Reading the COVID Fine Print: The Undoing of the Australian Open
The decision to go ahead with the Australian Open, the first of the grand slams of the tennis calendar, was always going to be fraught with problems. Players journeying from designated “hot spots” of novel coronavirus outbreaks; large entourages of individuals taking up places on chartered flights even as Australians struggle to get seats to return home; and the issue of what training facilities would greet players on arrival, were all ingredients for potential cockups.
Fifteen chartered planes are involved in the project, transporting more than 1,000 players and team members. The initial mood was optimistic, even filled with gratitude. An important international tennis tournament could resume. Business and sport could resume.
Then came the shaking realities. It took only a few of the flights to be compromised. Four travellers on two of the chartered flights had tested positive for COVID-19 on arriving in Australia. These included a broadcaster, coach and aircrew member on a flight from Los Angeles; the other, from Abu Dhabi, saw a stupefied Canadian coach Sylvain Bruneau return a positive result. A stunned Bruneau claimed to have “followed all safety protocols and procedures, including testing negative within 72 hours before the flight departure and felt perfectly fine” when boarding the plane.
This meant that 47 players and 143 travellers would be confined to their rooms in strict quarantine for 14 days, including Victoria Azarenka, Sloane Stephens, Angelique Kerber, Kei Nishikori and Heather Watson. Another flight from Doha, Qatar also had a passenger who tested positive on January 17, meaning the quarantining of more players.
Doing so has meant that tournament participants will have a good slice of their training time cut from preparations, leaving opponents that much better off. Swiss tennis player Belinda Bencic had the following observation: “We are not complaining to be in Quarantine. We are complaining because of unequal practice/playing conditions before quite important tournaments.”
We are not complaining to be in Quarantine. We are complaining because of unequal practice/playing conditions before quite important tournaments.
— Belinda Bencic (@BelindaBencic) January 16, 2021
Bencic has a point, but from the perspective of some tennis players, reading regulations and conditions of entering both a tournament and a country are of secondary importance. Tennis and training come first; their minders will do the rest for them, with uneven levels of competence. The rest is just bureaucratic fine print.
This would explain the brattish quality of some of the notes coming from players now quarantining on arrival. All of them have the same running theme: we were not told. “What I don’t understand,” groaned Kazakhstan’s Yulia Putintseva, “is that, why no-one ever told us, if one person on board is positive the whole plane need[sic] needs to be isolated… I would think twice before coming here.” Romanian player Sorana Cirstea was in full agreement. “They told us we would fly at 20% capacity, in sections and we would be a close contact ONLY if my team or cohort tests positive.”
I agree…if they would have told us this rule before i would not play Australia…I would have stayed home. They told us we would fly at 20% capacity, in sections and we would be a close contact ONLY if my team or cohort tests positive . https://t.co/kF58HEijqq
— Sorana Cirstea (@sorana_cirstea) January 16, 2021
Each player seems to have had a different reading in this feast of postmodern interpretation. Alizé Cornet has her own. “We’ve been told that the plane would be separated by a section of 10 people and that if one person of your section was positive, then you had to isolate. Not that the whole plane had to.” It would be good to have seen this in writing, and also, which body issued such instructions.
Cornet, it should be said, subsequently issued an unreserved apology, having been reminded in the indignant Twitter deluge that Victorian residents had endured conditions less accommodating than her own during the extended lockdown last year. “I guess I feel a bit anxious about all this and I better have shut my mouth.”
The Victorian Premier, Daniel Andrews, is clear in his mind what was furnished to the players prior to getting on their flights, resisting a stab at any tenuous grasp of reality. “I’m here not so much to be opining about how in touch with the real world these people are. That’s not my job. My job is to make it very clear. People were told what the rules were (before they got here).”
Australian Open director Craig Tilley’s account does not deviate from Andrews. “We did make it very clear at the beginning. That’s why we had the player groups in cohorts. There was always a risk that someone would be positive and have to go into 14 days of isolation.”
Some of the players have even had their own ideas for what the Victorian government and Tennis Australia should do. Perhaps the least qualified to do so, given his previous disastrous foray into COVID tennis, is the world’s number one ranked Novak Djokovic. Djokovic, it will be remembered, tested positive for COVID-19 in June last year after organising the Adria Tour, a tennis exhibition display in Serbia and Croatia that turned sour with infections, calumny and collapse. At the time, Tennis Australia’s Chief Operating Officer Tom Larner saw a bright side in the organisational mess: “There are a fair few learnings that have come out of that (Adria Tour).”
Some of the proposals by Djokovic, outlined in a letter to Tilley, are bound to find a receptive audience among some of the more disgruntled players. They include, not unreasonably, adapted fitness and training material for all the quarantine rooms and appropriate meals.
Then comes the proposed loosening and adjustments that will terrify the COVID-19 strategists: reduced isolation periods for players; the carrying out of more tests to confirm they are negative; permission to visit coaches and physical trainers (as long as they test negative); permission that both player and coach be on the same floor of the hotel; then a move of players to private houses with appropriate tennis court amenities. Melbournians with tennis courts, please stand up.
Andrews was firm and curt in response. “People are free to provide a list of demands. But the answer is no.” Emma Cassar, Commissioner of COVID Quarantine Victoria, was also unmoved in rejecting the requests. “It’s a firm no from me.” Cassar is also proving rather matronly in her sternness of the competitors in quarantine, noting various breaches of lockdown rules that have so far taken place. These include the opening of hotel doors to communicate with other players on the same floor. “It is really low-level but really dangerous acts which we just can’t tolerate.”
In Australia, the tournament is also causing domestic fraying. New South Wales Premier Gladys Berejiklian finds it rich that Victoria maintains a closed border with Australia’s largest city, Sydney, while accepting international travellers from virally ravaged lands. “There is nowhere in Australia currently designated a hotspot, so why shouldn’t people be able to return home?” she stated with unconcealed irritation. “I have always been arguing for that and I think this international event highlights the inconsistency of that.”
But as the Madam Premier would appreciate, money does not merely talk, but growls. Even in this case, her Victorian counterpart, the designated hard man and prosecutor of one of the world’s strictest COVID-19 regulations, has relented in agreeing for the tournament to take place. The result, when it starts on February 8, is likely to be a skewed, scrappy affair.
Like what we do at The AIMN?
You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.
Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!
468 total views, 4 views today
9 commentsLogin here Register here
Why have they brought so many other people who have been the ones with the virus ? The players could have all come separately, and then carried on getting ready while the entourage could quarantine if necessary.
Better they had not had the tournament in my opinion, bring Aussies home instead.
Yes it is grotesque to put sport before separated families, many in debt and desperate as they are stranded for months with no financial support from non family, whereas sportspeople get support.
If international tennis players are given priority over Australian voters wanting to return to Australia from overseas, does that mean that the Scummo Liarbral Nazional$ misgovernment treats Australian citizen as worse that third class in their own country??
Now I understand the Nazional$ thinking that allows the NSW Minister for Agriculture and representative of the Nazional$ in Northern Tablelands to say that he does not speak to any voter less than the Mayor of a town. He is not even a local, so has no qualms about selling Armidale drinking water to Costa Guyra Tomato Farm at a supply rate heavily discounted compared to Armidale ratepayers.
Perhaps all governments need the metaphorical bread and circuses, particularly during this silly season? After all, how many replays of Hard Quiz can be endured before The Box itself becomes the victim of extreme prejudice?
NEC, exactly. Pandering to a few celebrities hitting tennis balls is more important than reuniting families? Another 12 months of this nonsense and more and more people will not bother watching sports at all. I’m there already.
What a bunch of entitled petals.
Bring Aussies home before allowing any more sports players or celebrities in from overseas.
We will have them home by Christmas Morrison boasted. Yet another LNP target not achieved. All this mob can do competently is bullshit.
Well, it IS a stuff up if contingencies like practice locations and times under safe circumstances weren’t organised beforehand.
They are brats, but I think far more mature people might of been complaining at some of the more glaring inadequacies shown up.
The organisers should have foreseen that the players would complain loudly at the first hint of a stuff up.
the outside world is watching, It is supposed to be a premiere event.
Couldn’t organise a friday chook raffle at the local..
The conservative tennis establishment are terrified about losing the 4th grand slam to america or europe where it can be played more conveniently by the elite. It has been nearly 60 years since we were the elite.. People in that frame of mind can make poor decisions under normal conditions much less at this time. ps Bob The tennis people are professionals making a shit load of advertising money if they win a grand slam. They are meist elite bullies. Uniting families is 12 months overdue, scummo should suffer for that, but there is no priority. for ordinary aussies.
wam, true that. Barry T, petulant players are a minor distraction in a bigger game. The elite are using every opportunity to solidify a 2 tier society. Making a mockery of players inside hotel rooms is part of the handlers playbook, good tv if you like a laugh but not as funny as half-filled venues where everyone except players will be wearing a mask. Apparently viruses have their own set of rules and won’t go on courts? As calculus says, this joke of a tournament could have been much better organized. It seems that constantly changing rules is meant to disorientate the public. Even the NSW Premier said she didn’t understand border rules. Hint, that is THE plan. M-Not, bread and circuses exactly. The public needs more distractions like they need less brainpower.