Arise, Pandemic Profiteers
History’s annals are filled with war profiteers and hustlers for the opportunistic return. They come in the form of hoarders, arms manufacturers and wily business folk making a steal on slaughter and mayhem. But the other conflict – that of battling a pandemic – has also shown that profits exist for those willing to exploit the crisis.
With the global surge of SARS-CoV-2 in 2020, there were early signs that saving money, notably for large corporations, and earning greater revenue from such a lethal crisis, was possible. Work remotely as Zoom zombies – if you can. Retreat to the second or third abode, preferably in a remote location – if you have them. The sardine-packed proles toiling and providing essential services could endure the heavier burden of suffering.
Other historical periods also suggest sharp social inequalities in the face of disease and despair. That sublime Italian writer, Giovanni Boccaccio, who wrote The Decameron, a collection of 100 tales, gives us more than just a bird’s eye view into the horror of plague and affliction. The Black Death gathered somewhere between 40% to 50% of the European populace between 1347 and 1351. While Boccaccio cites the proverb that, “It is inherently human to show pity to those who are afflicted”, his colourful spread of characters suggests something quite different. The wealthy find fine seclusion amidst their provisions; the essential workers of the time go about their doomed labours, contracting the plague and dying in the process.
In October 2021, Americans for Tax Fairness and the Institute for Policy Studies Program on Inequality (IPS) found that billionaires in the US had seen their wealth balloon by 70%, or a mighty $2.1 trillion. The number of billionaires in the country had also spiked: from 614 to 745. During that same time, there were 89 million job losses among the less fortunate, 44.9 million attributable to COVID-19 illness, not to mention 724,000 deaths.
The culprits for such a huge wealth distortion are now familiar to us. The burgeoning online market during times of lockdown and stay-at-home orders enormously enriched the megalomaniacs of Silicon Valley and other industries.
There were some in the same income bracket who did not even need to lift a finger before seeing eye-wateringly improved accounts; asset prices shot up with jittery regularity, occasioned by enormous injections of taxpayer cash. In some cases, with the knowledge of government financial support, figures such as Australian billionaire Kerry Stokes could rake in corporate welfare while cutting the wages of workers. The spirit of pandemic generosity is rarely invoked.
In December 2021, the World Inequality Report, authored by a number of social scientists, estimated that the share of global household wealth owned by billionaires had risen that year from 2% at the start of the pandemic to 3.5% that year. “Contemporary global inequalities,” the authors of the report suggest, “are close to early 20th century levels, at the peak of Western imperialism.”
The one ray of reassurance in the otherwise discouraging report is the fact that government support, notably in wealthier states, did mitigate the more brutal effects of impoverishment. As lead author of the report, Lucas Chancel remarks, “in rich countries, government intervention prevented a massive rise in poverty.” The pandemic had demonstrated “the importance of social states in the fight against poverty.”
Oxfam has now added more material to the heaving shelves of inequality with a report released to coincide with that gathering of wealthy natterers known as the World Economic Forum. Not a smidgen of Oxfam’s dark revelations are original, but this does not make them any less relevant. The picture, filled in, shows a world of brutal, stratified inequality that promises to grow.
The opening is dramatic enough. “The wealth of the world’s 10 richest men has doubled since the pandemic began. The incomes of 99% of humanity are worse off because of COVID-19.” Good to throw the men into this, but it is also worth noting that there are some worthy representatives of the female sex, not least Australia’s wealthiest figure, iron ore magnate Gina Rinehart. This most unsympathetic of characters saw her own wealth soar from AU$16 billion to AU$36 billion. Not a bad return for someone who specialises in ruthlessly renting the earth while attributing this to hard work and genetic ingenuity.
All in all, 2,755 billionaires are raking it in globally, having received more in terms of their fortunes in the past two years than the previous 14 combined. “This is the biggest annual increase in billionaire wealth since records began,” the Oxfam report notes glumly. No wonder the hot-headed conspiracy theorists are champing at the bit, feverish at the prospect that plots have been hatched, and are being acted upon, in Davos and other champagne drenched venues.
The Oxfam account adds more texture to the arguments. As with other accounts about the increasing wealth disparity in pandemic times, the rise in revenues have occurred because of dizzying rises in stock market prices, “a boom of unregulated entities,” a greater prevalence of monopoly power, ongoing privatisation and that ongoing pattern of lower corporate tax rates and easing regulations. Workers’ rights and wages have also suffered, though Oxfam also makes the point that “the weaponization of racism” has its role to play.
Another parallel of the Black Death is worthy of note. The plague was so disruptive as to cause its own alterations of the feudal order. The wealthy might have scurried to their places of ornate and padded seclusion, but they were by no means guaranteed survival. Around them, aggressive depopulation fed the fulcrum of change. It emboldened the peasantry, resulting in a range of riots and a challenge to social and economic circumstances.
The likes of Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg have yet to see a modern version of a peasant insurrection. Perhaps it’s time they did.
Like what we do at The AIMN?
You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.
Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!
612 total views, 2 views today
4 commentsLogin here Register here
After the Black Death labourers of all sorts were few and far between so they commanded much higher wages than before. Can’t remember where I read this but makes sense. I for one will never spend a cent at Harvey Norman and recommend you do the same and tell everyone else, as I do.
Excellent discussion and reference to history. In Medieval Europe, England included, the wealthy aristocrats and gentry took to their country mansions and isolated in the lap of luxury, while the poor had nowhere to go, keep working and carry the full burden and exposure of disease, poverty and bankruptcy in the crowded diseased riddled streets of the city. This gap and trend has not changed as we see front line workers exploited and made to return to work COVID positive and not always asymptomatic, and during lock down people in dense housing blocks, appartments and suburbs seriously compromised at all levels. We saw this gap just between Eastern suburbs of Sydney versus Western suburbs and fanned by political favour and hardship imposed by the Berejiklian government. We saw large corporations and banks double their profits and halve their workforces and salary costs while receiving massive corporate welfare they didn’t need like Harvey Norman and 7 West Media, and none of it was given back in good faith. This money could have gone to families and small businesses, students, people who rented their homes and lost their jobs, lower income families with mortgages and children, the unemployed and under employed – But no the Liberals took the credit for this corruptly administered corporate welfare and continued to spread lies and blame poorer members of the community for the suffering and insults they had to bear at no fault of their own. Many lost their Super and savings, rent and mortgage debt substantially increased and both Liberals and Federal and NSW State governments couldn’t give a rat’s arse.
I too will not be shopping at any of these retailers that took advantage of Josh Frydenberg’s hugely unsuccessful and expnsive public debt give away, and declined to give it back. Neither will I be shopping in any retail chains or plazas who reduced their workforce, underpaid them, and now continue to exploit that workforce with lower wages, loss of Super, sick leave, annual leave and expect them to come to work while COVID +ve or suffer loss of income. Not shopping there and I will be checking and asking awkward questions and doing my research, with eyes and ears open.
Jon. I totally agree. The university of Melbourne vet Uvet which i have used for the past 30 years cut staff when the International students stopped at the start of the pandemic. 450 jobs were lost. It is one of the busiest vet clinics. To make matters worse they shut all vet services including emergency services for almost 3 weeks over Christmas. Yet the vice chancellor had a 7.1million dollar residence provided. Such greed and short sighted planning. Now they have a massive vet shortage and burnout demoralized staff. No longer will I be attending Uvet. Profits before people. I had to use 2 different emergency vets while they were closed. No wonder there is a major shortage of vets made worse by the pandemic. I won’t be shopping or using any services which take advantage of staff. Or refuse to give up not needed financial assistance. So many truly needy people went without while companies like Harvey Norman and Specsavers raked the money in.Micheal West did a good report on those who took money they never needed.
That picture of capitalist produced super maggots is revolting and to borrow from Henry Lawson, may they fall down through their arseholes and break their Nucking Fecks…and as with Carina, I will not support or use a large number of corporations, media outlets, money organisations, foreign profiteers.