El Paso - the United States' descent into…

By Europaeus *Continued from Part 4In the United States, the Immigration Act of…

A Mined History: The Bougainville Referendum

It would be an understatement to claim that Bougainville, that blighted piece…

Tis not the season to be jolly

As one day merges with the next and the year moves rapidly…

Indigenous Discovery project among prestigious ARC grants announced…

Southern Cross University Media ReleaseNew research into the impact of environmental changes…

El Paso - the United States' descent into…

By Europaeus *Continued from Part 3The El Paso shooter (Patrick Crusius) performed with…

Richard Muller and the conversion of a climate…

By RosemaryJ36  I had lunch with my younger son (in his early 50s!)…

2019 Loogy Awards for Excellence in Feculence

By Grumpy Geezer  2019 is coming to a flaming close swathed in smoke…

The Bloomberg Factor: Authoritarianism, Money and US Presidential…

Political rottenness may be bottomless. Consider the following description of a political…

«
»
Facebook

Repeal Medevac or just another stunt to waste time until the Christmas Break !

This government seem absolutely committed to wasting the time of our parliament (both Houses) with their silly ideological tantrums. After losing the union bashing vote for the totally inappropriately named Ensuring Integrity legislation they now want to repeal the Medevac legislation for the poor souls who are still stuck in detention on Nauru and Papua New Guinea.

You may remember the Migration Amendment (Urgent Medical Treatment) Bill 2018 was introduced at a time during the last parliament when the coalition were in minority. The Bill provided for the temporary transfer to Australia of persons on Manus Island or Nauru, and their families, if they were assessed by two or more treating doctors as requiring medical treatment and required the temporary transfer of all children and their families from offshore detention to Australia for the purpose of medical or psychiatric assessment.

The law allowed for Australian-based doctors to recommend a refugee or asylum seeker offshore be transferred to Australia for care rather than just leaving it in the hands of bureaucrats although it still allowed the minister to refuse if he disagreed with the clinical assessment – in which case it goes to the independent medical panel for review – or if he has concerns based on security or criminal grounds.

Peter Dutton hated this legislation as it took some of his power away but certainly didn’t stop him from interfering with a medical transfer if there were security or criminal considerations : Dutton maintained that the majority of these folk who have been detained offshore for more than six years are rapists, pedophiles, murderers and/or terrorists yet he does so without evidence and none have been charged with crimes either by the authorities in PNG or Nauru or Australia.

It seems that Jacqui Lambie is the crucial vote needed by the government to repeal this legislation but she has evidently placed a condition on the government for her support. She maintains that the real objective of the government should be resettling these folk rather than restricting their access to medical services. It is reported that she has called on the government to accept the resettlement offer made consistently by New Zealand to take 150 asylum seekers a year from Australian detention and then close the detention centres : considering there are only 263 people on Manus (and elsewhere in PNG) and 221 on Nauru this seems like a reasonable request from Lambie but Dutton has, we are told, rejected this demand.

Last week the full bench of the Federal Court threw another spanner into Dutton’s  manoeuvrings as one of the arguments the government have been pushing is that medical assessment by an Australian doctor of an offshore patient (by way off reviewing case notes and online video assessments where possible – although Nauru have been blocking these) was not acceptable medical practice and thus according to our government, the assessment must be left to doctors on Nauru and in PNG and evidently bureaucrats in Canberra . The Federal Court ruled that assessments done remotely by doctors in Australia were quite in order and reflected acceptable healthcare practice already taking place daily for Australian patients, particularly those in regional and remote areas.

The government have already signalled that they will be shelving their Religious Freedoms legislation until the new year after concerns were raised by various community groups including church groups about the extent of exemptions allowed to faith aligned educators, hospitals and aged-care operators who had stressed the importance of retaining a “religious ethos and culture” within their organisations. This included the extent to which such organisations could restrict employment by excluding those of other faiths or of no faith in general occupations including cleaners, gardeners, teachers, doctors and nurses. There is also a push from some denominations to allow them to be selective, based on religious criteria, on who they take in or to whom they provide their services or accommodation.

This so called Religious Freedoms legislation is turning into a real can of worms for the government and has the potential to split us into a society divided along lines of faith rather than the secular model we have aspired to since federation.

The question is, having lost the union bashing exercise and shelved the religious freedoms legislation, will they let go of the Medevac repeal or are they desperate for a year-end win at any costs?

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

9 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Leon Hassall

    It would be nice if the LNP put an Integrity process on themselves, but that would see them disbanded in a day.

  2. whatever

    That “look” Scotty has in the photo above the story, I’m sure he thinks its the ‘stern Conservative Stare-Down’, but I just see a flakey, anal-retentive no-hoper who hasn’t got a clue how he got the top job.

  3. Matters Not

    Re the Religious Freedoms legislation. In summary – for some it goes too far and for others it doesn’t go far enough. Thus no-one is happy and even the quiet Australians might head to the metaphorical political barricades.

    A text-book example of what not to do in Politics 101. And that’s the gospel truth.

  4. Kaye Lee

    What I find utterly hilarious is Coalition politicians continually telling us that “Australians aren’t interested in Canberra bubble stuff” and them assuring us that they “will burn for” the issues that Australians are really interested in…..

    And the legislation they are spending all their time on is entirely political. They are creating problems that don’t exist in order to appear macho. Union-busting when most unionists are middle-aged female teachers and nurses, border protection when all we are actually doing is persecuting innocent people, religious freedom when our constitution already assures that.

    Climate change, poverty, wages flat-lining, insecure work, energy prices, housing affordability, hospital waiting times – and all the other real concerns Australians have – are ignored in order to raise the profile of Peter Dutton or Christian Porter or Andrew Hastie et al.

  5. Barry Thoompson.

    Whatever- I think that photo shows his character flaws of arrogance, stubbornness, stupidity and smugness all in one shot.

    Kaye Lee- good post.

  6. Matters Not

    Re:

    absolutely committed to wasting the time of our parliament

    Perhaps. But what should Parliament be doing instead? Should they be (generally speaking) enacting more legislation or actually repealing same? Conservatives see that what we have, is just about right, and therefore change is undesirable – particularly if it involves a realignment of power(s). On the other hand, progressives see that the present is far from perfect and therefore change is both desirable and necessary – particularly if it realigns power towards greater access.

    Conservatives therefore believe that small government is good government and therefore wasting time is not really a pressing issue.

  7. Andrew J Smith

    ‘Wasting time’ and avoiding substantive issues is their strategy.

  8. My say

    The only reason they want to repeal Medivac ,is to show they won’t be beaten ,same goes for the Union Busting Bill, The first thing they said was that they are going to introduce it again , He really showed his true colours during the week what happens when he goes off script,

  9. wam

    My heart is light with my feet aslipping, asliding and twirling to your words, cuckoo.
    They are such a laughable bunch of blowhards. Thanks, booby.
    If only labor wouldn’t think scummos droogs and the loonies are colleagues and would give the laugh to them on sunrise and today plus a ‘fool of the week’ on the windows of alp pollies offices.
    That would ease the next 4 years pain.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: