Destabilizing Australia: Will the LNP’s Culture Wars Be…

By Denis Bright The hopeful possibilities of reaching out to build a better…

Dutton’s scattergun

It’s widely acknowledged that Tony Abbott came to be Prime Minister because…

A Copper’s Skewed Logic: Politicising Palestinian Visas

If only we could say that Peter Dutton, Australia’s federal opposition leader…

Human Rights?

By Bert Hetebry The term Genocide was first used in 1945 to describe…

Authoritarianism is taking over the world. Will it…

It would seem that many countries around the world have decided that…

Imperial Venality Defends Itself: Day Two of Julian…

On February 21, the Royal Courts of Justice hosted a second day…

I'm Not A Racist Butt...

It's interesting how quickly things change! I mean wasn't it just yesterday when…

Desperation grows in Ukraine war, two years on

Australia for UNHCR Media Release Australia for UNHCR is appealing for renewed support…


How Australia can generate a $52 billion windfall from science

Science & Technology Australia Media Release

Australia faces a ‘Sliding Doors’ moment when we can choose to supercharge our science and technology strengths and generate a $52 billion windfall for our economy – or consign ourselves to a future with our fate in the hands of others.

Heading into the Jobs and Skills Summit, new analysis by Science & Technology Australia shows how even a modest investment to train Australia’s first generation of bench-to-boardroom scientists could powerfully supercharge our national economic growth.

Science & Technology Australia wants to recruit and train Australia’s first generation of bench-to-boardroom scientists with the skills, networks and commercial knowledge to bridge the ‘valley of death’ in science commercialisation.

Science & Technology Australia President Professor Mark Hutchinson is one of Australia’s first generation of scientist-entrepreneurs. Under his leadership, the ARC Centre of Excellence in Nanoscale BioPhotonics has created 16 startups with a combined market capitalisation and market value of nearly $520 million.

“Imagine the potential of an Australian economy powered by up to 2000 more entrepreneurial bench-to-boardroom scientists,” said Science & Technology Australia CEO Misha Schubert.

“If just five per cent – a very conservative figure – of a new generation of bench-to-boardroom scientists achieve the level of success we’ve seen from some of our nation’s brightest commercialisation stars, it would generate a $52 billion return for the Australian economy.”

“That conservative level of success would not just create a wealth of new jobs for Australians, it would kickstart whole new industries and create an economy powered by science.”

Science & Technology Australia warns the nation’s economic competitors are rapidly scaling up their investments in science, technology, research and development.

If Australia keeps pace, the country can seize huge opportunities for the economy including new jobs, national income, intellectual property and sovereign capability.

“Right now, the world is in a fierce science and technology race to rapidly advance societies and economies,” Ms Schubert said.

“The stakes are high. If Australia doesn’t keep pace, we face the grave risk that the country will end up as a consumer, not a creator – eroding our sovereign capability and deepening our reliance on other countries.”

“But with bold strategic investments now, Australia can keep ourselves in play.”

“A few decisive steps now will get us on the train to a destination of an economy and society powered by science. Miss that opportunity, and we will be left stranded on the platform.”

This month the US passed the CHIPS and Science Act 2022 – a $52 billion boost for science and semiconductor research and development dubbed a “once-in-a-generation investment in America itself” by President Joe Biden.

The bold investment plan includes a $10 billion outlay in regional science and technology hubs and manufacturing, and vast new investment in STEM workforce development and STEM education from pre-school to university – with a focus on diverse communities.

“Australia should be every bit as ambitious for our science and technology ambitions.”

At the launch of National Science Week this month, Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said, “the most important piece of micro-economic reform which faces the nation today is infusing our economy with science and technology.”

Science & Technology Australia participated in the science and commercialisation roundtable this month leading into the Jobs and Skills summit.

The bench-to-boardroom plan is one of five policy fixes proposed by Science & Technology Australia to advance the urgent imperative of creating the “future powered by science” outlined by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in his Science Vision Statement.

  • Setting a bold new ambition for Australia to become a global STEM superpower;
  • Training Australia’s first generation of ‘bench-to-boardroom’ scientists;
  • Fixing chronic job insecurity in science to end the brain drain;
  • Confirming the Budget funding for research commercialisation investments; and
  • An urgent boost for breakthroughs in Australia’s discovery research grant budgets.

About Science & Technology Australia
Science & Technology Australia is the nation’s peak body representing more than 90,000 scientists and technologists. We’re the leading policy voice on science and technology. Our flagship programs include Science meets Parliament, Superstars of STEM, and STA STEM Ambassadors.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. New England Cocky

    No R&D No Economic Future.

  2. Harry Lime

    Cocky, this job summity thing is looking promising judging by the number of different organisations that want to ‘buy into’ it.Despite the sniping from the idiots in the Opposition and their usual brainless foghorn media enablers,it is a once in a generation opportunity to get serious.They had better disinclude anything to do with fossil fuels.

  3. Kerri

    Integral to this has to be greater support for Primary and Secondary teaching. Kids need the spark of inspiration in the formative years as much as they need the solid scientific knowledge later in their educational path. There is an especially pressing need for science to be more than cardboard models (though they are a good project) in primary level education. This needs to be fostered by fostering and arming teachers with the knowledge to light the fire from the start.

    #Harry Lime IMHO the right don’t want to encourage anyone who may develop greater knowledge than them. So that’s a pretty low bar right there and inspiration for the cat calling of “elite” “woke” and various other puerile labels.

  4. totaram

    I see from the web site of STA that it has been around since 1985 known earlier as FASTS. Throughout my career as an academic in the STEM area I never heard of them or of any of their activities. Where were they when the Howard govt. systematically whittled down the standing of the Universities and their research abilities? What inputs did they provide to government, when that same govt. told the Unis “there was no money” and they had better get it from International students? I never heard of any. What was their response to Universities getting “corporatised”, with Vice-Chancellors and their bloated managements of even small Universities being paid more than their counterparts at Harvard? All the while, University academics in STEM areas were being offered voluntary redundancies on a regular basis as funding went from boom to bust based purely on local fluctuations.

    As for research grants, the whole ARC scheme is a joke based on who knows whom. People who themselves are applying for grants are asked to “evaluate” the grant applications of others in the same field. Does this make sense? It used to be that an applicant for an ARC grant could nominate referees in other countries, so that such obvious conflicts of interest could be avoided. However, that option was soon abolished – guess why!

    This talk about Australia grabbing its share etc. is all very well, but it needs a lot of detailed work-through. Scientists don’t just pop up in the undergrowth to be harvested by clever apparatchiks. We have seen time-after-time how successive governments have let down the Australian science establishment, by cutting, chopping, changing and coming up with hare-brained ideas which could only have been dreamed up by people who had no idea about science or research of any kind. It is indeed necessary to “infuse our society with science and technology.” How will that happen? Most of our school-leavers don’t even understand basic mathematics or science. Neither do our politicians if you will excuse me.

    Judging from the past performance of this organisation, this is just nice-sounding hot-air.

  5. wam

    Loved science all my life and in 2022 I sit on my hands whilst my granddaughter’s science teacher spouts creationism.

  6. Lawiejay

    Harry Lime !

    Did you mean fossil fools?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page