Modi’s Cricket Ploy: Hindutva as Twelfth Man

This week, the International Cricket Council’s One Day International tournament will commence…

I'm an angry bigot, in a tiny country…

My first love is satire and comedy – I used to run…

Crash and Burn

This is both optimistic and troubling. Fairfax media reports that "China has put…

The Admirable Demonstration of Dan Tehan And Other…

Apparently, Dan Tehan was on QandA last night. I only know this…

Condensed Fun Facts, Dates, Myths/Misconceptions

By Richard Whitington Fun Referendum Facts Fun Referendum Facts #1: The ballot paper for…

Cannabis: We can shut up, toe the line,…

When President Obama commented that he thought cannabis was likely less dangerous…

Corruption suspicions hang over secret PNG refugee contracts

Refugee Action Coalition Media Release AUSTALIA’S SECRET PNG DEAL MUST BE INVESTIGATED Refugee advocates…

Dianne Feinstein: National Security State Diva

The tributes for the late Democratic Senator from California, Dianne Feinstein, heaped…


See your whammy and raise you

The carbon tax has been resurrected. It’s a double whammy. No, a triple! Pensioners will freeze and manufacturers will go out of business. The cost of living will skyrocket with a great big tax on everything.

Raising the GST to 15% is, however, very sensible.

Can they not see the incongruity?

Instead of collecting over $13.5 billion from polluters, hence encouraging them to invest in energy efficiency, we are paying out over $3 billion in public subsidies through the emissions reduction fund and the Green Army.

Getting rid of the mining tax was supposed to boost investment, employment and GDP. It has done none of those things. We gave up a projected $4 billion in revenue and were then supposed to lose the increase in the Superannuation Guarantee, the low income super co-contribution, the school kids bonus, the instant asset write-off increase, accelerated depreciation on motor vehicles, the twice yearly supplement, and the tax loss carry back.

Rescinding the changes to the Fringe Benefits Tax regarding car leases was supposed to save the car industry. All it did was cost us almost $2 billion to allow people to continue to fraudulently claim business usage of their vehicle, while the manufacturers were thrown under a bus and tens of thousands of people will lose their jobs.

Cutting the corporate tax rate to 28.5% was predicted to cost the economy $4.2 billion in 2016-17.

But back to the GST.

The following is from the Senate committee that investigated the introduction of the GST back in 2000.

Impact on the Living Standards of Households

Compensation – An Introduction

2.1 The Government’s proposed Goods and Services Tax is a regressive tax. It is a flat rate tax and like all flat rate taxes the lower one’s income, the greater the negative impact of the tax on the person’s living standards. Put simply, a household earning $100,000 pays exactly the same amount of GST on the same goods and services as a household earning $10,000.

2.2 The Government’s proposed Goods and Services Tax is even more regressive. This means that lower income households will pay the same rate of tax as high income households, and will pay it on a higher proportion of their spending – a double tax whammy.

2.3 The Government acknowledges the GST is regressive in the document Tax Reform: not a new tax, a new tax system (ANTS). They propose a complex system of compensation comprising tax cuts and increases in social security payments. The compensation is also highly regressive. The tax cuts for higher income households far outweigh the increases in social security payments for lower income households. A single person earning $100,000 gets an extra $64 a week – twenty five times the weekly benefit of the poorest single person. A couple with no children earning $100,000 gets $80 a week, five times the benefit that the poorest single income family with three children gets.

2.4 Under the Government’s proposed tax changes, the top 20 per cent of income earners get 50 per cent of the benefits from the Government’s compensation package.

2.5 The Government’s tax package claims that there are no households that are made worse off. Evidence presented to the Committee leads us to strongly question the validity of this claim.

2.6 Indeed the Treasury has revised its estimate of the real price effect of the GST in the first year from 1.9 per cent to 3.1 per cent. However, Treasury uses the 1.9 per cent to produce the compensation package which means many low income individuals and families become losers. Treasury has presumed prices will fall because of a 100 per cent pass through of tax reductions. Witnesses to the Committee said that a 70 per cent pass through was a more realistic assumption. Therefore a more reasonable estimate of the price impact of the GST is between 4–5 per cent.

Those calling for the GST to be raised suggest that the regressive effect on the cost of living could be offset by lowering income tax rates and abolishing other state based taxes like motor vehicle taxes, insurance taxes and conveyancing duties.

The problem with this is that you have to be employed for lower tax rates to be of benefit and the taxes they are considering cutting are mostly used by wealthier households.

Modelling by KPMG estimated that raising the GST to 15 per cent and applying it to all goods and services would raise an extra $42.9 billion in the first year but this assumes that lower income tax rates would lead to people working more hours. This is unrealistic as there are not the jobs available.

KPMG suggested leaving the top marginal tax rate steady at 47 per cent for those earning $180,000 or more, but cutting the next bracket to a rate of 33.1 per cent from 37, the one below to 32 from 32.5 per cent and the lowest tax bracket to 13.5 from 19 per cent.

However, despite leaving the top tax rate untouched, this scenario would result in the highest 20 per cent of income earners being $1,551 a year better off, while the lowest fifth of earners would be just $273 ahead.

There may be an argument for increasing the GST but without a significant increase to welfare payments, which Joe Hockey has already told us we can’t afford, it will just send more people into poverty while mooted changes to other taxes will leave wealthier households better off – again.


Login here Register here
  1. Terry2

    Tony said at election time:

    “Let me be as categoric as I can, the GST won’t change, full stop, end of story,” Mr Abbott said repeatedly.”

    He wouldn’t go back on his word, would he ?

  2. Kaye Lee

    September 5, 2013
    The Hon Joe Hockey MP
    Shadow Treasurer
    The Hon Andrew Robb MP
    Shadow Minister for Finance, Deregulation and Debt Reduction

    Today’s announcement also confirms that the Coalition will increase spending on hospitals, schools, defence and medical research – a far cry from the deceitful lies coming from the Prime Minister and the Labor Party that the Coalition would cut health and education.

    It confirms once and for all that:
    •There are no cuts to education, health, defence or medical research;
    •There is no change to the GST;
    •There is no “$10 billion fraud” as alleged by Kevin Rudd;
    •There is no $70 billion black hole in the Coalition costings; and
    •The Coalition will deliver a better budget bottom line than Labor.

  3. Zathras

    Taxation but with with compensation – the old compassionate Safety Net scenario.

    In other words, instead of putting a fence at the top of the cliff, you park an ambulance at the bottom (and hope for the best).

  4. helvityni

    As Mark Butler said on Q&A, Abbott is getting the states to do his dirty work, he got Baird to agree with him first, hoping other states will follow.

  5. silkworm

    The push for increasing the GST has always come from the corporate sector, who use it as a means of distraction from raising corporate taxes, the obvious solution to the revenue problem.

  6. Kaye Lee

    Businesses can claim GST back so what do they care.

  7. Anomander

    Love your work Kaye.

    Please – can someone keep a list of the lunacy and damage wrought by this government, so we can publicise it far and wide when the next election is called.

    We desperately need to make sure these clowns don’t get a second term and are resigned to oblivion for decades, because that’s how long it will take to undo their destruction.

  8. Rosemary (@RosemaryJ36)

    Anomander – I think the list you ask for is in existence and has been publicised when up-dated from time to time.
    We need one of two things in the immediate future.
    EITHER we need Bill Shorten to resign and either Penny Wong or Tanya Plibersek to replace him with Wayne Swan back as treasurer in waiting
    OR we need to encourage candidates of integrity to stand as independents in as many key seats as possible since if we get a hung parliament it will be more likely Labor that LNP which gets to negotiate successfully with the independents to form government.
    Above all I sincerely hope that Dick Smith stands against Abbott and ousts him!

  9. grey&grumpy

    Helvityni – Baird is a stalking horse for the GST arguments. Mark Butler (Q&A) was on the money.

  10. stephentardrew

    Funny thing is that no matter what they will eviscerate the poor to feed the wealthy and any scheme they come up with is going to do this.

    We all know it and understand it so the only solution is for the senate to stop the bastards and go for the next election.

    Give them nothing because they are masters of inequality, and redistribution upwards, and must be stopped no matter what.

    No smooth talky tax conferences whatever will be done is preordained so just stop them from passing anymore legislation including trade agreements.

    Are you listening Labor and Greens.

    This has gone to far and must be stopped.

    Where the hell is your courage Labor.

  11. dwejevans

    But golly Kaye, I am still wondering what I can spend my $550 per year on, I haven’t noticed that I am better off yet though, maybe I am not an average Australian householder!

  12. townsvilleblog

    The LNP seems to believe the extra money needed should come from helpless pensioners and the working poor, well, I think it should come from the idle rich and multinational corporations who dodge at least $13 billion of their taxation responsibility each and every year, problem being they may be donors to the LNP which probably excuses them from paying anything towards the country that makes them rich, all take and no give makes ordinary Aussies very angry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: