Ukraine’s Tank Problem

It seems to be a case of little provision for so much…

When culture war games trend lethal

The right-wing ecosphere throws an idiot ball into the civic discourse with…

The year ahead

Most people turn away from politics over the holiday period when the…

Cutting Your Power Bills In Half And Other…

A few years ago there was a scam where people were promised…

Values Based Capitalism: The Imperative of Defining Commitment…

By Denis Bright Editorial insiders at The Weekend Australian (28-29 January 2023)…

A walk in the forest

Bayerischer Wald can be just as hard to get to than it…

An Emergent Premier Chris Minns - Uniting Sydney…

By Denis Bright After more than a decade in Opposition, NSW Labor is…

Forget Australia Day And Celebrate: Rum Rebellion Day…

After pointing out for a number of years that January 26th isn't…

«
»
Facebook

Boastful Pay Cuts: The Coronavirus Incentive

It has become a source of pride. Highly salaried executives – often, it should be said, receiving pay very much disconnected from the value of their work – making voluntary pay cuts and telling everybody else about it. In sport, celebrated figures such as Lionel Messi and Christiano Ronaldo have chosen to reduce their enormous pay packages for the sake of the game. Both play for football leagues in Spain and Italy, countries ravaged by COVID-19, and both earn amounts reputedly coming in at $100 million a year. Such sums are scandalous to begin with, but it enables a sort of virtue to be practised, the sort that leaves few scares. Clubs such as Barcelona and Juventus host an army of non-playing employees, and such armies risk being culled.

This point is being demonstrated with some force in the United Kingdom, where handsomely paid players in the English Premier League have resisted calls to be virtuous in parting with their own cash in covering the fees of club staff. One figure keen to shout the message to do more is health secretary Matt Hancock. “Given the sacrifices many people are making, the first thing PL footballers can do is make a contribution.”

Julian Knight, chair of the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport committee, also had a bone to pick with the Premier League, writing a scolding note to its chief executive Richard Masters about potentially misusing the job retention scheme. “The purpose of the coronavirus job retention scheme is not to support the economics of Premier League clubs.”

The targets of economic pain have, inevitably, been the staff and personnel who do not find themselves kicking a ball on the pitch. Clubs such as Tottenham have furloughed non-playing employees. Newcastle was first out of the box, reducing the salaries of non-playing staff by 20 per cent. This sent a rather ugly message: If you are not a performer on the field, you will be targets of convenience for the financial razor gangs.

Scratching the surface, and we find dissatisfied players such as Andros Townsend, a member of the English football team, none too keen to be either noble or a target of virtue. “Football,” he pleaded on talkSPORT, “is trying to do a lot of good.” He found it surprising that footballers were “being painted as villains”. (Tool Townsend might be; sharp, he is not.) Reductions in his own salary, and those of his peers, was something he preferred to avoid in the discussion. The focus was on charitable good works, helping the homeless or donating to charities. “I am involved in a campaign, Football United, raising money for the emergency trust.” A toast, then, to his achievements.

The pattern is repeated among other football players who prefer to raise money from the public to support what are, already, publically funded facilities. Liverpool captain Jordan Henderson, for instance, is engaged in establishing a coronavirus fund with the purpose of raising millions of pounds for the National Health Service. The public can pay for something they already pay for, a truly innovative form of charity.

Across industries, the principle of superfluousness is coming to the fore. The mightily salaried are making claims of reduction to gain a seat in some heavenly kingdom. In doing so, they hope that no one will notice a cardinal fact: that the cuts are only to the base salary rather than the whole remuneration package. This has been particularly so in the airline industry, where executives are kitting themselves out in the vestments of a newly found morality. British Airways CEO Willie Walsh is accepting a 20 per cent pay cut for the remainder of his contract with International Airlines Group. Australian airline Qantas has also stormed up the ranks of virtue, with Alan Joyce taking no salary for the rest of the financial year ending in June 2020, while the executive management team accept a 30 per cent pay cut. Before shedding joyful tears for such consideration, Joyce’s rich rewards from the company should not be forgotten. According to the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors, his pay for 2018 was $23.88 million.

Few, in other words, should rush to join the self-congratulatory party. Delta CEO Ed Bastian’s base salary is $891,667, which he accordingly intends to cut “by 100 per cent through the next six months.” That constitutes a trifling 6 per cent of his mammoth $14.9 million compensation package. As Ethan Wolff-Mann of Yahoo Finance notes, that rich package consists of “stock awards, option awards, and other types of compensation that aren’t connected to the company’s stock price.” Shares, rather than salary, make the difference.

The picture looks equally seedy in the world of education, where the management heavies continue to bleed university budgets. In Australia, La Trobe University executives, self-termed “leaders”, have embarked on a process of trimming their bloated salaries. Senior executives who form a 12-strong group have been asked to cede 20 per cent of their pay packets “in the interest of minimising the economic impact of the crisis”. Vice-chancellor John Dewar explains the reasoning: “While the impacts at La Trobe may not be as severe as some other Australian universities, we will soon be facing a simple choice: ‘share the pain’ across the organisation’s staff or implement a significant cost cutting exercise.” Given how executive leadership imperilled the Australian tertiary system by overly investing in the foreign student market, they might do a little more than.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

 250 total views,  2 views today

3 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Keitha Granville

    I believe this is something governments could do to demonstrate they ACTUALLY care about a future for their citizens, or whether it falls into the ‘ all men are equal but some are more equal than others camp.
    For the foreseeable future, no one in Australia should be paid more than $200,000 a year, no one. Politicians, CEOs, sports people, NO ONE. If your current rate is lower, excellent, but if any more then you take a cut. The savings would then be available to keep countries, businesses, clubs etc afloat until revenue can again be generated. Why are we throwing funds at companies who will then hand millions to a CEO? Why are we continuing to pay MPs hundreds of thousands when the treasury is haemorrhaging billions. Spend some of that on people who STILL have nothing to survive with, despite the millions promised.

    Now is the time for those who have benefited from the wealth the world has provided for them to give something back. We might be a little less inclined to want to support their excess when this is over. Revolutions start over this very issue.

  2. Phil Pryor

    Isn’t it good that some are losing some financial fat around their corporate waists, fat that was never needed, nor earned mostly. If the dunny cleaners negotiated twenty dollars a wipe, they’d wipe like buggery to get the temptation. Execs have spent the last century working out cunning ways of legalised robbery. Some are useless anuses; one yank in Australia took multi millions of piss off money to end his uselessness in A M P. Sol the Mexican bandit failed but reaped big. B H P paid out a reeking goat who regularly stuffed up with a pool of piss off money and this goes on unreported all the time, while honest workers do extra for no money, threatened and coerced so as to keep a job. Perhaps B Joyce could donate a testicle and thus cut his fornicating in half. It would save us all heaps…

  3. New England Cocky

    How much have any Australian politicians, either state or federal, have voluntarily reduced their salary packages? Indeed, how many state or federal politicians have volunteered to take a salary package reduction? Certainly a political skeptic could reasonably conclude that had the COALition misgovernment been more concerned with the welfare of Australian voters than accumulating personal pecuniary interests, then the define of the Australian people against this pandemic may have been at least earlier and more effective.

    But don’t stop there ….. how about the shock jocks, Alan Jones and his bigoted, loudmouthed, far right wing extremists shouting down the best interests of Australian voters in support of their corporate sponsors, or as in the Jones case, misinforming the public about the virulence of COVID-19? Why there has not even been any push back by ACMA to call Jones to account for misinformation!!

    Meanwhile Smirkie Sacked from Marketing is being re-branded as the Gentle Genius Messiah who has saved Australian voters by lavishly gifting public monies to corporations rather than Australian voters to achieve the COALition’s desired 10% unemployment among Australian workers.

    That’s OK folks, just dip into your superannuation and all your expenses created by the COALition misgovernment will remove your retirement protection funds ….. and don’t look at the huge financial deficit created by the Morriscum policies. “How will you pay for it???”

    Oh, where is Kevin Rudd and Ken Henry when you need proper caring policies like “Go early, go hard, go families” to protect Australian families from the ravages of voracious foreign bankers??

    @Keitha Granville: That effect is the intention of the graduated taxation scales that successive governments of both persuasions have effectively removed with a seemingly endless string of tax exemptions, rebates and concessions that favour the undeserving wealthy and corporates at about $150 BILLION PER YEAR.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: