Ok, So This Is A Boring Post... Or…

Gloria Sty, bud Iyam riting this coz I wanna mayk sum poynts…

Border Paranoia in Fortress Australia

The imaginative faculties of standard Australian politicians retreat to some strange, deathly…

Where the Palestine laboratory takes us all

By Antony Loewenstein Israel's war on Gaza since 7 October has caused the…

No, no, no, no. Not more ‘illegals’!

By Bert Hetebry A group of South Asian men arrived on our doorstep…

Rafah, Gaza: Urgent Statement from CEOs of Humanitarian…

Oxfam Media Release We are appalled by the harrowing developments in Rafah, Gaza’s…

Joe Biden: The Damnation of Age

He was sweet and well meaning, but he was old. He was…

Revealed: Properties in nature's firing line

With Australians enduring intense climate-related disasters during the past five years, analysts…

Outbound Train

By James Moore “The two most powerful warriors are patience and time.” -…


Joe Hockey and the Coalition’s Legacy

In the highly technical and confusing world of money, a balanced budget means incoming dollars (revenue) should be the same as outgoing dollars (spending). If spending exceeds revenue then either an increase in taxes, or borrowing, or drawing down on cash reserves to cover the difference, or all of the above, is needed. It’s the same as running your own household. It’s that simple or at least it should be.

So, having viewed the recent US government shutdown from a safe distance, can our Federal government see any parallels in the way they are about to approach the problem of balancing our budget? If one listens to the far right Tea Party members of the Republican Party (TEA stands for ‘Taxed Enough Already’) you will hear them constantly resurrecting their hero Ronald Reagan and preaching Reaganomics with such fervour, it’s surprising the former president is not already the Patron Saint of America. Would they be right about Reagan’s economic credentials? No. Can anyone explain why to them? No, they won’t listen. So, should we be surprised to see that in Australia, there are already signs that we are just as stupid; that we won’t learn from history either, and that our new government is foolishly travelling down the same mad road as this ultra right wing extremist body?

Tea Party members support the principle of a balanced budget. But they go a lot further than that. They don’t think spending should ever exceed revenue. Reaganomics as interpreted by the Tea Party, or the American Taliban, as ‘Will McEvoy’ of ‘The Newsroom’ called them, means less taxes and less spending. That means the government gets less of their citizens’ money and spends less on social services and infrastructure. Technically, that makes sense. The problem with that philosophy however, is twofold. Firstly, it doesn’t work and secondly, it isn’t what President Reagan did.

Like so many events throughout history, the re telling of Reagan’s economic credentials, of what he did, generates an exponential growth in embellishment, distortion and deliberate misrepresentation as one side or the other quotes what they think they know when trying to win a few points. Reagan did reduce taxes in 1981 the first year of his presidency, but over the next seven years he raised taxes, particularly on incomes below $50000. He did this no fewer than eleven times, either directly or by closing tax loopholes and limiting allowable tax deductions. During this same period he reduced corporate taxes but did not reduce spending, rather he increased it, particularly in the area of defence. His administration was thus forced to borrow heavily both domestically and abroad to cover ongoing budget deficits. His management of the economy was helped somewhat by a period of relative peace; America was not at war. But even allowing for that, his economics made America the world’s largest debtor nation owing nearly $3 trillion dollars by 1987. Because he was highly selective with the various revenue streams where he applied his increases and cuts, the chief economic indicators for growth, unemployment, poverty, tax revenues and deficits for that period varied wildly across a spectrum of highs and lows. This meant anyone who came after him (i.e. Republican presidential hopefuls) could cherry pick figures and quote percentages for any given period of his presidency and use them to emphasise their own economic plans. In reality, however, their claims were meaningless and could not seriously be applied to present day economic rationalism. In the main, Reagan’s economic reforms favoured big business and the wealthy at the expense of middle and low income workers.

And that brings us to the Tea Party of today. They want less regulation, lower taxes and froth at the mouth whenever the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) is mentioned. They want policies that essentially place the burden of revenue raising on the less well off, while rewarding the wealthy for being, just that. Sound familiar?

So, how does Reaganomics impact on Australia? Essentially, while not saying it, the Coalition’s approach to economics is a broad version of Reaganomics; not what Reagan did, but the myth of what he did, i.e. lower taxes, having less government regulation, reducing waste and where possible, reducing welfare payments. Our Treasurer, Joe Hockey has made it clear that the age of entitlement is over, that we must learn to live within our means. No argument there. The problem is that Joe Hockey had us thinking originally that he could do this and return a surplus budget. He can’t and he knows it. He knows that our current net debt of $284 billion will increase to almost $400 billion by 2016 when we next go to the polls. That is unavoidable. That is why he is now flagging an increase in our debt ceiling to a staggering $500 billion. This he claims is Labor’s legacy. Really?

Hockey made a lot of noise about the state of the economy before and during the election suggesting that we were facing a national emergency. He has now had time to appreciate the truth of the matter and his rhetoric has noticeably subsided. Prime Minister, Tony Abbott also made a great deal of noise about reducing debt and deficit. The recently announced Commission of Audit is the process by which the new government will determine what stays and what goes. Declining revenues will play a big part in determining the choices available, and the dismantling of the carbon tax will only add to Hockey’s woes. This could hardly be called Labor’s legacy, certainly not in the way Hockey was referring. Dismantling the carbon price will reduce revenue making all of the coalition’s promises that much harder to keep. Those promises include a paid parental leave scheme and a ‘Direct Action’ policy to tackle climate change, the Coalition’s replacement policy for the carbon tax, which will involve paying big polluters to reduce their carbon emissions. Yet, Hockey insists those promises will be met. We can expect the Treasurer to be talking a lot about Labor’s legacy in the coming months. But in reality, the program he is laying the groundwork for, will be very much the Coalition’s legacy. The Commission of Audit report to be completed by March 2014 will show that forward projections of revenues will not accommodate their promises even with their intended budget cuts. Hockey’s options will be a hard pill to swallow and involve raising taxes, borrowing and, heaven forbid, possibly even raiding the future fund. Either way, raising the debt ceiling will be essential. Better to do it now while nobody’s looking. But given the Prime Minister’s attitude to climate change, the greatest temptation for Hockey and Abbott will be to simply dump ‘Direct Action’. It will most likely be delayed, like, forever! The next three years are not going to be pretty for the coalition or the country and the end result will give Labor plenty of ammunition come 2016 when the government will have to explain why the national debt jumped from the present $284 billion to probably in excess of $400 billion in just three years with no plans to combat climate change. Funny how the theory of Reaganomics looks so good on paper, but when applied in practice, will work the same way here as it did in the US.


Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. JohnB

    Great article Michael,
    Abbot & Co are Reagonomics re-born- but this time Australian’s are the test dummies.
    Rachel Maddow sums it up here:

    The LNP’s policies on climate change are criminal when viewed in the light of the overwhelming evidence of available science.
    A gross dereliction of a governments duty of care for the welfare of Australia’s citizens.
    Implementing ‘pseudo action’ and supporting the deceptions of their corporate sponsors to ensure increased profitability of the fossil fuel industry is sabotaging the future of our children – and planet Earth.

    Is there a greater crime against humanity???

  2. Roswell

    Thanks for that video. I watch her shows nightly via iTunes.

  3. CMMC

    This is like putting Fagin and his school of pickpockets in charge of crowd security.(Oliver Twist)

    “Commission of Audit, Business Council of Australia chairman Tony Shepherd will lead the commission while the lobby group’s chief economist and director of policy, Peter Crone, will head its secretariat.

    Mr Shepherd is chairman of Transfield Services, a construction and services firm that has won a string of contracts in recent years worth hundreds of millions of dollars.”


  4. Kaye Lee

    Business Council of Australia chairman Tony Shepherd will lead the commission of audit while the lobby group’s chief economist and director of policy, Peter Crone, will head its secretariat.

    Mr Shepherd is chairman of Transfield Services, a construction and services firm that has won a string of contracts in recent years worth hundreds of millions of dollars. These include the contract for maintenance and support services at the Nauru detention centre worth $184.3 million.

    Mr Shepherd is understood to be leaving his Transfield position at the end of this week.

    Also listed on the Austender website are Transfield contracts with the Defence Department worth more than $400 million.

    Asked on Tuesday whether there was a conflict of interest in appointing Mr Shepherd to oversee a process that could see substantial government functions outsourced to the private sector, Mr Hockey said: ”We don’t apologise for appointing the best team to eliminate government waste.” (Amanda Vanstone???)

    The BCA, which represents Australia’s top 100 companies, has advocated an increase in the GST but wants a large cut to the corporate tax rate while railing against any reduction in what has been dubbed ”business welfare”, including tax concessions for depreciation, research and development and mining exploration.

    Richard Denniss, the executive director of the left-leaning Australia Institute, said the BCA had been a close ally of the Coalition when it was in opposition, opposing the carbon and mining taxes and supporting the ”greatly exaggerated” contention that Australia had a significant debt problem.

    ”It’s like getting Greenpeace to do an audit of environment policy,” he said.

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/contract-riches-for-audit-chief-20131023-2w1w7.html#ixzz2iZvugdxH

  5. jagman48

    Thanks JohnB a great video .

  6. dafid1

    Appreciate the article John also you have written in a language easily understood. I despair for the country and middle/low income families and singles under this regime. Evil leaks from their every pore.
    Many of those who ensured the election of the Conservatives are already being rewarded for their loyalty which in some cases relied on lies and misinformation. Come in Jones, Hadley, News Corp, ABC, Miners.
    I look forward to LOTO Shorten awakening from his slumber and taking the fight to the Govt. His softly softly approach, is hardly encouraging the troops or the social media supporters.
    I look forward to another installment from you in the months ahead

  7. Sandra Searle (@SandraSearle)

    dafid1, you can look forward to Shorten being a lot tougher than he looks. The softly softly approach that you see at the moment covers a very accomplished & cleaver man who will definitely make TA & his mob squirm. He is as tough as nails under the softly softly countenance.

  8. Misst

    Thank you for this, Michael, spot on! I am just so fed up with Howard worshippers trusting his pupil, Tony, implicitly. Like the view of Regan, our view of Howard is whitewashed. I just cannot believe that Tony would sign away our sovereignty in a Trade Agreement. How can the LNP get away with their potential destruction? Will they ever be asked any questions?

    Sandra, lets hope Shorten steps up soon …. I want to hear him …. I want to need ear plugs!!

  9. dafid1

    I look forward to the awakening Sandra. Although I supported Albo for the leadership am prepared to give Bill a go,

  10. linda

    Thank you for your article, John.As much as i enjoyed reading it i am left with a overwhelming sense
    of anger at the subject.With all the articles i have read today, i think i have reached my limit of LNP filth!!!
    For six years, we have had to hear the putrid hate spewing from Tony and his cronies attacks on the ALPs
    every move,while the whole time claiming they could do a better job!!When they don’t deliver on their promises during the next three years.Oh well i guess they think they can just lie their way through another election.My hope is that people won’t be fooled twice.I hope Bill Shorten will be a dark horse in the race.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page