I saw the following words on Facebook and noted that the author was unidentified. However, further perusal revealed that they were highly sage in content. As my enquiring mind would dictate, I decided to digest the words and see if they were sympathetic to my journey. I separated their thoughts and married them to quotations from my writing. My thoughts are in quotes and I haven’t attempted to expand on the person’s writing; instead, I have allowed my quotes to speak for themselves.
A: If you believe in God, he is probably as real to you as if he were standing next to you. You sense his presence and his love. You can ask for advice and receive it. He can console you when you are distressed. He is a constant companion. You need him. He exists. And this is true, whatever religion or God you believe in.
Faith is the residue of things not understood and can never be a substitute for fact.
Imagine, if you will, a world where superstition runs rife, knowledge is circulated orally, and all sorts of beliefs and stories are propagated throughout Middle Eastern countries. Many Biblical stories have been passed down from earlier times. Thoughts grow and prosper; some survive and are even recycled.
If the Bible is the supposed literal (or inspired) word of God, why then did he stop dictating? So much of it is just outdated. Now that’s something to think about.
B: But if you cease believing in him, he goes away completely. You discover you do not need him. He no longer exists for you.
“Religion does not have a monopoly on morality.” Or anything else in my experience.
Why does religion assume it has some bizarre ownership on people’s morality? Assuming that an atheist is any less moral than someone religious is absurd.
C: Today, hundreds of millions of ex-believers accept God as an imagination project. Utterly convincing at the time, but imagination all the same.
It is far better to form independent opinions relative to your life experience and reason than to allow yourself to be blindly led by others.
D: Perhaps this raises a question for every believer, why do some people lose their belief? Why do they let go of something so important and so real?
The ideas of today need to be honed with critical reason, factual evidence and scientific methods of enquiry so that they clearly articulate the currency of tomorrow.
E: Perhaps they were not genuine believers in the first place? But that seems unlikely given that some were lifelong pastors and some dedicated much time and money to helping the church and spreading the word.
America may be the most advanced technological nation on earth but its social progress on matters of great moral importance is still fighting its way out of the dark ages when mysticism was rampant.
F: When you talk to ex-believers, most do not say anything bad happened to them. Perhaps something terrible happened to them, and they blamed God? That doesn’t seem likely either. In any case, that would be a reason to believe God let you down; it does not mean God doesn’t exist when all your experience confirms that he does.
I think what atheists and others find most offensive with religion is not only that they reject theist belief, but also the injustice, immorality and hypocrisy that often comes with it.
What other reasons could there be?
G: One possibility is they started to think. Perhaps, when they looked seriously, they could find no objective evidence that God exists. Maybe they realised it was impossible to disprove the possibility that their God was made up.
Generally, people assume that a theory (for example, the theory of evolution) is something unproven. In the scientific world, a theory is something that has evolved to fit known facts.
My thinking took me in many different directions of discovery, torment and release, but I have never regretted the journey.
H: Perhaps they began reading scripture and found uncomfortable discrepancies that should have no place in sacred texts. Maybe they saw morality in scripture that would be normal in a brutal Iron Age society but should not exist in texts inspired by the breath of a perfectly moral God.
If you read the Bible with literalist intent, it becomes the only textbook on living never updated, but if you read it with logical reasoning and an exploratory mind, all manner of things are revealed.
The study of free will is an essential foundation of rational thinking and objective application of thoughts to actions. How many seriously take up the study of free will and the constraints of pre-determined facts that limit free will, and personal action?
The teaching of literalism in some churches holds back any worthwhile discussion about finding the truth.
On one hand do you shape the truth for the sake of literalism? On the other, do you tell the truth even if it may tear down the view people have of your faith.? Alternatively, do you use the contrivance of omission and create another lie. I can only conclude that there is always a pain in truth but there is no harm in it.
G: Perhaps they gradually allowed reason and logic to take priority over imagination. Maybe this led them to realise they could imagine God, and they could imagine no God. And the no-God scenario made much more sense.
Everyone can do this if they try.
Science has made in my lifetime, the most staggering achievements and they are embraced, recognised and enjoyed by all sections of society. The only areas that I can think of where science is questioned is in the religious fever of climate change doubters, conservative politics and religious belief.
Nothing has ever stood in the way of science and technology. Its advancement has been staggering. So why are the conservative political and religious forces so opposed to it?
Generally people assume that a theory (for example the theory of evolution) is something unproven. In the scientific world, a theory is something that has evolved to fit known facts.
“We all have to make important decisions in our lives.” Nothing is more important than rejecting those things that tempt us into being somebody we are not.
There are three kinds of people. Those who know. Those who know when they are shown or listen, and those who have no interest in knowing.
Thank goodness, my children, in the early stage of their development, acquired independent minds. This rendered any attempt by me at indoctrination of any sort futile. Teach your children how to think. Not what to think.
[textblock style=”4″]
My thoughts for the day
When asked as to my belief or otherwise in religion, or indeed my atheist thoughts, I can only say that I find myself in a perpetual state of observation which of course is the very basis of science or fact.
The ability of thinking human beings to blindly embrace what they are being told without referring to evaluation and the consideration of scientific fact, truth and reason never ceases to amaze me. It is tantamount to the rejection of rational explanation.
I have concluded that one of the nasty effects religion (any religion) has on people is “that it teaches that it is a virtue to be satisfied with not understanding.”
Sometimes I allow myself the indulgence of thinking I know a lot. Then I realise that in the totality of things, I know little. One thing I am certain of however is that there are known facts in the world because science proves them.
I am often staggered with the vigour American atheists use to confront religion. However, when one examines the conduct of religious institutions in that country I cannot say I am the least surprised.
[/textblock]
[textblock style=”7″]
Like what we do at The AIMN?
You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.
Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!
Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
[/textblock]
