No means no

As the now former Royal Spanish Football Federation President Luis Rubiales discovered…

Mission to Free Assange: Australian Parliamentarians in Washington

It was a short stint, involving a six-member delegation of Australian parliamentarians…

The Angertainer Steps Down: Rupert Murdoch’s Non-Retirement

One particularly bad habit the news is afflicted by is a tendency…

The ALP is best prepared to take us…

There's a myth created by the Coalition as far back as I…

On the day of Murdoch's retirement...

By Anthony Haritos Yes, we were cheap. And we were very nasty. Yes,…

We have failed the First Nations people

These words by Scott Bennett in his book White Politics and Black Australians…

Fighting the Diaspora: India’s Campaign Against Khalistan

Diaspora politics can often be testy. While the mother country maintains its…

The sad truth

Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price's comment that: ... she did not believe there are…


Penal Assassination: The Gradual Effort to Kill Assange

They really do want to kill him. Perhaps it is high time that his detractors and sceptics, proven wrong essentially from the outset, admit that the US imperium, along with its client states, is willing to see Julian Assange perish in prison. The locality and venue, for the purposes of this exercise, are not relevant. Like the Inquisition, the Catholic Church was never keen on soiling its hands, preferring the employ of non-church figures to torture their victims.

In the context of Assange, Britain has been a willing jailor from the start, guided by the good offices of Washington and none too keen in seeing this spiller of secrets released into the world. Bail has been repeatedly, and inexcusably, refused, despite the threats posed by COVID-19, the publisher’s own deteriorating health, and restrictions upon access, at regular intervals, to legal advice from his team. Just as some banks are deemed too large to fail, Assange is considered too large a target to escape. Let loose again, he might do what he does best: reveal government venalities in war and peace and prove the social contract a gross deception and mockery of our sensibilities.

The UK legal system has been the ideal forum to execute the wishes of Washington. Each legal branch that has examined the extradition case has assiduously avoided the bigger picture: the attack on press freedom, exposing war crimes, illegal surveillance of a political asylee in an embassy compound, the breaches of privacy and legal confidentiality, the encroachments upon family life, the evidence on proposed abduction and assassination, the questionable conflicts of interest by some judicial members, the collusion of State authorities.

Instead, the courts, from the outside, have taken a blade to cut away the meatiest, most solid of arguments, focusing on a sliver that would be, in due course, defeated. The sole decision that favoured Assange only did so by essentially regarding him as an individual whose mental fragility would compromise him in a US prison facility. In such a case, suicide would be virtually impossible to prevent. District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, who made the ruling, thought little of the publisher’s credentials, heartily agreeing with the prosecution that no journalist would have ever exposed the names of informants. (This farcical interpretation was rebutted convincingly in the Old Bailey trial proceedings.)

The rest has been a grotesque show of gargantuan proportions, with the High Court and the Supreme Court showing themselves to be political dunces or, which is not much better, dupes. Believing a number of diplomatic assurances by US prosecutors on Assange’s post-extradition fate, made after the original trial, seemed awfully close to a form of legal match-fixing. We all know that court cases and the law can be analogised as betting and having a punt, the outcome never clear till it arrives, but this was positively ludicrous.

To anyone following the trial and knowing the feeble nature of reassurances made by a State power, especially one with the heft of the United States, promises about more commodious accommodation, not being subject to brutal special administrative measures, and also being allowed to apply for a return to Australia to serve the balance of the term, was pure, stenchy balderdash.

Amnesty International is unequivocal on this point: diplomatic assurances are used by governments to “circumvent” various human rights conventions, and the very fact that they are sought to begin with creates its own dangers. “The mere fact that States need to seek diplomatic assurances against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (other ill-treatment) is indicative of a risk of torture.”

The US prosecuting authorities have even gone so far as to weaken their own position, making their undertakings conditional. Typically, they shift the focus back on Assange, suggesting that he might influence matters by his own mischievous conduct. All in all, nothing said was binding, and the glue holding the promises together might, at any given moment, dissolve.

Admirably, Assange continues to have some fiercely dedicated followers who wish him well and wish him out. Independent Australian MP Andrew Wilkie has the sort of certitude that can pulverise the attitudes of bleak sceptics, though even he must nurse a few doubts. In his address to supporters of Assange in Canberra, delivered on the lawns of the Australian Parliament, he was confident that keeping “the pressure up” would eventually lead to justice for the publisher.



In a crisp summation, Wilkie distilled the case. “The US wants to get even and for so long the UK and Australia have been happy to go along for the ride because they’ve put bilateral relationships with Washington ahead of the rights of a decent man.” Keep maintaining the rage, he urged his audience.

The matter is considered so urgent that Australian Doctors For Assange have warned that death may be peeking around the corner. “Medical examinations of Julian Assange in Belmarsh prison in the UK,” stated spokesman Robert Marr, “have revealed that he is suffering from severe life-threatening cardiovascular and stress-related medical conditions, including having a mini-stroke as a result of his imprisonment and psychological torture.”

The organisation has written to US Ambassador Carolyn Kenney “requesting she urgently ask President Biden to stop the US persecution of Australian citizen Julian Assange for merely publishing information provided to him and stop the US attempt to extradite him from the UK.”

From the Australian perspective, we can already see that there is a go-slow, cautious approach to Assange’s fate, which also serves the lethal agenda being pursued by the US prosecutors. Despite a change of the guard in Canberra, the status quo on power relations between the two countries remains unaltered. Everyone, bar Assange, seems to have time to wait. But in terms of life and health, the time in question is almost done.


Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. Mike

    The fact that it’s been made public (in a stealthy yet spectacular way) for such a long time by the biggest, baddest bully on the block now is a deterrent to others. This is the way the U.S. Imperium operates as the end draws near and the military-industrial-techno-feudalist complex sets itself up for its final “apres moi, le deluge” moment, taking the planet down with it.

  2. Phil Pryor

    Another instalment on a depressing topic that barely shifts. Repeating.., I have little regard for LAW while obeying and respecting the particular law and its requirement for us. But, having grown up in a world where one could have been under the LAW of Hitler, Stalin, Peron, Pinochet, Saddam, Pol Pot, etc, hundreds of law abusers, crooks, crazies, homicidals, unstable and inhuman types, one imagines law to be malleable, pervertable, “ignorable”, hypocritical, lucrative, obsessive and every other relevant concept to you or me. When mighty murdering conquerors could take it all, from the whole land to your desired parts, you know that law, justice, decency, must be defined, fought for, actualised. The British semed to fight in the Great War for freedom, a surprise to them perhaps, for they did not intend to extend it to Kenya, Mesopotamia, Egypt, not at all… It is peculiar, that the secrecy in filthy doings by government agencies can see truth seekers and public minded if awkward figures like Assange suffer, be threatened, and we know the CIA and other similar bodies seek only our well being, we the ordinary…

  3. John Hermann

    The obvious fact that the UK establishment is willing to execute the orders of the US Imperium without question signifies that the UK has abandoned any pretense of possessing independent legal, foreign or military policies, and is simply a vassal state. The same designation applies to Australia, because the Australian government could have demanded the return of Assange to Australian shores at any stage if the will to do so had existed. The reason for the absence of that will has to do partly with Australia’s long-standing inferiority complex, its long history of belonging to an empire and perceived security in perpetuating that state of servility, and also fear of the consequences of adopting genuinely independent foreign and defence policies especially if those policies happen to conflict with the policies of the hegemon. The historical record of the last half-century and longer reveals that those states that have refused to obey the orders of the hegemon have suffered terrible consequences, including especially economic sanctions.

  4. Terence Mills

    In her judgement of January 2021 Judge Vanessa Baraitser accepted the expert medical advice that continued incarceration of Julian Assange endangered his mental health and risked his death by suicide.

    She ordered his discharge pursuant to section 91(3) of the Extradition Act 2003.

    The fact is that he remains in maximum security in the UK some twenty months later.

    I have to agree, one way or another they want him dead !

  5. New England Cocky

    Readers of the over 300+ CIA literature will have discovered that the Standard Operating Procedure is to pressure everybody else to do their dirty work (and carry the cost and opprobrium). The CIA & the US warmongers do not care if Assange gets to the USA (United States of Apartheid) so long as he dies uncomfortably for exposing the American War criminals for their dirty deeds, up to and including POTUS.

    RELEASE JULIAN ASSANGE IMMEDIATELY!! It is never a crime to expose war criminals and their crimes. Indeed, it is the duty of every citizen in the democratic world to confront the oppressors and demand jusitce for the victims.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: