Open Guidelines: The Foreign Interference Problem in Australian…

Education has always been a political matter, whatever the apolitical advocates of…

Money and power completely out of balance

Reading today of Bill Gates being once more top of the tree…

Children's Letters To ScoMo

A few weeks ago, Scott Morrison sent a tweet about a letter…

Government idiocy costing us billions

With a headline like that, I could go on to discuss innumerable…

I have nothing but contempt for Scott Morrison

I write today with heavy spirit and considerable anger about men and…

The spying on Timor-Leste case ... et cetera…

By Dr George Venturini  On 23 May 2013 the Australian Broadcasting Corporation radio…

Yaroomba Beach. Dark deeds on the edge of…

Do you live in a small beach-side community anywhere along the beautiful…

MYEFO will be interesting

The latest Monthly Financial Statement from the government raises some questions regarding…

«
»
Facebook

Let’s talk about jobs and how the baby boomers could help

A few days ago, the monthly Labour Force survey for February was released and the news raised some concerns.

Over the month, the number of unemployed persons increased by 1,800.

On seasonally adjusted figures, there was a decrease of 7,300 persons in full-time employment.

Monthly hours worked increased by 1.9% over the past year, which was below the 2.3% increase in employed persons.

The average hours worked per employed person was 138.5 hours per month.  In August 2013, average hours worked per month was 141.7 per employed person.  Multiply that by over 12.7 million people in work and it is a significant loss of hours.

Scott Morrison has promised, without any plan other than tax cuts, to create 1.25 million jobs over the next five years.  Aside from his previous comments that governments don’t create jobs, the ABS report that, over the past year, the labour force increased by 237,500 persons, so 250,000 new jobs per year barely keeps up with the current workforce increase let alone the future as we grow.

When they talk about participation rates, they use the age bracket 15-64 year olds, ignoring the staged increase in the entitlement age for the aged pension.  For anyone born after 1 July 1952, they are no longer eligible on their 65th birthday and those who were born after 1 January 1957 must wait until they are 67.

As our parents live longer and our children breed later, people in their 60s now often have to work as well as provide care for aged parents and childcare for young grandchildren as their daughters return quickly to the workforce.  They are often the people who fill volunteer roles.

Many people use up their superannuation during those years or are forced onto Newstart or a disability pension.  It has also been suggested that they should raise the age at which super becomes available.

A different strategy would be to value the caring role that people of that demographic play.

If people in their 60s had the option to work or to fill that caring and community role, it would free up some jobs for younger people.  It would allow parents to return to work without such crippling childcare costs.  It would facilitate elderly people staying in their own homes longer.  I also think retirees could play a far greater role in training and mentoring inexperienced workers.  (As could young people in helping older people learn about new technology).

Rather than increasing entitlement ages, how about we decrease them back to 60, increase the aged pension but tighten up assets and income tests, and make some space for our young people to get a start.  Or perhaps have some sort of transition to the pension payment where people in their 60s could have their caring and volunteer work see them eligible for some part-payment.

When costing these alternatives, notice should be given to the economic benefit of lessening of demand for aged and child care places and the social benefit to the community of volunteer services like Meals on Wheels or school canteen duty or Landcare groups.

The government has acknowledged that we have an aging population.  Rather than considering that a problem, it’s time to work out how to make the best use of us.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

8 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Robert Dodgson

    Great ideas, but impossible to be taken up by government because it doesn’t fit into the marketing strategy.
    Government is not about community it is about getting voters to elect you

  2. Robyn Dunphy

    Kaye, at 64, struggling to find a medication that doesn’t devastate my quality of life, frankly I’d love to retire. But I quite simply can’t. No social housing available, I’d be homeless. Not really, as I could temporarily live with my daughter, but I hate imposing on their life.

    Today is a rough day, admittedly – this new medication (3rd in 4 years) is causing me to feel emotionally fragile. Badly. I don’t yet qualify for the whiz bang biologics under our PBS rules. Enforced suffering.

    There is heaps I could do to contribute in the ways you discuss, if survival wasn’t my overriding daily consideration.

  3. Kaye Lee

    I am sorry to hear about your health issues Robyn. That is another thing that we, in our 60s, often have to deal with as well. I don’t have the answers but the conversation should be about how we support all in our society to make their best contribution – how we best help them start, how we facilitate their participation, and how we live a life of dignity as we grow older. THEN we can talk about how we gear the economy to achieve that.

  4. Lambert Simnel

    That’s what they voted for in NSW, Robyn.

  5. Florence Howarth

    Has one noticed over the last few years the behaviour of the economy appears to have no connection with the leaders of many countries. We have Morrison, US, Trump. UK in throes of Brexit disaster. Leadership problems in many other countries. The economy moves on regardless.

  6. PK65

    Rather than simply increasing the aged pension, to really value those in caring and in volunteering roles HOW about we have a Job Guarantee Program, these activities would clearly fit into a Job Guarantee Program which would see them paid the minimum wage and ALSO have all the same rights and protections as if employed in the private sector (including workcover, superannuation, etc), which is something that doesn’t occur under the umbrella of volunteering.

    Dr Steven Hail… Job Guarantee Program…
    https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1579373108812493&id=673798776036602

  7. Harry

    PK65: absolutely! The private sector will NEVER employ all who want to work, leaving hundreds of thousands out of work and dependent on iinadequate income support in what is supposedly a “strong economy”.

    A Job Guarantee is the only non-neoliberal approach to tackling this very much soluble program.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: