We need to know the truth

I first want to start by saying, that I am not an…

Greenwashing the Tokyo Olympic Games

“The gap between rhetoric and reality is a persistent one when looking…

Scott Morrison And The Ministry Of Information And…

In a crisis, good information is paramount so it’s really lucky that…

"Ye shall know them by their fruits"

On Wednesday, 20 July, The Prime Minister did three radio interviews. During…

Tokyo’s Pandemic Games Open

The auguries are not good for the Tokyo Olympic Games. Resignations have…

It’s the forest, silly!

By David C Paull The Pilliga forests are a significant water, biodiversity and…

Seeking the Post-COVID Sunshine: Returning to Henry Kissinger’s…

By Denis Bright The upsurge in international tensions favouring the containment of China…

Why Did We Need Katie Hopkins When We…

Ah, cancel culture strikes and Katie Hopkins is sent away simply because…

«
»
Facebook

Secrecy and Calamity in Australia’s Vaccine Rollout

With a lamentable, even disgraceful vaccination rate, confusion over how best to deal with the AstraZeneca supply, vague promises about the arrival of other COVID-19 vaccines, and a degree of complacency, half of Australia found itself in lockdown conditions earlier this month.

A good deal of this was occasioned by an outbreak in Australia’s largest city in June, which saw the state of New South Wales become the last bastion to yield to the lockdown formula. For the duration of the pandemic, the state government saw the blunt approach as unnecessarily harsh to residents, preferring to rely on fabled common sense. We, the argument went, were different. Business and commerce could be left in peace, bar some tinkering on matters of social distancing.

But common sense and wily viruses do not necessarily go hand in hand; and the Delta variant of COVID-19 is proving more than a match for public health authorities. It began with an airport driver in Sydney, who caught the strain from flight crew from the US. Infections ballooned, helped along by a gathering at a birthday party of around 40 people, one of whom had unknowingly crossed paths with the driver. Those not infected turned out to be the ones who were vaccinated.

While the critics have been – and will be – noisy about the tardy reaction of the Berejiklian government in NSW, nothing can take away the dunce status accorded to the Commonwealth, whose primary responsibilities on quarantine and public health have been forfeited. This monumental debacle, a product of smugness and contentment, was bound to unfold. The building of specially adapted quarantine facilities to house arrivals from overseas was stubbornly resisted when Australia was essentially free of COVID-19. Hotel-based quarantine, run by the State governments, was deemed more than suitable.

There was also a diabolical lack of vision on purchasing a range of vaccines. All that mattered was the AstraZeneca option, billed as saviour of the nation and intended to give Australia a sovereign capability. Manufacturing it on home soil was celebrated as something visionary. But that was not to be. The roll out has been stuttered, erratic and abysmal. The blood clotting controversy, a risible communications strategy, and a worried public has left the Morrison government floundering. Other vaccines had to be selected, and supply of these remains woeful. To date, just 7% of Australians are fully vaccinated.

Getting a sense about how profound this floundering could be gathered from the way the government approached the pharmaceutical giants to begin with. What, exactly, was promised by either of the parties? On that score, the Morrison government is keeping mum, as well it might. Secrecy is often the first refuge of the incompetent, and there is much secrecy on the way the Commonwealth has been implementing its vaccine policies.

For one, the entire vaccine supply agreement with AstraZeneca has been stubbornly withheld for reasons of national security, a laughably grim state of affairs. The only thing we have to go on is the letter of intent between the government and the pharmaceutical giant, which was only released because it says nothing at all.

The ABC’s 7.30 program, testing the country’s feeble Freedom of Information laws, sought access to the full agreement on April 12. The answer from one Allison Jones, assistant secretary to the COVID-19 Vaccine Taskforce in the Department of Health, was a typically frail rebuke of the public interest. In refusing access to the agreement, she considered there to be “real and substantial grounds for expecting that [its disclosure] would, or could reasonably be expected to, cause damage to the security of the Commonwealth.” What follows is a dull regurgitation of various definitions of “security” and the “security of the Commonwealth” from various statutes, none of them vaguely applicable to discussing public health. But this technique of irrelevant spray gives us an insight on bureaucratic thought processes: that health priorities fall within the realm of the clandestine.

Jones cites, for instance, the definition under the FOI legislation of “security of the commonwealth,” which is “taken to extend to: (a) matters relating to the detection, prevention or suppression of activities, whether within Australia or outside Australia, subversive of, or hostile to, the interests of the Commonwealth or any other country allied or associated with the Commonwealth.”

The absurd, and irrelevant definition of “security” from the Australian Security and Intelligence Act 1979 (Cth) is also thrown in for good measure. These include everything from espionage to “acts of foreign interference” and “the protection of Australia’s territorial and border integrity from serious threats.”

Few clues were given as to what sort of damage could arise from making the agreement public, other than exposing the government to unalloyed embarrassment. “I consider the particular damage to the security of the Commonwealth to be the fact that disclosure of the information could provide insight into the unique arrangements for the manufacture and supply of the COVID-19 vaccine.” Releasing the details of the contract would signal “to other countries the terms agreed between the Commonwealth and AstraZeneca.” What a frightening prospect.

Bill Bowtell, the architect behind Australia’s response to the HIV/AIDS pandemic, has made a spirited argument for transparency in this regard. “Public health cannot be secret health,” he asserts. “The advice, proceedings and participants of all AZ meetings should be published.” He makes the salient point that the deal has actually compromised national security. And no government wishes their citizens to know that.

 

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

9 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Brad Black

    ‘Secrecy is often the first refuge of the incompetent,…’ and the guilty!

  2. TuffGuy

    As an aside to the above I would love to see someone be able to come up with a list of all those politicians (of all flavours) who have any financial interests in AZ or CSL. I feel that information on its own would be extremely revealing.

  3. Andrew J. Smith

    From SMH 27 Jan ’21:

    ‘AstraZeneca chief executive Pascal Soriot will leave CSL’s board just months after being appointed over fears of a potential future conflict of interest between the two biotechnology giants.’

    Would be interesting to ask for comment?

  4. calculus witherspoon.

    And according to Essential, the mugs still think they are doing a good job…

    I watched the Senate try get the truth out the government concerning botched Pfizer vax and Brendan Murphy cutting across a civil servant being questioned about the negotiations.

    I thought this post was supposed to be apolitical.

  5. Bill

    And still no debate about early treatments such as offered by FloridaHealth gov? https://floridahealthcovid19.gov/treatment/new-treatments/ “Two monoclonal antibody treatments are Bamlanivimab (Bamlan) and Regeneron. . . used for patients with mild to moderate COVID-19”.

    Treating covid with anything other than an experimental vaccine hasn’t occurred to the medical laggards here yet? Maleficence in office? Just curious. Are politicians, medical advisors and media companies which are signed up to the Trusted Network Initiative TNI taking orders from drug makers? Why are drug company directors not researching treatments and going for only the most profitable option, vaccines?

    Then there is Ivermectin, the drug treatment of choice for many doctors in India, Iran, US, Mexico. Ivermectin is on the WHO’s essential medicines list, but that seems to count for nothing.

    Good points Keith and Tuff guy.

  6. New England Cocky

    Ah Ivomectin, an agricultural drug that I used on both sheep and pigs. But hang on, you cannot use an established drug to control a pandemic because that would remove all financial incentive for Big Pharma to do the research necessary to control the pandemic.

    Then as Ivomectin may be out of copyright there would be no additional financial reward to Big Pharma executives and shareholders … that would be contrary to the Liarbral Nazional$ COALition misgovernment pouring public funds into every hair-brained scheme proposed by Party members wanting to put their snouts deep into the public funding trough.

  7. Bill

    NEC, exactly, the profit motive of Big Pharma. If only the average Aussie understood there are several treatments including Ivermectin available. wtf are the TGA, Medical Boards and Chief Health Officers up to? Do they actually do any independent journal research or do they just take for gospel what a drug company says?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 16 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded.

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: