Manus, Nauru way worse than Pezzullo texts

By Jane Salmon All the hyperbole about Pezzullo's fall from grace is…

From my "To read" list comes nothing but…

Now, how do I tackle this? Do I use the information in…

Cruel Prerogatives: Braverman on Refugees at the AEI

Suella Braverman has made beastliness a trait in British politics. The UK…

Dictator Dan Quits And Victoria Is Free...

With the resignation of Dan Andrews, Victorians can once again go to…

Tech Council of Australia Supports Indigenous Voice to…

Media Alert Canberra: Following the announcement of the referendum date, the Tech Council…

The Legacy of Daniel Andrews: Recognising the Good…

Today the impending retirement of Daniel Andrews – Labor Premier of Victoria…

Study reveals most common forms of coercive control…

Media Release A new study by the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and…

Great Expectations from the Summit of the G-77…

By Denis Bright The prospects for commitment to UN General Assembly’s sustainment development…


New Brooms, Old Stories: The Australian Labor Party and Julian Assange

After having a few lunches with Australia’s then opposition leader, Anthony Albanese, John Shipton felt reason to be confident. Albanese had promised Assange’s father that he would do whatever he could, should he win office, to bring the matter to a close.

In December 2019, before a gathering at the Chifley Research Centre, Albanese also referred to Assange. “You don’t prosecute journalists for doing their job.” In December 2021, he also expressed the view that the “ongoing pursuit of Mr Assange” served no evident “purpose” – “enough is enough.”

That said, prior to winning office, the Labor opposition was hardly making disruptive ripples on the subject. “As an Australian, he is entitled to consular assistance,” came the anaemic remark from Senator Penny Wong and opposition spokesperson for foreign affairs in April. “We also expect the government to keep seeking assurances from both the UK and US that he’s treated fairly and humanely … Consular matters are regularly raised with counterparts, they are regularly raised and this one would be no different.”

The problem with these assurances is precisely why such a stance is woefully, even disgracefully, inadequate. These have no weight or bearing in law and can be ignored. Power lies, and absolute power lies absolutely. Such a crucial point was blithely ignored by Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales Ian Burnett, and Lord Justice Timothy Holroyde, in their December 2021 decision. In reversing the lower court decision, the justices thought little of questioning the bad faith of Washington’s guarantees that Assange would not spend time in the ADX Florence supermax, or face special administrative measures (SAMs), were he to be extradited. These might have been made at the initial trial, but the prosecutors decided, after the fact, to change their tune on appeal.

Within the new government, there are Labor members who insist that Assange be freed. Julian Hill MP is one, convinced that Albanese, as Australia’s new Labor Prime Minister, would be a “man of integrity” and be true to his “values.” Within his own party, there were members “who have had an active involvement in the Assange group based on these critical principles – press freedom and fighting against the chilling effect on the media that this persecution would have – and would hope that our government could achieve an outcome.”

A number of voices outside politics have also urged the new government to make urgent representations to Washington to change the prosecutorial, and persecuting tone, against the WikiLeaks founder. Guy Rundle insists on “some form of official representation” to the US to end extradition efforts which would see Assange charged under the Espionage Act of 1917. “It should also make representation to the UK government to refuse extradition immediately, and release Assange.”

Rundle is also correct to note that Labor’s form on Assange is pure in its rottenness. Given the chance – as in 2018 and 2019 – it has generously exploited security leaks used by journalist Annika Smethurst to attack the proposed expansion of surveillance powers.

Stuart Rees, founder of the Sydney Peace Foundation, senses a new form of politics “in the air.” Citing Archbishop Desmond Tutu’s remarks that there could be no future without generosity and forgiveness, he sees any intervention to free Assange as “a next step towards recovery of national self-respect.” The only thing for Albanese to do: get on the phone to UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson to cancel the extradition.

Despite the changing of the guard in Canberra, it should not be forgotten that it was a Labor government, led by the country’s first female prime minister, Julia Gilliard, who accused Assange of illegality in publishing US State Department cables in 2010. Gillard, impetuously and inaccurately, tried to impress her US counterparts in tarring and feathering WikiLeaks. “Let’s not try and put any glosses over this,” she stated in December that year. “It would not happen, information would not be on WikiLeaks if there had not been an illegal act undertaken.”

All zealous and afire with premature purpose, Gillard sent in the Australian Federal Police to investigate the matter, hoping that it would “provide the government with some advice about potential criminal conduct of the individual involved.” The priority here was identifying any Australian laws that might have been broken, since she did not feel up to the task. And there was, she claimed perversely, “the common sense test about the gross irresponsibility of this conduct.” Not a fan of exposing state illegality, notably by the US, was Julia.

Such conduct, at the time, did more than raise eyebrows. Opposition legal affairs spokesman George Brandis failed to identify any relevant law that might have been breached, either Australian or US. Liberty Victoria president Spencer Zifcak was “astonished” that a lawyer of presumed competence could have made such remarks. “There is no charge, there is no trial, there is no properly constituted court, and yet the Prime Minister deems it appropriate to say that Mr Assange has committed a criminal offence.”

Within less than a fortnight, the AFP, in concluding its investigation, informed Attorney-General Robert McClelland that “given the documents published to date are classified by the United States, the primary jurisdiction for any further investigation into the matter remains the United States.” After evaluating the material concerned, the federal police had failed to establish “the existence of any criminal offences where Australia would have jurisdiction.”

How the publisher’s fate is handled will be revealing of the new government’s attitude to traditional alliances. Albanese, when asked this week how he would approach the Assange case, had removed the hat of candour. “My position is that not all foreign affairs is best done with the loudhailer.” Now more embedded than ever in the US security framework, crowned by the AUKUS alliance, the length Australian politicians and officials will go to rock the boat of cordial understanding on the issue of Assange is unlikely to be extensive. Even if Albanese prefers to put the loudhailer aside, the prospects of seeming supine and looking ineffectual are brutally real.


Image from Twitter (@wikileaks)


Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button


Login here Register here
  1. Andreas

    Now, Mr Albanese:

    A man of his word – or another gutless wonder?

  2. Ken

    Enough is enough. Bring Julian Assange back to Australia as soon as possible.

  3. Claudio Pompili

    I will eat my hat if Albanese or Wong press the UK/USA to drop extradition and bring Assange home. The weasel words to do do not inspire confidence.

    The fawning display of subservience demonstrated at the AUKUS meeting in Japan 23 May by Albanese when Biden put his arm around Albo’s shoulder said it all. Albo/Wong were wallowing in their own self-importance.

    I hope I’m wrong. We’ll know any day now when Priti Patel hands down her decision.

  4. Harry Lime

    Albanese has been Prime Minister for two weeks..has he cured cancer yet? Yes It should never have reached this point with Assange,but certain people never managed to get out from under Uncle Sam’s desk.Albo’s got an awful lot on his plate..10 years of diabolical wreckage by the rotten former government for starters,but let’s hope he pulls out the loudhailer in private.

  5. Kaye Lee

    Penny Wong gave an interview on RN 03 June 2022

    Foreign Minister: The Prime Minister has expressed that it’s hard to see what is served by keeping Mr Assange incarcerated and expressed a view that it’s time for the case to be brought to an end. What I’d say is the Australian Government, actually under both parties, has consistently raised the issues associated with Mr Assange and his incarceration with the US and the UK.

    Karvelas: And will you be more active in that space now? Now that you are the Government?

    Foreign Minister: Well, I think the PM was asked this in Tokyo and he made the point that his position is that not all foreign affairs is best done with a loud hailer and I would be taking that advice.

  6. Robert Boyd.

    Just another gutless government it seems. Afraid to stand up to the U.S.A.

  7. Barry

    One of the reasons i voted for this guy,is because i believed that he would get Julian Assnage released,especially after everything he has said,if he has lied about this or chooses to do nothing now he has been elected,so he don’t upset our masters America,as much as he has ambitions for a next term,he for sure will lose my vote,so now grow some and get this innocent man out

  8. Laurie Patton

    The dilemma facing our new prime minister is that Mr Assange (allegedly) undertook actions which broke laws that would see him charged here too.

    The “press freedom” campaign, pursued by some for what could be seen as personal political positioning, is weak given that the salient material obtained by WikiLeaks was published by mainstream media outlets without similar consequences.

    WikiLeaks, on the other hand, went beyond the bounds of traditional journalism by dumping onto the Internet masses of uncorroborated and unfiltered confidential government files.

    A solution for Mr Assange might be to do a plea bargain based on a lesser charge and to seek his release on the basis of “time served”.

    Ultimately, we need both countries to enact whistleblower laws that protect people who reveal wrongdoing in the public interest.

    That said, it’s arguable as to whether or not such laws would extend to the above-mentioned actions of WikiLeaks.

  9. New England Cocky

    @ Laurie Patton: When is it a crime to expose war criminals$ If POTUS is an alleged war criminal then he correct;ly should face accouniting for his actions. FREE JULIAN ASSANGE IMMEDIATELY!!

  10. Albos Elbow

    Legal proceedings in the US are drawn out and costly, and we hope Labor has the right intentions, but it may take some time.

    In the meantime, lets just smuggle an automatic rifle into his cell and let Julian sort it out the American Way.

  11. Ken

    Hopefully the Poms will make a decision soon and we will get the good news that Assange is on his way back to Australia.

  12. Terence Mills

    It was Chelsea Manning who released the security data and sent it to Assange – she also shared confidential information with The Guardian and The New York Times – Manning was sentenced to thirty five years in jail but that was later commuted by President Obama – it wasn’t a pardon, Obama used his Presidential powers to commute the sentence after she had been in jail for seven years : she is now free.

    Assange, if anything, was a journalist come messenger – you don’t jail the journalist or shoot the messenger !

    I am confident that Albanese or Penny Wong will already have spoken to the Americans whilst in Tokio for the Quad.

    In the UK the extradition issue has been handed to Home Secretary Priti Patel to make what can only be a political determination.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: