Promising the Impossible: Blinken’s Out of Tune Performance…

Things are looking dire for the Ukrainian war effort. Promises of victory…

Opposition Budget in Reply: Peter Dutton has no…

Solutions for Climate Australia Media Release National advocacy group Solutions for Climate Australia…

Understanding the risk

It's often claimed the major supermarkets would prefer to see tonnes of…

A Brutal Punishment: The Sentencing of David McBride

Sometimes, it’s best not to leave the issue of justice to the…

Climate pollution and petrol bills coming down as…

Climate Council Media Release AUSTRALIA IS OFF AND RACING on the road to…


It’s time we reckoned with what it means to become a corporatocracy.…

Plan B

By James Moore Every time there is a release of a New York…

Australian federal budget falls flat in tackling inequality:…

In response to the 2024 federal budget, Oxfam Australia Interim Director of…


Australian Values are for migrants, not governments

Last year, Peter Dutton was making a lot of noise about “Australian values” as part of a push by him to make it harder for migrants to gain citizenship.

Despite his proposed bill not having seen the light of day, the Home Affairs website advises that, in order for people to apply for permanent residency, they must sign an Australian Values Statement:

“Australian society values respect for the freedom and dignity of the individual, freedom of religion, commitment to the rule of law, Parliamentary democracy, equality of men and women and a spirit of egalitarianism that embraces mutual respect, tolerance, fair play and compassion for those in need and pursuit of the public good.”

Fine words no doubt, but more impressive in their aspiration than their application.

How can we say we respect freedom and dignity of the individual when we keep thousands of people in immigration detention indefinitely? Or when we impose the cashless welfare card on people based on their postcode rather than their individual circumstances? Or when we see Aboriginal youths locked up and abused in juvenile detention? Or mothers taken from their children and incarcerated for not paying a fine?

How can we say we value religious freedom when a noisy minority, including politicians, call for a ban on Muslim immigration, the building of mosques, the wearing of the burqa or even the hijab, halal certification, and the private practice of Sharia law? The same people who want to demonise Islam regard any criticism of their religious beliefs as victimisation and persecution.

Conservative Christians in this country don’t want the freedom to practice their religion – they already have that. They want to be exempt from the laws of the land regarding discrimination and to impose their beliefs on everyone by opposing legislation on issues like same-sex marriage, stem cell research, abortion and assisted dying. They have insisted that secular schools employ religious chaplains yet demand the right to employ only those who adhere to their beliefs in their own schools.

Government secrecy and their increasingly heavy-handed approach to whistleblowers and media reporting shows the government has little regard for the rule of law. Their inaction and suppression of information about illegalities – the Australian Wheat Board/Sadam Hussein scandal, the RBA Securency/One Note bribery case, the bugging of the East Timor parliamentary offices, the payment to people smugglers to return asylum seekers to Indonesia, possible war crimes committed in Afghanistan, bugging of the phones of foreign politicians, the abuse of asylum seekers held in indefinite detention – all raise important questions about the application of the law when it comes to our government. As does the constant rorting of expenses, opaque process for giving out contracts and grants, and post political employment of Ministers.

I am not sure what Parliamentary democracy even means when the government views all MPs who aren’t them as losers and the PM tells us it will be him alone that will determine policy. It is ridiculous for the government to tell Labor and Greens MPs that they must agree with all Coalition legislation because they won the election. Everybody sitting in those chambers won and have a duty to represent their constituents. If we really had parliamentary democracy, the government would be willing to amend legislation to improve it. All votes would be free rather than party dictated.

If men and women are considered equal in Australia, why is there still a pay gap? Why was Julia Gillard treated so appallingly? Why are female politicians bullied by their colleagues? Why is feminist a dirty word, eschewed by conservative women as well as men? Why is their a domestic violence epidemic that sees a woman killed by a current or former partner every week? Why are there no female priests or imams or rabbis?

Any idea that our government ‘embraces mutual respect, tolerance and fair play’ is laughable when you look at how they conduct themselves during Question Time and in interviews, constantly denigrating and misrepresenting Opposition parliamentarians and launching very personal attacks. The lies told during the recent election campaign show no respect for the electorate and absolutely no intention of fair play.

If it is intrinsically Australian to show compassion for those in need, why is the government ignoring the universal cry to increase Newstart payments? Why are asylum seekers locked up? Why are 116,000 people homeless? Why are people being bombarded with historical Robodebt overpayment claims? Why can’t pensioners afford to pay their power bills (which could be immediately cut by 9% if they chose to classify electricity as an essential item and exempt it from GST or they could subsidise it through an energy supplement to welfare recipients)? Why are we classified as ‘lifters and leaners’?

Any government who claims to pursue the “public good” whilst ignoring climate change cannot be taken seriously. Their idea of public good has degenerated into a mad scramble for individual wealth.

In so many areas, this government is failing to respect and uphold the Australian values they make migrants sign up to.

They fail the test for permanent residency. After their temporary visa expires in three years, they should be deported forthwith.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. Baby Jewels

    As always, spot on, Kaye!

  2. Brad Golding

    Great comment! Even the term “Australian Values,” is crap. Surely we aspire to universal values, but using the term Australian values suggest we are better than other nations thus appealing to the very vocal red neck flag waving morons who, sadly, walk among us and are allowed to breed. Surely what is implied as Australian values are the same as those of Canada, NZ, USA, Russia, China, Iran, Germany, etc.. We are not better than any of them and none are better than we are. However, regrettably, in some nations, the governments abuse those values to suppress the people who aspire to them.

  3. Matters Not


    … government has little regard for the rule of law

    Indeed! In a proper democracy, the rule of law goes beyond what the legislative and executive branches determine to include what the judicial arm rules (after due consideration). In the United States a Court has decided Trump has been violating the Constitution by blocking people from following his Twitter account because they criticized or mocked him.

    Seems to me that this ruling might have implications for ‘freedom of speech’ here in Australia in light of this freedom of religion Bill which will soon see the light of day. It seems that this legislation might offer (special) protections for the ‘religious’ from criticisms and restrictions that apply in other areas of social life, broadly defined. In the US the court ruled that:

    that the best response to disfavored speech on matters of public concern is more speech, not less.”

    Of course that’s there, here – the political power brokers will probably decide the opposite.

  4. Uta Hannemann

    “Fine words no doubt, but more impressive in their aspiration than their application.”

    Kaye, I agree with what you are saying about these words. It is a shame that these words are being promoted without zero intend to promote their application!!

    “It is ridiculous for the government to tell Labor and Greens MPs that they must agree with all Coalition legislation because they won the election.” I too wonder, Kaye, how they can get away with saying something as ridiculous as this!!

    Men and women cannot rely on being treated equally in Australia, that is for sure. And you say:
    “The lies told during the recent election campaign show no respect for the electorate and absolutely no intention of fair play.”
    This sort of disrespect annoys me no end. I just wonder, why isn’t more of the electorate annoyed by this? Why are people with such abhorrent behaviour voted back in? There must be some explanation for this!!
    The government does not like so called ‘lifters and leaners’, right? They only want to ‘govern’ for so called ‘aspirational’ people.
    And whether we like it or not, individual wealth creation is more important to them then doing something about climate change. So much for ‘good’ government. Do we as Australians not deserve a better government?

  5. Cool Pete

    Well said! Potty Potato has no idea! Australian values are acts of hypocrisy under this excuse for a government.

  6. Phil Pryor

    Have you interviewed a piggy lately, about values? Oink and Grunt, you hear, values indeed and well expressed. It’s a galaxy ahead of a skinful of excrement named Dutton, the doubtful, devious, destructive, dodgy DILL, a typical q’land polly, all anus and no cerebrum.

  7. James Cook

    I’m disappointed that Labor is not continually reminding the Govt AND the MSM that the majority of Australians did NOT vote for the Coalition and Labor is representing those people.

  8. Bronte ALLAN

    So well said Kaye! It seems ALL these COALition mob would not even know or understand this “Australian Value Statement”, even though it was probably drafted by one of their lackeys! Very wise words etc in this “Statement”, funny how almost none of them are in use etc by this fcking mob. Perhaps IF these wise words were used & “obeyed” by the COALition we would (maybe) live in a much fairer & just society. Pipe dreams unfortunately. I agree with James because this is (surely) what Labor should (must) be doing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page