Modi’s Cricket Ploy: Hindutva as Twelfth Man

This week, the International Cricket Council’s One Day International tournament will commence…

I'm an angry bigot, in a tiny country…

My first love is satire and comedy – I used to run…

Crash and Burn

This is both optimistic and troubling. Fairfax media reports that "China has put…

The Admirable Demonstration of Dan Tehan And Other…

Apparently, Dan Tehan was on QandA last night. I only know this…

Condensed Fun Facts, Dates, Myths/Misconceptions

By Richard Whitington Fun Referendum Facts Fun Referendum Facts #1: The ballot paper for…

Cannabis: We can shut up, toe the line,…

When President Obama commented that he thought cannabis was likely less dangerous…

Corruption suspicions hang over secret PNG refugee contracts

Refugee Action Coalition Media Release AUSTALIA’S SECRET PNG DEAL MUST BE INVESTIGATED Refugee advocates…

Dianne Feinstein: National Security State Diva

The tributes for the late Democratic Senator from California, Dianne Feinstein, heaped…


Cutting Climate Change Research: Cuts at the Australian Antarctic Division

Australia’s funding priorities have been utterly muddled of late. At the Commonwealth level, there is cash to be found in every conceivable place to support every absurd military venture, as long as it targets those hideous authoritarians in Beijing. It seemed utterly absurd that, even as the Australian federal government announced its purchase of over 200 tomahawk cruise missiles – because that is exactly what the country needs – there are moves afoot to prune and cut projects conducted by the Australian Antarctic Division (AAD).

On July 10, an email sent to all staff by the head of division, Emma Campbell, claimed that the AAD “won’t be able to afford” all current positions. Since then, the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) has given a flimsy assurance that no jobs will be lost. “The focus will be on finding areas where work performed by those on fixed-term contracts can be incorporated into the work of ongoing staff,” stated a spokesperson for the department.

This all seemed an odd state of affairs, given the promise by the previous Morrison government that an additional AUD$804.4 million would be spent over a decade for scientific capabilities and research specific to Antarctic interests.

Unfortunately for those concerned with the bits and bobs at the AAD, the undertaking was not entirely scientific in nature. Part of the package included AUD$3.4 million to “enhance Australia’s international engagement to support the rules and norms of the Antarctic Treaty system and promote Australia’s leadership in Antarctic affairs.”

Australia’s long-standing obsession with claiming 42 per cent of the Antarctic, one that continues to remain unrecognised by other states, has meant that any exploration or claims by others are bound to be seen as threats. In 2021, the People’s Republic of China built its fifth research station base in Australia’s Antarctic environs, sparking concerns that Beijing may be less interested in the science than other potential rich offerings. They are hardly the only ones.

The AAD, however, has shifted its focus to identifying necessary savings amounting to 16% of the annual budget, a crude, spreadsheet exercise that can only harm the research element of the organisation. As Campbell’s staff-wide email goes on to declare, a review of the future season plan is also being pursued, along with the concern about a “budget situation [that] has made the three-year plan process harder than expected.”

A spokesperson for DCCEEW claimed that the resulting AUD$25 million difference in funding could be put down to the planning difficulties around the commissioned Antarctic icebreaker, the Nuyina. Few could have been surprised that the process resulted in delays, leading to the AAD to seek alternative shipping options.

What proved surprising to the Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government (when will they ever change such excruciating names?) was that there had been “no cuts to the [AAD] at all”. As Federal Minister Catherine King went on to say, the Australian government had not altered administering “the $804 million budget that is there for the Antarctic Division. There are no cuts, we’re a bit perplexed as to where this story has come from.”

The difference between Canberra’s automatic assumption of reliable finance and delivery has not, it would seem, translated into the individual funding choices made in the ice-crusted bliss of Australia’s southern research stations. According to Nature, two of Australia’s permanent research stations – Mawson and Davis – will not be staffed to their full capacity over the summer period.

The implication for such a budget trim will have one logical consequence. As Jan Zika, a climate scientist working at the University of New South Wales reasons, “When someone says there’s a cut to the AAD, it basically means less science, less understanding of what’s going on.” Zika is unsparing in suggesting that this was “catastrophic” (the word comes easily) given the changes to the sea ice under study. “We’re seeing so little sea ice relative to what we normally see at this time of the year.”

To have such gaps in data collection was also “catastrophic” to scientific and ecological understanding. “If we have data up to a certain date, and then we have a gap for three years, five years, and then we start to get the data again, it doesn’t make it useless. But it makes it really hard for us to get that understanding that we need.”

Zika is certainly correct about the sea ice findings. On June 27, data gathered by the US National Snow and Ice Data Center showed that the sea ice enveloping Antarctica was a record winter low of 11.7 million square kilometres, namely, more than 2.5 million square kilometres below the average for the time between 1981 and 2010.

Other researchers, notably those who collaborate with the AAD, fear the impeding effects of budget cuts. Christian Haas, a sea-ice specialist at the Alfred Wegener Institute of the Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research in Bremerhaven, Germany sees this as inevitable. Nathan Bindoff of the University of Tasmania, who specialises in physical oceanography, has also suggested that such funding cuts would delay investigative procedures with irreversible effect. “We’re probably going to be too late to address some of these questions.”

This hideous disjuncture says it all: climate change research, trimmed and stripped, thereby disrupting the gathering of data; military purchases and procurement, all the rage and adding to insecurity. While such foolish, exorbitant projects as the nuclear submarine plan under AUKUS is seen as an industry, country-wide enterprise that will produce jobs across the economy, the study of catastrophic climate change is being seen as a problem of secondary relevance, ever vulnerable to the financial razor gang.


Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button



Login here Register here
  1. Harry Lime

    A disinterested observer might conclude that we shovelled one lot of incompetent and corrupt manure out of the stables, only to install a new, and improved version of the same shit.Albo & Co are tilting towards a minority government at the next voting lottery…at best.When we can least afford it,Labor is burning any chance of a viable future on the altar of hanging on to government.The rhetoric being used is light years away from reality.The nightmare continues.

  2. ajogrady

    Thoroughly agree Harry Lime.
    When timid warmongering Albanese and many other timid warmongering Labor politicians
    lose their seats at the next election will Albanese finally then admit he was absolutely wrong and showed poor judgement when he, without question, whole heartedly acceptanced Scott Morrison’s pre election AUKUS wedge that not only goes against Labor principals and values but makes Australia a first strike military target? Labor once stood for peace and prosperity. Now Albanese AUKUS
    Labor stand for war and austerity.”The shiver looking for a backbone”Albanese now owns the AUKUS Albatross. Albanese reminds us that he is just like the war criminal John Howard, just in a different suit.

    Robo Debt shows we need an Independent Inquiry into AUKUS

  3. RomeoCharlie

    It may gut be the nes sources I am reading ( not Murdoch) but I can’t remember a a Labor Government or Prime Minister who have aroused such widespread disillusion. Albanese’s totally unconvincing appearance at the national conference, exemplified by the pathetic attempts ( as shown on ABC TV News) to arouse some passion in the delegates was emblematic.He talked of fulfilling election promises but those promises were so modest and uninspiring fulfilling them is modest progress indeed, and vastly overshadowed by what he didn’t promise and what needs to be done. Yes he led them to power but some serious action, and change of direction will be needed to retain it.

  4. leefe

    The word I’ve had from people within the AAD is that the savings are a result of eliminating consultants and their exorbitant fees, and having their work, where essential (and a lot of it wasn’t), performed in house. The bean counters say it should not, and is not planned to, result iin any cuts to actual research.
    In other words, mostly a media beat-up.

  5. Phil Pryor

    Comments here are rightly unhappy, showing disillsionment, for a rotten, hopeless, ignorant government run from Howard to Morrison has us waiting for better now and in future. But, what prevails? Cuts, promises, wild acceptance of the burden left behind when much should be scrubbed, reset, rethought. Never has this nation had such poor representation, as outlined aganst needs and likelihoods, The people in public life cannot fill out the roles adequately. We have mental midgets in loose suits, talking, imagining, fantasising, when the nation needs intelligent consideration, planning, actuation, devoted honesty of working towards good goals. AUKUS is so pointlessly foolish, aggressive, wasteful. Corporations continue to rob workers, raid resources, aim at profiteering. The environment and climate gets slow and low attention. We have no future at all if population expansion and GDP dreams remain a neverending and growing curse behind a dim future. Who is leading world movements for peace, restraint, harmony, diplomacy, consultation?

  6. Anthony

    Albo is a good foot-soldier for the US Military-Industrial complex.
    They want to sell weapons, who else they going to call?
    Meanwhile, China continues apace, occupying Antarctica as it sees fit.
    Antarctica as some kind of off-limits resource-rich extraction protectorate of the world?
    Nope, the CCP wants it, so that’s that.
    My condolences to future Aussies, we could not get rid of successive dud govs.
    It’s like watching cattle with a nose-ring led around the paddock.
    Mooove says the think tank lobbyist, now, do a dump here, do a dump there. Good boooy.
    Vested interests & lobby groups set the agenda, Labor & Libs go along to get along, as long as there’s a personal profit.
    Who still believes either Labor or Libs represent the interests of the people or environment? I don’t.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: