Government approves Santos Barossa pipeline and sea dumping

The Australia Institute Media Release Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek’s Department has approved a…

If The Jackboots Actually Fit …

By Jane Salmon If The Jackboots Actually Fit … Why Does Labor Keep…

Distinctions Without Difference: The Security Council on Gaza…

The UN Security Council presents one of the great contradictions of power…

How the supermarkets lost their way in Oz

By Callen Sorensen Karklis Many Australians are heard saying that they’re feeling the…

Purgatorial Torments: Assange and the UK High Court

What is it about British justice that has a certain rankness to…

Why A Punch In The Face May Be…

Now I'm not one who believes in violence as a solution to…

Does God condone genocide?

By Bert Hetebry Stan Grant points out in his book The Queen is…

As Yemen enters tenth year of war, militarisation…

Oxfam Australia Media Release As Yemen enters its tenth year of war, its…

«
»
Facebook

The Bigot in Chief: Trump’s Intolerant Past

The suggestion that the current President of the United States is a racist and an intolerant bigot is hardly original to me. A quick scan of his twitter feed is all the evidence you need. The US House of Representatives (the House) voted recently to condemn Trump’s racist comments against four Democratic Representatives of colour. To set his more recent remarks in context, I want to delve into Trump’s bigoted past, and show that his current behaviour is nothing new. This is not to excuse it, but to show that he has not really gotten worse, he is the same bigoted dolt he always was.

Housing Discrimination, Part One: Race

In the 1970s, the Department of Justice sued Trump and his father for discriminatory housing practices. Translation: they did not want to rent to black people. If you think this seems extreme, consider these recollections from people involved in the case

ELYSE GOLDWEBER: What they had done was send “testers” – meaning one white couple and one couple of color – to Trump Village, a very large, lower-middle-class housing project. And of course the white people were treated great, and for the people of color there were no apartments. We subpoenaed all their documents. That’s how we found that a person’s application, if you were a person of color, had a big C on it..

For the people of colour there were no apartments – indeed. But Trump could not just deny black people apartments. He had to mark their applications with a giant yellow sta – no – sorry – a giant C. Remarkable: the Civil Rights Act of 1964 had been the law for nearly ten years by this point. But bigots like Trump and his old man do not bend to the law; that is for peasants. We do what we want. The case was settled by what the lawyers call a ‘consent decree’ – essentially the accused makes restitution to the plaintiffs and the case goes away.

To put the issue beyond doubt, there is this gem from Trump after the settlement. Quote John Yinger, another lawyer

Trump had some interesting language after the settlement: He said that it did not require him to accept people on welfare.

Yes, because all black people are on welfare. Trying to keep this one G-rated folks; it is a struggle. The racism, condescension and prejudice just oozes from every pore of his being. I do not hate anyone, but this man makes it hard.

Housing Discrimination, Part Two: Disability

Lest you think that Trump’s bigotry only relates to race, here is another story told about the Bigot in Chief

We met with the architect to go over the elevator-cab interiors at Trump Tower, and there were little dots next to the numbers. Trump asked what the dots were, and the architect said, “It’s braille.” Trump was upset by that. He said, “Get rid of it.” The architect said, “I’m sorry; it’s the law.” Trump’s exact words were: “No blind people are going to live in this building.”

Amazing, is it not? This man has no empathy, no conscience. He has no concept of compassion. Even ignoring all that, as the architect said, it was the law to put braille dots in elevators. There are two major aspects to this. First is the the massive prejudice and ‘f those who are different to me’ mentality. Thus far we have no blind people and no black people. Gee I wonder what his preferred candidates were?

The second, and far more important, is the overarching sense of ‘the law does not apply to me’. Trump believed then, and certainly believes now, that he is able to do as he pleases and that no laws or restrictions apply to him. He thinks of himself as a modern day king or emperor: above the laws to which mere mortals are subject. The great tragedy, as the last seventy-plus years show, is that he is right. There have been, and continue to be, precisely no consequences for Trump flagrantly and frequently violating the law. As with any child, he learned what he lived: wealth, privilege, power. He learned that he could do what he wanted and face no consequences, so that is what he came to expect. And society obliged.

The Central Park Five, Then and Now

The article I am using as the basis for this piece is much longer, and details many incidents with similar primary evidence quotations. I have chosen what perhaps are the more obscure and distant examples of his racism and prejudice. I want to end on the well-known case of the so-called Central Park Five.

In April of 1989, a woman was raped in central park. Hysteria was such that five young men, four African-Americans and a latino, found themselves arrested and charged with the crime. However, before the trial had even started, Trump took out full page ads in all the major newspapers calling for the death penalty for these young men. Ignore the barbarity of the death penalty, and its use on teenagers. Ignore too the fact that, for all its viciousness, rape is not a capital crime. These young men were not even convicted of the crime! Trump was attempting to blatantly taint the jury pool (voir dire would have been scintillating). The young men were convicted, but spared capital punishment. There was, as usual, no punishment for Trump for his blatant tampering with the justice system.

In 2002, DNA evidence exonerated the young men and they successfully sued the city of New York for millions. In 2016, some fourteen years after their exoneration, Trump still believed they were guilty. He is clearly not amenable to facts, he does not change his thinking on an issue once his mind is made up, and we have always been at war with East Asia.

Conclusion: Bigot in Chief

The media and the corporate Democrats are going after Trump and passing meaningless resolutions in the House condemning him for his racist tweets. There is actually a far larger point at play here, and it shows how truly dangerous Trump is.

Consider briefly the definition of the word bigot: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudice. Related terms include doctrinaire, fanatic, sectarian.

All of these terms have one thing in common: proponents lack that quality which being President of the United States most requires: mental flexibility.

This is what makes Trump so dangerous: not his racism, not the fact-free nonsense he spouts on a daily basis, but his simplistic, dogmatic and rigid world view. His inability to learn, to change, to adapt. For all the vile crap he has said in and out of office, look beyond that and see the true danger: the man in charge of the largest military in human history is not capable of learning anything.

We live in troubled times, as Green Day said.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

 

11 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Wat Tyler

    According to CNN, Trump is supported by over 90% of registered Republicans…

  2. Kerri

    The only facts Trump is willing to accept change on are his own behaviours.
    “I was not a fan” has been disproven with the release of footage of Trump fawning all over Jeffrey Epstein.
    Epstein looks less a fan.
    Netflix has a 4 part series on the Central Park 5 well worth watching as is the Oprah interview with the cast and actual subjects.
    (I skipped through the cast stuff, though they did a good job, to the real CP5 who were clearly altered from the whole episode whilst Trump remains, as ever, unaltered.

  3. Josephus

    The far right sites are so happy that Epstein is, at least by descent, Jewish. Back to the 1930s. I hope Trump is discredited utterly, together with his pal Epstein. Maybe some of the nutty christians that support him will change their minds.

  4. James

    And which Australian political leader has been sucking up to him as we speak?

  5. Terence Mills

    I would like to see all women in Congress (Republican included) come out and stand with the four women of colour that Trump has chosen to single out for abuse.

    I would also like to see him roundly beaten at the next election and then possibly the FBI will take him into custody for his numerous criminal activities.

    They also need to flush the Trump family entourage from the White House and fumigate that stately building.

  6. Jon

    He didn’t know what the dots on the buttons in elevators are for???
    Some Genius!

  7. Aortic

    There are none so blind as those who cannot see.

  8. wam

    It is unthinkable for trump to contemplate failing.
    All politicians develop a political ego from sychophants and the system. Trump went into politics with the ego already in place. He neither needed development nor any form of apprenticeship bang straight in to the top, warts and all.
    I was one of the few surprised how well a woman did in America and always thought the man chosen to represent the republicans was the next president.
    Being an americophobe the best was always trump, he was the least educated, the richest by far, the most obnoxious by farer and with only his low ‘god and the bible’ index as a negative. Almost perfect to ^@%@% up America.
    Your words suggest I was right.
    But are we??
    There are no democrats on my facebook and only three American relatives of friends. The republican stuff they share is scary enough to frizz any normal person’s hair but it is interspersed with economic and social snippets hinting at success of his ‘policies’ nothing I have seen or heard on murdoch or cable lends support but we know who cares about facts when ‘belief is in the air’???
    The happy snaps of donald and boris, with memories of the other pair boris and george, are so twirling imagination I am salivating at the prospect of a monumental cockup in both the poms and the septics wonder which will hit the vodka???
    ps
    There is always a silver lining, apparently trumps’ dentist has found bigfoot

  9. Phil

    Trump always reminds me of Rossini’s William Tell Overture. With apologies to Rossini.

    To the dump to the dump with Trump Trump Trump To the dump to the dump with Trump Trump Trump To the dump to the dump with Trump Trump Trump with Trump and the good ol USA.

    That is nearly as lame as Bomb Bomb Iran.

    I see it is heating up in the waters off Iran. Not long now.

  10. Henry Rodrigues

    And still the Grand Old party of stiff conservatives and the frothing at the mouth ‘base’ stand by their man. Ah the good ole USA. I am glad I do not live in the USA, its bad enough having Scummo and his band of dickheads, to contend with.

  11. Freethinker

    This is the USA, Trump only weak up the hate and racism within the people in that same manner that Abbott started here during his time in opposition and during his ruling.
    America: Love or Leave it’ sign at Virginia Baptist church
    “People that feel hard about our president and want to down the president, and down the country and everything, they ought to go over there and live in these other countries for a little while,” said Pastor E. W. Lucas, Friendship Baptist Church.
    “Since we’ve had favorable comments on it, I thought I’d just leave it a while,” said Pastor Lucas. “Preachers, by and large, today, are afraid they’re gonna hurt somebody’s feelings, and when I get in the pulpit, I’m afraid I won’t hurt somebody’s feelings.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page