Oxfam Australia welcomes Australia’s UN vote on the…

Oxfam Australia Media Release Oxfam Australia welcomes the Australian Government's decision to vote…

Monash experts: South Korea's political crisis

Monash University South Korea was plunged into political chaos overnight when President Yoon Suk…

Billions of people to benefit from technology breakthrough…

University of South Australia Media Release A novel approach to make seawater evaporate…

A Global Crisis and Australia’s Unique Opportunity

How Community Independents Are Redefining Democracy and Offering Australia a Path Away…

Political Challenges: More Progressive Responses to Ongoing Culture…

By Denis Bright The LNP certainly knows how to frame its commitments to…

Neocolonialism is alive and flourishing. The human cost……

My People When you gonna leave My People Give them room to breathe My People Stop…

Albanese Government leaves skilled construction machinery workers in…

Master Builders Australia Media Release After the long-awaited release of the Federal Government’s…

Australia’s War History: From Britain’s Wars to Neutrality

By Denis Hay Description Australia’s war history. Explore our history of supporting Britain’s wars…

«
»
Facebook

Tag Archives: Arthur Sinodinos

Arthur Sinodinos – Perfect for Assistant Treasurer!

Photo: inaur.com

Photo: inaur.com

Ok, there have been a lot of unfair remarks made about Mr Sinodinos. I can’t remember any of them specifically but I have a vague recollection that a number of people at a large dinner party were suggesting that he wasn’t fit to be Assistant Treasurer. At least I think it was a dinner party. There was food and wine and people were talking. Not wishing to appear greedy I refrained from eating and just concentrated on the wine. If I use the same standard that people are applying to Arthur, I’m not fit to be Assistant Treasurer either. Which is clearly nonsense because I have exactly the sort of skills Australia needs at the moment. I am good with money. It’s when I’m broke that I’m not so good. So if you want me to be good, just give me lots of money.

But I digress. We were talking about what people were saying at the alleged dinner party. The general consensus was that if Arthur Sinodinos couldn’t remember anything from his time at that place where he was paid more money than they were, then he shouldn’t have a position of responsibility in the Government. I thought I should set them straight.

“Class warfare, pure and simple!” I said.

People stopped and listened in that way that they often do when I crawl out from under the table and speak with my deep, well-modulated authorative voice.

“You’re all just jealous, I continued, “because you’re paid too much and if there were no minimum wage, you’d soon see what you were worth! How on earth are we expecting him to remember some part time job from the last century. Can any of you remember every detail from a job where you only worked for twenty hours? I doubt it.”

“It wasn’t last century. It was only a few years ago. And he was being paid a large amount of money,” asserted someone.

“Exactly my point, you’re just attacking him because you don’t have the skill set to earn that sort of money.” I reached for the wine bottle and poured myself another glass.

“Apart from being totally unaware of anything that the company was doing, exactly what skills did he demonstrate?”

“He can open doors. Not the everyday sort of doors that anyone can open, but the doors that are normally closed unless someone with a particular knowledge turns the handle a particular way. He wasn’t there for his excellent memory. If he had an excellent memory, he’d be on some quiz show.”

Who Wants To Be a Millionaire?” suggested someone whose name I can’t remember.

“The trouble is,” I patiently explained, “that none of you loony left understand the way the economy works. That’s why Labor sent Australia broke. They had no understanding of balancing a budget.”

“But the Liberals have eliminated the debt ceiling and intend to borrow more than twice as much as Labor did,” insisted the person at the end of the table.

“And their Paid Parental Leave is going to add billions to the bottom line,” added the man next to me.

“Look,” I said, “the PPL is completed funded. They intend to cut company tax by one percent, except for the top companies where they will have a one percent surcharge to pay for the scheme.”

“But if they cut company tax on these companies by one percent then add one percent, aren’t they just back where they started?” said the person on the end of the table.

“And won’t the companies just pass it on as they did with the Carbon Tax?” said the man next to me.

“No, because it’s a levy, not a tax,” I told them.

“What’s the difference?”

I could tell that I was dealing with simpletons. I needed to use more concrete examples.

“Take this bottle,” I said, holding up the wine bottle.

“It’s empty!’

“Exactly my point. That bottle represents Labor policies. The bottle is now empty and nobody got any benefit from it.”

“Well, we all got to drink some,” said someone. And they laughed. Everyone’s a comedian.

“Now, hand me the full bottle of wine at the end of the table. This represents a strong economy. Empty bottle – Labor. Full bottle – the Liberal’s plan for getting the economy back on track.” I poured myself another glass. “If this was Labor, they’d be doing this into everyone’s glass and then we’d have no wine left. But because it’s the Liberals it only goes into one glass and then the trickle down effect will mean that it isn’t just wasted. So having poured one glass, I’m putting the top back on, then talking it home so that it doesn’t end up empty. That’s sound economic management.”

“I have one question,” said the man at the end of the table.

“Yes,” I said.

“Who invited you to this party?”

“I can’t remember.”

“Did anyone invite you?”

“I don’t recall.”

“What are you doing here?”

“I’m a financial expert,” I told him.

With that, I picked up the wine and left.

 

Joe Hockey Manages to Smear Himself

The Courier Mail today ran a story revealing that would-be Treasurer Joe Hockey failed to declare a family interest for most of the duration of his Parliamentary life.

Mr Hockey declared the directorship of Steel Harbour Pty Ltd held by his wife, Melissa Babbage, in May last year among a series of “new positions” under spouse declaration rules. But business records show Ms Babbage was appointed to the role in 1998. Pecuniary interest register declarations are supposed to be made within a month.

What was even more interesting than the seeming disregard for public accountability, was Mr Hockey’s response to the story …

“As I become aware of my wife’s commercial interests I declare them, as is appropriate,” Mr Hockey said.

No, Sir, that’s not good enough. Setting aside the question of what it implies about a relationship that one can go over a decade without knowing about one’s spouses’ Directorships, the rules pertaining to the register of pecuniary interests are such that you have an obligation to ask your wife about them. But what’s most extraordinary about Mr Hockey’s response was his utter petulance, nay arrogance in declaring the revelation to be a Labor “smear campaign”.

Mr Hockey said: “The Labor Party has previously engaged in this type of muckraking and then been forced to correct such unsubstantiated assertions. It is a desperate action from a desperate government.”

No go, Joe. I mean, what “smear”? There’s no indication from you the story is incorrect. There’s no concession from you – at least none reported that I can find – that you erred significantly. No apology. No “oops”. Just a pathetic attempt to pass the buck to those who are simply pointing out that you have failed in an important area of public accountability. Is it too much to ask that you acknowledge the failure and offer at least a smidgen of contrition? It’s not the Labor Party asking this of you, Joe, it’s the Australian public (or at least those that think such things matter).

Earlier this year when Liberal heavyweight Arthur Sinodinos was forced to apologise to the Senate for failing to declare a bunch of Directorships, he at least showed some character. Can you, Mr Hockey, match that? Do you share a similar level of concern and regard for the principle of transparency in Government? It would appear not.

Even if were to come to light that you had expressed some sort of penitence it wouldn’t matter, as trying to make the issue about Labor and “smear campaigns” is a pathetic and cowardly way to attempt to abrogate your personal responsibilities. And you want us to support you as a future Federal Treasurer?

What’s also somewhat tangentially interesting about the Courier Mail’s story, is that despite the fact they were revealing a not insignificant failure on Joe Hockey’s part, they nevertheless saw fit to litter the story with photos clearly intended to show him in a positive way. Happy snaps of him and his wife, culminating in a fantastically irrelevant-to-the-story family shot of the couple and their children.

I don’t know about you, but I prefer my news services, when reporting actual news, to not attempt to emotionally manipulate me, and how else is such a thing to be interpreted?

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button