Maximising solar self-consumption by rethinking PV panel orientation
University of South Australia Media Release
Over two million Australian households – more than 20 per cent – now have rooftop photovoltaic (PV) solar panels, and while this is a generally positive scenario, the increased uptake of PV systems around the nation is creating a few challenges for our electricity industry.
UniSA solar researcher, Kirrilie Rowe, says one key problem currently facing home PV stems from the discrepancy between the times of peak use and peak production.
“Solar panels on residential dwellings are typically installed facing the equator to maximise the energy collected, but the power generated by an equator-facing panel peaks at around midday, whereas residential loads typically have peaks in the morning and afternoon,” Rowe says.
At the moment, households are paid a ‘feed-in tariff’ for excess electricity they send to the grid, but, as the number of homes producing electricity increases, the viability of exporting to the grid is reduced.
“In some markets at certain times we’re already seeing over-supply during peak production times, which can cause grid instability and is leading to reductions in feed-in tariffs,” Rowe says.
“The real challenge now facing the solar industry is finding ways to balance production and consumption by maximising self-consumption for the solar panel owner.”
Offering one elegantly simple solution to this challenge, Rowe’s research explores how rethinking the orientation of rooftop solar panels might better match times of production to patterns of consumption, even if that means a slight reduction in overall energy generation.
“Traditionally, PV panels are mounted facing the equator as this creates more energy per square
metre of PV panels, but this orientation does not necessarily maximise the community self-use of the energy prior to the excess being exported to the wider grid,” Rowe says.
“By orienting panels in different directions rather than just facing the equator, it’s possible to minimise the shortfall between load and generation.
“This benefits the end-user by decreasing the amount of electricity required to be imported, and the stability of the grid by decreasing the amount of variability between peak and low loads.”
A recent study by Rowe and Associate Professor Peter Pudney calculated the optimal self-consumption panel orientations for a community of 29 individual dwellings and a residential building with 42 apartments in Australia.
“Our analysis uses detailed load data and detailed irradiance data and shows that optimal panel placement for self-consumption is never towards the equator,” Rowe says.
“In both cases, if the panel area is small enough so that the household will not export, then facing the panel north is best. But as panel area increases, it becomes better to face the panels facing north-west to meet the afternoon loads, and if even more panel area is available then panels should be faced north-east and west.”
Over the next few years, as solar uptake increases, feed-in tariffs fall and the cost of solar batteries remains prohibitive, the real value of solar self-consumption will continue to rise.
The strategy developed by Rowe and Assoc Prof Pudney offers a simple approach to improving self-consumption without increasing set-up costs on new PV systems, and the method could also be easily adopted for remodelling existing systems.
“The information on how to orient solar panels to minimise power shortfall is useful to groups developing
housing precincts and has been used to design a renewable energy system for a retirement village with 24 dwellings,” Rowe says.
“Future work will incorporate energy storage into the model,” she adds.
Like what we do at The AIMN?
You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.
Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!
Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
700 total views, 4 views today
2 commentsLogin here Register here
A great little read:
We only have 4(3 labor 1 clp) federal pollies and I asked them by message early last year whether they had voted themselves batteries for their houses and investment properties.
No reply as yet but history of political self-interest suggests their silence is affirmation of their right to feather their nest, to accept payment without conditions, to regard every waking minute as work, to not spend any of their salary because they work 24/7 and deserve compensation.
There was real fear in the eyes of a senator when I suggest that all the worries of ‘lazy theiving bastards would disappear if the published their diary showing details of each meeting who, where, how long and outcomes. It would clear the air about any corruption and show the extend of their absence from family..
She cut me from her page and retired to victoria on her pension.
““Future work will incorporate energy storage into the model,” she adds.”
That is where the benefits are. And tried and proven storage at the level of grids and mini-grids is reversible pumped storage hydro. The technology is old and proven and sites for the systems have been identified in about a thousand locations around Australia. Batteries are still a bit more expensive and don’t last as long, but we need to throw everything into the mix.