Renewable energy heat system to reduce industrial gas use by up to 80 per cent
UniSA Media Release
Australia is currently considering a range of options to stimulate post-COVID economic recovery, including weighing the relative value of increased investment in gas infrastructure against the benefits of expanded renewable energy projects.
A central issue in this debate is the use of fossil fuels by industry, particularly suggestions that in the short to medium term, gas will remain a key part of many industrial heat applications.
While acknowledging fossil fuels will likely always retain some role in industry, research and development undertaken by the University of South Australia’s Future Industry Institute (FII) suggests the role of gas may shrink over the next few years.
FII researcher, Dr Rhys Jacob, is part of a team developing technologies and energy strategies to deliver renewable alternatives for industrial gas applications, and he says many innovations in the area will be commercially viable sooner rather than later.
“There is a lot of work being done, around the world, towards the electrification of heat,” Dr Jacob says.
“This research is looking at how we use low-cost variable renewables to offset what is traditionally fossil fuel fired heat, and the recent progress has been excellent.”
In a project supported by ARENA and the new Reliable Affordable Clean Energy for 2030 Cooperative Research Centre (RACE for 2030 CRC), FII researchers are currently prototyping a commercial scale system that stores renewable electricity as heat and releases that heat on demand for industrial applications.
“We have already successfully tested a smaller version of the technology last year, so we are confident it works, and we’re now in the process of upscaling it and refining features so it delivers a ready-to-go solution for industry,” Dr Jacob says.
“Our research shows that, used in conjunction with renewables such as solar and wind, this system could reduce gas consumption by as much as 80 per cent in some industries.”
The thermal storage system, which is set to begin testing in early 2021, will initially be designed to deliver heat in the range of 200 to 700 degrees Celsius, with scope to increase that output to over 1000C in the future.
The units will be self-contained and stackable, with each unit delivering 850-1000 KWh of thermal storage capacity.
“These will essentially be like a 10-foot shipping container, and the end user will be able to roll them out as modules, much the same as they do with batteries – you have the one design, and then however much storage you need, you add them up together.”
Dr Jacob says FII’s research suggests the most cost-effective system would not replace gas entirely but could reduce its use by between 60 per cent and 80 per cent depending on the application.
“You will still need to have the option of fuel as a backup for when renewable output is low, because from the data we have run, if you want to use purely renewables and storage, you would require a huge amount of storage just to cover the extreme situations.
“So, we’ve developed a hybrid approach, where our system can deliver 60, 70, and 80 per cent of heat needs using renewables and storage, then the small shortfall will be covered by a fuel, which could be an existing gas system, or renewable fuels like hydrogen or biogas.”
As a sideline to developing the heat system, FII research suggests other hybrid industrial systems combining base-line renewables with a fuel backup are economically savvy and environmentally sustainable across a range of applications.
“For instance, we just released a paper looking at wastewater plants, many of which currently harvest biogas created through the treatment process, and then burn that gas as fuel for their onsite operations,” Dr Jacob says.
“Our study shows that if they used renewables to power operations as much as possible, and sold the harvested biogas back into the wider system, only using the small amount they need for backup, there would be significant economic and environmental gains over the traditional biogas-only system.”
This hybrid approach is already being trialled in Europe, with similar tests likely in Australia soon, and Dr Jacob says it reflects a general feeling that many industries are ready to embrace greater renewable use now that it can deliver both financial and environmental benefits.
“We’ve had conversations with a number of interested parties about how we can use our technology to provide process heat, and the advantage of these hybrid approaches, from industry’s point of view, is that they leverage existing fossil fuel infrastructure but make the overall system more cost effective and energy efficient,” Dr Jacob says.
“So, a small amount of high value fuel can be used on demand when required, but abundant, cheap and clean energy can do the grunt work.”
Like what we do at The AIMN?
You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.
Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!
3 comments
Login here Register here-
Consume Less -
New England Cocky -
totaram
Return to home pageI hope Angus has read this.
The use of heat produced as a by-product of a process and the conversion of that heat into electricity is well known old technology. SAs early as the 1960s Professor Landecker at UNE had designed a refrigerator with the produced heat being used to for space heating in the cold winter climate of Armidale NSW.
The electricity base load ”problem” that is vaunted as the best reason for coal fired electricity will be overcome when Australian R&D workers put their minds to the problem, just as they did to build the Coolgardie safe to keep meat cool in desert regions.
NEC: The last line in the article on “base load” in Wikipedia is:
“According to National Grid plc chief executive officer Steve Holliday in 2015, baseload is “outdated”, as microgrids would become the primary means of production, and large powerplants relegated to supply the remainder.[17]”
So you can see that the concept of baseload is just a convenient simplification for discussing electricity power supply. From the same article:
“While historically large power grids used unvarying power plants to meet the base load, there is no specific technical requirement for this to be so. The base load can equally well be met by the appropriate quantity of intermittent power sources and dispatchable generation.[3][4]”
The problem is easily solved by the proper use of storage by, reversible pumped hydro, a well-worn technology over a hundred years old. For example
“The biggest storage facility in the world is on the Virginia-West Virginia border, with 50% more capacity than the Hoover Dam.[12]”
The whole “problem” is created by the usual suspects to bamboozle people who are not well-versed in the specifics of power supply provisioning. The idea is to continue support for coal-based power generation to advantage the coal lobby.