Unnecessary Fussing: China, the United States and APEC

The parents on the global stage of power are bickering and now,…

The APEC Aftermath: Learning from the Statecraft of…

By Denis BrightTensions were always anticipated at the APEC in Port Moresby.…

How do you argue with that?

In order to progress sensible policy direction in this country, it is…

The corrupt cat of capitalism

It’s out of the bag …. the corrupt cat of capitalism ...…

Progressive reform in a populist era

By Stephen FitzgeraldHaving a progressive agenda with greater equality leads to higher…

Charges Under Seal: US Prosecutors Get Busy With…

Those with a stake in the hustling racket of empire have little…

Cause and Effect

Recently Fairfax media published an article written by Steve Robson, a professor and current President…

Which bank just screwed pensioners - again?

Commonwealth Bank Reneges on Reverse Mortgages for PensionersBy Phil Gorman“Equity Unlock Loan…

«
»
Facebook

The Saudi Arabian Model: Blueprints for Murder and Purchasing Arms

It reads like a swaying narrative of retreat. A man’s body is subjected to a gruesome anatomical fate, his parts separated by a specially appointed saw doctor – an expert in the rapid autopsy – overseen by a distinctly large number of individuals.  Surveillance cameras had improbably failed that day. We are not sure where, along the line, the torturers began their devilish task: the diligent beating punctuated by questions, followed by the severing of fingers, or perhaps a skipping of any formalities. One Turkish investigator sniffing around the Saudi consulate in Istanbul saw such handiwork “like a Tarantino film.”

The result was clear enough: the Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi went into the Saudi embassy on October 2 and never came out alive. (Even an attempt of the gathered crew of death to procure a Khashoggi double was noted.)

For aspiring authoritarians, the Saudi state is a model instructor. First came blanket denial to the disappearance: the Saudi authorities had no idea where the journalist had gone after October 2. On October 18, Riyadh officially acknowledged Khashoggi’s death. By October 21, Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir had come to the conclusion that this had, in fact, been murder, and a mistake. “This was an operation where individuals ended up exceeding the authorities and responsibilities they had”.

Then, an improbable story of a fist fight developed through the media channels. (When one has to kill, it is best to regard the enemy as inappropriately behaved when they dare fight back.) In the presence of 15 Saudi operatives, this was all richly incredulous – but the Kingdom does specialise in baffling and improbable cruelties.

It was clear that distancing was fundamental, hence the cultivation of the “rogue” theory, with Saudi operatives taking a merry trip off the beaten path. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan was happy to pour water on the suggestion. “We have strong evidence in our hands that shows the murder wasn’t accidental but was instead the outcome of a planned operation.” It had been executed “in a ferocious manner”.

The Turkish president has, however, danced around the issue of ultimate state sanctioned responsibility. Neither King Salman, nor Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), have been publicly outed in any statements as either showing awareness of the killing or ordering it. Prince MBS and his father are happy to keep it that way, severing their links with the killing as assuredly as the killers had severed the journalist’s fingers. This is evidenced by the Crown Prince’s own labelling of the act as a “heinous crime that cannot be justified”.

The Saudi Public Prosecutor has also decided to move the case from one of accidental killing (fist fights will do that sort of thing) to one of planned murder. A bit of cosmetic housecleaning has been taking place (another authoritarian lesson: look busy, seem engaged with heavy concern): 18 people have been arrested and two advisers sacked by the Saudi state. The Crown Prince, according to the official Saudi Press Agency, has chaired the first meeting of a committee established to reform the country’s intelligence services.

This authoritarian blueprint also implies a staying power in the face of other states who see Saudi Arabia as cash cow and security partner. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has a rich appetite for foreign arms, a point not missed on the weapons makers of the globe. Some attrition is bound to take place: certain countries, keen to keep their human rights credentials bright and in place, will temporarily suspend arms sales. Others will simply claim disapproval but continue leaving signatures on the relevant contracts of sale.

Some ceremonial condemnations have been registered.  Members of the European Parliament voted upon a non-binding resolution on Thursday to “impose an EU-wide arms embargo on Saudi Arabia.” Germany, temporarily concerned, has suspended arms sales to the House of Saud, with Chancellor Angela Merkel deeming the Khashoggi killing “monstrous”. Canada’s Justin Trudeau briefly pondered what to do with a lucrative defence contract with Riyadh worth $12 billion, only to then step back.

The Canadian prime minister did acknowledge that the killing of Khashoggi “is something that is extremely preoccupying to Canadians, to Canada and to many of our allies around the world” but has not made good any threats. His predecessor has become the ideal alibi. “The contract signed by the previous government, by Stephen Harper, makes it very difficult to suspend or leave that contract.” Cancellation would lead to penalties which, in turn, would affect the Canadian tax payer.  How fortunate for Trudeau.

France, the United Kingdom and the United States remain the three biggest suppliers of military hardware to the kingdom, a triumvirate of competitors that complicates any effective embargo. Which state, after all, wants to surrender market share? It’s a matter of prestige, if nothing else. President Donald Trump’s reaction is already clear: a suitably adjusted lid will be deployed to keep things in check till matters blow over; in the meantime, nothing will jeopardise a $110 billion arms deal. Business with a theocracy can be patriotic.

The French angle has been reserved and coldly non-committal. “Weapons exports to Saudi Arabia are examined in this context,” claimed foreign ministry deputy spokesman Olivier Gauvin, meaning that his country’s arms control policy was made on a case-by-case basis. For France, keeping Riyadh in stiff opposition to Tehran’s regional ambitions has been a matter of importance in its Middle Eastern policy for decades, a point reiterated by President Emmanuel Macron in April. And the Kingdom pays French arms exporters well: between 2008 and 2017, Saudi Arabia proved the second biggest purchaser of French arms (some 11 billion euros), with 2017 being a bumper year with licenses coming to 14.7 billion euros. Riyadh can expect little change there.

Britain’s Theresa May, in the tradition of elastic British diplomacy (condemnation meets inertia), has insisted that her government already has the appropriately stringent rules on arms exports, another way of shunning any European resolution that might perch on human rights. Such strictness evidently does not preclude the eager oil sheiks of Riyadh, though Britain’s foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt did suggest the Khashoggi killing, should it “turn out to be true” would be “fundamentally incompatible with our values and we will act accordingly.” Such actions are bound to be symbolic – much money has been received by the British arms industry, with earnings of £4.6 billion coming from sales to the Kingdom since the Saudi-led war on Yemen began in 2015. Sowing death, even if through the good agency of a theocratic power, is lucrative.

The fate of Khashoggi, cruel and ghastly, seems a piddle of insignificance in that light.  “Brexit,” urged Philippe Lamberts, MEP and leader of the Group of the Greens, “must not be an excuse for the UK to abdicate on its moral responsibilities.” That abdication, on the part of Britain and its arms competitors, took place sometime ago.


6 comments

  1. Christopher J. Ward

    I trust you will forgive me for saying that this is a very good article but viewed from a professional standpoint, it is obvious that the Saudi embassy in Ankara was effectively bugged, probably by Turkish intelligence. Therefore, it appears that the whole grisly business has been well recorded in for a change that Erdoğan was well and truly informed of events. Dealing with Saudi Arabia and Iran appear to be well-nigh insoluble problems for the US government but I think we are overlooking the fact that Khashoggi was never some type of pro-Western activist. There is sufficient evidence to convince me that he was a Muslim Brotherhood fanatic but that is not justification for his murder or execution. For some reason, the mainstream press wants to look at this business as being an assassination, where patently it was no such thing. I think the facts speak for themselves and that a Saudi team flew into Turkey in numbers: 15 is the number bandied about and that included, to our shame, a medical person, trained in Melbourne. I hesitate to call him a doctor. It is high time that our government pulls back from any engagement with Saudi Arabia let alone providing any military assistance. For many years, I have been absolutely disgusted that we are paying such a high price of petrol/diesel because of the international oil cartels. The US does not need Saudi oil and petroleum products: perhaps it’s time for our population to be put ahead of any international relations with the Sau’d regime.

  2. Phil

    Looking at the mind boggling expenditure for global arms sales, there can be no doubt that humanity is stark raving mad.

  3. helvityni

    When mammon rules, then the arms-selling countries keep their morals and diplomacy ‘elastic’….Et tu, Trudeau !

    When it comes to making money, we can’t worry about a killing of one journalist…Arms means war…killing…

    Shades of Tarantino film indeed.

  4. Zathras

    Trump’s first international visit as President was to Saudi Arabia where he received a medal and participated in some sort of sword dance.

    He then claimed he made a big arms deal with them but in fact it was Obama’s existing deal that was “on hold” pending investigation into human rights abuses in Yemen. Trump just reactivated the deal and made it look like it was a new one and claimed credit.

    The US invasion of Iraq was largely to placate Saudi’s fear of invasion by Iraq after the Kuwait incident.

    However, as well as being a good weapons-buying customer the main reason for the US support of Saudi Arabia is down to the importance of the Petrodollar which maintains the value of the $US and as long as OPEC continues this arrangement, all is OK for both sides.

    That’s why the US conveniently turns a blind eye to the excesses and atrocities carried out by the Saudis and continues to support them and is therefore complicit in many of the things they do.

    This latest event will be little more than an embarrassment and will result in business as usual. Expect another distraction from elsewhere and this incident will soon be forgotten.

  5. paul walter

    The ultimate example of Imperialism, where the local kleptocrats keep the loot repatriated to the mother formation in return for not being replaced themselves.

    Changed little since Cicero’s time in Cilicia and two thousand years ago.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: