Evading Medical Care: Australia’s Refugee Arrangements with Taiwan

It is a credit to the venality of Australia’s refugee policy that…

Let's Keep The ABC And Sell The Government!

As I'm fond of pointing out, Liberal governments have a strangely inconsistent…

Do unto refugees

By John HalyDeterring and imprisoning asylum seekers is gaining popularity in the…

Our Minister for Women misses the point ...…

In 2012, Tony Fitzgerald summed up the state of politics in Australia…

Saga of Super Saturday: Will the LNP’s $144…

By Denis BrightA month out from Super Saturday, the five simultaneous by-elections…

If Abbott and Kelly want to cross the…

One of the most important roles of government is to prioritise.  They…

Day to Day Politics: In amongst the bullshit…

Friday 22 June 2018When I awoke Wednesday morning at 5.45 it was…

Activists Call for Mass Medical Evacuation from Manus,…

Media ReleaseIt is worrying that the latest death on Nauru and the…

«
»
Facebook

Bullied Relations: Australia, East Timor and Natural Resources

“The Commission instead opted for the easiest way out, which is a shame as in my perception it reveals a lack of impartiality on your behalf!” (Chief East Timorese negotiator, Xanana Gusmão, Feb 28, 2018).

In the scheme of things, Australia has deputised as regional bully for imperial powers since it became an outpost of the British empire. Neighbouring states have been ridiculed, mocked and derided as sub-human and incapable. The term “failed state” is still used in Canberra’s circles of presupposing power over desperate basket cases. Little wonder that China smells a wounded reputation.

It is in that spirit that signing of an agreement between Australia and East Timor to demarcate maritime borders took place. Officially, there were smiles, even a sense of back slapping. The March 7 press release from Foreign Minister Julie Bishop conveys the moment of false elevation:

“The treaty is a historic agreement that opens a new chapter in our bilateral relationship. It establishes permanent maritime boundaries between our countries and provides for the joint development and management of the Great Sunrise gas fields.”

The story behind the rubbing and flesh pressing was more questioning. The countries had, after all, reached this point after allegations of espionage threatened to scupper talks. Those allegations pertained to efforts on the part of the Australian Secret Intelligence Service to spy on East Timorese delegates during negotiations of the 2006 CMATS (Certain Maritime Arrangements in the Timor Sea). Where the division of revenue is concerned – in that case, the Greater Sunrise gas field in the Timor Sea – the spooks will follow.

The central points of historic contention between the states remain traditional: natural resources and how best to harness them. Neither could quite agree on who should have access to oil and gas reserves in the Timor Sea. The political imbroglio had its genesis in the 1989 Timor Gap Treaty signed between Australia and Indonesia when President Suharto’s kleptocracy, not to mention brutal suppression of East Timor, were deemed acceptable matters of realpolitik.

The subsequent liberation of East Timor left the fledgling state in a parlous, near-death state. Indonesia and Australia continued to share the resources of the Timor Gap in gluttonous merriment till the signing of the Timor Sea Treaty. The document had one glaring flow: the lack of a determined permanent maritime border. CMATS, which East Timor duly tore up, permitted an equal division of revenue, but similarly postponed the discussion of a maritime border.

Central to the Timor-Leste strategy was a determination to do it by the international law book. East Timor argued for a maritime border lying half way between it and Australia; Australia, that it follow its continental shelf. The Permanent Court of Arbitration, and Conciliation Commissioners, were duly engaged in applying the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Australia subsequently celebrated the outcome as “the first ever conciliation under [UNCLOS].”

While students of international law cheered the result, the political dimension proved uglier. East Timor’s chief negotiator and all-round resistance figure Xanana Gusmão lashed Australia and the Commissioners in a letter to the Conciliation Commission.

The Commission, he argued, were ignorant on East Timorese matters. The “chosen technical expert does not have appropriate experience or understanding from working in Timor-Leste or similar developing country contexts.” Their assessments on “potential benefits to the Timor-Leste population” were “shockingly superficial”, a point that only advantaged Australia.

Gusmão also had another gripe: Australian negotiators had seemingly been gotten to by the extractive industry heavies, Woodside Petroleum and Conoco Philips.“Civil society could potentially perceive this as a ‘form’ of collusion between the Government of Australia and Darwin LNG Partners and/or the Sunrise J.”

That the officials of Timor-Leste should harbour obstinate suspicions is not only understandable but sagacious. To deal with a repressive, sanguinary Indonesian military was painful enough. But then came international knowledge about the brutal regime operating in East Timor, knowledge that came precariously close to active complicity. Fraternal talk tends to be counterfeit in the market of geopolitics.

The 2,500 page Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor, transmitted by Gusmão, then East Timorese president, to the national parliament in November 2005 referenced hundreds of illuminating formerly classified US and British documents. These showed tacit approval by both the US and UK for the invasion of East Timor in 1975 and the status quo till 1999, during which some 100,000 Timorese died.

There were even open instances of Indonesian officials showing interest, as a National Security Council memorandum to US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger states, “in knowing the American attitude regarding Portuguese Timor (and, by implication, our reaction to a possible Indonesian takeover).” They were not disappointed.

As late as 2014, the Australian government would go to considerable lengths to prevent the release of files pertaining to Canberra’s knowledge of Indonesian troop deployments during the occupation. Of particular sensitivity were operations conducted in late 1981 and early 1982 which ended in predictable massacre. In a decision by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal agreeing with the government, President Justice Duncan Kerr claimed with Kafkaesque absurdity that he had to “express conclusions which I am unable to explain”.

What the justice did reveal was a tantalising titbit on the regional bullying East Timor has been subjected to at the hands of murderous and occasionally complicit powers. Evidence submitted to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade revealed a certain insistence on the part of US authorities in 2013 wanting “the Australian government to continue to restrict access to … four documents” with “ongoing sensitivities”.

East Timor remains a state on a drip. It is impoverished. Despite all this, the Australian preference remains determined and exploitative. The issue on where the oil and gas will be processed continues as a niggling sore point. Canberra prefers that piping take place through Darwin, with an 80 percent revenue sweetener to East Timor.

That will hardy pass muster for Dili, which sees value in having the processing facility in East Timor, where a “petroleum hub” is being developed. To that end, it is even willing to surrender a revenue cut to Australia. Power machinations, and Australia’s petroleum lobby, may well yet undo these arrangements. The regional bully remains renascent.


6 comments

  1. New England Cocky

    So what were the “Black Ops” undertaken in Timor Leste by elements of the Australian Army during this period?

  2. Phil

    Thanks once again Binoy for another fascinating (and scathing) exposure of the filthy machinations that operate behind the scenes as Australian governments and their corporate interests screw the neighbours.

    Meanwhile most of Australia seems to be entertained by junk TV with its faux realities and the lurid details of petty political peccadilloes. If Australia goes down the proverbial gurgler it will be a well deserved end since too few of our compatriots seem to give a shit about what is important.

  3. Roswell

    Binoy isn’t bad, is he, Phil?

  4. diannaart

    Thank you Binoy.

    In the 1990’s I was working with some people from East Timor and helped with the campaign for independence after the 1991 Dili massacre.

    Brave people gave up careers in Australia to return to East Timor to protect people from Indonesian troops – literally running from safe house to safe house – some did not survive.

    All the people I worked with were women – their courage, conviction and bravery is yet to be acknowledged. Given that East Timor remains under threat by Indonesia and exploitation by Australia, I will not provide any names of these brave people.

    I was unable to help much after 1996, when I first contracted an illness which has become chronic and limits me today, but I often think of the young women I was privileged to work with (at their invitation) and my hopes remain with them, their families and the people of Timor-l’Este

  5. Ian Hughes

    Thank you Binoy – excellent article.

    There was a very good piece in The New Daily about Ian Melrose who spent more than $3 million of his own money in supporting East Timor during this saga. Australia’s behaviour was despicable and Mr Melrose is to be applauded. Link to the article here: https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/national/2018/03/07/timor-leste-ian-melrose/

    I despair for my country – too often, these days!

  6. Kyran

    This whole saga has been the ‘perfect example’ of the bullying that goes on in the post-colonial (yet still colonial) world.
    Much of this occurred under the reign of little Johnnie, the Weasel. In one breath, maritime borders could be moved or excised in the blink of an eye if it related to those pesky refugees seeking asylum. In the very next breath, those borders were intransigent or unalterable for the benefit of companies wanting to get at natural resources.
    From the linked article, written in January 2017, Timor Leste “agreed to drop the spying case as part of the “good faith” negotiations to resolve the underlying disagreement over maritime boundaries.
    In a joint statement, they also said they would aim to resolve permanent maritime boundaries by September this year.”
    “The talks are a result of East Timor’s move last year to take Australia to the United Nations for compulsory conciliation in order to resolve the boundary dispute.”

    That action in the UN was doomed to failure when ASIO ‘sort of’ detained the spy at the centre of it. According to The Guardian, he still hasn’t got his passport back (since 2013).

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/07/australian-spy-who-revealed-bugging-of-timor-leste-cabinet-under-effective-house-arrest

    From another Guardian article, there were other considerations, such as “no compensation for past exploitation”.
    “L’ao Hamutuk, a Timorese human rights group, published calculations claiming Laminaria-Corallina has produced 203m barrels of oil since it began production in 1999, with more than US$2.2bn in tax paid to the Australian government.
    It estimates Australia received another $2.4bn in revenue from the other fields.”

    “Bernard Collaery, a lawyer intimately involved in the case, described the treaty as “more of the same” and said a median line boundary was “no victory at all”.
    It was something Timor-Leste had already been entitled to under United Nations law of the sea convention since Australia signed it, Collaery said.
    “Australia has been a pickpocket in the Timor Sea, shuffling through the poverty-stricken garments of these people for years,” Collaery told Guardian Australia. “And it’s horrible.”
    Collaery said former Timor-Leste president Xanana Gusmão, a close friend of his, was “between a rock and a hard place” with his people, and “the next generation of Timorese may not be as tolerant as he’s been”.”

    So, what’s the ‘end game’? Timor Leste has been bludgeoned into accepting whose only benefit will be possible future negotiations with Indonesia on their borders. They’ve dropped a legal case that would have assured them an ‘upper hand’ in negotiations for compensation, which they have also dropped.

    “A letter from Gusmão to the UN conciliation committee, leaked on Tuesday, accused Australia of colluding with resource companies in pushing for the gas to be piped to Darwin.
    He said giving up 10% of the revenue share in return for a Timorese processing plant would bring about $25bn in downstream revenue to his country.”

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/07/treaty-confirms-australia-profited-from-timor-leste-oil-and-gas-rights-groups-say

    Timor Leste is already building a processing hub but the corporates want to have the resources processed in Darwin.
    “Canberra prefers that piping take place through Darwin, with an 80 percent revenue sweetener to East Timor.”
    Anyone wanna guess who’s going to win? When it comes to these colonials, always follow the money.
    Thankyou Dr Kampmark and commenters. Take care

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: