Promising the Impossible: Blinken’s Out of Tune Performance…

Things are looking dire for the Ukrainian war effort. Promises of victory…

Opposition Budget in Reply: Peter Dutton has no…

Solutions for Climate Australia Media Release National advocacy group Solutions for Climate Australia…

Understanding the risk

It's often claimed the major supermarkets would prefer to see tonnes of…

A Brutal Punishment: The Sentencing of David McBride

Sometimes, it’s best not to leave the issue of justice to the…

Climate pollution and petrol bills coming down as…

Climate Council Media Release AUSTRALIA IS OFF AND RACING on the road to…


It’s time we reckoned with what it means to become a corporatocracy.…

Plan B

By James Moore Every time there is a release of a New York…

Australian federal budget falls flat in tackling inequality:…

In response to the 2024 federal budget, Oxfam Australia Interim Director of…


Jellyfish, not jaws what we fear in the ocean

University of South Australia Media Release

As the weather heats up this week, shark sightings and the possibility of an encounter will again become a popular topic of conversation. And if mass media accounts are anything to go by, you would be forgiven for thinking we all share this fear of potentially meeting Jaws on our next trip to the beach.

But according to new University of South Australia research, it is drowning and other animals – such as jellyfish, crabs, and stingrays, not an encounter with Jaws, that people fear when they take a dip.

In a survey of 400 participants who were prompted to explain why they were afraid of going in the ocean, sharks appeared well down the list, coming in fourth behind drowning, other animal encounters and deep water.

UniSA Online course facilitator for psychology, Dr Brianna Le Busque says the results of the study are surprising, given the media’s portrayal of shark-human interactions and the animal’s vilified status in popular culture.

“We’ve all seen Jaws and read the sensationalised headlines about shark “attacks” – given sharks’ representation in the mass media, it would be easy to assume that everyone’s biggest fear is an encounter with a shark,” she says.

“In reality, our study found more people fear drowning than sharks when it comes to swimming in the ocean.

“It’s promising to see that people’s fears are actually aligned with the statistical chance of these threats, given many more people drown per year compared to fatal shark interactions.”

The results are good news for shark conservation as they indicate a shift in public perception, according to Dr Le Busque. She says changing people’s perception of sharks is critical to protect them, with many species experiencing population decline.

“Even though many shark species are at risk of extinction, mass media still tends to focus on threats from sharks to humans, rather than from humans to sharks,” she says.

“This can have devastating consequences for the world’s shark population with effects we will all feel.

“Sharks play an integral role in our marine ecosystem. They have been around for more than 400-million years keeping our ocean habitats intact, which is important as oceans provide much of the oxygen we need to live.

“We know that people are less likely to support conservation initiatives and more likely to support potentially harmful mitigation strategies if they fear sharks. To support shark conservation, we need to reduce the perception of risk sharks pose to better reflect reality.

“That’s not to say we need to get rid of this fear altogether, but we need the fear to be proportionate to the threat.”

Dr Le Busque, whose research focuses on the psychology of shark conservation, says another interesting finding from the study was that 22 per cent of respondents had experienced a known encounter with a shark in the wild.

“This number was far higher than we expected – almost one in every four people had seen a shark in real life,” she says.

“In a way, this finding reaffirms the need for us to reframe how we view shark and human interactions – most sharks species are not known to harm humans.”

The results from the study were published in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences in a paper titled ‘People’s fear of sharks: a qualitative analysis’.


Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. Michael Taylor

    I have no fear of being taken by a shark.

    Similarly, I have no fear of dying because my parachute chord failed to work.

  2. Kronomex

    Michael, what about getting caught in a nasty storm and then being attacked by flying sharks that lurk in the rain and clouds?

  3. Michael Taylor

    They’re a different matter. I’m always fighting those buggers. That’s why I always take my pet drop bear with me. Rips ‘em to shreds.

  4. Consume Less

    What about what sharks have to deal with. Baited drum lines, shark nets, fisher people, game fisher people, long lines, habitat destruction, diminishing food sources due to over fishing and now a warming ocean. All thanks to us homo sapiens.

  5. wam

    When I was young and visiting adelaide, the sight of a shark at the beach set of sirens and we all scurried out of the water up the jetty to see a very scary dark shadow prowling its way through the green waters. So only 22% having seen a shark from a jetty or a boat, would be very low but I don’t know what ‘known encounter’ means? The results of the survey are very surprising and hard to believe, especially in south australia. Where, despite the wonderful work over many years of Rodney Fox having made a tremendous difference in resetting the image of sharks as animals deserving of respect, (His company have tours where people using his invention of the shark cage to view sharks in their environment.), the traumatic death of a young lad jumping into the water at a fish cleaning spot and being torn to pieces and 4 other fatal attacks have occurred this century. So the risk of shark versus the risk of drowning, other animals or jelly fish is far higher. Certainly up here the box jellyfish is our killer in the sea and sharks are miles behind crocs.

  6. leefe

    “I have no fear of being taken by a shark.

    Similarly, I have no fear of dying because my parachute chord failed to work.”

    They aren’t that closely comparable.

    Back when I was still working as a dive instructor I attended a big country party given by a pair of ex-students. They were also sky-divers, and the guests were about 50-50 SCUBA/parachute. You could tell the sky-divers apart because every single one of them limped; mostly as a result of long-term damage from less-than-perfect landings.

    You’re safer underwater. If there’s an equipment malfunction, it’s easier to get to the surface than to get to the ground once you’re out of the plane. Admittedly, adverse animal interactions are less likely in the sky, although some birds can get pretty stroppy …

  7. paul walter

    Triffic pic of the Noah’s Ark.

    But no jellyfish, because they’d have to go to Canberra.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page