Put niceties aside, Albo

I was immediately taken aback when I read that the Opposition was…

Whitewashing at Shinzo Abe’s State Funeral

Be careful who you praise and the degree of zeal you do…

Why Peter Dutton Is Such A Cuddly Koala...

Interviewer: I've been told Dinsdale Piranha nailed your head to the floor. Stig:…

Australian EV Truck Manufacturer Doubles Assembly Capacity

Electric truck manufacturer SEA Electric has extended its commitment to the Australian…

Now is not the right time ...

By 2353NM Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II was buried last week with all…

Whither Constitutional Change?

Within a very short space of time, we are going to be…

Breaching Human Rights: Australia, Climate Change and the…

Australia has a mixed relationship with the United Nations Human Rights Committee. …

So Now It's Wrong To Be Racist, Eh?

Just a few short years ago, Attorney-General George Brandis assured us that…

«
»
Facebook

STRONG Economic Management And How We Take It For Granted…

Today Scott Morrison made an announcement on what the government was intending to do if re-elected:

Millions of Australians will soon save $10 per script for common medications, which means those taking one medication a month could save $120 a year, or those taking two medications a month could save $240 a year.

“Because of our strong economic management, the Coalition is winding the clock back on the cost of medications, reducing the cost per script to 2008 prices.”

Now one of the troubles with being an incumbent government is that people eventually start to pick fault with things even if they’re a good idea. “Why didn’t you do it earlier?” is a common response and to a certain extent that’s unfair because nobody can do everything all at once. However, it’s also a legitimate question, particularly when a government is saying what an excellent idea it is. If it’s so good, why wasn’t it one of your first priorities and why is it only being trotted it in an election campaign?

Notwithstanding all that, I wonder how many people noticed the way, Slippery Scotty just inserted one of the great myths of Australian politics: The superiority of the Liberals’ economic management.

I’m sure that there’ll be saying but Labor always spend too much and create debt and cause global share markets to crash and… Look, Labor just can’t manage money.

Which brings me back to Morrison’s statement about strong economic management. Because of it, he tells us, they are “winding the clock back on the cost of medications” and that we’ll have 2008 prices… Wow, isn’t that impressive?

Except for one little detail which nobody picked him up on: What the hell does he mean by “strong economic management”? I mean, his party has presided over an increase in debt to the point that it’s about to hit one trillion dollars which – to give you some perspective: If God had put a thousand dollars aside every day for Jesus to spend at the second coming, he still wouldn’t have hit the trillion dollar mark. As for the actual budget, well, it’s not in surplus and there’s no plan to have it in surplus because, like just about every problem the government sees, there’s nothing that they can do about it. It’s outside their control and they don’t hold a hose.

If a trillion dollar debt and an inability to get the budget back to surplus is STRONG economic management, what does weak economic management look like?

I envisage Labor saying that they’ll match this promise only to have some journalist ask them to tell us where the money is coming from.

Economic management – it seems – means that the Liberals can manage to get away with not being held to account on the subject of the economy because if they propose something then it must be good economics. Just like when Josh Frydenberg tells us that low unemployment is the result of the government but high prices and low wages are nothing to do with them,

And speaking of Josh…

Josh attacks the independents as fake independents at every opportunity and suggests that they are actually a party. This is quite interesting as a line of attack and seems to suggest that the idea of being part of a party is somehow wrong. I mean, while they might all be in favour of action on climate change and an integrity commission, they don’t function like a party and we could have a long debate about this, but I think there’s a stranger subtext. If, for the sake of argument, one of them said, “Yes, we are but aren’t the people criticising us also a party and don’t they have members of their party calling net zero dead so which party do people want?”

Driving around Kooyong over the past few days, it’s hard to miss enormous portable billboards on the back of trucks with Josh’s beaming face and the words “Strong economy”… They’ve cut back on the three word slogans in the interests of economy.

But I couldn’t help wonder why Josh is getting large trucks. When I ventured out this morning there was a very small car with signs encouraging us to vote for Gladys Lui.

I mean, it does seem a bit unfair. Josh gets a big truck and she gets a small car… Is this merit or just because he’s the Treasurer? Or is it because the Liberals have given up on Chisholm?

Ah well, in 21 days we’ll discover how close it really is.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

 1,648 total views,  2 views today

7 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Phil Pryor

    Morrison used to fall off the end of his knobby and sprain his oscillating wrist, so managing an actual economy by a turd who has never ever worked, failed at lying advertising, cheated and backstabbed endlessly, is totally absurd. These right wing turds cannot calculate, must employ endless lists of minders, advisors, outsourcers, “experts” (at crookedness and deviation) and other conscripts, mercenaries, accomplices, henchmen. SICK.

  2. Lurline

    It would be nice if they cut pensioners prescription prices by $10 a script, then they would’ve been paying me $3.20 per prescription instead of me paying the chemist $1000 over the first 3-4 months of each calendar year.

    Once again the liberals sound economic management means forgetting about those of us living below the poverty line.

  3. New England Cocky

    I am happy for the few Australian voters who will benefit from this extraordinary Scummo largesse that allows the beneficiaries to pay for about 24 cups of coffee at your favourite coffee shop/bar each year. Less than one coffee a week for the poor Australian voters and more than $1,000 a day for the worst Prim Monster since Federation in 1901 seems a little unbalanced without the obligatory fantasy carpark, Olympic shooting range or white elephant project for the benefit of corporate mates.

    STOP THE LIES VOTE LABOR

  4. Kerri

    Rossleigh, you are clearly in my territory. I have lost count of how many times I have seen Josh graffitied, cleaned up, graffitied again, cleaned up, graffitied again well you get the drift.
    As for Gladys, I note that her jaw has been straightened in her corflute pics?
    Her jaw is crooked due to some long ago injury that should not be regarded as a weakness for election?
    But then when your leader embraces photoshop (that 2 left feet pic?) ?
    It kind of proves Albo’s claims of image being more important than action.

  5. Terence Mills

    The international standard for employment participation has been set at ‘one hour per week’ so that all participating nations are on the same page for comparing data. It was never anticipated that this would be used as a political game as it is in Australia.

    As was recently pointed to in The Conversation there are now more people on uemployment benefits than there were before COVID struck :

    https://theconversation.com/how-can-more-people-be-on-unemployment-benefits-than-before-covid-with-fewer-unemployed-australians-heres-how-181733

  6. totaram

    Lurline: “Once again the liberals sound economic management means forgetting about those of us living below the poverty line.”
    Umm, not “forgetting”. The correct description is “deliberately ignoring”.

    Terence: You are completely correct. Hence the unimportance of that “unemployment” number, which Albo could not remember and which is supposed to show he has no idea about “the economy”. The fact that knowing about the economy can be reduced to remembering a few numbers, shows how easy it is to bamboozle and average voter. This trick is now decades old, and the voters haven’t learned anything, it seems. Sad, but not unexpected..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: