Promising the Impossible: Blinken’s Out of Tune Performance…

Things are looking dire for the Ukrainian war effort. Promises of victory…

Opposition Budget in Reply: Peter Dutton has no…

Solutions for Climate Australia Media Release National advocacy group Solutions for Climate Australia…

Understanding the risk

It's often claimed the major supermarkets would prefer to see tonnes of…

A Brutal Punishment: The Sentencing of David McBride

Sometimes, it’s best not to leave the issue of justice to the…

Climate pollution and petrol bills coming down as…

Climate Council Media Release AUSTRALIA IS OFF AND RACING on the road to…


It’s time we reckoned with what it means to become a corporatocracy.…

Plan B

By James Moore Every time there is a release of a New York…

Australian federal budget falls flat in tackling inequality:…

In response to the 2024 federal budget, Oxfam Australia Interim Director of…


Evacuating Nauru: Médecins Sans Frontières and Australia’s Refugee Dilemma

It is an organisation not without its problems. Conceived in the heat of idealism, and promoted as the vanguard of medical rescue and human rights advocacy, Médecins Sans Frontières has had its faults. Its co-founder Bernard Kouchner went a bit awry when he turned such advocacy into full blown interventionism. As Nicolas Sarkozy’s foreign minister, his conversion to politicised interventionism in places of crisis went full circle. He notably split from MSF to create Doctors of the World, where he felt imbued by the spirit of droit d’ingerence, subsequently given the gloss of “humanitarian intervention”. With its mischief making properties, such interventions have manifested, usually in the guise of wealthy Western states, from the Balkans to Africa.

MSF, at least in its operating protocols, is meant to be solidly neutral and diligently impartial. But neutrality tends to be compromised before the spectacle of suffering. Bearing witness disturbs the mood and narrows objective distance. On June 17, 2016, by way of example, the organisation stated that it could not “accept funding from the EU or the Member States while at the same time treating the victims of their policies! It’s that simple.” Central to this, as Katharine Weatherhead explained in an analysis of the organisation’s stance, is the “ethic of refusal” and témoignage, “the idea of being a witness to suffering.”

Australia’s gulag mimicry – a prison first, justice second mentality that governs boat arrivals – has done wonders to challenge any stance of distance humanitarian organisations might purport to have. To see the suffering such policies cause is to make converts of the stony-hearted. What matters in this instance – the MSF condemnation of Australia’s innately brutal anti-refugee policy on Nauru – is its certitude.

The Australian government has taken the high, icy road and left the UN Refugee Convention in shambolic ruin; it insists, repeatedly, that refugees are to be discriminated against on the basis of how they arrive to the country; it also suggests, with a hypnotically disabling insistence that keeping people in open air prisons indefinitely is far better than letting them drown. (We, the message goes, stopped the boats and saved lives!)

MSF, which had been working on the island since November 2017 primarily providing free psychological and psychiatric services, was given its marching orders by Nauru’s authorities last week. Visas for the organisation’s workers were cancelled “to make it clear there was no intention of inviting us back,” explained MSF Australia director Paul McPhun.

A disagreement about what MSF was charged with doing developed. The original memorandum of understanding with the Nauru government tends to put cold water on the suggestion by Australia’s Home Affairs Minister that MSF had not been involved in supplying medical services to the detainees on the island. In dull wording, the agreement stated who the intended recipients of the project would be: “People suffering from various mental health issues, from moderate to severe, members of the various communities living in the Republic of Nauru, including Nauruan residents, expatriates, asylum seekers and refugees with no discrimination.”

It was obvious that the revelations would eventually become too much for either the authorities of Australia or Nauru to tolerate. Having been entrusted with the task of healing the wounds of the mind, MSF’s brief was withdrawn after the organisation’s findings on the state of mental health of those in detention. “Five years of indefinite limbo has led to a radical deterioration of their medical health and wellbeing,” claimed McPhun in stark fashion to reporters in Sydney on Thursday. “Separating families, holding men, women and children on a remote island indefinitely with no hope of protection except in the case of a medical emergency, is cruel and inhumane.”

Undertaking a journey from war torn environs and famine-stricken lands might well inflict its own elements of emotional distortion and disturbance, but Australia’s policy of keeping people isolated, distant and grounded took it further. It was penal vindictiveness, a form of needless brutal application.

In McPhun’s sharp assessment, “While many asylum seekers and refugees on Nauru experienced trauma in their countries of origin or during their journey, it is the Australian government’s policy of indefinite offshore detention that has destroyed their resilience, shattered all hope, and ultimately impacted their mental health.”

The organisation has made it clear that Canberra’s insistence that “offshore detention” remains somehow humanitarian is barely credible, there being “nothing humanitarian saving people from the sea only to leave them in an open-air prison on Nauru.”

Such a cruel joke has turned the members of MSF into a decidedly militant outfit. “Over the past 11 months on Nauru,” states psychiatrist Beth O’Connor, “I have seen an alarming number of suicide attempts and incidents of self-harm among the refugee and asylum seeker men, women and children we treat.” Particularly shocking were the number of children enduring the effects of traumatic withdrawal syndrome “where their status deteriorated to the extent they were unable to eat, drink, or even to walk to the toilet.”

With such observations, there is little surprise that Nauru’s government, which was evidently seeking to find an ally and an alibi, felt slighted. The doctors had to go. “Although MSF claimed to be a partner to Nauru and the Nauruan people instead of working with us,” came the government justification, “they conspired against us.” The government was no longer inclined “to accept the concocted lies told about us purely to advance political agendas.”

What the government statement also insisted upon was the comparative advantage the hosted refugees and asylum seekers had. They had their own tissue of mendacity to proffer. “The facilities, care, welfare and homely environment offered to refugees and asylum seekers are comparable or better than what other refugees and asylum seekers across the globe receive.” For that to make any sense, a comparative study on suicides, psychological corrosion and trauma would have to be done across the world’s refugee camps. In those terms, Nauru’s performance, aided and abetted by their Australian sponsors, has been ghoulishly stellar.


Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. Phil Gorman

    It is time to end Australia’s barbarous treatment of people attempting to reach Australia by boat.

    Offshore detention for the purposes of assessment may be acceptable providing all cases are processed quickly and humanely within 3 months or so.

    The deprivation of liberty of people who have committed no crime is itself a crime.

    The indefinite detention of asylum seekers and refugees is a crime against humanity.

    The failure to honour the Government’s duty of care is a crime against humanity.

    The Government’s attempts to disparage suffering people and keep them out of sight and out of mind are despicable.

    The Government’s shameless attempts to justify its stance plus its underhand manipulation of events and obfuscation over it’s relation with the corrupt autocracy of Nauru are a national disgrace.

    I wholeheartedly support Medicins Sans Frontieres’ position on their ejection from Nauru.

    “Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) strongly condemns the sudden decision of the Government of Nauru to end MSF activities and expresses high concern for the conditions of the patients that we have been forced to leave behind.

    MSF calls for the immediate evacuation of all asylum seekers and refugees from the island so that they complete their resettlement process in a place of safety with dignified conditions.

    MSF calls for an end to the Australian policy of indefinite offshore detention: separating families and holding men, women and children on a remote island indefinitely with no hope or protection except in the case of a medical emergency is inhumane. This policy of detention should be immediately stopped and never replicated by any other government. It’s not MSF’s psychiatrists and psychologists that should have left Nauru, it’s the hundreds of asylum seekers and refugees who Australia has trapped on the island for the past five years.”

  2. paul walter

    Dutton and co surely hit an unimaginable new low with this latest effort.

    I say it because, though worse things have happened this century, this situation more than any had an easy solution for anyone who had learned from these things and wasn’t a sadistic lunatic.

  3. New England Cocky

    The fascist Liarabral Party including the Monster for Xenophobia, Putrid Dutton, are pursuing inhumane policies designed to make Australian voters fearful of any person who cannot afford to fly into Australia on a regular international airline.

    So, The present Peoples Republic of China (PRC) policy of external migration for young Chinese citizens continues without restriction and the interest of the PRC government supported young Chinese business persons is very evident in regional urban centres where they are making a positive difference to their respective local economies that the Australia LNP misgovernment chooses to neglect and ignore while pouring billions into already over-crowded and polluted metropolitan cities. This PRC policy has been in place since about the 1988 Tianamin Square assassinations, as a trade off against the multi-BILLION foreign student investments by PRC that props up a top heavy administrative mess known as the Australian university tertiary system.

    This rather ironical position by the LNP misgovernment ignores the history of “traditional” immigration programmes that brought thousands of white European migrants out of the post WWII economic disaster that was war ravaged Europe on ocean liners. These immigrants were looking for the opportunities offered by a new start Down Under, resulting in the arrival of Julia Gillard, who became Australia’s first Lady Prime Minister, and Tony “Toxic” RAbbott, the Wanker of Warringah.

    There is little doubt that the present policy of off-shore detention of persons shown to be refugees is little different to the concentration camp policies of the German Nazi Party after 1933 with Gypsies and political prisoners.

    I look forward to working on the election campaign to “Dump Dutton” and consign this ILL-liberal misgovernment of self-serving Parliamentary Allowance rorters and self-indulgent adulterers to the WPB of political history.

    Women supporting Adultery support National$.

  4. helvityni

    Don’t ya worry, we can sink even lower…

    “I’m one of those Christians ,but nowhere in my bible does Jesus say: let children of All colours come to me…”

    I remember how ordinary caring Italians put teddy bears and flowers on the coffins of asylum seeker children whose bodies were pulled of the sea….

  5. paul walter

    Can’t see how Helvi.

    Yet they keep on confounding me.

    Perhaps its just the anchor dragging and bouncing along the bottom.

    New England Cocky, are you suggesting that most Tory women are harlots?

    What about Michaelia Cash?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page