Increase in phone and internet complaints in quarter…

Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Media Release The Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman’s (TIO) Quarter Two Complaints…

Has capitalism captured the world?

Has capitalism captured the world? Phil thinks so. In late 2018 l wrote…

Neo-Nazi sentenced to jail for attack on anti-racist’s…

Media Release Desmond Liddington, a neo-Nazi extremist who pleaded guilty to his part in the attack…

Walkin' in Memphis

By James Moore “There is no such thing as race. None. There is…

Was Pell a decent man? No

George Pell’s funeral in Sydney has shown clearly the divisions within the…

Pell's Posthumous Coronation

By David Ayliffe I was confused by the funeral of Cardinal George Pell.…

It's the little things that count

If the sound from your TV stops one day, you logical first…

Just Wait Till Peter Dutton Hears About Student…

Student voice: “​Student voice acknowledges that students have unique perspectives on learning, teaching,…

«
»
Facebook

Intelligence Spats: Australia, Britain and Huawei

A note of fraternal tension has been registered between the United Kingdom and Australia. It began with Britain’s decision to permit China’s technology giant Huawei a role in the construction of the country’s 5G network. While the decision is qualified to non-core functions, as UK officials term it, the irritations to the United States and, it follows, Australia, have been far from negligible.

Members of the US Congress have been clear that letting Huawei into the stables of security risks future trade deals. US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, on a visit to the UK, has been equally insistent on the dangers. “When you allow the information of your citizens of the national security information of your citizens to transit a network that the Chinese Communist party has a legal mandate to obtain, it creates risk.” In Munich attending an international security conference, US Defence Secretary Mark Esper warned that, “Reliance on Chinese 5G vendors … could render our partners critical systems vulnerable to disruption, manipulation and espionage.” As for US President Donald Trump, the words “apoplectic” and “fury” figured in responding to the UK decision.

Australian officials have relished their role in telling the old, long-in tooth Mother Country off. Simon Gilding, director of the Australian Signals Directorate till December, suggested in The Strategist that the UK was putting its faith in “a flawed and outdated cybersecurity model to convince themselves that they can manage the risk that Chinese intelligence services could use Huawei’s access to UK telco networks to insert bad code.”

Gilding does not mince his words. “5G decisions reflect one of those quietly pivotal moments that crystallise a change in world affairs.” The British decision had been “disappointing” in “doing the wrong thing” on the technology. It had not considered, for instance, Australian testing in the field. “I was,” he smugly recalled, “part of the team in the Australian Signals Directorate that tried to design a suite of cybersecurity controls that would give the government confidence that hostile intelligence services could not leverage their national vendors to gain access to our 5G networks.” Measures of mitigation were designed with the express purpose of preventing a state actor from gaining access to the networks. All failed.

The UK government has been attempting to reassure allies within the “Five Eyes” agreement that any security concerns are unjustified. UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab spent a good deal of his time during this month’s visit to Canberra attempting to assuage members of the Federal Parliament Intelligence and Foreign Affairs Committees. That effort seemed to fall flat.

In a report that was published in the Sydney Morning Herald, Deputy Intelligence Committee Chair and Labor MP Anthony Byrne was irate, notably at Raab’s response that the Huawei decision was a “technical” if “difficult” matter, but hardly political. “How would you feel,” Byrne is reported to have asked of Raab, “if the Russians laid down infrastructure in your own networks? That’s how we feel about Huawei.”

Officially, Byrne gave the impression that things had gone rather well in “a full and frank discussion regarding 5G, trade and strategic challenges.” Privately, that same Byrne was cocksure, daring, even rude. According to the source reported in the Sydney Morning Herald, “He basically said: ‘I’ll raise you my ASD [Australian Signals Directorate] against your GCHQ [Government Communications Headquarters].” China, he argued, had become an “existential” threat to Australia, being both its largest trading partner and most formidable “security threat”.

Few others were privy to the discussions that took place between Raab and various Australian parliamentarians. Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee’s Liberal MP Andrew Hastie was present, as was Foreign Affairs Committee chair, Liberal senator David Fawcett. The other person to bear witness to discussions was the UK High Commissioner Vicki Treadell.

For Treadell, the matter was obvious. Someone in the meeting had ratted. As the ABC subsequently found out, “measured” and “stern” letters were duly sent from the High Commissioner’s Office to both committee chairs chiding them for the leaks. Despite failing to confirm the existence of such letters, the UK Commission being supposedly “unable to comment on private briefings, or on any information pertaining to these private briefings”, the shells had been fired.

Feeling put out, Parliament’s intelligence and security committee cancelled a planned visit to the UK scheduled to take place in March, preferring the more reliable, anti-Huawei environs of Washington. The official, anodyne explanation for the cancellations was put down to advice given by Australia’s High Commissioner in the UK “as he advised that counterpart committees in the UK have not yet reconstituted following the UK’s December election.”

The reasons given to the ABC by a member of the intelligence committee proved more forthright. “If this is the attitude of the British, we may as well visit the Americans who we can trust more on this stuff.” A right royal spat, indeed, and one not without its juvenile connotations.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

 314 total views,  2 views today

8 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Josephus

    No doubt the Russians and Chinese spy on everyone, so too the Five Eyes. It is beginning to sound like the Orwellian 1984 scenario, in which all sides are made to feel threatened by a triad out to dominate the world. Paranoia here we come.

  2. Pingback: Intelligence Spats: Australia, Britain and Huawei #newsoz.org #auspol - News Oz

  3. LambsFry Simplex.

    Oh dear!

    The naughties… wouldn’t play the game. Have the poms been thinking that if offshore influences control its electronics, no longer any point worrying about who when it is just a colony either way.

    Byrne is classic ALP right.. further up the arse of the Americans even than the LNP.

  4. John

    Never mind that none of the mainstream “authorities” even begin to consider the very real potential negative effects of 5G radiation on ALL biological organisms -perhaps even catastrophically so.
    Check out the Global Research website for a detailed list as to the reasons why. And the most recent article on the topic in Dr Mercola’s newsletter too.

    Of course all of the usual dreadfully sane apologists for mega-bucks big business as usual like to pretend otherwise.And the proponents of so called evidence based medicine too. Which of course depends on which evidence one chooses to focus on, and of course deliberately ignore or downgrade.

    Follow the money trail.

  5. Zathras

    For all the sinister talk of foreign governments potentially spying on us it’s odd that they haven’t mentioned that OPTUS has the contract for communications within Parliament House – a company owned by the Singapore government.

    For the price of “a peppercorn per year” we also host US military bases at Pine Gap – used for monitoring missile launches from the old USSR as well as being a “listening post” for spying on foreign communications generally. We really don’t know the entirety of what those bases do but they have certainly made us a first-strike nuclear target should war break out.

    Former Huawei lobbyists Alexander Downer and John Brumby must be feeling nervous over a possible FBI probe, particularly a potential espionage allegation for Downer coming from the Mueller investigation.

  6. New England Cocky

    Oh dear ….. the other economic fact of this “political spat” is that production revenue from sales of communications equipment goes to PRC rather than US corporations, that likely build in their own “spying” circuits. Think mobile phone tracking, Facebook tracking etc. It has long been recognised that the most accurate intelligence comes from individuals themselves rather than from apparatchnicks who “interpret” data. Yes, 1984 is upon us.

    The obvious national security problem is that Australia refuses to develop their own technologies so cannot be certain that communication technologies purchased from elsewhere are clean of any undeclared surveillance capacity for use by the manufacturing nation or its puppet master entities.

    The long instilled cultural cringe encouraged by too many decades pandering to English masters has impeded the development of our own Australian national identity and industries.

  7. DrakeN

    “Knowledge is Power.”

    Yet our dumbarsed military heads and their captive politicians believe that power comes out of ineffective aircraft, obsolete-before-they-are-designed submarines and diplomatic maneouvering.

    “You don’t know what you don’t know and do not even know what there is to know.” or words to that effect.

    One might say that letting the opposition know that you know that what they know is not what they thought that they knew is such a lovely mind game.

    But who knows?

    Saddam’s “Weapons of Mass Destruction”, anyone.

    The truth is: “Bullshit Baffles Brains”.

    Not 2B or not 2B but B to the power of three.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: