Urgent call for Australian Centre for Disease Control…

Public Health Association of Australia Media Release Public health experts are calling for…

The Hero Haunted World

By James Moore I do not understand. Perhaps, I never will. Does anyone? As…

Swiftie Nonsense Down Under

Gaza. Palestinians. Israel. Genocide. Taylor Swift? This odd cobbling of words is…

New research highlights the growing prevalence and economic…

New research by the e61 Institute presents five facts on the use…

Ok, So This Is A Boring Post... Or…

Gloria Sty, bud Iyam riting this coz I wanna mayk sum poynts…

Border Paranoia in Fortress Australia

The imaginative faculties of standard Australian politicians retreat to some strange, deathly…

Where the Palestine laboratory takes us all

By Antony Loewenstein Israel's war on Gaza since 7 October has caused the…

No, no, no, no. Not more ‘illegals’!

By Bert Hetebry A group of South Asian men arrived on our doorstep…

«
»
Facebook

Orthodoxies or Humanity?

By Bert Hetebry

Orthodox: Following or conforming to the traditional or generally accepted rules or beliefs of a religion, philosophy or practice. (Oxford Dictionary)

Humanity:1. Human beings collectively. 2. The quality of being humane. (Oxford Dictionary)

Reasoned discussion is interesting, engaging, respectful and often enlightening. To consider a situation, event, philosophic stance from different points of view canvassing the intricacies and nuances of an argument, to explore differences and possibly agreeing to disagree while retaining respect for those whose views are disagreed with becomes difficult when the rule of orthodoxy is applied. Throughout history the defence of orthodoxy has caused rivers of blood to flow. To dare to differ from the strict rules enforced by a ruling group, whether it be a religious body or some other authoritative body can become a bloody, lethal affair. To dare to challenge the dictates of those in power is dangerous. Even today, in an ostensibly democratic environment, orthodoxy rules, debates are reduced to simplistic thought numbing platitudes which mobilises fear and division toward those who seem to threaten the orthodoxy.

The history of Christian churches in Europe is marked with repeated violence in efforts to retain its orthodoxy, its doctrinal purity as dictated by the church hierarchy, from Rome.

One challenge to orthodoxy which had a profound impact was the nailing of his 95 theses to a chapel door by Martin Luther, questioning among other things, the sale of indulgences, whereby a wealthy person could buy his way to salvation, a blatant fundraiser for a church which was more concerned about building great cathedrals than caring for the most needy. The action of so publicly questioning the orthodoxy, the way in which the church operated if you will, started the Reformation, where the new denominations were formed, first the Lutheran Church, later in Geneva Jean Calvin formed what became the Reformed Church and so the church splintered into independent denominations which led to the Thirty Year War where religious deviance was attacked with the full force of military actions.

Schisms in the churches and the resulting persecutions led the Puritans to charter the Mayflower and settle in New England, in what is now the USA, the Amish from the lowlands of the Netherlands to settle in Pennsylvania, the Huguenots from France and Belgium to settle in South Africa, the escapes from persecution to settle in newly found lands where there was the freedom to live and worship as each sect determined was their interpretation of the Biblically mandated way to live and worship, each in their own ways forming a new orthodoxy which led to their own means of persecution such as the Salem Witch Trials which resulted in the public hanging of thirty people deemed to be guilty of being witches.

Religious orthodoxy and the conflict between orthodoxies stem from differing interpretations of teachings, among the Christian churches, the interpretation of the New Testament texts, but a more profound conflict is between the Old and New Testaments.

In the Old Testament, the sign of being of God’s People was marked for the males through circumcision which was conducted on the eighth day after the child’s birth, a mark he would carry for life and committed him to the written law as handed to the Israelites by God, through Moses after the escape from slavery in Egypt as chronicled in the book of Exodus. Additionally, the over-arching laws of the Ten Commandments were directed into minor laws in the book of Leviticus, and taught through the worship services and sacrifices called for through those laws. The Exodus was seen as confirmation of the promise God made to the patriarch of the Israelites, Abraham, that his offspring were God’s chosen people and the land of Israel was the land God promised to Abraham’s descendants through time immemorial.

The New Testament sign of God’s grace is through baptism, a washing away of sins with water. Baptism is a sign that the person being baptised is reconciled with God but that sign is invisible. In other words, the person is one of God’s people, saved through the grace extended by Jesus Christ carrying the punishment of his or her sin.

Two orthodoxies in conflict for over two thousand years is the basis for the persecution of Jews throughout the ages.

Baptisms were recorded by the church, confirming the birth of a person, confirming that they legally exist, but the church did not record the birth of those who were not baptised, Jews, who were circumcised, or Gypsies who practiced Believer’s Baptism, a baptism of a person old enough, mature enough to understand the teachings of God’s Grace extended through the death and resurrection of Christ.

Both groups were alienated, were barred from owning land and the wealth that enabled or any other benefits accorded subjects of the realm within which they lived.

Through the learning of the written laws they lived by, Jews were highly literate, and using those skills developed business skills, marketing and money skills which were at times welcomed when a region was struggling but spurned when things became good again, through the leadership of Jewish management.

Gypsies were not as literate and became more a travelling group, performing menial tasks, itinerant workers who were often preyed on for their labour of despised when they ask for a fair return.

Religious orthodoxy has been a cruel means of control and alienation throughout history, but other orthodoxies have been as alienating and bloody. Political orthodoxy is one such example and the control the Communist Party had in the USSR and still has in China serve as examples, but the sometimes insidious nature of politics that can be a divisive in democracies as political parties and their leaders position themselves using fear and bribery as means of attaining and maintaining power. This was so clearly demonstrated in the campaign held leading to the referendum on the Voice last year. Orthodoxy is inherently conservative and the campaign to not change the constitution was marked most poignantly through the empty slogan “If you don’t know, Vote No”.

The ‘debate’ from the conservative side of politics was filled with misinformation, essentially dumbing down any arguments to empty sloganeering and a refusal to listen.

In much the same way, the holders of the keys to orthodoxy in other places run to the same rule book, empty slogans and fear, the rise of the Party for Freedom in The Netherlands which campaigned on fear of difference, fear of racial difference, fear of religious difference. The Tories in Britain campaigned for Brexit, fear of foreigners, fear of loosing their Britishness, Trump in the USA, Make American Great Again, and fear of immigrants, fear of difference. Empty slogans, generalisations to describe whole populations as rapists and murderers or any other epitaph to engender fear.

The enforcement of orthodoxy has dreadful outcomes for those specifically targeted, the most recent can be witnessed in both Afghanistan and Iran, where fundamentalist regimes have power and enforce their rule of Sharia Law on their populations. The forced growing of beards for men and complete covering of women, denying girls education in Afghanistan, and a recent example in Iran of a protester who was executed by hanging on a crane placed at the main intersection of a town, his crime, waging war against God, essentially campaigning for freedoms which are being denied, in this case, the rule that women must have their heads covered.

And then there is Israel, where the Orthodox Religious Zionists are the most powerful political group, although a minority, they hold politically privileged positions. The rise of Zionism in the late 19th century and the beginning of immigration to Eretz Yisrael, coming home as it were to the land God promised to Abraham in Genesis, if the timeline is correct some 4000 years ago, to retake the land at first little bit by little bit but since 1948 laying claim to it exclusively for God’s Chosen Ones. Using the communication tools of orthodoxy, to dumb down the argument, refuse to recognise that the people who have lived there for as long as time can be recorded are not defined as a people, but as terrorists, empty slogans which are never explained to denigrate and dehumanise. That was reminiscent of when Nazis tattooed a number of their prisoners, their names were obliterated, they were dehumanised, made a number.

An important question which deserves an answer is which takes precedence, Orthodoxy or humanity? A brief run through history it appears unfortunately that orthodoxy takes precedence.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

11 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Douglas Pritchard

    The cruel, and barbaric act of genital mutilation on male infants may, of course, in the presence of their “family”, set them up for hatred towards all, and sundry, for the remainder of their days?

  2. Roswell

    Very good read, Bert. I enjoyed that.

  3. Andrew Smith

    Good read, including Gypsy culture and this ‘Orthodoxy or humanity?’

    More the former as orthodoxy or authoritarianism have emerged in the west with ageing electorates, and especially Anglosphere, often fossil fueled ‘freedom & liberty’, with its roots in Calvin and eugenics of Malthus/Galton?

  4. New England Cocky

    A thought provoking read. Thank you.

    Uhm ….. 1) ”Two orthodoxies in conflict for over two thousand years is the basis for the persecution of Jews throughout the ages.”
    .
    Your duration is a bit long because Jewish persecution dates from Innocent II about 1100AD thanks to his imperialist intent of dominating & exploiting the Middle East around then Jerusalem, at that time one of several Eastern centres ofsocial & economic excellence.
    .
    2) ”Through the learning of the written laws they lived by, Jews were highly literate, and using those skills developed business skills, marketing and money skills which were at times welcomed when a region was struggling but spurned when things became good again, through the leadership of Jewish management.”

    Here is the jealousy, coveting & greed that background Jewish persecution.
    .
    3) ”And then there is Israel, where the Orthodox Religious Zionists are the most powerful political group, although a minority, they hold politically privileged positions.” Plus a corrupt Prim Monster intent on staying out of jail.
    .
    The IDF invasion of the Gaza Strip can only be described as STATE SPONSORED GENOCIDE BY ZION@ZIS TO DISPLACE & DISPOSSESS INDIGENOUS PALESTINIANS SO THAT AFTER RE-BUILDING THE RESIDENTIAL PREMISES WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR FRESH WAVES OF ZION@ZI COLONIST SETTLERS WANTING CLEAR TITLE TO THEIR REAL PROPERTY AFTER ESCAPING RUSSIAN CONSCRIPTION, AMERICAN CHAOS OR EUROPEAN INDIFFERENCE.

  5. wam

    As an atheist male, the power of the church, by men for men, is amazing, in its hold over intelligent women.
    My memory:
    orth…jews is the front page of their paper showing the leaders of europe with angela merkel photoshopped out.
    muslims before they execute a virgin rape her so she wont get to heaven
    xstians women can never be equal because god gave them a 25% handicap to make sure man is dominant..
    Are such basic things not offensive to women?

  6. leefe

    Can we do away with this idea that the Puritans decamped to the Americas to escape persecution?
    They went so they could enforce their own style of persecution on others.

  7. Clakka

    Bert, I’m interested that you would make ‘orthodoxy’ and ‘humanity’ the counterpoints in your discussion.

    Given that precepts of ‘humanity’ and ‘orthodoxy’ would have their various roots in families, tribes, clans, and so on and so forth, right through to the entirety of the planet. And it seems, but for the term ‘humanity’, such distinctions apply to animalia, and possibly plantae, in the push to dominant genetic lineage.

    One could discuss the notion of corruption. But beforehand, it may be worth considering that ‘orthodoxy’, like gene expression, is not a static thing, rather that it is essentially ever moving. And that it is ‘humanity’ (or other animalia or plantae) in its endless encounter with the ‘other’ that drives that essential ever-movingness.

    I guess that it depends on whether one is drawn for convenience to notions of permanence and enduring sameness, or for a different convenience, notions of a death (and resurrection) cult. Or for that matter a fear or acceptance of the vicissitudes of control and inevitability of entropy. God(s) or not.

    Language, like art are such tricky things, much lays in the eyes and ears and interpretations of the beholder.

    Should one without an agenda or a stack of pigeon holes to fill stand alone before another, does one seek to muse on otherness or sameness?

  8. paul walter

    And what the writer claims is true-history and reninds us of the Reformation wars, down to the horrificThirty Years War.

  9. Phil Pryor

    To assist the Cocky’s comments, it is a truism that centuries of more intense persection of Jews occurred from the time of Urban II’s papacy and his preaching of a crusade at the Coucil of Clermont in 1095. This initiated violent enthusiasm, militarism, European nationalisms and reactionary narrow religious intensity, and, more pogroms of Jews. For nearly one thousand years, Jews everywhere had not been too different in their communities, as they were anatomically similar converts mostly. It would be wrong to imagine that today’s Jews are direct genetic descendants exclusively of original Palestinians of Herod’s time. Neither are popes direct descendants genetically of Peter or anyone…(Some useful info is available in “General Anthropology”, Barnes and Noble, 1955, Jacobs and Stern.)

  10. leefe

    Phil:

    “Neither are popes direct descendants genetically of Peter or anyone…” (my emphasis)

    Sorry, but everyone is a direct descendant of someone; someones, in fact. Depending on how far back you can trace things – and considering the inclinations of senior clergy at various times – it is even possible that at least one pope is or has been a direct descendant of a previous incumbent. Irrelevant, but possible.

  11. Phil Pryor

    Certainly Pope Alexander VI, first one who acknowledged his illegitimate children, appears proven as father of eminent Cesare Borgia. Leefe’s interest opens up many ideas here…Now, who does look like Errol Flynn?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page