To be truthful, "sorry" is a word so…

When you think there isn't much to write about in politics, the…

Mangroves: environmental guardians of our coastline

University of South Australia Media Release They are the salt-tolerant shrubs that thrive…

Tuvalu, Climate Change and the Metaverse

When lost to climatic disaster and environmental turbulence, where does a whole…

Nats Vote No OR When You're Standing At…

It's sort of interesting that just a few days ago we had…

Was Amtrak Joe derailed?

By 2353NM Prior to becoming President, Joe Biden was a US Senator for…

Football Capitulates at Qatar

It did not take much. The initial promises of protest from a…

Thanks To Dan Andrews I Got My First…

Just to be clear here, I didn't get it at the polling…

Democracy Tested

The only defence that we, the people, have against an arrogant leader…

«
»
Facebook

From Placido Domingo to Meatloaf – When Pathos turned to Bathos

By Paul G. Dellit

Ian Macfarlane and Garry Gray gave a joint interview on their departure from politics. Macfarlane made the observation that Australian politics was not now attracting candidates of the calibre it once had. Gray nodded assent. Macfarlane went further to suggest that the Australian electorate had come, in recent times, to regard their politicians as clowns and their Parliament a circus. Gray agreed and was able to amplify the point.

Macfarlane had served eighteen years in Federal Parliament and Gray nine. Both of them had gained significant experience of life in the private sector before they entered Parliament. Both entered politics because they wanted to make a difference, albeit opposing differences. Both of them believed in the causes they espoused. Both were and remain men of substance.

We cannot pretend that these men were not also motivated by the drive for personal success. Both have healthy egos which gave impetus to all that they have achieved in life. Both have compromised their principles when they believed that pursuing them would be pointless. And as we reflect upon Macfarlane’s disappointment with the current crop of political strivers, we cannot pretend that any one of our prime ministers, for example, not even Curtin, has been motivated by nothing more than altruism.

What distinguishes Macfarlane and Gray from the pratfalling people in funny costumes and red noses whom they wish had never become legislators, is that quality of substance. People of substance have the intellectual humility to know that they have some learning to do when they take on a new job. They are able to understand the dimensions of the task they face, and have the ability to grow to meet its challenges. They are able to solve new problems by extrapolating solutions from academic knowledge and life experiences. They have genuine situation awareness and the sensitivity to recognise that every new situation must be addressed on its own terms rather than some predetermined ideological formula. Above all, they apply these skill-sets to achieving public-interest outcomes, rather than paying lip-service to them as they ruthlessly pursue personal agendas.

In spite of his compromised, equivocal performances as Communications Minister, and now as Prime Minister, before he embarked upon a political life, Malcolm Turnbull was a man of substance. We must also allow that the values he espoused as a layperson might as easily have seen him take his place in a Labor caucus or a Liberal cabal, on the right of the former or the left of the latter.

Now, unfortunately, there are some parallels to be drawn between Turnbull’s current parliamentary leadership of the Liberal Party and Menzies’ leadership of the United Australia Party. Malcolm has not the leadership skills sufficient to the task of leading the Liberal Party along the path he mapped out for it when he became ‘leader’, any more than Bob did as leader of the UAP.

So we must consider Malcolm a wether, rather than a ram, as far as men of substance go in the current Parliament. (For all you died-in-the-wool city slickers, a wether is a male sheep whose nutbush gets dropped off as he leaves the city limits – to mix the metaphors).

As for the rest who currently warm the green and red Parliamentary seats, Macfarlane and Gray make the point that they are predominantly men whose shiny arses have been polished for most of their working lives. They owe today’s Parliamentary salaries to yesterday’s factional elbow grease: they owe their pre-selections much more to their success at the factional game than any ability they may have shown as people who understand real-world problems, real-world problem-solving, macro-level issues of strategic national importance, the philosophical underpinnings of the social policies they espouse, and nor can they claim even a nodding acquaintance with the broad sweep of history and the importance of global cultural similarities and differences. They are predominantly men and predominantly shallow, engaged in a kind of political shadow play dumbed down for those gullible enough to believe their slogans, and enlivened by nothing more than name-calling and ad hominem attacks. In short, they lack substance.

The problem is not confined to the left or right of the Speaker in each House. There are no Whitlams or Hawkes or Keatings waiting in the wings of the Labor Party, nor any Menzies or Frasers in the offing for the Liberal Party. No need to waste time on the agrarian socialists, the National Party. Tony Windsor was the best thing they could ever have had going for them, but they are the Nationals, after all.

The Liberal Party has produced Prime Minister Tony (it’s all been said) Abbott, Treasurer Joe Hockey (with remarkable insights to offer on the lifestyles and driving habits of poor fringe dwellers, how to run the economy like a take-away shop, and his own brand of doing add-ups).

Treasurer Scott Morrison (“We don’t have an expenditure problem. It’s a spending problem.” And we will all remember his analysis of trickle-down growth and budget balancing by giving tax breaks to companies who don’t pay any tax. Still, he’s no longer the sociopath ruining the lives of asylum seekers. We have the sociopath Peter Dutton for that job these days).

But it’s not all down to the men. Foreign Minister Julie Bishop has been a stand-out performer in demonstrating how it’s done in the ‘it’s all about me and my career’ current Liberal Party view of the world. She was that lawyer who distinguished herself by seeking to cheat dying asbestos victims and their families out of their compensation. Now she’s the mistress of the eye-catching entrance. Australia should push its image as a modern, forward-thinking country. But in terms of international diplomacy, the way you dress is a form of communication. Wearing a formal jacket over what appeared to be a teddy – the night attire, not the cuddly toy – would be bad enough in any international diplomatic setting, but to turn up as the guest of our nearest, most populace neighbour and show such insensitivity to their Muslim culture is inexcusable. The only mitigation we can find is that she just doesn’t know any better – another to add to the list of our insubstantial political employees.

I have not said anything about the currently players in the Labor Party. They seem to be in a state of flux. To me, Shorten looked really wether-like at the beginning of his tenure, and now perhaps we can hope that he is growing a formidable pair.

If there is any hope for the future, I think it is mostly in the hands of the women of both Parties, women who have had to find their way through the patriarchal maze that no man has been forced to negotiate. Marise Payne and Tanya Plibersek come immediately to mind, and Penny Wong in the Senate. They are all people of substance as their performances to date have demonstrated.

In the wash-up, I believe we are right to think of most of them, and most of them men, as the clowns that Macfarlane and Gray alluded to. Parliament has become a circus. And the whole bloody exercise is costing us a fortune. We pay for professionals and find we are at the mercy of self-serving second-raters. More importantly, the opportunity cost of having these mendacious buffoons charting our future is more than anyone can calculate.

 

 322 total views,  2 views today

12 comments

Login here Register here
  1. David

    Interesting read. Re women leading either party as PM. After the disgusting way Julia Gillard was treated by parliamentarians, men and women and the media plus the electorate at large, this country is a long long way away from entertaining such an experiment again.
    I still feel sick at what Julia endured, publicly most of the time she showed little emotion.
    My God how she must have been crying inside. That she is now engaged in an Internationally leadership role says it all about her guts, talent and determination and says nothing for her tormentors.
    We were robbed and we are the poorer for it

    As a PS Note while the male Tory former PM’s can’t keep their mouths shut. Julia gets on with her job silently.

  2. Matters Not

    Yes it’s a great article. Very insightful and all that.

    And besides I agree with you. ?

    With reservations on minor points of detail.

  3. wam

    wow paul have you met gary gray or mcfarlane?
    Sorry your reference to meatloaf suggests you have.
    Did you catch the challenges from the ETU including gray’s support for unlimited 457 for chinese workers with no test for qualifications in the following sectors. Automotive Electrician Cabinetmaker Carpenter Carpenter and Joiner, Diesel Motor Mechanic Electrician (General) Electrician (Special Class) Joiner Motor Mechanic (General) Motorcycle Mechanic and the move to drop him?(the kiwis put a 100 limit in any sector and 1800 over all)
    Perhaps you missed macca’s attempted move???
    Marise???? you must have a different tv from me heard of materiel or mal brough what about howard adviser dan tehan?
    Plibersek was powerful under gillard as was roxon but one went quiet and one quietly went.
    Did cash cross your mind or the woman cathy mcgowan rolled?

  4. kerri

    Turnbull has risen to his level of incompetance. I believe this is due to his being used to calling the shots and having others obey. He seems incapable of dealing with folk whose confidence and respect he needs to lead. He is clearly particularly poor at negotiation and is too hasty in lying to convince others of his opinion as a “plan B” when his subjects won’t obey. He is not the leader. He is the follower. He cannot be a true leader whilst he is bound by the bullying nature of his fellow right wing MPs, and none of this will change if he wins government in his own right as he will still be hamstrung by the right. He is a lost cause.

  5. FreeThinker

    Great article Paul

    With respect to your comment about Julie Bishop :

    ” Wearing a formal jacket over what appeared to be a teddy – the night attire, not the cuddly toy – would be bad enough in any international diplomatic setting, but to turn up as the guest of our nearest, most populace neighbour and show such insensitivity to their Muslim culture is inexcusable. The only mitigation we can find is that she just doesn’t know any better.” Bishop is doing what thousands of Australians do each and every day in Indonesia and in Bali particularly, with their crass Australian cultural insensitivity. Yes, sadly Julie Bishop reflects us in that sense.

    Furthermore, though it is the most visited country in the SE Asian region, as stridently monolingual Australians, we, at a national level, simply do not bother to learn their language. A tiny number of our Year 12 students learn the language of this populous nation with its 260 million people.

  6. Kate Ahearne

    Thanks for this. Small quibble. In the first para – ‘assent’, not ‘ascent’.

  7. Paul G. Dellit

    Thanks Kate. As a stickler in such matters (we seem to be losing the word that means every second instance in a sequence), and struggle as I did to find some excuse for this solecism, I simply say thanks.

  8. Michael Taylor

    I shall take responsibility for the error, which I have now fixed.

  9. Möbius Ecko

    Whilst being a stickler, and doing something I rarely do, pick up spelling and grammar in posts, I believe this should have been pursuing and not pursing.

    “Both have compromised their principles when they believed that pursing them would be pointless.”

  10. diannaart

    @David

    “I still feel sick at what Julia endured, publicly most of the time she showed little emotion.
    My God how she must have been crying inside. That she is now engaged in an Internationally leadership role says it all about her guts, talent and determination and says nothing for her tormentors.”

    Me too. I know I do not have the same measure of quiet strength she has – no wonder she made a few gaffs – who wouldn’t?

    Those years did major damage to increasing the number of talented women (by talented I exclude the Bishops, Cashes et al) from increasing the level of intelligence of our parliamentarians.

  11. king1394

    Gary Gray (ALP) and Ian MacFarlane (Liberal) are two of my least favourite politicians. Neither have deep principles that I have noticed. Gray has undermined Labor a number of times, and MacFarlane’s last attempt to maintain ministerial level by leaving the Libs for the Nats has shown this. MacFarlane’s most significant appearance in the last few years was his insistence on wearing a private company logoed high viz shirt in what had to be some sort of satirical gesture (and an insult to real working people). Gray and McFarlane may criticise the other MPs but I would not want to see the Houses of Parliament dominated by men like these two.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: