Government heat map ‘wake up call’ to stop…

Climate Media Centre Advocacy groups have welcomed the release of the Federal Government’s…

Compulsory income management doing more harm than good:…

Charles Darwin University Media Release Compulsory income management (CIM) in the Northern Territory…

Flicker of Hope: Biden’s Throwaway Lines on Assange

Walking stiffly, largely distracted, and struggling to focus on the bare essentials,…

Seizing a Future Made in Australia

Climate Council Media Release THE CLIMATE COUNCIL celebrates today's announcement that the Future…

The Meanjin essay: The Voice and Australia's democracy…

With Stephen Charles AO KC The dire state of truth in Australia’s civic…

Haunted by waters

By James Moore We were young when we lived near the Rio Grande…

The price of victimhood: The Higgins/Lehrmann gravy train

By Bert Hetebry I’m not much good at sums, but I can imagine…

An Open Letter: Save Toondah - it’s the…

By Callen Sorensen Karklis Dear Readers, Seventeen years ago I was inspired by…


Casuals due to get relief in Victoria, in lieu of national action

Victorian casual workers plying their trade in any of a number of industries and sectors may be entitled to up to five days of sick and carer’s pay in the near future, as the Andrews state government announced on Monday that a pilot program will be launched as a scheme within the 2020-21 state budget.

As the Victorian state budget is due to be read on Tuesday, the Andrews government recognised earlier during the COVID-19 pandemic that the loss of work affected thousands of casual workers in more than just an adverse manner, that they were feasibly unable to take days off to care for sick and infected family members by virtue of a simple consequence tied to the casual workforce – you don’t work, you don’t get paid.

“When people have nothing to fall back on, they make a choice between the safety of their workmates and feeding their family. The ultimate decision they make isn’t wrong – what’s wrong is they’re forced to make it at all,” Daniel Andrews, the state of Victoria’s premier, said on Monday.

The proposed program, entitled the Secure Work Pilot Scheme (SWPS), would provide five days’ worth of sick and carer’s pay, to be paid to workers at the normal casual award rates per the national minimum wage.

Currently, under the National Employment Standards (NES), casual workers – of which and as of November 2018 one in four workers across Australia were classified as casuals – have been entitled to two days of carer’s leave and two days of compassionate leave.

However, each of those spells are of an unpaid nature.

Should the SWPS get approved, workers in a yet-to-be-determined range of eligible industries and sectors would be entitled to as much as $753.80 based on a 38-hour working week at $19.84 per hour under minimum wage conditions updated to the current financial year.

Following the state budget’s reading, the scheme will be subject to several stages of planning and debate alike, before its enactment, targeted for a proposed start for late 2021.

The $5 million plan for the SWPS will undergo a series of consultations and inquiries between members of the state Parliament, regarding the design and feasibility of the scheme, including processes for casual and insecure workers to undertake, with ultimately no cost to businesses.

Such practices are expected to include casual and insecure workers to pre-registration for the scheme, an education campaign for enrolment, and a defining element of eligibility issues.

The Andrews Labor government, while describing the target of the scheme as going towards “priority industries”, has yet to define which industries and sectors will partake in the scheme, but areas such as cleaning, hospitality, tourism, security, retail, and aged care, and their related sectors, are expected to be involved.

The SWPS proposal has already won various degrees of support from the federal Labor party, the union movement and business lobbies alike.

Tony Burke, federal Labor’s shadow minister for industrial relations, immediately hailed Andrews’ leadership in Victoria on unveiling intentions for the scheme, and wondered why the Morrison government couldn’t do the same on a national level in Canberra.

“Victoria’s plan to provide sick pay to casual and insecure workers shows real leadership in stark contrast with the inaction of the Morrison Government,” Burke said on Monday.

“If the COVID-19 pandemic has shown us anything it’s that insecure work is not just a threat to the wellbeing of individuals – it’s a threat to the wellbeing of our society. A high proportion of Australia’s coronavirus infections came from people turning up to work sick,” added Burke.

Luke Hilakari, secretary of Victoria Trades Hall, endorses the proposed SWPS program (Photo from ETU Victoria)

Luke Hilakari, the Victoria Trades Hall secretary, while agreeing with Burke on the lack of national action, also commended the Andrews government for taking the first steps.

“Just like the introduction of wage theft laws and labour hire laws, it has been up to the states to show leadership while Prime Minister Morrison is forced to play catch up,” said Hilakari on Monday.

Hilakari also believes that the proposed scheme at Spring Street could lead to a domino effect which would ultimately drive down the numbers in the casual workforce.

“Covid-19 laid bare the problems workers have been pointing to for years: insecure work is toxic and forces people on marginal incomes to make terrible choices. Do workers go to work sick to pay the bills, or do they risk their job by staying at home?” said Hilakari.

“Sick workers attending work is a cost to business. Workers having a sick leave entitlement may result in a major lift in workplace productivity with more workplaces staying healthy.

“Victoria is the first State Government to show leadership in piloting practical solutions to disincentivise insecure work,” added Hilakari.

“Workers staying on the job when they’re sick is bad for business – for the rest of your staff and for your customers. We believe this scheme will benefit businesses and workers right across Victoria,” echoed Tim Pallas, treasurer and minister for industrial relations in Andrews’ state government.

The state’s highest business lobby, however, is taking a cautious approach to Spring Street’s proposal, but nonetheless looks forward to working with the state government and union groups to develop a multi-partisan solution that appeals to all parties.

“The Victorian Chamber will talk to members and government about the potential implications of this proposal, including the cost and complexity for business. The Victorian Chamber will not support any additional cost, impost or taxes on business, particularly as we are trying to restart the economy and incentivise the creation of more jobs,” Paul Guerra, chief executive of the Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said in reaction to the state government’s announcement.

Yet Andrews defended the scheme as a step in a progressive direction.

“This isn’t going to solve the problem of insecure work overnight, but someone has to put their hand up and say we’re going to take this out of the ‘too hard’ basket and do something about it – and that’s exactly what we’re doing,” he said.


Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. calculus witherspoon.

    Not according to Xtian Porter, who thinks it a heist of some sort.

    Never give a sucker a break.

  2. wam

    My mob are of the mind that andrews deserves a peace prize for his handling of pressure from federal victorian ministers and their media.
    Exceptions my NSW and NT rabbottians who like scummo, persist with attacking dan, Annastacia and mark for being labor.

    These Andrew’s words will stick it up the whinging children in canberra.
    “…too hard’ basket and do something about it – and that’s exactly what we’re doing,”

    As for casual my darling grandaughter deferred her course and took a gap year and in january had collected 3 jobs in Wangaratta to fund her uni and bang march sent her home. She resumed her work and is back in her plan. Hopefully her deferred course will still be available and she doesn’t get bumped by this year’s cohort.

  3. Terence Mills

    The Morrison government are fighting to maintain the status quo and to treat casual workers as self-employed and thus not entitled to receive paid sick-leave, holiday pay etc as an employee normally would.

    Around the world, Uber are being used as the template for testing whether a worker is self employed and thus not entitled to any employment benefits or whether they are employees.

    So far The Fair Work Ombudsman has not yet committed to whether it should run a legal case to argue that Uber drivers are employees or self employed contractors. On the basis of the Fair Work Ombudsman’s initial assessment (and government policy), the drivers are considered self-employed independent contractors.

    In Britain the argument has so far favoured casual employees following a test case involving Uber drivers. The Central London Employment Tribunal has given a landmark ruling that Uber drivers should be treated as employees, entitling them to statutory protections including the National Minimum Wage, paid sick leave and holiday pay. Uber are appealing this decision and the results of that appeal could have a significant bearing on the so called Gig economy in Australia.

    In the USA it is being handled on a state by state basis and a California appeals court has determined Uber (and Lyft an Uber competitor) must classify their drivers as employees rather than independent contractors, siding with a lower court that found the ride-hailing companies were likely violating state labor law. This decision is also being appealed by Uber and Lyft.

    Dan Andrews is right in prioritising this matter in the absence of any leadership at federal level but ultimately we have to treat this as a federal issue and, in my view, grant employment benefits including paid sick leave to all “employees”. It is noticeable that as the nation gets back to work after COVID that most of the jobs on offer are casual (i.e. with no employment benefits).

    So once again we are going down this rabbit hole of determining who is an employee and who is a genuine self employed contractor.

    Watch this space !

  4. Gangey1959

    I’m a forklift driver. I get payed ONLY by agency B. I work ONLY at workplace X.
    When I signed on with B, I was asked what sort of hours I was looking for, but at no time was I guaranteed any at all, or that MY preferences would be taken into consideration when a job came up. I get no sickpay, no leave, no holidays. No surprises there.
    I have a set rate of pay, day rates for OT, and no super on overtime.
    There is no negotiation on these conditions. That is what they are, take them or don’t work.

    A contract, on the other hand, is negotiated. Hours, rates, breaks, overtime, etc etc. That would be a cold day in Hades.

    I’m a fucking casual. No ifs, buts or maybes. And I can get a call within two hours of shift start time and be expected to attend work.
    Our scottyfrommarketing and his buddies can shove his “fair go for those who have a go” up their holey arses.

  5. Matters Not

    ‘Tis Unions, sometimes known as collective action as distinct from individual action, that gave labour industrial muscle. Them were the good ole days, the memory of which is accessible through historical accounts.

    The United States national debt is now above $27 trillion dollars which translates to more that $82 thousand per citizen and above $218 thousand per taxpayer. Most scholars are of the view it will never be paid off. The deficit stands somewhere north of $4 trillion. Uber has never made a profit. Neither has Tesla.

    It’s a brave new world. Everyone’s a gambler. Little wonder that Morrison is an avid reader and advocate of the prosperity gospel. Subscribe to-day and find financial salvation.

  6. Carl Marks


    I’ll say it yet again.

    Where is the problem, with unemployment at such high level?

    The unemployed do have access to these jobs, or only the offshore labour firms?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page