Democracy Tested

The only defence that we, the people, have against an arrogant leader…

Promises, Promises, Promises

What's a promise or, more specifically, an election promise? Is it a…

Coming to Terms with Floods of Challenges

By Denis Bright Finton Magee’s Street Art on the railway underpass at Merivale…

Victorian Election: Liberals under siege from extremist religious…

The Victorian election is a mess. This is the product of the…

Silicon Valley Fake: Elizabeth Holmes and the Fraudster’s…

It has been one noisy time for the paladins of big tech.…

Opinion Polls OR If I Raced Usain Bolt…

Costello Media told us that the two major parties in the Victorian…

A view of Trump from Down Under

The news that former President Trump would be standing for the position…

Greed is the problem, not workers

Of course, The Australian republished Andy Kessler’s ridiculous Wall Street Journal column,…

«
»
Facebook

The Bond Vigilantes Get Busy

While the levels of schadenfreude will be going through the roof given the unfolding farce in British politics, the resignation of Liz Truss as UK Prime Minister was troubling in one vital respect. True, her juvenile salad understanding of economics, which involved spending billions on tax cuts and energy subsidies, was lamentable. To cope with the beast of aggressive inflation, she was advocating a policy that would feed it.

Then came the not-very-invisible hand of the market, which decided to throttle her government and its policies with petulance. While the vigilantes of the market have, depending on the occasion, burst into song at the announcement of tax cuts, thereby stimulating growth, the reaction was far different this time. Trussonomics had the effect of sending a spike in bond yields so serious it threatened the British pension system. The pound also received a mighty battering.

In one vital respect, this was yet another savaging blow for democratic, or at least representative control vis-à-vis the market. Never mind what those silly politicians do, the buccaneers in London City and Wall Street and other such engine rooms of finance know better. They, not the world’s treasuries, can dictate policy for the commonweal by driving up borrowing costs. Central banks the world over are also complying, implementing monetary policy aligned with the bond market.

With the sacking of Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng and his replacement in the resurrected form of Jeremy Hunt, the task of appeasing the bond vigilantes, a term minted by economist Ed Yardeni in the 1980s, gathered pace. Hunt even went so far as to announce a few Economic Advisory Council consisting of Rupert Harrison, former chief of staff of ex-Chancellor George Osborne; former Bank of England members Sushil Wadhwani and Gertjan Vlieghe; and JPMorgan strategist Karen Ward.

As Yardeni puts it, the bond vigilantes, active in the 1980s and early 1990s, went into something of a hibernation, largely because of subdued rates of inflation, negative interest rate policies and quantitative easing. They terrorised such figures as President Bill Clinton into throwing out a promise of tax cuts and cheered the arrival of Robert Rubin from Goldman Sachs who insisted that budgetary restraint was needed to keep interest rates on US government bonds low.

It was such threatening conduct that inspired Clinton’s political advisor James Carville to revise his assessment on what he would like to return as were reincarnation possible. Initially, he had thought of returning as president, the Pope, or a .400 baseball hitter. “But now I want to come back as the bond market. You can intimidate everybody.”

Along with others, Yardeni remarks that the stimulative fiscal and monetary policies implemented in response to the pandemic saw inflation “roaring back in 2021 and 2022 forcing central banks to tighten their monetary policies, while fiscal policies continued to run amok.”

In truth, the bond vigilantes were already poking around at the first stirrings of the Global Financial Crisis in 2007, taking issue with the way countries were handling the debt crisis. Those keen on austerity and severe budgets, Ireland being notable among them, were given different treatment to those governments needing to raise funds to prop up much needed stimulus programs.

The tragicomic irony of Truss’s demise was how it proved to be the logical outcome of the ideological script she and her colleagues had contemplated in the previous decade. Along with her friend, colleague and ultimately sacked Chancellor Kwarteng, the animal virtues of rampant market freedom were qualities to be praised. In Britannia Unchained, a 2012 tract that never ceases in its oddness and inaccuracies, the image is one of freedom from bureaucracy and the swiping freedom of markets. They urge the invigorating “frontier spirit” to fight the “risk-averse society” that had come to shackle Britain. They praise the risk-taking venture capitalists as ingenious libertarians.

At the core of such a misreading is the steadfast refusal to accept that the market is a set of relationships and decisions, many linked through public and private investments and ventures. Far from being an expansive, unaccountable force to be worshipped, the market is the sum set of policies that involves, rather than rejects, the role of government.

Such capitalist phenomena as Silicon Valley and the Big Tech Wonderland arose precisely because of government support through contracts and state-funded research, with much of the impetus coming from the US military. The venture capitalist tends to wait for the seed to take root before swooping in. Jacob Soll of the University of Southern California also remarks that even such a “self-styled libertarian” figure as Tesla CEO Elon Musk received an enormous government hand to the value of US$6 billion worth in contracts, with another US$6 billion in electric-vehicle rebates. This is not to mention billions more in terms of grants, loans and $US60 million in subsidies from the state of Texas.

Unfortunately for Truss, her own neoliberal nonsense, ill-informed and historically inaccurate, ended up hoisting her. Her belief in the correcting market, as opposed to a correcting government policy, was so profound it destroyed her brief premiership. In a very true sense, she got her just desserts. Democracy, however, did not.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

 2,212 total views,  4 views today

5 comments

Login here Register here
  1. RomeoCharlie29

    Binoy, I am not an economist and have ne economic credentials which, I suppose, gives me as much right to comment as anyone else. Yesterday saw Lowe and the RBA lift interest rates again to curb that nasty inflation. But it’s not working. I wonder when Lowe and his henchpeople will realise that, absent significant wage increases, their policies are only hurting those they profess to want to protect. Because interest rate increases and petrol prices — two major household costs — aren’t included in the CPI, it has become a distorted metric and is not fit for the purpose it is used for: calculating inflation and determining such things as pension increases. It isn’t only liberal/national governments whose policies distort the economic situation, the new ( much hoped for) Laborgovernment turns out to be not much different from its predecessor. It refuses to increase Jobseeker, despite having agreed (in Opposition) it needed action; it continues to give the fossil fuel industry subsidies ;: despite having savaged the Coalition over its refugee detention regimes, it now pursues the same reprehensible conduct; despite lip-service opposition to whistleblower persecution it continues to pursue McBride; it’s pursuit of tax evaders is lukewarm at best; its action against the greedy, money grubbing gas producers (those making huge profits from OUR resource) is late and timorous and finally all or most of the big ticket benefits are off in the future. I didn’t vote for a Labor wimpfest, I voted in the hope that the small target was a ploy, designed not to scare the horses, and once the election was won we would see the hairy-chested Tory killer Albanese said he was. Instead I am seeing an appeaser, even apparently prepared to water down the national ICAC legislation because Dutton (and some of his own people) are worried about public hearings. Jim Chalmers is a nice bloke but we don’t need ‘nice’ we need a fighter prepared to grab the economy by the scruff of its neck and shake it until the bludgers in the money markets, the fossil fuel industries, the wage thieving employers, the business and investment property owning profiteers and the tax evaders start to pay their debts. We want to see the homeless housed, those living in poverty given a living wage, and the vast middle class sharing the profits, not further exacerbating the economic inequality now being felt. In short I want to see a traditional Labor government supporting its people.

  2. Harry Lime

    RC 29,you ain’t on your Pat Malone,excellent post.

  3. wam

    The name’s ‘bond, profit bond’, rates stirred and shaken. Licenced to get subsidised government money and free to avoid tax responsibilities. ps albo can’t support the traditional people because it wasn’t in their campaign promises.

  4. New England Cocky

    @ RC 29: Agreed. I am rapidly losing faith in the unwillingness of the Albanese LABOR government to tackle any of the major economic and social disasters created since that snivelling little rat Johnnie Howard corrupted the egalitarian model of Australia.

  5. Clakka

    About the blood-suckers, well said – a big tick. And of course, ‘hopes and prayers’ nor bandaid solutions will cut it. We need focussed fiscal action, not monetary shenanigans.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: