Some Christians Rely On Blind Faith; Others Rely…

My wife watches a lot of murder mysteries, so I've sort of…

Massive Decisions – Zero Transparency

Australians for War Powers Reforms Media Release The Australian people and the national…

Gold standard Gladys - the shine is fading

Eeny meeny miniMo: The accidental head master and the prefect. Warning: This post…

Nuclear White Elephants: Australia’s New Submarine Deal

It does not get any messier or more chaotic than this. Since…

Which major political party is more qualified to…

Tom Tesoro writing on Facebook, said: "They all sense their economic destiny, their…

News Corp Turns Climate Change Inactivist

The faux Damascene converts have been doing the rounds in the Murdoch…

Why are 'religious' organisations given tax free status?

There would have been few people who were not deeply shocked by…

NSW Labor opposition leader makes sense in daily…

Opposition leaders and shadow ministries not getting enough air-time in traditional media,…

«
»
Facebook

Droning Disasters: A US Strike on Kabul

No more profoundly disturbing statement was needed. In the dying days of the official US departure from Kabul, a US drone etched its butcher’s legacy with a strike supposedly intended for the blood-lusty terrorist group ISIS-K, an abbreviation of Islamic State in Khorasan Province. Its members had taken responsibility for blasts outside Harmid Karzai International Airport that had cost the lives of at least 175 individuals and 13 US service personnel. Suicide bombers had intended to target “translators and collaborators with the American army.”

President Joe Biden promised swift retribution. “To those who carried out this attack, as well as anyone who wishes America harm, know this: We will not forgive. We will not forget. We will hunt you down and make you pay.” American “interests and our people” would be defended “with every measure at my command.”

In his sights was ISIS-K. “I’ve also ordered my commanders to develop operational plans to strike ISIS-K assets, leadership and facilities.” A response “with force and precision” would take place “at our time, at the place we choose and a moment of our choosing.”

On August 28, an announcement by the Pentagon was made that two “high-profile” members of the group had been killed in a drone strike in Khorasan Province. That same day, the President warned that the group was likely to conduct another attack. The US military was readying itself.

The following day, to demonstrate such precision and choice, a vehicle supposedly carrying an unspecified number of suicide bombers linked to ISIS-K and speeding towards Kabul airport was struck in a second drone attack. The site of the attack, being a residential neighbourhood in the city, should have given room for pause to those precisionists in the military.

The strike was meant to leave a lasting impression upon ISIS-K fighters. Initially, US officials were pleased to inform the Associated Press that “multiple suicide bombers” had perished in the attack. “US military forces conducted a self-defence unmanned over-the-horizon airstrike today on a vehicle in Kabul, eliminating an imminent ISIS-K threat to Harmid Karzai International Airport,” stated US Central Command spokesperson Capt. Bill Urban.

The outcome of the strike was apparently something to be proud of. “Significant secondary explosions from the vehicle indicated the presence of a substantial amount of explosive material.” But this came with a rounding caveat. “We’re assessing the possibilities of civilian casualties, although we have no indications at this time.”

The story started to congeal over interviews, discussions and threads. A dribble of information suggested loss of civilian life. A number quickly emerged in the flood that followed: ten family members had lost their lives. From the New York Times, there was Matthieu Aikins patching things together. Bodies were named: Somaya, daughter of Zemari. Farzard, Zemari’s son, also killed. The narrative twists, inverts and disturbs more: Zemari’s nephew, Naser, was an Afghan army officer, former guard of the US military. He had applied for an SIV (Special Immigrant Visa), hoping to flee Afghanistan for the United States.

 

 

To the BBC, Ramin Yousufi, a relative of the victims, could only tearfully despair. “It’s wrong, it’s a brutal attack, and it’s happened based on wrong information.” Questions followed. “Why have they killed our family? Our children? They are so burned out we cannot identify their bodies, their faces.”

At a press briefing on August 30, Army Maj. Gen. William “Hank” Taylor of the Joint Staff tried to make something of yet another messy bungle in the annals of the US military. “We are aware of reports of civilian casualties. We take these reports extremely seriously.” John F. Kirby, Pentagon press secretary, was “not going to get ahead of it. But if we have significant – verifiable information that we did take innocent life here, then we will be transparent about that, too. Nobody wants to see that happen.” Urban also stated that the Pentagon was aware of civilian casualties “following our strike on a vehicle in Kabul today.”

The attack had that sheen of atrocious incompetence (Kirby preferred the term “dynamic”), but that would be a misreading. Killing remotely is, by its nature, inaccurate, though it has a disturbing fan club deluded into thinking otherwise. The death of civilians, subsumed under the euphemism of collateral damage, is often put down to shonky intelligence rather than the machinery itself. As Rachel Stohl of the Stimson Centre is a case in point. “These are precise weapons,” she erroneously observed in 2016. “The failure is in the intelligence about who it is that we are killing.”

Drone strikes have demonstrated, time and again, to lack the mythical precision with which they are billed. Those in proximity to the target will be slain. Whole families have been, and will continue, to be pulverised. “Gradually,” the New York Times observed with stunning obviousness in 2015, “it has become clear that when operators in Nevada fire missiles into remote tribal territories on the other side of the world, they often do not know who they are killing, but are making an imperfect best guess.”

In 2016, research conducted by the Bureau of Investigative journalism found that the lethal returns from the US-UAV program proved to be overwhelmingly civilian. A mere 3.5% could be said, with any certainty, to be terrorists.

The use of drones in combat is also politically baffling, self-defeating and contradictory. As Michael Boyle has explained, referring to the use of UAV warfare in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia, such a counterterrorism strategy was distinctly at odds in providing, on the one hand, a flow of arms and financial resource to the very governments whose legitimacy they undermined through the use of such strikes. By all means, we supply you, but have no trust in your competence.

A mere month after the conviction of whistleblower Daniel Hale, who did more than any other to reveal the grotesque illusion of reliability behind the US drone program, UAV warfare was again shown to be a butchering enterprise praised by the precisionists and found politically wanting. Those attending the funerals of the slain family members, an event taking place in the shadow of US power in retreat, needed little convincing who their enemy was.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

 

9 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Jack Cade

    In his ‘Mother of All Talk Shows’ on Sunday, George Galloway alleged that ‘most of the people killed in the atrocity at Kabul Airport were actually shot by US soldiers in the widespread panic’. He also alleged that the ‘sophisticated suicide weapons’ actually consisted of a single, pretty crude suicide bomb.
    I have since been told (but have not seen it myself) that the BBC reported the same allegations.

  2. Phil Pryor

    There were savages long ago, murderers, pillagers, robbers, assassins, domineering and oppressive. They are still with us despite the hopes of civilised advancement and general wishes for peace and prosperity. It is shameful that imperial and former colonial nations are still quite horrible, ruthless, impelled by a self fixated desire to be supreme, to control suitable orthodoxies, to have submissive and compliant controls and situations. The USA leads, it believes, the “free world” in which corporations and media maggots hold power and elections offer no decent or real choice. let alone a “say”. USA wars, intrusions, suppressions, interferences, scheming and plotting has led to death among the innocent of several millions. Domestic homicide alone outweighs a national total of all wars. Free? Peace? When? In my college days, the USA was said to have various states employing the firing squad, poison, hanging, the electric chair and either the garotte or guillotine, still on the books as they smartarsed scientific execution. Now they will seek new long range detached and impersonal weaponry, perhaps one day a controlled meteor on the skull, or a Hollywood death ray. Perhaps the Huns were morally superior…

  3. Williambtm

    Yes, Phil, we share the same views in what has become our world under the mongrel determinations of the US of A.
    I am still unable to determine what or if any benefit does the USA offer to humankind on this planet.

    How about Scatmo, he trusts the USA and its influence over Australia and its people?

    George Galloway has a reputation for delivering facts.

  4. Roswell

    Invading Afghanistan seems to be a bit of a hobby.

    The British invaded in 1839, fearful of Russia ever moving in and thus neighbouring colonial India.

    The British invaded again about 40 years later. Same reason.

    And again in 1919. And again, same reason.

    The Russians ‘finally’ invaded in 1979.

    The rest we all know about.

  5. wam

    The septics have always used excessive tactics in war and business and ignored accepting responsibility for any collateral damage by rationalising that the end justifies the means. We, the silent generation, too young for korea and too old for vietnam, remember audie murphy jumping on the back of a disabled tank and destroying a division of germans with a never ending machine gun belt. Historically, the major disasters, under the guise of war, are unrecognized by the system. The three worst massacres begin with soldiers killing men women and children at Wounded Knee. 100 years later congress apologised but blamed an Indian’s gun discharging for the massacre. Bud Dajo’s killers were praised by the president for their part in the kill or capture campaign where all men, women and children were butchered. The No Gun Ri 3 day massacre was quietly hidden for nearly 50 years till clinton expressed ‘regret’ but no apology.(https://apjjf.org/2015/13/9/Charles-J.-Hanley/4294.html) Body parts, including skulls, were amongst the most popular souvenirs of WW2 Mai Lay, Calley apologised but not America. Abu Graib bush sorry but no responsibility. Drones are the continuation of my experience in Nagasaki, only 25 years after the second bomb, where an American woman had written in the visitors book “better them than us”. Where does American and Australian soldiers sit in the Afghanistan campaign in this context? Will time tell?
    The American education system and the Japanese education system need to teach the history of their wars. Then some responsibility may be accepted.

  6. Brozza

    The umerkin attitude is/will be, ‘collateral damage’, f*ck off, nothing to see here, who cares anyway, all muslims are terrorists, it’s their own fault for living there, ………………………………….
    When you’ve killed more than 12 million since WW2 in losing wars against 3rd world countries, what’s a few more matter as long as the arms industry and the banks remain profitable.

  7. Brozza

    Roswell – There was no invasion in 1979. Afghan President Taraki and the pro-Soviet Government back in Dec. ’79, requested Soviet intervention in their fight with the Mujahadeen. The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, said in his memoirs (From the Shadows), that American intelligence(?) services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan some months before the Soviet intervention thanks to a directive signed by Carter in July of that year.

  8. Jack sprat

    “if you want to stop terrorism you must first stop partaking in it ” Noam Chomsky

  9. Jack Cade

    The Shovel said it all this week in an article about Biden promising distressed and grieving arms manufacturers that ‘a new war will be started soon.’

    You’d think a nation that has only succeeded in beating Grenada since WW2 would learn to stop picking on countries that actually fight back.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: