Ukraine’s Tank Problem

It seems to be a case of little provision for so much…

When culture war games trend lethal

The right-wing ecosphere throws an idiot ball into the civic discourse with…

The year ahead

Most people turn away from politics over the holiday period when the…

Cutting Your Power Bills In Half And Other…

A few years ago there was a scam where people were promised…

Values Based Capitalism: The Imperative of Defining Commitment…

By Denis Bright Editorial insiders at The Weekend Australian (28-29 January 2023)…

A walk in the forest

Bayerischer Wald can be just as hard to get to than it…

An Emergent Premier Chris Minns - Uniting Sydney…

By Denis Bright After more than a decade in Opposition, NSW Labor is…

Forget Australia Day And Celebrate: Rum Rebellion Day…

After pointing out for a number of years that January 26th isn't…

«
»
Facebook

In 2017 let’s be the change we want to see

By 2353NM

Well, look at that. 2016 is finished and 2017 has arrived to present us with more challenges. To be brutally honest, 2016 wasn’t the best of years for those who prefer progressive policy, equality, and fairness for all. Later this month, Donald Trump becomes president of the USA; at the time of writing Malcolm Turnbull still survives as prime minister of Australia; and the likes of Cory Bernardi and George Christensen seem to be in charge of the LNP’s policy settings, probably in spite of what Turnbull would like to think. In the past, articles at this time of the year have suggested that no one really cares about politics because the beach, tennis, and cricket are too appealing. While the beach hasn’t lost its charms (depending on the weather and the crowds), the tennis has the same identities as 2016 and the test cricket is a matter of concern as 2016 concludes.

If it makes us feel any better, it seems that as 2016 ended, Turnbull was under the pump with the state premiers openly critical of Turnbull’s back-down on looking at pricing schemes to limit carbon emissions. Probably even more surprising was the Business Council of Australia slamming the government for ruling out such a scheme. It’s not often that ALP premiers and the Business Council agree on something so fundamental. On top of that, there are outbreaks of logic about the emptiness of Turnbull’s ‘Jobson Grothe’ (sorry, that should read ‘Jobs and Growth’) slogan that nearly lost him the election held mid-year. While there have been 25 years of economic growth, the September 2016 quarter resulted in a 0.5% contraction, the first for 5 years. As the ‘leftie elites‘ at the ABC reported:

The only way for millennials to save, for households to pay down their debts, for all of us to have good job prospects and more security and to avoid that credit crunch, is for the Government to go back on everything they have been saying for years, and to increase its spending.

An increasing number of experts are now going against the mainstream, and making the point that for the rest of us to save, the Government has to borrow.

“Voters have been force-fed this neoliberal line that is without foundation in theory, history, experience or practice,” said Professor Mitchell.

Australia’s treatment of refugees is now an international talking point. The New York Times recently published a feature article on the issue noting that:

In Peter Dutton, the immigration minister, the country has its own little Trump. Last May he portrayed the asylum seekers as illiterates bent on stealing Australian jobs, and he has suggested “mistakes” were made in letting in too many Lebanese Muslim immigrants. His soft bigotry resonates with enough voters to sway elections.

At the same time, Manus and Nauru are a growing embarrassment to Australia, a party to all major human rights treaties. “There is an increasing realization that this is unsustainable,” Madeline Gleeson, an Australian human rights lawyer, told me.

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull knows this and needs a way out. After Omid Masoumali, a young Iranian, burned himself to death on Nauru this year, a cartoon by Cathy Wilcox captured Australia’s shame. Above a man in flames was the caption “Not drowning.”

Before we all decide to give up amongst the doom and gloom, there are a few things we should try. According to Jay Rayner’s article in The Guardian, a tub of Haagen Dazs salted caramel ice cream may help. While I can’t offer any personal experience, it might be worth a try.

Or we can take the example of some notable Australians who have suffered greatly at a personal level and turned the suffering into a positive message for the greater good.

Daniel Morcombe was waiting for a bus on Queensland’s Sunshine Coast in December 2003. He was going to a shopping centre to buy Christmas presents. He never made it to the shopping centre or home afterwards. Daniel was 13. For eight years, his whereabouts were unknown. In August 2011, a person who used to live on the Sunshine Coast was charged with Daniel’s abduction and murder and he was convicted in March 2014.

Bruce and Denise Morcombe are Daniel’s parents. They had every right in the world to retreat into their remaining family and mourn Daniel’s disappearance but they didn’t. In 2005, they set up the Daniel Morcombe Foundation, and pledged:

The Foundation’s key role in the community is the education of all children about their personal safety. By directly assisting educators and parents through the funding and development of child safety educational resources as well as assisting young victims of crime, the Foundation continues to empower all Australians to make their local communities safer places for all children.

The Foundation is strongly committed to the development and education of Respectful Relationships for children and teenagers in our schools and communities and also assisting in reducing the over-representation of Indigenous Australians in the Child Protection sector.

The Foundation has developed and made freely available a number of resources and phone apps that target school children across Australia. Most of the material is free. The Daniel Morcombe Foundation also raises awareness through activities such as the ‘Day for Daniel’ where schools are encouraged to discuss ‘stranger danger’ and similar issues with students. Bruce and Denise Morcombe’s list of achievements is extensive and ongoing, with seemingly no chance of slowing down in the near future:.

The Daniel Morcombe Foundation remains committed to Child Safety Education and developing Harm Prevention resources that help educate children, teachers, parents, carers and their families to ‘Keep Kids Safe’.

In addition, the Foundation now has a strong focus on building Respectful Relationships within our schools and communities through proactive education. Coupled with our core messages of Recognise, React, Report, this will enable children and young adults to act positively and appropriately while staying safe.

The Foundation continues to develop new cutting-edge resources that are required in our ever-changing cyber and physical world. We are committed to fund new projects and initiatives in partnership with Universities, Police, community and educational organisations to ensure an on-going commitment to child safety and respectful relationships. These resources will continue to be made available and accessible to all communities (free of charge) throughout Australia.

Clearly, the Morcombe family made the decision to tell Daniel’s story rather than bottle it up. They had the good sense to gather people around them who knew how to get a story out and publicise the story relentlessly. Like a lot of public good programs, no one can really say how many kids’ lives have been saved by the work of the Morcombes in the past 11 years and how many will be saved in the future, but the real point is this: instead of asking why it happened and blaming the bus company (the bus Daniel was going to catch broke down and a replacement one was full prior to getting to Daniel’s location, so it didn’t stop); the police for not finding Daniel immediately; themselves or any one of the other thousand or so coincidences that could have saved Daniel, they resolved to do something to ‘fix it’. The Daniel Morcombe Foundation is successful and rightly so. I know my kids have been exposed to the ‘Day for Daniel’ message and are well aware of some protocols that may help them to escape a similar fate to Daniel’s — as are thousands of other school-aged kids around Australia. Rather than being consumed by it, the Morcombes turned their grief and agony into a movement that clearly makes the society we live in a better place to be.

Rosie Batty was the, 2015 Australian of the Year due to her work in countering domestic violence in Australia. Unfortunately, Batty has personal experience of domestic violence as well as witnessing her son being murdered by an ex-partner at Tyabb, Victoria, during 2014. As the website for the Luke Batty Foundation states:

Everyone in Australia was hugely affected by the manner in which Luke was killed and communities from far and wide responded generously by sending to Luke’s mum Rosie, hundreds of cards, an abundance of beautiful flowers, and donations, both large and small

The Luke Batty Foundation website and Batty’s telling of her story has certainly brought awareness of issues around domestic violence against both women and men in this country. Once there is awareness, there is the opportunity to take action to hopefully eliminate the problem from our society. Batty’s ongoing work will continue to promote solutions to the issue of domestic violence.

Like the Morcombes, no one would have blamed Batty if she had withdrawn into an environment where she had caring people around her and questioned how and why the events surrounding the murder of her son occurred. She hasn’t — obviously deciding that her suffering can be better used in creating a public good.

The Morcombes, Rosie Batty and others who have turned adversity into good can teach us all a lesson in relation what looks like the rebirth of the ultra-conservative/alt-right/delcons or whatever terminology you want to use.

There is a version of an old saying that suggests that if at first, you don’t succeed — don’t try skydiving. While flippant, the answer to the excesses of those like Bernardi, Christensen, and Dutton in pushing Australia into being a mean and dispirited collection of minions is to keep pushing the case for the alternative. You, too are perfectly capable of writing an email or letter to a politician that is party to something that offends you. You too can write a post on a blog. There is no magical formula that is shared by ‘the elite’. Should you choose The Political Sword as your media of choice we’ll even help you (just click on the this ‘Contact’ link and give us an idea of what you want to write about). You too can ‘like’, ‘share’ or post something on your social media account. A groundswell of support can work miracles.

Marketing experts tell us that personal recommendation has far more influence than advertising or statements by those who are not trusted as highly (such as politicians). The same people will also suggest that emails and correspondence critical of the actions of public figures and companies are read and if there is a sufficient volume, action will be taken to address the concerns. Some will tell you that you have no idea: ensure that you have some facts to back up your argument and be prepared to lay the facts out calmly and logically.

Bloggers and social media posters do get noticed. Greg Jericho enjoyed a quiet life blogging as ‘Grogs Gamut‘ until Mark Scott, then managing director of the ABC read something Jericho wrote on his blog about the quality of journalism during the 2010 election. Scott used the comment in a missive to his staff about the quality of the election news coverage. Jericho now writes for The Guardian and the ABC websites after The Australian outed him claiming ‘the public interest’.

So, in 2017 don’t just sit there and yell at the TV when Turnbull or his minders put yet another nail in the coffin of the society where people are supposed to be equal, where we care about each other and those who are not as well off as we are, and we care about the quality of life of those that follow us — do something about it.

Apart from being part of the change you want to see, you’ll feel much better if you do try to change the world.

What do you think?

If issues discussed in this article have affected you or those close to you, please call Lifeline on 13 11 44 or Kids Helpline on 1800 55 1800.

This article was originally published on The Political Sword

For Facebook users, The Political Sword has a Facebook page:
Putting politicians and commentators to the verbal sword

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

 

 188 total views,  2 views today

8 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Adnil

    As Eldrige Cleaver once said “There is no more neutrality in the world. You either have to be part of the solution, or you’re going to be part of the problem”
    I have friends who believe the rwnj and shock jocks are telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth! It’s near impossible to reason with them so I wonder what it will take to change their attitude.

  2. Michael

    Adnil, share with your friends: the closest to democratic orgasm is the 4 minutes it takes to complete a ballot paper every 3-4 years.

    It is our non-accidental (that is, by design whether by awareful neglect or just apathy), systemic civic ignorance + laziness + sustained conditioning to believe that if “you VOTE for me and I’ll do it for YOU (but I will still follow the party platform to demonstrate my loyalty and commitment to my fellow party members and hopefully my contribution to the overall confusion with my mates in strategic sections of the media and generous donations received will fog your memory and give you lots of fear + ignorance excuses to vote for me in 3-4 years’ time, in the mean time I can do almost anything)”

    Gotta love this democracy!

  3. Jennifer Meyer-Smith

    2353NM,

    100% agree.

    Adnil, keep trying with them or at least, move onto some other unenlightened types, who are not your personal friends who you won’t feel so compromised by for appealing to their better natures while caring for them as mates, as they’re not your mates. I hope that makes sense.

    Michael, the ballot box is the final word. But the political process until then is very productive with every letter, phone call, representation, twitter/facebook message.

    1,000 days approx are between each election and 1,000 days the moron pollies need reminding that we exist and we have many expectations.

  4. Michael

    Jennifer, I would agree if there were consequences – I skeptically share your optimism – the list of “productive” looks increasingly like “so long as it makes them happy”.

    As for expectations – I only have one – an accountability mechanism (yet to be designed) to voters based on issues between elections.

  5. Jennifer Meyer-Smith

    Fair enough,

    but what I’m saying is the necessary glue that shows there are living, breathing, interested and most importantly, engaged people who will be voting. Physical and involved presence trumps all.

  6. Kyran

    Duncan Storrar is an advocate for the poor and voiceless through ‘Rise and Be Heard’, notwithstanding the treatment he received for the heinous crime of asking a question.
    Alpha Cheng is an advocate for peace and tolerance, notwithstanding the murder of his father.
    Malala Yousafzai is an advocate for peace and education, notwithstanding an attempt on her life by those who have no regard for peace or education.
    Behrouz Boochani is an advocate for refugees and asylum seekers rights, notwithstanding his incarceration by our government (without charge or conviction) on Manus.
    Like Rosie Batty and the Morcombes, these are examples of courageous people with conviction.
    To ask any of our political leaders (on a global basis) to show a fraction of their courage and integrity can be no more than an exercise in futility. It is inconceivable that change can be expected from those who are not just a part of the problem, they are the problem.
    As you quite rightly point out, 2353NM, it becomes incumbent on all of us to become advocates for those less fortunate in the hope that change can be effected through the ballot box.

    “I believe profoundly in the possibilities of democracy, but democracy needs to be emancipated from capitalism. As long as we inhabit a capitalist democracy, a future of racial equality, gender equality, economic equality will elude us.”

    “I am no longer accepting the things I cannot change. I am changing the things I cannot accept.”

    The words of Angela Davis are as relevant today as they were in the 60’s. Thank you, 2353NM and the AIMN. Take care

  7. Florence nee Fedup

    Michael I think the place to begin would be with fixed terms. Takes power away from PM to manipulate the system with threats calling early/late election.

    Second would to appoint speakers from outside the parliament. A position that would require at least 2/3 support of MPs in both houses to appoint. The speaker office would be in charge Ethics Committee etc. Even go as far as taking on some of the responsibilities of the leader of the house.

    Election rolls to be digitised. Name crossed off on computer, not paper roll. Would make voting more than once impossible. Easy enough to do.

    A limit put on the number media people can have in each department. Not 70 odd that now reside in Dutton’s department, put their by Morrison.

    Just beginning. Above is economical and very doable.

  8. Michael

    Kyran, to your “As you quite rightly point out, 2353NM, it becomes incumbent on all of us to become advocates for those less fortunate in the hope that change can be effected through the ballot box.” I would add it would be in “both’s” interest (the us and the less fortunate) and dare I venture to say cheaper in all respects – the one less fortunate may have the cure for cancer and “us” may continue to advocate and learn more about each other.

    Florence, I would be happy to begin exchanging ideas on the process (the HOW of) of exchanging ideas on the subject with you and interested others – where?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: