Ok, So This Is A Boring Post... Or…

Gloria Sty, bud Iyam riting this coz I wanna mayk sum poynts…

Border Paranoia in Fortress Australia

The imaginative faculties of standard Australian politicians retreat to some strange, deathly…

Where the Palestine laboratory takes us all

By Antony Loewenstein Israel's war on Gaza since 7 October has caused the…

No, no, no, no. Not more ‘illegals’!

By Bert Hetebry A group of South Asian men arrived on our doorstep…

Rafah, Gaza: Urgent Statement from CEOs of Humanitarian…

Oxfam Media Release We are appalled by the harrowing developments in Rafah, Gaza’s…

Joe Biden: The Damnation of Age

He was sweet and well meaning, but he was old. He was…

Revealed: Properties in nature's firing line

With Australians enduring intense climate-related disasters during the past five years, analysts…

Outbound Train

By James Moore “The two most powerful warriors are patience and time.” -…


Would you like a Swastika with your Lamington Slice?

The Supreme Court in Britain has solved the conundrum of our age and we can all go back to watching the Block or the Bachelorette without the nagging worry about bakers and gay cakes: what a relief!

A judge of Britain’s Supreme Court has upheld an Appeal from a baker who refused to incorporate the message “Support Gay Marriage” on a cake he was making for a gay couple.

The judgement stated inter alia that: “Nobody should be forced to have or express a political opinion in which he does not believe.”

Simple really, isn’t it?

It was never in dispute that it remains unlawful to discriminate against a customer based on that customer’s sexual, religious, political or any other personal belief or attribute: you just can’t do that. But, if the customer wants you to incorporate a message on the cake that is personally objectionable to the baker based on a well-founded and conscientious belief he or she holds, then it is absolutely the right of the baker to refuse to lift his or her piping-bag to comply with your wishes.

So, let’s assume for the sake of argument that you are a left-handed, lesbian, line-dancer with a fetish for little men with odd moustaches and snappy salutes and you request that your lamington slice be fashioned in the shape of a swastika with the legend ‘Heil Hitler’ etched across it in hundreds and thousands. The baker is well within his or her rights to refuse to do so if he or she is not a fan of the main proponent of an Aryan master-race. However, that is the only basis on which you can be denied service. If you select the default lamington slice with no adornments, your personal characteristics and attributes cannot stand between you and your chosen chocolate and coconut treat.

Now, it can get complicated. If for instance you go into your local bakery and ask for a three-tiered, iced wedding cake with two little men (or two little ladies) on top. The baker may stop you right there and is justified, on this British Supreme Court ruling, to say to you: ‘no problems with the cake, sport, no problems with the three tiers and the icing but I will not, for religious and reasons of conscience place two blokes on the top: one bloke or one bloke and a lady or one bloke and a dog, at a pinch, but not two blokes’. So, we have a problem but not one that is insoluble.

A progressive baker with his eye on the bottom-line could, for instance, place a cardboard box near the front door to the shop with an assortment of little Lego type people and he could look the other way or get on with fashioning the swiss-rolls while you select your chosen adornments: who’s to say what you may choose and it’s got nothing to do with the baker or anybody but you!

Bakers are not the gatekeepers of our society, you may well say but they have the right at law to discriminate when it comes to promulgating a belief which they do not share. There are however degrees of what is acceptable to the reasonable baker and his conscience. For instance, if you order an apple-crumble and ask for the message ‘Peter Dutton Rocks !‘ piped across it, it is quite reasonable for the baker to refuse to do so. Not because apple crumbles don’t lend themselves to icing but because the statement is patently untrue and misleading.

Now that we’ve sorted that one we can get back to the Bachelorette and ask the question that is troubling the nation: why do these blokes all have tight little suits? Did their Mum throw them in the washing machine and have they shrunk? And what happened to their socks, could they still be lurking in the washer?

A conundrum for another day, perhaps?


Login here Register here
  1. Ro Bailey

    If someone asked me for a cake with “Peter Dutton Rocks” on it I would refuse to do it.

  2. josephus

    What a mindless, trivial episode this legal dispute indeed is. If one of the two love birds can hold an icing piper thingo then he can ice the darned cake can’t he? Or they can ask a friend, say a black lesbian line dancer who likes baking, to do it for them.
    Thank you for making me laugh but really, the planet is warming – all over the world icebergs are melting and hurricanes blow, but this couple can think of nothing better to do than sue a bigot?

  3. New England Cocky

    Now josephus, you have to distract the masses from recognising that the conservative forces in England are attempting a return to a 19th century agricultural economy because the European bankers have screwed over Maggie May in the Brexit negotiations, to wrest control of the lucrative inter-banking business for Brussels, the German banks and their US sponsor banks.

    I think the Brits got it correct with this judgment. If you cannot work with one baker, find another tradesman you can work with and get on with the job.

    Playing politically correct legal games is a costly big wank. I hope cost followed the event and the original plaintiffs are required to meet all the baker’s legal costs.

  4. helvityni

    Thanks, but no thanks to Swastika, and to the slice of Lamington as well…..Almost one-quarter of children and two-thirds of adults are overweight or obese, and rates continue to rise….

    Be an individual, say no to wedding cakes as well… you’ll survive.

  5. king1394

    My daughter had a salt and pepper shaker on top of her wedding cake – they happened to be shaped like doves and looked very nice. She put them there herself. We’ve no idea what the baker might have thought

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page