What's their policy this week?

While Tony Abbott spent his short tenure undoing everything Julia Gillard had…

Casting Kavanaugh: The Trump Supreme Court Drama

Stage set Washington.  Object: adulterating power.  The arm of government: the judiciary.…

Scott Morrison Cancels Government!

Right, just remember that you read it here first.Any day now, ScoBro…

The Pathology of Mass Surveillance: The UK, Bulk…

It’s fitting that the same society that produced George Orwell with his…

Why was Quaedvlieg really sacked?

On 15 March 2018, the head of the Australian Border Force, Commissioner…

The United Nations junket - at your expense

Every year, Australia sends two federal politicians for a three-month secondment to…

Politics from the Pulpit

Scott Morrison is Australia’s first Pentecostal prime minister. He is a member…

The wages of pollution is tax

By John HalyHow is it that recent parliamentary bloodletting over tax breaks and…

«
»
Facebook

Sacred Cows

It’s time to kill some political and social sacred cows.

Politicians cannot change their mind

Of course they can and they shouldn’t be pilloried for it. Shorten recently suggested that he would be legislating to renege on some of the LNP’s business tax cuts should he get to the other side of the House of Representatives at the next election. If Shorten refused to answer the question, us ‘mug punters’ would have been hammered for days over Shorten’s refusal to answer a simple question. Regardless of the machinations of the ALP behind the scenes, clearly the discussion demonstrated to the Opposition (and that word is important) that there was considerable disquiet in the community should the repeal ever happen.

The thing is that Shorten leads the official Opposition political party in Australia. His job is to articulate the policy differences between the current government and the one that he would lead. Should it become evident upon (potential) election that the situation that allows his policies to be delivered changes significantly, he needs to again have the conversation with the Australian public prior to taking action. While most recent newly-elected governments claim that circumstances are not as they were told and change their pre-election policies, usually there is little evidence presented to justify the argument. You’re not ‘being lied to’, rather the management of the issue has been generally shoddy.

Sexist remarks can be OK

No they can’t. Apart from the illegality implicit in denigrating someone because of their gender, ethically and morally all people are equal and should be treated as such. Using the recent example of Senators Leyonhjelm and Hanson-Young, regardless of what he heard or claims he heard, Leyonhjelm was completely wrong in his responses to Hanson-Young. To go onto television and attempt to justify the indefensible only adds to the crime. He claims ‘freedom of speech’ which is a two-edged sword. Others can equally claim that Leyonhjelm is a politician with dubious ethics, representing a minor party with few followers, that needs the media coverage to stand a ghost of a chance of re-election without fear of retribution. If Leyonhjelm found the passage above to be insulting, he would be duplicitous as he claims to support absolute ‘freedom of speech’. The claims repeated above about Leyonhjelm are also factual — he is a politician from a minor party up for re-election at the next Senate election — unlike his attempt to impose his moral judgements (based on rumours and innuendo) in a sexist and hateful tirade to Hanson-Young and repeated endlessly when asked to repent for his crimes. Matt Holden wrote in The Age with much more eloquence than I can muster

What Leyonhjelm has tried to do to Hanson-Young would never be OK in any circumstances. That goes without saying, although it seems equally necessary to say it.

But his timing is exceptionally poor. Women are angry right now, and with good reason. They have plenty to say about the problems with men, and what they are saying is uncomfortable and confronting for men to hear. It’s easy to feel under attack.

But this charged moment, triangulated by #MeToo, Harvey Weinstein and the brutal deaths of young women including Eurydice Dixon and Larissa Beilby, is not the time for men to react defensively. It’s the time for men to shut up and listen, and to learn to sit with the uncomfortable feelings. They won’t kill us.

Adults found guilty of offences against children should be shown pity

No – they should be sacked from the position that gave them the access they used inappropriately. Resignation is the soft option. The administration of the various religious and sectarian groups that have or will have to deal with this issue are just as culpable if they don’t sack those that have demonstrably failed to adequately care for those placed into their care. They are in reality dismissing the findings of the legal process, demonstrating their true level of care for those that have been directly affected and, in some cases, allowing the offender the opportunity to offend again. As an example of inappropriate behaviour, the practice of the Catholic Church of transferring ‘suspect’ priests to another community was disgusting and demonstrated who really mattered to the hierarchy of the Church at the time.

Climate change is a conspiracy

It isn’t and if we do nothing, future generations will rightly condemn us and our immediate predecessors for fiddling while Rome burnt. It is also of interest here that the same conservatives who claim that climate change is a fiction because not all scientists agree on what is absolutely going to happen, in a lot of cases they also claim to follow religious principles. While a discussion on the reality of the various gods worshipped in various religions is way beyond the scope of a political blog, there is far greater agreement within the scientific community on the causes and effects of climate change than there is in the texts that are the central tenets of the Christian religion and others which, according to their dogmatic adherents, are the literal and absolute teachings of their respective gods. It is interesting and to the detriment of society that conservatives can accept contradiction and uncertainty in one area of their lives but expect absolute certainty in others.

Australia needs more coal fired electricity generation capacity

No it doesn’t and the stuffing around over the past decade by conservatives with a hidden agenda has cruelled it for all of us. On 11 July, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) released a report on the future of power prices with some sobering news for all of us. As reported in The Monthly’s daily email on 11 July

The truth is that the ACCC’s report on electricity prices does not help the coal huggers one little bit. Going by the 80/20 rule, there are some neat figures in the report: exactly 80 per cent of the cause of higher electricity prices over the last decade has nothing to do with green schemes, renewable subsidies, emissions reduction targets or any other culture-wars bugbear; exactly 20 per cent does. The largest single factor, as we all knew already, is over-investment in electricity networks (poles and wires), and that’s where the single biggest price reductions can be made by virtue of some neat proposals from the regulator.

Some plain facts, straight from the report: annual electricity bills have risen in real terms by 35 per cent in the decade to 2017–18, from $1210 to $1636 – an annual increase of $426. The biggest single component, higher network charges, is responsible for $148 or 35 per cent of the increase. The cause? The regulator’s “limited ability to constrain excess spending by network owners” (the gold-plating problem), and reliability standards being “set too high”. (Which is why experts like RenewEconomy say the NEG’s reliability standard will never be used. The ACCC report itself hints that “reliability shortfalls … may be infrequent”). Here’s where the ACCC calls for “decisive action”, as we’ll see.

The next biggest component is higher wholesale electricity prices, worth $96 or 22 per cent, which the ACCC attributes to a tightening of a market previously oversupplied with electricity generation, and higher gas prices as east coast LNG exports began. The third biggest component, costing $84 or 20 per cent, is made up of environmental schemes, particularly subsidies due to the renewable energy target, and excessively generous state feed-in-tariffs for rooftop solar, which have generally been wound back but which are still costing money. Higher retail margins ($68 or 16 per cent) and retail costs ($30 or 7 per cent) make up the rest.

The ACCC also looks at the relative costs of renewable (solar/wind generation and battery systems) versus coal powered generation to retain reliability and it’s not good news for the luddites in the LNP that want a new ‘high efficiency’ coal generation plant anywhere. Again from The Monthly:

In today’s AFR, columnist Matthew Stevens writes [paywalled] that new wind farms cost $50/MWh, batteries cost another $20/MWh, while new coal-fired power costs $90/MWh. If we let the market takes its course, it’s game over for coal.

So ‘the carbon tax’ that never really was didn’t increase electricity prices as much as gold plating and higher wholesale prices for electricity. Not that it will stop Abbott, Kelly and their kooky band of hangers-on from attempting to derail the discussion yet again when the compromise NEG is discussed with state leaders in August.

Governments never give me anything

Well actually they do. How about transport links, communication links, the ability to live in a country where wrong doers are actively detected and dealt with according to law, keeping the law breakers off the streets, subsidised education, subsidised healthcare, safety standards for your home, transport and a multitude of other items, consumer protection, assistance to those that society has deemed to need a hand such as families, the aged, the infirm and those that can’t find work? If you don’t qualify for any of these at this stage of your life, first consider how lucky you are and second contemplate if your needs will change as your life situation changes.

That’s not to say that the mix of government expenditure is correct. There is a fairly large proportion of the Australian community that would suggest the close to $5BILLION we have spent to keep humans in inhumane conditions on Manus Island and in Nauru between 2012 and 2017 is poor value for money. Others like Turnbull and his government would suggest that freezing Medicare rebates for GP visits and defunding the ABC is appropriate to ensure that other ‘needs’ can be met. Now your opinion on the choice of expenditure might be in accordance with the government or it may not — it is however your right to tell your elected officials what your opinion is.

Those with a scientific bent will have heard of a process known as titration. Basically, a known quantity of one chemical compound is added (carefully) to another compound. Nothing happens until the last drop is added, then a reaction occurs. It’s the same in real life — there is a point where the alternative viewpoint is actually noticed and acted upon.

There are a number of ways of doing this from sending your MP or the PM an email, through writing a blog post (it’s not that hard, trust me) through joining a lobby group or political party that shares the majority of your beliefs.

The sacred cows we’ve discussed here (and there are many more) have come about because those without vested interests have sat there under the impression they can’t change a thing. So let’s try and kill some sacred cows — stand up and say something. Tell the media that politicians can change their minds; call out sexist remarks and inappropriate behaviour as it occurs; tell our politicians that the current culture wars need to be over. It really is up to you to express your opinion and create the change you want to see.

What do you think?

This article by 2353NM was originally published on The Political Sword.

For Facebook users, The Political Sword has a Facebook page:
Putting politicians and commentators to the verbal sword – ‘Like’ this page to receive notification on your timeline of anything they post.

There is also a personal Facebook page:
Ad Astra’s page – Send a friend request to interact there.

The Political Sword also has twitter accounts where they can notify followers of new posts:
@1TPSTeam (The TPS Team account)
@Adastra5 (Ad Astra’s account)


9 comments

  1. corvus boreus

    2353N,
    A timely article of brutal honesty.
    I would like to proffer another corrective maxim for inclusion in necessary societal definitive alterations;

    “EPIC TROLL”
    No, this is just a modern euphemism for what was historically known as an ‘explosively diarrhetic arse’.

  2. Kaye Lee

    “But this charged moment, triangulated by #MeToo, Harvey Weinstein and the brutal deaths of young women including Eurydice Dixon and Larissa Beilby, is not the time for men to react defensively.”

    Most men are decent people. But many men are also still very uncomfortable with women speaking up about the way we are spoken to and the way we are viewed let alone expressing opinions and giving advice. Do you have any idea how trivialising it is to be expected to look pretty? Do you have any idea how stultifying it is to be the one expected to enjoy housework and cooking and shopping? Do you have any idea how wearing it is to have to massage male egos? Do you have any idea how hard it is to be expected to always be the carer? And it’s not only men that make things difficult. There are many women who still see their role as keeping their man happy. I was recently told, by a woman, that the secret to a good relationship was making sandwiches and giving blow jobs. Good for who I asked.

    We women still have a long way to go in accepting and respecting ourselves so it may not be surprising that some men are confused and confronted. Perhaps we may be taken a little more seriously when we throw our stilettos in the bin.

  3. corvus boreus

    KL,
    Ah the high-heel shoe, an iconic modern symbol of sado-masochistic fetishism.
    Amidst the corn-inducing basal stimulus of orthopedic torture that sends corkscrew twists of muscle distortion through the sciatica into the main pathway of the central neural system as a pre-paid ticket for wincing migraines borne of chronic pain, there is a muscle clenching that uplifts the gluteous maximii in a way that some people find sexually attractive.
    Personally, I don’t get the aesthetic appeal of a garment that inexorably cripples.people.

  4. RosemaryJ36

    I think mothers have a duty to ensure that their male partners and sons take an equal share in all family duties. Fair enough let the strongest take on the tasks that are too much for the weaker family members. As a child, I was expected to service my bicycle and before learning to drive, to understand the workings of the internal combustion engine! And that was much more than half a century ago!

  5. Kaye Lee

    Rosemary,

    I agree. But that was also a function of the time when we fixed things. I remember learning how to darn. It was the days when you actually kept a car until it died. We learned tricks to squeeze a while longer out of our vehicles.

    I see family as a partnership. It will work out differently depending on individual circumstances. My two adult children still nominally live at home which actually means they and their partners share time between each others places – sometimes there’s two of us, sometimes six. Our attitude is we are adults sharing a house. No-one expects anyone else to specifically do anything – you do what you can when you can to help.

    Some may have called my domestic ineptitude neglect. I call it independence training 🙂

  6. wam

    Apart from T S Eliot’s ‘right thing’, mind changing requires a reason except when the mind had no reason beforehand?
    I wish someone in labor had the guts to ask an autocue morning show ‘journalist
    ‘have you stopped:
    drinking
    beating your wife

    Wonder when middle east religions will realise that men who kill women and children are forgiven and accepted into heaven? No, they do not enter god’s heaven
    Australian men who kill their family are ‘good blokes’
    no they are murderers and cannot enter heaven.

  7. oldfart

    While climate change is not a conspiracy, there certainly is a conspiracy surrounding it that is in motion and that is the efforts of the far right et al to deny it’s existence

  8. New England Cocky

    “Governments never give me anything

    Well actually they do. How about transport links, communication links, the ability to live in a country where wrong doers are actively detected and dealt with according to law, keeping the law breakers off the streets, subsidised education, subsidised healthcare, safety standards for your home, transport and a multitude of other items, consumer protection, assistance to those that society has deemed to need a hand such as families, the aged, the infirm and those that can’t find work?”

    It is here that the neoliberal unthinking fails; they demand that everybody except themselves pay for the political stability and peaceful environment that allows them to prosper according to their merits and achievements, while they siphon off every possible tax relief that can be imagined.

    “To each according to their need; from each according to their ability” is a much better philosophy. Yes, there will be backsliders, just as the undeserving wealthy and corporates are presently self-serving backsliders. But that is no reason to throw the baby out with the bath water.

  9. helvityni

    “It’s time to kill some political and social sacred cows.”

    When? We are not even willing give away plastic shopping bags; they’ll be stronger and they will be free…

    The Dutch got rid of them decades ago….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: