It has always been my hope that I…

Peter Dutton, unopposed. We need a girly thing to be Deputy to win…

Dutton is not what this country needs, even…

If Peter Dutton is the best the Liberals can offer as an…

Morrison reaped what he had sown

Writing this a couple of days after the most important election in…

Reality bites

By 2353NM Every political commentator in the land has their own personal opinion,…

Why We Should Ignore Women And Greenies!

Let me imagine that my wife tells me that she's leaving me…

And so it came to pass

And so it came to pass that truth persisted, hope survived and…

Election 2022: Prospects for a New Multidimensional Era?

By Denis Bright Election 2022 is more than a Labor victory. It opens…

The Great Teal Tsunami: Arise Australia’s Independents

Rarely in Australian history has a governing party suffered such loss in…

«
»
Facebook

Surrender, Accommodation and RATs

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test has been the mainstay of COVID-19 testing. But reliance upon such a regime, which requires the administration of middlingly competent personnel at appropriate testing sites, has caused its fair share of global disruption.

The dreaded queue, where one waits for hours only to be possibly turned away for capacity reasons, is one such manifestation. During this latest phase of COVID-19 infections – that of Omicron – these human lines have spawned with inexorable force. In Australia, where the queue is worshipped by the country’s good burghers, something near a paralysis is being experienced in terms of time taken to do the test, await the result and be in isolation.

Omicron’s arrival on the virology scene has caused a shift in public health strategy across numerous countries. As the Washington Post remarks, the world’s nations “are making a subtle but consequential pivot in their war against the coronavirus: Crushing the virus is no longer the strategy. Many countries are just hoping for a draw.” Zero-covid strategists still lurk, but they are mainly found in the halls of power in Beijing, which still insists that cities can be locked down with violent spontaneity.

The popular mantra now is that of living with SARS-CoV-2, as if it were a difficult neighbour prone to throwing rubbish over the fence from time to time or steal low hanging fruit. There will be difficulties; there will be disputes. The nastier effects will be ameliorated, or at the very least moderated.

This was certainly the long-held approach of the financially minded policymakers, who tended to see public health in terms of tolerable deaths (if the elderly shuffle off the mortal coil, that’s no great loss, their time having come) and tolerable, self-assessed risk. The Swedish model became something of an exemplar on this, keeping some restrictions in place while permitting the society and economy to remain, for the most part, open.

Many European states also adopted such a policy by stealth, even before the advent of vaccines. In September 2020, bioethicist Effy Vayena of ETH Zurich noticed “a big shift in focus. What we’re seeing now in Switzerland is people getting used to the idea of living in a risk society. We’re asking: ‘how do we live with this?’”

The arrival of vaccines added impetus to arguments from market planners and open society preachers that the shackles had to be removed, and the virus, to some degree, received with caution. Finally, there was a viral exit strategy. There was just one problem: no COVID-19 vaccine guarantees immunity. Infections and transmissibility remain realities.

While the easing of the clenched fist in response to COVID-19 is hard to dismiss given the mind-numbing exhaustion and enervation of lockdowns and social restrictions since the early part of 2020, complacency remains the most looming threat: letting down one’s guard, abandoning the prudence of sanitation, the wearing of masks, or physically distancing.

For Maria Van Kerkhove, epidemiologist at the World Health Organization, the issue is almost melodramatically clear. “This notion of learning to live with it, to me, has always meant a surrendering, a giving up.” Angela Rasmussen, a virologist based at the University of Saskatchewan, also looks at the issue in terms of battles and games. “I understand the temptation to say, ‘I give up, it’s too much.’ Two years is a lot. Everybody’s sick of it. I hate this. But it doesn’t mean actually the game is lost.”

In Australia, the government, as part of its philosophy of making people more tolerant of the virus, is pressing for a more flexible testing regime regarding COVID-19. The flawed, somewhat presumptuous practice of relying on people to be independent and sound on the issue of their health, has become popular. Leave it to them, for instance, to conduct their own COVID-19 tests at home with unnerving accuracy.

Sociologist Alan Peterson is rather gloomy about the whole shift of responsibility from barely competent State to the overly burdened citizenry. “Making individuals responsible for testing (or ‘home-testing’) with RATs [rapid antigen tests], with little knowledge of when best and how to test, and the limitations of testing, leaves much scope for interpretation and error.”

The effectiveness of RATs, notably on the issue of picking up traces of Omicron, has also become a source of unwanted excitement. The US Food and Drug Administration did much to stir the pot with a statement released at the end of last December: “Early data suggests that antigen tests do detect the omicron variant but may have reduced sensitivity.”

With such hope vested in rapid antigen tests, there has been a run on the market. As with the initial problems with acquiring adequate mask fittings, supplies are snapped up at a moment’s notice. There have been price hikes of such order as to concern the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), with RATs retailing anywhere from AU$20 to $30 to an extortionate $AU70. (The wholesale costs for the tests range from $AU3.95 to AU$11.45.)

In the United States, that hefty bosom of private enterprise, money is being made on bogus at-home testing kits. The FDA warned this month that “fake and unauthorized at-home testing kits are popping up online as opportunistic scammers take advantage of a spike in demand.”

Certain countries have averted that problem by imposing price caps and providing RATs gratis to the populace in massive numbers, but Australia, where a certain predatory will to extort the highest price for the most menial service reigns, the matter is more muddled. Hope can prove costly.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

 60 total views,  4 views today

9 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Jack Cade

    When I heard that there AFP were going to investigate the price gouging of RAT, my immediate thought was ‘they’re obviously confident no Coalition sponsors or cronies have been at it’.
    That’s what they have done to us.

  2. James Robert LEONARD

    Jack Cade
    It’s more likely that sponsors and cronies won’t be punished – in a sort of selective prosecution process.
    This is, after all, happening largely because the prime minister didn’t want to undercut the pharmacy industry, and it’s primarily large pharmacy franchise groups where the unconscionable price gouging is occurring. And don’t forget his god only loves prosperous people and this will help our less honest pharmacists to prosper.

  3. corvusboreus

    Methinks the AFP will most likely be directed to focus their investigations on finding some grifter-gang of ‘brownish-boys-with-funny-names’ who have boosted a few Chemist Warehouses, so that a Current Affair can get some good footage of a few stereotypes getting nabbed.

    Or am I over-stooping?

  4. New England Cocky

    @Jack Cade: I guess it is a little like the Hell$inger$ Choru$ Fe$tival ”Church/cult $ervice” that was excluded fom the provisions of the Health Order. But who cares … When Hell$inger$ Choru$ includes Police Commissioner Mick ”the Garbage Man” Fuller as a paid up member who will protect ”the work of the cult/church” as well as the Pope has protected the kiddie fiddling paedophile priests?

  5. Michael Taylor

    GL, it’s all part of the “let it rip” plan.

    It works so well, so why change it? How else are we going to reach herd immunity unless everyone gets Covid?

    On a more serious note: this is crazy. Absolutely gobsmacking crazy. They will next be saying; “Come back, Djokovic, all is forgiven.”

  6. corvusboreus

    GL,
    To me the dullardest facet of the poly-subcompetent phuqtardiocy within those moves is the halving of post-infection isolation time from a fortnight to 7 days, especially given mutability of longevity twixt variant strains, existent and potential emergent.

    40 days is a quarantine.
    14 days is a quatorzine.
    7 days is a week.

  7. GL

    The more they yell and scream and threaten anyone who says that Scummo and Crony Co. Inc. are lying about RAT’s with “penalties” the more the whole thing stinks.

    https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/huge-new-claim-in-seized-rapid-test-saga/news-story/001908a9d0f0e5ec62fa1b5877be4367

    DoPe is so full of Scummo’s excess faecel matter it’s a wonder he doesn’t explode.

    https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/nsw-records-20-148-covid-19-cases-30-deaths-as-gps-shorten-child-vaccination-gap-20220122-p59qbs.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: