Afghanistan is a quiet undertaker, a cunning, persistent survivor, and understand or like them or NOT, they have waited, ready, able and quick, to reclaim their country for what they see and want. Too stupid to learn after Vietnam and Iraq, the USA now recedes and suppurates in its decline, for they are utterly and totally untrustworthy except to provide dogshit T V for endless repeats on commercial thieving, lying, propaganda channels in our exceedingly backward land…I saw a plaque on the wall of Canterbury Cathedral with officers’ names, ranks of men, losses, defeats, in Afghanistan in 1842. Stupidity???

  3. Terence Mills

    There seems to be a lot of blame being directed to the Biden Administration for what is going down in Afghanistan at the present.

    It pays to have a look at the agreement – to which the Afghan Government were not a party – with the Taliban that the Trump administration initiated in February 2020 : it was this agreement that created the momentum for the Taliban to take over Afghanistan.

    To suggest that Biden should have withdrawn from this agreement when he took office in January 2021 is disingenuous.

    have a look at the agreement :

  4. DrakeN

    Thank you for that reference, Terence.
    Now that the Taliban have breached the agreement, what do the mad Donald and his Republican and other acolytes propose to do about it?
    Another question is: Where the hell is the well trained and equipped Afghan military?

  5. Arnd

    Terence, the absurdly named “Agreement For Bringing Peace To Afghanistan” is merely the latest in a long chain of surrealist installments leading to the present tragic outcome for the people of Afghanistan.

    Google “Halliburton” and “Dick Cheney”. If you want to go further back, for a bit more backgrounding of how the dynamics fit together, look for “Prescott Bush”, “George H. W. Bush”, and “George W. Bush”. For more information about the kind of messy US interference in the Middle East that has fuelled Arab and Islamic resentment in the area for decades look for “Mohammad Reza Pahlavi”:

    During Mohammad Reza’s reign, the British owned oil industry was briefly nationalized by Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh until a UK- and U.S.-backed coup d’état deposed Mosaddegh and brought back foreign oil firms under the Consortium Agreement of 1954.

    This shit had a long, long run-up, and was pushed along enthusiastically by vested interests from the West. Plenty of Westerners profited, and presumably still now profit from it. Suggesting that “Butter does not melt in Biden’s mouth!”, is disingenuous!

  6. wam

    It is a great tragedy that the afghanistan rout of the septics is not like that of vietnam where the people were freeing their country from foreign occupation.
    People with plans for the country and the skills to develop and prosper.
    People who, despite being bombed at over twice the rate of allied bombing of germany and japan, have succeeded.
    The taliban are the poor people of Afghanistan and in 20 years the bases were lavish in their support of locals. Any idea how many bases were in the poorest areas?
    The taliban are hampered by a religion and cannot easily develop beyond the past. So any progress is another 20 years behind and the visions of 50 years ago
    are unlikely ever to be seen again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: