A Science Future Fund to supercharge economic growth: Budget 2023
Science & Technology Australia Media Release
Creating a visionary Science Future Fund that could generate economic returns of up to $2.3 billion a year would help offset mounting social services spending pressures on the nation’s finances and start to reverse Australia’s dangerously low investment in income-generating R&D.
In its pre-Budget submission, Science & Technology Australia has proposed the new future fund as a clever way for the Albanese Government to implement its election pledge to boost Australia’s research and development investment “… getting it closer to the 3 per cent of GDP achieved in other countries.”
Applying CSIRO economic models to the proven example of the Medical Research Future Fund, the peak body says a new Science Future Fund could generate economic returns of up to $2.3 billion a year for Australia – at no future cost to the Budget after its initial capitalisation.
Science & Technology Australia President Professor Mark Hutchinson said it would powerfully advance the Prime Minister’s ambition of an economic future “powered by science” and the Deputy Prime Minister’s pledge that the Albanese Government will be “the Science Government.”
“Supercharging Australian discovery science would unleash a new golden era of breakthrough discoveries to power our nation’s economic development in the decade ahead,” he said.
“By creating an ambitious new Science Future Fund, the Government can forge an enduring legacy to put science investments beyond short-term funding cycles.”
“This fund would be a gamechanger for Australian economic growth.”
“It would match the ambitions of our global technological allies and rivals; safeguard our national security and sovereign capability in an era of escalating global economic uncertainty; future-proof local jobs; and deliver a more prosperous future for all Australians.”
An astute and agile strategy is urgently needed to drive the transformation of Australia’s economy and lift our nation up the value chain.
The analysis by STA shows that this Science Future Fund could inject $650 million every year from investment income into science breakthroughs, generating a massive $2.3 billion in new economic returns for the country every year.
A Science Future Fund would be a legacy-defining move to ensure Australia doesn’t fall behind its global economic competitors, who are rapidly scaling up their strategic investments in science.
“Right now the world is locked in a fierce science and technology race, as other countries strategically invest to secure their own economic futures through science breakthroughs and innovation,” said Science & Technology Australia CEO Misha Schubert.
“In the US, the CHIPS and Science Act will supercharge science by a massive $52 billion – something US President Joe Biden calls a “once in a generation investment in America itself.” The UK is also dramatically ramping up public investment in R&D.”
“Australia must be every bit as bold in our ambition to be a global science and technology superpower,” Ms Schubert said.
As with the MRFF, the Science Future Fund would be a ‘locked box’ of capital, invested with a mandate of generating strong annual returns. These returns would then be used to transform Australia’s discovery science research – helping us to be first to technological breakthroughs and pursue ‘moonshot’ programs that need long-term investments.
“This is a prudent and proven model to deliver long-term sustainability without recurring expenditure in future Budgets.”
“Australia faces an array of serious economic challenges – sluggish growth, a productivity crisis, real wages going backwards, and a growing Budget deficit.”
“A Science Future Fund would powerfully tackle each of these challenges. It will deliver breakthroughs that will turbocharge productivity, generate new higher wage jobs, and return income to the economy to fix the Budget deficit.”
Science & Technology Australia’s full pre-Budget submission can be found here.
About Science & Technology Australia
Science & Technology Australia is the nation’s peak body representing more than 90,000 scientists and technologists. We’re the leading policy voice on science and technology. Our flagship programs include Science meets Parliament, Superstars of STEM, and STA STEM Ambassadors.
Like what we do at The AIMN?
You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.
Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!
Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
2,282 total views, 6 views today
4 commentsLogin here Register here
No R&D No economic future.
we dont have a shortage of ideas in australia. We have a shortage of funds to bring the ideas to market. Areas we could put billions are 1/ medical research, 2/ battery research and manufacture 3/ cheap housing, not the bigmacs we now build. If elon musk can make cars by turning the engineering around, why cant we do the same for housing? 4/ recycling could be made to work, make the rubbish producers pay for the clean up. $0.0000001 to manufacture but $10 to clean up after doesnt seem right. 5/ bring financial sector to heel. banks are supposedly supporting industries, not THE fucking industry. If you look around just about everything is tied into housing. No wonder the FW at the RBA think they only have one lever. 6/ go EVs hard. Thats exported dollars we can save. let the fascists and dictators keep their oil . 7/ streamline the economy. There are so many things we do that are convoluted and create unnecessary industries, ie super. Pay pensioners a decent amount and then suddenly they wont need that investment property for their retirement. Super sucks $120b + out of the economy every year. Shit , its not hard to find glaring problems everywhere you look. 8/ drop the pension age and encourage people to work. An extra $4000 a year is just touching the sides and an exercise in penny pinching. If people work, they pay taxes. Let them earn……. an older population is a problem if you assume they will be kept out of the work cycle. AGISM and FW thinking.
Michael, can you please choose another social media platform other than twitter. Since Elon Must took over twitter has gone from being a great site to share things on but not now. It’s full of right wing & USA rubbish.
Sandra, most of our traffic used to come from Facebook but now they want $23 just to have our articles show up in the timelines of only 778 of our 23,000 AIMN Facebook followers.
Twitter is our last free beacon.