Australia's Humanitarian Visa System is Inhumane: An Open…

By Loz Lawrey Dear Minister Giles, Since my previous emails to you of 14…

AUKUS, Congress and Cold Feet

The undertakings made by Australia regarding the AUKUS security pact promise to…

"If The Voice Loses It Will Be Albanese's…

"If The Voice Loses It Will Be Albanese's Fault!" Yep, I saw that…

Research shows young people want to contribute to…

Victoria University Media Release Victoria University research in partnership with the Youth Affairs…

Meta and Privacy: The Economy of Data Transgressions

Meta, to put it rather inelegantly, has a data non-compliance problem. That…

We need to change how we think and…

By Callen Sorensen Karklis Neoliberalism is an illness: unregulated capitalism, it is not…

HAK Birthdays: Henry Kissinger Turns 100

“Once you’ve been to Cambodia, you’ll never stop wanting to beat Henry…

Yes is inclusive, No is divisive

The words speak for themselves, but I shall return to them briefly…


Only one Census error corrected – but we’re ‘Religion Neutral’

By Brian Morris

Decades of Census bias – on the question of ‘Religious Affiliation’ – is not fully resolved. Australia is more than 50 percent ‘religion-neutral’, but full ‘secular democracy’ remains a minefield of covert religious politics. A FREE eBook here, explains this dilemma. But results from this 2016 census may just be the catalyst needed for change!

To many Australians, every call for “the separation of Church and State” is seen merely as a slogan. Why all the concern, they say – “the battle has been won; we are already secular; our constitution says so; and religion is in terminal decline.” Apart from the constitutional point, the rest is bitterly naive. The nation is far from being ‘secular’ – the Churches maintain their undue political influence and the secular agenda remains stalled.

It is has always been more about politics than religion. For the establishment – governments, academia, the judiciary and sections of the media – religion has historically played a crucial role in conditioning a naive public to the pomp, ceremony and extravagant self-interest of the upper tiers of the professional classes; including Church hierarchies. And while ‘traditional’ Christianity has lost its congregational base, the vacuum has been steadily filed with US-imported evangelism. The census lists 19 fundamental Pentecostal churches, alone. So the mutual benefits of a well-established symbiotic relationship – between politics and religion – remains precisely the same.

With the release of Census data it may appear that religion plays a diminishing role in the nation’s political process. Such an assumption would be wrong, even thought the figures are improving. ‘No Religion’ is now first choice for 30.1 per cent of the public; with Catholics at 22.6 per cent, Anglicans 13.3 per cent, and Islam at just 2.6 per cent – and the total Christian figures is down to 52.1 per cent (though still inflated).

The Census does (in part) reverse a century-old trend. Up from 22.3 per cent in 2011, the secular count is now 30.1 per cent. And while this option was moved up from rank last place to top spot on this questionnaire – in line with most western countries – it does explain why the ‘secular’ score has produced such artificially low figures since federation! This historical and wholly contrived imbalance, since 1901, has heavily obstructed secular reform – while providing massive subsidies for religion, from the public purse.

But the true 2016 statistic should also include data which is not yet recorded. Added to the ‘raw’ secular figure of 30 per cent is that long established hidden tally of some 20 per cent of ‘lapsed Christians’. Surveys have shown this large cohort continue to record at each census – through sheer force of habit – the religion they were given as a child; although it’s a faith they have never practiced in adult life. It is reflected in the fact that only 8 per cent of the population attend church on a regular basis.

The other statistical glitch occurs where Christian parents continue to allocate their own religious denomination to their children, at each census. But even this doesn’t account for the persistent secular imbalance perpetuated by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, on the question of Religious Affiliation.

Advertising executives learn ‘Surveys 101’ in school – that answers to any kind of questionnaire (including the census) are only as good as the questions asked. Despite 440 submissions to the ABS to re-word question 18, after the 2011 Census, Canberra statisticians continued to lead with the phrase, “what is the person’s religion?” It induces the public to automatically believe they should actually have a religion – so they dutifully record one!

Other countries use far more accurate terminology, stating: “does the person practice a religion?” – yes or no?. And if the answer is “no” they are asked to move on to the next question. It sorts the sheep (literally) from the goats – and it’s far more professional from an analytical viewpoint. All these factors (still) contribute to a gross distortion of the true secular landscape. Net beneficiaries of this needless confusion are, of course, the Churches.

So, rather than the 30 per cent – recorded in this 2016 census – Australia is, in reality, more than 50 per cent non-religious. Even in 2012, a Win-Gallup poll (table 6) concluded that 48 per cent of people in Australia were ‘Not Religious’. So this year’s Census result clearly understates the basic figure – not to mention ‘lapsed’ Christians, possessive parents, and the grossly misleading census question.

Distorted statistics meant decades of windfall gains for the Churches

Accumulated financial and legislative benefits to Catholic and Protestant Churches have been a bonanza! They share regal privileges that rank only with British monarchs. They pay no tax on their accumulated wealth, their property, their investments, or their profitable businesses. And like the royals, Churches also receive vast government grants that come from the pockets of besieged tax-paying workers.

The solution seems simple — religions have been massively over-compensated through a series of Census glitches which they have rorted over many decades. So why not just reduce government largess to each denomination? The problem is that such a solution is not in the best interests of the ‘establishment’.

This Census fiasco goes back to Federation. In 1901, bureaucrats merely accepted Church propaganda that the nation was 96 perc ent Christian, even 150 years after the Age of Enlightenment. And each consecutive Census gave no clear option to record any expression of ‘non-belief’. It was not until 1971 – just 45 years ago – that the ABS gave citizens a brand new option! Simply, “If no religion, write none.” This was to be written in an obscure box buried deep on the form, as nothing more than an afterthought. But the result was most illuminating! The non-religious vote burgeoned from 0.8 per cent to a staggering 6.7 percent – for those brave enough to list this new and blasphemous opinion!

By 2011, the combined Christian figure remained at a grossly inflated 61 per cent – with ‘No Religion’ an artificially low 22 per cent. But this secular option still languishing in last place, hidden below the box in which artful citizens still write alternative religions such as “Jedi”, “Mickey Mouse”, and “Spaghetti Monster”.

Christian Churches continued to use that exaggerated 61-to-22 figure to claim that “Christianity is 3 times more relevant than Godless secularists.” They have capitalised on this alleged 3-to-1 ratio to claim moral superiority and to win enormous grants and tax concession from successive state and federal governments.

Conservative estimates put the level of tax exemptions – to all religions – at a staggering $20 billion per year. This is far less than the $31 billion calculated by the Secular Party of Australia – and it allows for generous concessions for verifiable charity work to help those genuinely in need. But it doesn’t excuse the raft of Church businesses that operate at a profit, or for taxation on their property, investments and wealth. And it does not take into consideration the $12 billion in government grants to private religious schools in 2016.

Funding for Christian education was almost zero in 1960, until Liberal prime minister Robert Menzies began giving grants to Catholic schools. Australian governments are consistently conservative but – particularly from the era of John Howard – our parliaments have been some of the most heavily Christianised in the western world. And that includes the tenures under Labor rule. All this was put into crystal clear perspective with the book by Prof. Marion Maddox; “God Under Howard; the rise of the religious right in Australian politics.”

Religious schools now enroll 40 percent of Australian school students, while the public system is becoming akin to “welfare education” for the less well-off. It remains Liberal Party policy to expand private schooling, with Malcolm Turnbull stating clearly that federal governments should fund only private schools – and let the states take care of public education!

But the 2016 Census may well be the catalyst to gradually bring an end to the extravagance of governments in gifting such rich and long-standing privileges to the Churches ­­- all based on corrupted statistical data.

A further benefit that relates to being majority secular – rather than a Christian nation – comes with the real and present danger of Islamic extremism. While many parts of the West, including Australia, have experienced attacks, there is an ameliorating effect that comes with religious neutrality.

This is particularly evident in Scandinavian countries where strongly secular communities have far less religious violence. Secular neutrality is a more effective principle than Christianity, which claims a religious superiority over Islam. Secularism is neutral to all religions – it does not favour any faith over another – it does not inflame tensions between Sunni and Shiite, or Protestant against Catholic; it simply opposes all hostility based on religious belief.

Australia is a signatory to the United Nations charter for ‘Freedom of Religion and Belief’ – with a full definition that also includes ‘non-belief’. The constitution is a secular document – based on Section 116 – and we should respect that. Historical records show those who framed it, prior to federation in 1901, intended parliament to be free of religion – as distinct from Britain where the monarch swears to uphold the Church of England.

In 2017, governments continue to defer to religious practices, rather than the secular constitution. They open each parliament with church services and with a daily ritual of saying prayers. And there is a persistent concern among MPs to defer to a perceived Christian majority.

Recognising Australia as a fully secular nation will not create an immediate seismic political shift, but eventually it will have an impact. As with Scandinavia, a more secular worldview will progressively serve to calm religious rhetoric, that only inflames social division — and to advance legislative change that is more equitable.

But, in the shorter-term, the wishes of a religiously-neutral public will gradually draw politicians to conclude that supporting secular policies does not incur political risk. Australia continues to uphold Freedom of Religion and Belief – where people have the right to believe what they wish. But that is quite different to the current circumstance where religion unduly influences the politics of education, health and a broad social agenda.

About Brian Morris: World travel shaped Brian’s interest in social justice — wealth, poverty and religion in many countries. His book Sacred to Secular is critically acclaimed, including from the Richard Dawkins Foundation. It’s an analysis of Christianity, its origins and the harm it does. It’s a call for Australia to become fully secular. More information about Brian can be found on his website, Plain Reason.



Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. Jaquix

    There needs to be an additional question next time. “How many times did you attend a church service in the last 12 months? (Excluding weddings, funerals or christenings).

  2. Miriam English

    Well said, Brian. As the statistics approach reality, so might our politicians. I hope for an investigation into corruption in politicians so we could find out just how much money the “good” churches have been poisoning our democracy with. I know Howard was being fed enormous sums from loony Christian cults like The Brethren.

  3. John Kelly

    Only 8% of Australians attend church on a regular basis. That statistic alone tells us how secular we are. The churches exist for one reason and one reason only: to perpetuate their own existence.

  4. townsvilleblog

    I see Muslim population is up 160% since 1991 and it seems that they are mostly very religious but the population in general are beginning to realize that there is no God and have come to depend on their own values.

  5. darrel nay

    I wonder if John Kelly would make similar comments about the mosques?
    Bashing Christians is so trendy and cool. It gives the virtue -signalers something to chirp about.

  6. helvityni

    A Muslim guest on the Drum last night said that many Muslims were too scared to admit to their faith, and I can totally understand that..

  7. helvityni

    …and as for Christian Churches, and the child abuse by their preachers, who is brave enough to enter one…

  8. Ken

    Another excellent article by Brian. He predicted this result and how right he was.

  9. havanaliedown

    Yes, kids are much safer in a mosque… after all, Mohammad (PBUH) married a nine-year-old. Ask an adherent… Mohammad was “the perfect man who should be emulated”.

  10. kerri

    A further distortion to the census stats on religion was the absurd email doing the rounds, and yes I got one from a “friend” I wish my husband had never given our email address to, advising that even if you have no religion you should mark “christian” or otherwise there will be a mosque built in your area. My daughters response was “mark christian and they will build a bloody church near you”.

  11. Bronte ALLAN

    Totally agree with your thoughts Brian. ALL the Governments we have had in Australia have always “pampered” to the ever smaller Christian churches & their followers/believers. As to why they still are tax exempt is beyond reality in my opinion! The Vatican city is the world’s “richest” city, which surely would also mean that the Catholic churches do not “need” any of the Government’s handouts etc. The same would also apply to the other Christian faiths. As for all the so-called ‘fundamental Pentecostal” churches (?) & all their money grabbing ways etc, surely none of them should “qualify” for ANY tax exemption etc? We definitely need a new way of asking about peoples’ religious leanings, so the way the questions are worded in the next Census should definitely be changed as per Brian’s suggestions.

  12. diannaart

    New questions for next Census:

    If you replied ‘yes’ to any religion?

    Are you accepting of others no matter their religious beliefs?

  13. kerri

    Bronte ALLAN it has always baffled me why some religions dubbed “cults” are less deserving of government (read taxpayer) largesse than the older “faiths”? But then it has always baffled me why people believe so fervently in something beyond both proof and logic.

  14. Mark Needham

    Churches are in their own way terrorists. The malice and intent, directed at children, the mental flogging is not warranted, uncalled for, and in my mind illegal.
    They are pandering to child’s innocence, to accept the offer of a ‘thing’ that loves them, offers them sort of everything, with nary an opportunity to actually know, that by their ‘obeyance’ they will receive.
    My mum, never said Yea or Nay, just said, “make up your own mind”.
    I just never clicked, that it was a scam. Mum should have said, “I think it is a scam, I believe it to be a scam, listen, look, but watch out, and make up your own mind”.
    I was not hurt, physically, by religion, or I think mentally, but there were occassions., when….

    I was an Apprentice in the Navy. 2 churches/chapels, 1 for the Prottys, and the other Catholics. I joined the services as a C of E, just came out of my mouth (15 year old). But I often attended Church Parade ( everyone attended Church Parade, Apprentices, ie, Ships Coy, were exempt), at the Catholic set up, because their service lasted about 10 to 30 minutes before the protties.
    But, one day at the Chapel,, the Chaplain…..( about 1966, no names, hey) not sure what started it, but as a Lieutenant, he was an Officer, and he had a gutfull of something this particular day, ” Right o, any of you boys, who do NOT want to be here, you may leave.”. At the time, an hofficer was God his self, someone stood up and proceeded to walk out, emboldened I, and 1 to 2 hundred others also walked out. Could have been all of us, not sure.
    The Officer of the Day, clears Lower Deck, and gets right up us, being indolent, insolent, proper little a holes.
    Skipper next day on Monday up us all, also. Can not rember actual punishment, reckon the waste of time, parading being lambasted was punishment in itself.
    Oh, rule was, We had to attend Church Parade, dress of the day, 10’s or 2a’s, but if you decided that you were not of any religious persuasion, then whilst Church services were being held, the heathens would , Skirmish, the Depot or Airstrip, for rubbish, ie, worked. Funnily enough, I never saw any Heathens, any religious crap was better than organised crap.
    I know there was no physical/mental abuse, but it just used to irk me, that grown men, Captains and Admirals, and Lieutenant Chaplains, in dresses, had the better of us.
    Nowadays, I would politely, refuse religion and refuse the offer of toil, whilst others prayed, all politely mind, but positively and emphatically.
    Not an Alter boy, ( thank god)
    Mark Needham

  15. Pingback: Opinion (detailed): Independent Media 28.6.17 - Only ONE census error corrected | Plain Reason

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: