Semitic semantics

By Bert Hetebry Where did the term ‘Semitic’ come from and what did…

Australian Futures: Conventional Strategic Wisdom Versus the Long…

By Denis Bright The strategic game of Chinese checkers has replaced the warm…

Liz Truss and the West: A Failed Former…

It is unfortunate that column space should be dedicated to Britain’s shortest…

World Peace: Australia’s Role in Global Demilitarization

By Denis Hay Description: Discover how Australia can be a role model for world…

Dutton is a man of little compassion and…

All that I had predicted about Peter Dutton has come to pass.…

Compost: a climate action solution

Composting’s role in the fight against climate change will be in focus…

The River Road

By James Moore “Four wheels move the body, but two wheels move…

Balancing eSafety and Online Censorship, 2024

By Denis Hay Description: Explore how Australia’s eSafety laws impact free speech and how…

«
»
Facebook

More than 1/3 illicit drugs sold on the dark web contain unexpected substances

RMIT University Media Release

Testing of illicit drugs bought online found 35% were not what they said they were, highlighting the urgent need for more local drug testing facilities in Australia to prevent harm and overdose.

The RMIT-led study analysed 103 illicit drug samples sourced from the now-defunct dark web forum Test4Pay in collaboration with the Australian National University, UNSW Sydney and Canadian testing facility Get Your Drugs Tested.

While 65% of samples contained only the advertised substance, the study found 14% of samples had a mixture of the advertised substance with other psychoactive or potentially harmful chemicals.

Meanwhile, 21% of samples did not contain any of the advertised substances.

MDMA, methamphetamines and heroin sourced were consistently found to only contain the advertised substance.

Products sold as ketamine, 2C-B and alprazolam were most likely to be completely substituted with other substances or new synthetic drugs, which increased the risk of unwanted side effects, potential overdose or death.

Of the 19 cocaine samples tested, only four were pure cocaine while 13 contained other substances and two samples did not contain any cocaine at all.

Lead researcher and RMIT Vice-Chancellor’s Senior Research Fellow, Dr Monica Barratt, said the results were concerning as drugs sold through cryptomarkets – online vendors on the dark web – were believed to be less likely to be mixed or substituted with other substances.

“Cryptomarkets allow anonymous buyers to review purchases, which theoretically means vendors who sell inferior products are more likely to receive bad reviews, thereby rewarding vendors selling superior products,” said Barratt, from RMIT’s Social Equity Research Centre.

“But despite this perception of accountability and quality, our findings show prohibited drugs purchased from cryptomarkets are still not safe from adulteration and substitution.”

The dark web drug market

According to the 2023 National Ecstasy and Related Drugs Reporting System survey, there was a slight decline of people buying drugs on the dark web, with more people turning to messaging and social media apps to source drugs.

“These apps are a lot more convenient and easier to use than the dark web, but they lack many of the security features and review capacities of darknet markets,” she said.

Barratt said Australia’s policies on tackling darknet markets focused on using law enforcement to ‘disrupt’ operations.

“These takedowns are used to create a sense of general deterrence through announcing arrests and interruptions to markets,” she said.

“However, we know through research on darknet market takedown operations that this ecosystem is quick to adapt to removal of markets.

“These days, vendors have accounts across many markets, in case one goes down, their clients can find them on other markets. This mitigates against the disruption of a takedown.”

Australia’s approach to drug regulation

With Australians finding new ways to source illicit drugs, Barratt said it was more urgent than ever to launch more drug checking services.

Currently, CanTEST is the only drug checking service available in Australia, with Queensland due to launch its own services this year and Victoria considering following suit.

“Drug checking is a precautionary and pragmatic response to the health risks of unpredictable drug markets, often detecting hazardous substances before they flood the local market,” she said.

While drug checking services have been operating around the world for over 50 years, Barratt said Australia remained resistant to expanding the harm reduction service.

“Australia’s resistance to opening more drug checking facilities stems from an assumption that drug checking ‘green lights’ drug use,” Barratt said.

“Drug checking services never tell consumers that their drugs are ‘safe’ as no drug use can be 100% safe.

“What the service can do is explain the known risks of specific drugs, in a credible and non judgemental way, enabling people who use drugs to adjust their behaviour to reduce risk.”

A 2022 systemic review of pill testing found people who found unexpected substances in their drugs were more likely to discard them and adjust their use.

“If we can prevent overdoses from happening in the first place, then we can not only reduce harm for consumers and avoid the pain felt by bereaved family members, but also ease the pressures on our emergency health system,” Barratt said.

“Adulteration and substitution of drugs purchased in Australia from cryptomarkets: An analysis of Test4Pay” was published in the Drug and Alcohol Review (DOI: 10.1111/dar.13825)

Monica J. Barratt, Matthew Ball, Gabriel T. W. Wong and Angus Quinton are co-authors.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

5 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Andyfiftysix

    Drug testing? We cant even identify the problem. Prohibition doesnt work but here we go again. Just look at how we control tobacco and alcohol. Tax and tax until we create another industry…. chop chop.
    Sending this underground leads us back to square one. The only winners are the suppliers, everyone else loses one way or another.
    Reforms are not likely anytime soon, too many votes on being tough on crime.

  2. LambsFry Simplex.

    Yes, has me thinking, too. If you were delving into substances illegal, why would you go to a drug testing facility, where you might be identified?

  3. Roswell

    Black markets are very profitable, by the looks.

  4. Bob

    Sellers on the dark web are never going to meet buyers. Anyone think sellers care about customers health? As long as the buyers don’t die suddenly within a month of purchase I don’t see any further govt intervention. I read a report last year that independent researchers have found graphene oxide in vapes. Ingesting that toxin will likely result in lung cancer but not for a couple of years, unlike tobacco which takes some 20 years to appear. What needs to be understood is that the transhumanist experiment is now in its ascendancy (since early 2020) and whether the vape sellers know it or not, some anti-humans are now dosing multiple products ranges, including vapes, with graphene oxide.

  5. Pingback: More than 1/3 illicit drugs sold on the dark web contain unexpected substances - independent news and commentary Australia

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page