Mangroves: environmental guardians of our coastline

University of South Australia Media Release They are the salt-tolerant shrubs that thrive…

Tuvalu, Climate Change and the Metaverse

When lost to climatic disaster and environmental turbulence, where does a whole…

Nats Vote No OR When You're Standing At…

It's sort of interesting that just a few days ago we had…

Was Amtrak Joe derailed?

By 2353NM Prior to becoming President, Joe Biden was a US Senator for…

Football Capitulates at Qatar

It did not take much. The initial promises of protest from a…

Thanks To Dan Andrews I Got My First…

Just to be clear here, I didn't get it at the polling…

Democracy Tested

The only defence that we, the people, have against an arrogant leader…

Promises, Promises, Promises

What's a promise or, more specifically, an election promise? Is it a…

«
»
Facebook

Vague Alternatives and G7 Summitry: The Build Back Better World Initiative

Summits often feature grand statements and needless fripperies. In Cornwall, the leaders of the G7 countries were trying to position and promote their relevance as the vanguard of democratic good sense and values. They, the message went, remained relevant, valuable and essential to the order of the earth, despite challenges posed by the autocrats.

Never let contradiction get in the way of such a united front. Babbling about liberal democratic values matters little when it comes to crusty realpolitik. The UK and the US continue to supply armaments to their favourite theocracy, Saudi Arabia, even as they take issue with Russia and Chinese actions they deem aggressive, cruel or authoritarian. Germany’s position on dealing with Russia remains distinct within the grouping, not least on the issue of energy politics and the Nord Stream 2 gas project. Nor does the G7 necessarily share the same attitude in dealing with China, each having had its slant in coping with Beijing’s actions in recent years.

The China Syndrome has produced some form of united response at the summit. Welcome, then, to the Build Back Better World (B3W) initiative. This will entail, according to a White House factsheet, “a values-driven, high-standard, and transparent infrastructure partnership led by the major democracies to help narrow the $40+ trillion infrastructure need in the developing world, which has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.” The initiative will also involve “the G7 and other like-minded partners” coordinating and mobilising “private-sector capital in four areas of focus – climate, health and health security, digital technology, and gender equity and equality – with catalytic investments from our respective development finance institutions.”

A senior official in the Biden administration told Reuters that, “This is not just about confronting or taking on China. But until now we haven’t offered a positive alternative that reflects our values, our standards and our way of doing business.”

Since 2013, President Xi Jinping’s multi-billion-dollar Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has niggled the sphere of influence watchers. While the developed world went into something of an investment coma after the Great Recession of 2007-9, notably in developing economies, China took its wallet out. Attached conditions to the investment would be few; questions about human rights, freedoms and business transparency would not be obstacles. As this was happening, high-income states went into chatter mode while keeping their shut purses, formulating principles for quality infrastructure investments.

The BRI infrastructure program, currently featuring 2,600 projects, is China’s geopolitical bridge to developing states, linking Beijing through an assortment of road, maritime and rail projects. These include the $100 billion China-Myanmar Economic Corridor, and the $62 billion China Pakistan Economic Corridor. Over time, the initiative has moved into 5G technologies and fiberoptic networks.

The BRI initiative is also a way of jostling out countries long presumptuous about keeping their backyard free of competition. (Australia, for instance, has shown alarm that its long-standing position as Pacific bruiser and charity giver is facing dethroning.) And it has worried recipient states initially warmed by Chinese offers of investment. In 2016, Pakistani Senator Tahir Mashhadi, chairman of the Senate Standing Committee on Planning and Development, issued a warning. “Another East India Company is in the offing; national interests are not being protected. We are proud of the friendship between Pakistan and China, but the interests of the state should come first.”

The G7 states have been doing much head scratching as to how to rival and blunt the BRI. In 2019, the Trump administration, along with Japan and Australia, suggested their own counter: the Blue Dot Network, the principles of which underpin B3W. The BDN initiative seeks to promote “equality infrastructure investment that is open and inclusive, and transparent, economically viable, financially, environmentally sustainable and compliant with international standards, laws, and regulations.” The inaugural meeting of the Blue Dot Network’s Executive Consultation Group took place on June 7.

While not specifically referencing the BDN (anything deemed worthy by President Donald Trump is to be assimilated rather than acknowledged), US President Joe Biden has been making regular sprays about, as he told reporters in March, establishing “a similar initiative coming from the democratic states, helping those communities around the world.”

In April, Biden and his Japanese counterpart, Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga, met to discuss “practical commitments” in establishing an alternative to BRI projects. There was a special emphasis on promoting and protecting “the technologies that will maintain and sharpen our competitive edge” based on “democratic norms that we both share – norms set by democracies, not autocracies.”

Cornwall has become the site for similar assurances. The B3W is all about, as the Biden administration claims, “offering a higher-quality choice.” The choice will be offered “with self-confidence … that reflects our shared values.” Kaush Arha, who worked as the US G7 sherpa for the Blue Dot Network in 2020, sees the way paved “for BDN to earn the endorsement of the G7” and feature at the 26th United Nations Climate Change Conference of the Parties in November.

The details of this new plan, for all its claims to transparency, remain opaque. In the first place, it places strong emphasis on private sector contributions that are supposedly drawn in an open, accountable manner. Robert Daly, director of the Wilson Centre’s Kissinger Institute on China and the United States asks the question “whether this is going to be actually new funding, new capacity to build infrastructure in the region, or is this a repurposing and repackaging of resources that are also available.” Eventually, the participating powers will have to show the money.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

 396 total views,  2 views today

7 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Jack Cade

    Curly Larry and Moe stood aside to plan an invasion of Taiwan.

  2. Phil Pryor

    It’a nauseous sight, our Pustular Misfit posing out on the fringe of a big lad’s meeting, a mere flea on the tail…and the big chaps are not able to agree on much in betweeen pointless posing about mights and ifs and buts. The quality of Merkel will be missed and not replaced. Talk of an Indo-Pacific discussion is laughable, for the USA has its weaponry, its stolen Diego Garcia and its Guam. Biden has a bit to do to Untrump the shitpile still oozing. The “west” will not and cannot undo anything much of China’s BRI ideas and plans, physically, geographically, financially, in strategy or action. As for Australia under this coating of conservative cloacals being a large scale Indo-Pacific godfather, Hah! We fail at bushfires and plagues, climate policy, taxation, etc…

  3. wam

    I would imagine private companies with access to public funds, will be selected?
    To my thinking when india and china make a himalaya pact and work on africa, south america and eastern europe, the G7, if it isn’t already, will be irrelevant without the ASIAN 2.

  4. Zathras

    Apart from the obvious posturing and traditional grand announcements from the G7+ the reality is that we can barely fund our own infrastructure in this post-COVID environment let alone splash money around at other countries.

    Add that to the typical selfish Australian “look after ourselves first” before sending money to foreign countries ethos I can imagine the blowback at the ballot box from those die-hards, If it doesn’t buy votes money won’t be spent and further antagonising China will hurt us even more.

  5. Harry Lime

    If this latest photo op,lame duck gabfest doesn’t convince anyone we’re on the road to shit creek, nothing will.The Liar of course,will return as the all conquering hero,having achieved precisely nothing but the enhancement of his reputation as a bloviating dickhead.On the upside,Chinese language courses should experience a surge in demand.The global cataclysm has already started,further confirmed by an anachronistic gong to that deceitful hag from sky in the dark.
    Happy not-Betty’s birthday.

  6. Phil Pryor

    Mon., a m., and the political posing pontificators are departing from the G 7 show, all front and little forehead. Joris Bonker loved it, with endless witty attempts to reduce attention from vital matters, and Joe Who got near adulation for not being the Great Unwiped Orange Orifice. As for our professional liar, he floated on the fringes of the pot, making brainless assertions and getting a laugh for dismal dithering on vaccination, climate policy, humanitarian outlook and for pretending unthespianly. Meanwhile the local awards were handed down in a continuum from William the Conquering Murderer and Thief, with a royalty approved list of saints, who and why nominees, more sluts than ever and some of those seemed to be actual traitors to Australia and its real interests. But, it’s the age of thieves, heartless individuals, conservative conspirators, devious donors, pushy political perverts, advertising anuses, media maggots, all of whom unfaily tarnish the good community workers, professional and dedicated achievers, honest few deserving leaders. Harry shares his views and they are right on…

  7. GL

    Can anyone guess where Saint Scotty has put his trumpet (hint, it’s not his mouth) about “Prime Minister Scott Morrison says the leaders of G7 nations have a “strong level of support” for the stand Australia has taken against China…”

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-06-14/morrison-g7-leaders-back-australia-stand-on-china/100212798

    Of course the G7 leaders have not pressured him about climate and climate change, they know a great big thick plank when they see one.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: