Crash and Burn

This is both optimistic and troubling. Fairfax media reports that "China has put…

The Admirable Demonstration of Dan Tehan And Other…

Apparently, Dan Tehan was on QandA last night. I only know this…

Condensed Fun Facts, Dates, Myths/Misconceptions

By Richard Whitington Fun Referendum Facts Fun Referendum Facts #1: The ballot paper for…

Cannabis: We can shut up, toe the line,…

When President Obama commented that he thought cannabis was likely less dangerous…

Corruption suspicions hang over secret PNG refugee contracts

Refugee Action Coalition Media Release AUSTALIA’S SECRET PNG DEAL MUST BE INVESTIGATED Refugee advocates…

Dianne Feinstein: National Security State Diva

The tributes for the late Democratic Senator from California, Dianne Feinstein, heaped…

Media Alert - Refugees Say "Fair Go, Albo"

A protest vigil will be held for 4 days at the electoral…

The Voice reveals the urgent need for truth…

The fact that Elon Musk has just halved his election integrity team…


How The Voice Will Force Us All To Become Vegans!

The recent proposal for legislation to require social media companies to crack down on misinformation and disinformation has some positives but it’s also something that needs careful consideration.

For a start there’s a big difference between misinformation where a person is just repeating incorrect information because they believe it to be true and disinformation where someone is deliberately spreading lies in order to weaken the case of an opponent. However, the big problem is deciding at what point an unpopular point of view becomes misinformation. Take Nick Coatsworth’s comments about Covid-19 not being airborne in the early days of the pandemic. Given he was one of the “experts” leading our response, would contradicting that have been misinformation?

And take this exchange on Twitter:



Apart from the fact that the writer of the tweet liked my retweet with the comment “Own goal?”, there’s a strong argument that asserting that Dutton was right about the “serious damages claims” following the Apology to the Stolen Generation could be considered misinformation. But Andrew Bolt would argue that there was no Stolen Generation, so the tweet could also be considered misinformation on the grounds that it talks about something that Bolt denies even exists so…

But I do find it interesting that supporters of the No campaign are the ones who seem to be most upset about any potential legislation to ban misinformation. It’s almost like saying without misinformation, we got nothing…

Perhaps I’ve got it wrong but there’s a very clear racist element to what some people are saying about the Voice. Let’s leave aside the areas of dispute which I’ll categorise as follows:

  • The structure of the Voice will be determined by the Parliament and if it were to be problematic in any way, Parliament could restructure it. The Constitution will only be require that there be some form of Indigenous Voice to Parliament. This is disputed by the anti-Voice campaigners who argue that the lack of detail may mean that the Voice will be given wide-ranging powers by those leftie judges on the High Court.
  • The Voice has no real power and will simply advise Parliament meaning that like all sorts of advice to Parliament from experts to Royal Commissions to bodies set up specifically to take the politics out of decisions, the advice could be ignored. This is disputed by some who argue that the Voice will have the power to insist that we change the date of Australia Day, move out of our houses if an Indigenous person wants it, stop the Reserve Bank from raising interest rates and force us all to become vegans.
  • The Voice referendum came about after years of consultation culminated in the Uluru Statement from the Heart called for it. This is disputed by some who argue that Anthony Albanese just thought of it because he wants some sort of vanity project and it’ll be a Canberra voice and it’s all the Labor Party’s idea because they want someone else to have the power to make all the decisions.
  • It’ll be a Canberra voice and we shouldn’t listen to Canberra voices unless they’re members of the Liberal Party.

So leaving aside the areas of dispute, it does seem strange when Sussan Ley gets up in Parliament and asks if the Voice will be able to advise the Reserve Bank… I mean, leaving aside the whole idea that the Reserve Bank is independent and doesn’t even have to listen to the government and the Voice is a voice to Parliament and the Executive and it doesn’t mention the Reserve Bank anywhere in the Referendum so you might as well ask, “Will the Voice be able to give advice on what shows I should watch on Netflix?” or “Will the Voice be able to give me advice on whether I should add any extra letters to my name in the hope that it gives me extra ssuccesss?”

But apart from Sussssann’ss absurdity, there does seem an underlying element of the Voice being just a bit too uppity. You know, stepping outside their area. You know, giving advice to more than just, well, things that should concern them… You know… like well, I’m not racist but we know that some of those people, you know… And, you know, if they were to express an opinion, you know… I mean, as if they’d know, you know… As if it’d be worth listening too…

Well, I’m not racist but…

And as for Peter Dutton, well, he’s a swell guy who just wants what’s best for everybody and the idea that foreigners could come here on boats and disrupt the whole way of life for those living here is something that only convicts from a couple of centuries ago should be able to do. As for African gangs, that wasn’t racist because we all know that African gangs are scarier than Caucasian gangs… Don’t believe that leftie stuff about Dutton! He’s a swell guy with a great sense of humour… Don’t you remember his great joke about Pacific Island people having no sense of time with water lapping at their door? Not racist at all.

In terms of the whole the interesting question is whether trying to portray Dutton as a great humanitarian could be considered misinformation.

While the opinion polls are telling us that support for the Voice is slipping, one has to take the polls with a grain of salt. After all, I remember that the opinion polls were telling us that the Victorian election would be close and that Andrews may lose his seat.

Of course, I am overlooking the possibility that it was those Dominion voting machines that were rigged and that the polls were right. Ok, the Victorian Electoral Commission says that it doesn’t use voting machines but how do we know that isn’t disinformation?


Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. Phil Pryor

    The stinking, reeking, rotten, rubbishy conservative cloddy clump of pathetics, nappy fillers, defectives and B Ridiculous-Jchoice is a huge stain on Australia’s history, with virtually nothing positive achieved. Merde Dog the scrotumfaced scribbler-in-chief makes it all doubly crook. It is now an electronically charged and empowered liar’s paradise world. Sick.

  2. GL

    Scare tactics, fear and outright lies will always have a welcome deleterious effect for important things like the Voice. Objects like The Spud will go straight into frighteners (and gutter) mode to try and wreck it while he ruins…er, runs…a party totally bereft of rhyme, reason and sense. He, and other LNP pollies and Rupert, know it’s value but they still have the shits that they were kicked out and just want to demolish Labor for the sheer bloody mindedness of it all.

  3. Stephengb

    What delicious irony

    He is me genuinly concerned that the proposed Constitutional change would great a divided community.

    And here we are the country is already divided, where that division is getting quite vitriol.

    I can only conclude that I should vote Yes just try and prevent a divsion, whilst clearly (in my mind anyway) voting to create a Constitutionally enshrined division between Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islanders, and the rest of us dispiret inhabitants.

    Oh what a dillema

  4. Roswell

    Will I have to hand back my boomerangs?

  5. Harry Lime

    Roswell,just throw them and they’ll take care of themselves.

  6. Douglas Pritchard

    I will continue to keep alive the Drop Bear myth just to be difficult.
    Doing my bit for social media.

  7. Roswell

    Harry, I tried that but they kept coming back. 🤷🏻‍♂️

  8. Stephengb

    Harry Lime
    Only if you study aeronautical engineering for 50,000 years to discover how the Aboriginal’s 50,000 years of design expertise designed the boomerang to return to the thrower (but only if he missed the target). At which point you could alter the design to prevent it returning, thus a thrown away the boomerang would not return?

  9. New England Cocky

    Oh Rossleigh ….. you have misrepresented the Anglo-Celtic Australians (ACA) with this comment. In my experience, ACAs are never racist, they just don’t like anybody with a better sun-tan ….. because they are jealous.
    This article is simple misinformation until you include the LIARBRAL$ who could not lie straight in bed ….. especially those stalwarts of conservative self-serving neoliberal unthinking, Scummo of the Secret Seven Ministries, Stewie Robodebt, Anus Taylor and unChristian Porter the alleged rapist.
    There is little doubt that Beetrooter will ignore the Voice because then the grazier can plead piteously for yet another cash handout to maintain the price of the $100 legs of lamb, the cost of alcohol made from Australian raw materials and the Northern Inland Railway (NIR) pipedream that is presently guessed to cost at least $1500 BILLION if completed.
    It is unreasonable for the Voice to allow consultation between mere Australian voters even Aboriginal persons, and politicians without the LIARBRAL$ and NOtional$ parties receiving the implicit handout ”donation” to party funds to maintain the status quo in favour of foreign owned multinational corporations.
    The Voice of Aboriginal and Non-Indigenous Australian voters counts for nought under the ”Canberra bubble” especially in Ministers offices after hours when doing unpaid overtime training a colleague in the procedural intricacies of government.

  10. Terence Mills

    I think the Reserve Bank may be in need of a bit of advice !

  11. New England Cocky

    @ Douglas Pritchard: Have you forgotten about the Lesser Known Bunyips that reside in the creek below the pub? They have large luminous eyes that glow in the bar lights ….. after the first five rounds of beers, according to Beetrooter.

  12. Clakka

    Yeah, good article, excellent questions.

    Truth in advertising … the eternal conundrum, subverted at every turn.

    It’s difficult to poll the subtleties of the bush telegraph, try as they might.

  13. Paul Smith

    But… but… but I’m already a vegan. So… what’s it gunner to dofa me? Oh! I know! Vote YES and find out! But… but… but I was gunner vote YES anyway, so… … Oh, BTW, Roswell, Charlie Drake may know a thing or two about… y’no…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: