From Malcolm With Love
Thursday 1 February 2018
On 14 September 2017, Malcolm Turnbull delivered a closing statement during Question Time in Parliament, asserting his parties commitment to Australia and Australian values; specifically through welfare reform in the form of the cashless welfare card.
What sticks in my mind is that in the brief minute or so that it took to deliver this rambling diatribe, he used the magical word ‘love’ no less than eight times. And there is something very powerful and telling in that.
“Australia is the most successful multicultural society in the world. On Australia Day, which we defend, which we defend, we begin those celebrations with an acknowledgment of country, a welcome to country….Australians love this country. They love Australia Day. They love the values it embodies. And at the heart of those values, Mr Speaker, democracy, freedom, the rule of law, mutual respect, mutual respect and mutual obligation.
Now we on our side, Mr Speaker, we believe that welfare money should not be spent on drugs and booze….but those opposite have no problem with it being spent on drugs and booze. They will not support us. How shameful. If they loved those people on welfare, if they love them, if you love them, what would you do? Would you tell them to get off the drugs, get off the booze? Well, I’d hope so. We’d hope so. But no, the Labor Party won’t do that….I tell you, Mr Speaker, when we do, we do so with love. We do so with love and compassion and the Australian values of helping our mate, looking after each other, standing up for Australia, standing up for Australians.”
I wonder how many people have picked up on the Prime Minister’s almost liturgical use of the word ‘love’ during his term in office?
All you need, as the Beatles say, is love. And I would contend that with respect to the incumbent LNP government, love will be the very thing that causes them to lose their grip on power. Because love is the key commodity that the present federal line-up does not have, and Turnbull at some level understands the significance of this full well.
In the days prior to that September 2017 speech in Parliament, Turnbull was spruiking the Coalition’s cashless welfare debit card, describing it rather hopefully to the assembled media in Kalgoorlie as “an exercise in practical love.”
Mining baron Andrew ‘Twiggy’ Forrest’s philanthropic donation of 400 million in May 2017 earned a similar wrap from the Turnbull love machine, with Malcolm dropping the ‘l’ word no less than three times for good measure, when he gushed: “This is an act of love. It is an act of generosity and above all, it is an act of leadership that will inspire other Australians, now and in the years to come, to show their love by helping those who we can support and we can advance through that commitment of love for mankind.”
Sounding rather like a magician proving there was no hidden card up his sleeve, he then told Mr Forrest: “This is not extracted from you by force of law; this is a matter of conviction, of your love and your commitment.” Perhaps this observation was intended more for our benefit than Twiggy’s.
Turnbull’s love reared its ugly head again last month, shortly after he deliberately stirred racial tension and division by magnifying the so-called ‘African gang’ problem in Victoria, despite the fact that Sudanese offenders accounted for only 1% of the state’s total reported crime. Facing off with acting Premier James Merlino at a media conference, the PM deflected attention with the claim that there was “love bursting all over the place.”
So where did this all start? Back in January 2016, Malcolm Turnbull’s liberal (pardon the pun) use of the word led Sydney Morning Herald’s reporter Tony Wright to remark: “It’s not every day a political leader publicly uses the word love, and it’s even rarer that love and technology are joined in the same sentence. Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull tossed love around like fairy dust on Friday.” Back then, the target of his effusiveness was a new website providing a database of services for the homeless. Turnbull enthusiastically referred to it as a triumph of “deep love combined with technology focussed on the customer.” Not since William S Burroughs’ novel ‘Naked Lunch’ featured a steam-powered dildo called Steely Dan have love and technology been so successfully mated. Turnbull’s penchant for the word ‘love’ is equally strange, yet perfectly explainable.
If we are to take Malcolm at his word, that seems to be a whole lotta love; to borrow the words of another iconic band. And therein lies the problem. There simply isn’t a whole lot of love for the people emanating from this government and Turnbull must realise this. In over half a century of life in Australia, never have I seen a public so distrusting of politicians and disenchanted with its leaders; so worn down by their exhortations of terror and division. So tired of not being listened to. So close to revolution. That may seem melodramatic to some, however the turn-outs of people protesting the treatment of refugees, the desire for marriage equality and more recently the solidarity of Aussies wanting to change the date of Australia Day speaks of the growing disenchantment with the LNP’s style of ‘business as usual.’
Perhaps his most telling use of the word ‘love’ came in a declaration on the day of parliament’s legalization of same-sex marriage when he exhorted: “What a day for love, for equality, for respect.” Malcolm would undoubtedly like to be remembered as the Prime Minister who paved the way for marriage equality to become a reality in this country. His own personal commitment to this social milestone is unquestionable. Had he held to his own values rather than succumbing to the manipulations of the string-pullers in his cabinet, he might have some stronger claim to this accolade. As it stands, same sex marriage passed into law despite his party and his ministry team, rather than because of them; despite the divisiveness and disharmony stirred by an unnecessary plebiscite. It became a victory for the people, not the government.
People are not feeling the love from Turnbull’s government and I believe a fair proportion of the blame lies squarely at the feet of the conservative faction who have pulled the strings and enacted a divisive agenda. Australians are seeing a government given to in-fighting; a government which has stopped listening to the people. A party being devoured from the right. Malcolm is forced to step into the breach and assure us that there is love there. But his words have an increasingly hollow ring.
This ‘love deficit’ is a characteristic of the conservatives and their bleak world view. They are largely driven by the reflexes of threat and disgust. It is seen in their hostility towards foreigners and racial and ethnic minorities who are viewed as a dark, destabilizing influence on Australian culture and good order. There is a tendency for them to be pro-gun and defence oriented to counter the perceived threats of incursion and criminality which they repeatedly warn us about.
It is a faction bent on turning us into a police state. This week Dutton appeared on ABC News to warn tourists visiting Australia to attend the upcoming Commonwealth games that there are strict penalties in place for visa over-stayers. He stated that 95.5% of tourists are law-abiding, with 0.5% at risk of potential overstay. Firstly, what would possess anybody to issue such a sour warning, given their own acceptance of the fact that the vast majority present no such problem? And secondly, none of the foreign tourists that Dutton was directing the warning at would likely be watching an Australian news station anyway.
The conservative ethic is not only to order us to keep off the grass, but to remind us that a fine and a prison sentence will apply if we disobey.
They oppose welfare support for the poor due to its perceived encouragement of dependency and the potential for abuses of the welfare system. It was the federal government and Centrelink who created a virtual climate of fear in the Australian community with their aggressive pursuit of the ‘robo-debt’ program. And let’s not forget the recent blaze of headlines announcing that hard-working Aussies are forking out $83 a week to finance our national welfare bill. Just this week came the news that Tony Abbott had floated a radical plan of cutting welfare support to under-30’s ahead of the 2014 budget. The fact that these are the very same people that Turnbull showered with so-called ‘acts of love’ makes this a bitter pill to swallow.
I don’t believe that we are wired to live perpetually with such joylessness and dour severity. We respond to sincerity and love. The psychological make-up of conservatives expressed as a lack of empathy, compassion and flexibility forces Turnbull into a position of synthesizing love, so to speak; to re-dress the imbalance and to convince the public of a sense of care and human warmth that his party consistently fails to deliver.
As an aside, it’s notable that the phenomenon of ‘synthesizing love’ is not just limited to Turnbull either. Last week came the news from the USA that hardline conservatives blocked a proposal for a pathway to citizenship for the ‘Dreamers’ – the 700,000 undocumented immigrants now facing potential deportation. According to polls public sentiment is leaning in favour of the Dreamers being given the opportunity of citizenship. In response, Trump reflexively demanded that lawmakers craft a bill of protection to protect them; tellingly referring to it as a “bill of love.”
As well as this sense of ‘love deficit’ conservatives seem to be possessed of a distorted sense of self-perception and the lack of any real ability for self-assessment and perspective-taking. And therein lies their ultimate downfall.
Talk is again turning to a leadership spill with three conservatives – Abbott, Morrison and Dutton – suggested as contenders. Without Turnbull’s Doctor Frankenstein to breathe love and light into the body, we will be left with a ruling party run by the Monster. And that never ended well in the movies.
1,078 total views, 2 views today
24 commentsLogin here Register here
Why is Malware looking more like Shorten in the pic above? Maybe he has walked a mile in someone else’s shoes? Perhaps that should be a requirement before anyone is sworn in as a politician?
I think it is just that his hair is more restrained. Nothing more.
What a rort the cashless welfare card is. It costs $10000 per anum per card to administer & guess which party’s politicians have shares in that company. It hasn’t actually worked on remote Communities either the stats are bs. The reason Indigenous people have no money on communities is they pay $50 for a $10 bag of lollies, $80 for a cake. Meat is 5 times what it is in the nearest towns. Not including rorts white business owners run on them because they think they get more money then them.
Very thoughtful. You have a love for truth.
Six drops of essence of terror, five drops of sinister sauce….but the tincture of tenderness is snake oil.
Great analysis. Thanks Leo Jai for deepening my understanding of what drives the conservative mind, and especially what drives the conservative mind mad. This is the most refreshing take I have read recently on this government’s capture by hard line conservatism. What an ugly disposition this government has.
From being Orwellian, through to being Kafka-esque in their perversion of language, I think we have now entered that dream zone where the ruling rabble are seeing everything in blurred slow-motion and their meaningless, repetitive muttered incantations are only meant to justify their useless existence to themselves as they know no-one else is listening.
…and I liked KL’s recipe, too.
Just more Turnbullshit
A fine post, Leo. Mighty fine.
Interesting article and I too have noticed Malcolm over-using the word “love”. At a speech at the cricket Jane McGrath Foundation event I think I counted 6 “loves” i less than 3 minutes. One would have been sufficient. If he thinks we believe he’s sincere, hes got another think coming. All actions pointing to an election this year, which I certainly hope is the case.
CHAMPION ACT OF RANDOM KINDNESS AND ALL BECAUSE YOU LOVE THEM
But that is how you win elections, kill the opposition, kill the people’s livelihoods, kill the economy and kill off civil rights… But do it with love like some random act of kindness!
This is the grand schema, the grand deception, you tell the people what they want to hear, tell it in the good Aussie tradition and vernacular, put all the right words in there, accuse the opposition of being the opposite to all these grand values and traditions, laugh a little at the opposition’s expense and all those who don’t have a voice or ear of parliament, ridicule them, smack them in the teeth, intimidate them, shout at them, accuse them of everything under the sun, remember to point your finger and punch your fists in the air… But do it with love like some random act of kindness.
Smile and do it because you say you love them and take that silly supercilious sympathetic sycophant soppy smile you practiced in the mirror off your stupid hypocritical arrogant face… But do it with love like some random act of kindness and you will be the champion!
thank you Leo, my mates down the pub don’t have much love for the indigenous, brainwashed they are, but they listen when I make the counter arguments and I’ll keep trying for as long as I can speak. As for welfare fraud, well my views on that have changed as I get older. I’m too afraid of consequences to partake, but I would never dob in someone who can game the system anymore, it’s not as if they spend our money wisely. Weapons rather than cars ffs.
My mates still fall for the trick that their taxes fund welfare.
Its spend then tax stupid, I say. Some of them are listening
When you only give them a bit of money, well that still goes to smokes and pokies. I see the kids under the raintrees across from my local, being ‘looked after’ by one of the aunties. Those behind the bar with their responsible gaming licenses can also see, but they don’t say anything. I see the same kids eating chips and soda for dinner too…
Divided we are, and that’s just how our masters like us. Love indeed, what a misuse of the word.
Most people understand that when you resort to love potion #9 you really are scraping the barrel.
and rule of law.
The only people the Liberal Party love are themselves and their own reflections in the mirror.
The only love the coalition have is the love of money and power for themselves and their rich mates. As for the rest of us they couldn’t give a monkeys.
The most cruel, inept, uncaring, lying government in Australia’s history.
If this mob win the next election I am seriously thinking of moving overseas. Enough is enough.
“If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.” 1 Corinthians 13:1 (RSV)
Is Turnbull really full of love? His talk is full of snake oil. That so many of these Coalition people claim to be Christians is a source of wonder and dismay. Their main love is money.Their song should be, with apologies to TS Eliot: “We are the hollow men/ We are the hollow men/Leaning together/Headpieces filled with [money]. Alas!”
Meanwhile, speaking of speeches. The Murdochian media is much enamoured with the performance of Trump, who has become for them the very model of a modern major president – and a buddy of our Oz.
In The Australian (1/2/18) Greg Sheridan, Foreign Editor, tells us: “Trump’s State of the Union speech a sign of growing maturity” – which suggests that signs of ‘growing maturity’ have not been there until now. Sheridan lists some policies which he (and the Coalition/IPA, too, remember) think are brilliant, such as lower taxes and the burning of red tape.
Sheridan seems to suggest the speech is entirely of Trump’s making, but all of us can see that Trump merely read it off a screen. Next will come the-off-the-cuff twitters which will reveal the true Trump.
And here in Oz, Turnbull will follow Trump’s lead and reduce taxes for the middle class, just as his fellow Coalition leader John Howard did a while ago – a nice bit of pork barreling, given no doubt with “love”.
“Love”, I reckon if we substitute the word “f*ck” instead we will all have a better understanding of what Talkbull is on about! How dare he even try to think that everything he has uttered is all in the name of “love”? He is nothing but a lying, inept, obscenely over-paid, “unlovely” flucking conservative/right wing/flat earth so-called “Liberal” (sic!) would be politician, & so are ALL his fellow members in both the Libs & the Nats! WTF??
Turnbull is just the opportunist we knew he was. Opportunists will take whatever side they see as “potentially winning”. That is why he has been such a hypocrite, relative to his previous popular trending views.
He is what Keating described as a suckhole. I see Shorten as not in any way different…and Plibersek a weak pretender.
.Didn’t Keating also say that Mr Mal lacks good judgement, maybe he’s filling the suckhole with LOVE…
What would Keating say now?
What etnorb said
The Fizza is such a fcukhead.
I believe we should chip in a get Malcolm a dictionary because for a supposedly eloquent man, which I have coincidentally never witnessed, he misuses and abuses words for which he has no actual sense, either intellectually or experienced
The man is purely mendacious.
We are not hearing the soundless “tough” before every “love” Turnbull utters, but it is there.
Dianna, Malcolm would want us to believe that it’s true love, or endless love, but I’m a cynic. It’s more like feigned love.
Actually, come to think of it, there is no love.