How do we make an ideal society?

If you were starting from scratch wanting to build an ideal society,…

A Tale Of Two Leaders But Whatever You…

A few days ago, I was tempted to write a scathing piece…

Punishing the Unvaccinated: Europe’s COVID-19 Health Experiment

Forget any notions of juicy carrots; the stick approach of savage punishment…

Undermining trust in institutions is a dangerous game…

The longer the Coalition remain in power, the greater their arrogance and…

The Morrison enigma

By Ad astra It’s becoming alarming. Every day our Prime Minister becomes more…

If Gladys is a “great candidate”, our country…

By TBS Newsbot Gladys Berejiklian managing to resign in disgrace, face the ICAC…

Let’s be clear, Gladys Berejiklian is being investigated…

Over the last few days, there has been a full court press…

Omicron and the Travel Ban Itch

Stick to the script: owe that duty of care to your population,…

«
»
Facebook

Funeral Rites for COVID Zero

It was such a noble public health dream, even if rather hazy to begin with. Run down SARS-CoV-2. Suppress it. Crush it. Or just “flatten the curve,” which could have meant versions of all the above. This created a climate of numerical sensitivity: a few case infections here, a few cases there, would warrant immediate, sharp lockdowns, stay-at-home orders, the closure of all non-vital service outlets.

Then came mutations and variants. Delta became the word mentioned like a terrorist saboteur, placing bombs under the edifice of the health system. The pro-market factions within governments receptive to using lockdown formulas could claim that harsh stay-at-home rules were not working. It was time to open up the economy; time to live with the virus, and, consequently, a good number of deaths. It was time for the epidemiologists to do more modelling.

A crucial factor to this was the arrival of COVID-19 vaccines and the acceleration of vaccination programs. Studies showing how increased vaccination coverage would reduce cases of COVID-19 and precipitate a fall in hospitalisation began to catch the attention of policy makers. One, a preprint and yet to be peer-reviewed paper from August, looked at the effects of vaccination coverage among the 112 most populous counties in the United States. It found that a 10 per cent increase in vaccination coverage could be associated with a 28.3 per cent decrease in the rate of hospitalisation and a 16.6 per cent decrease in COVID-19 hospitalisations per 100 cases.

In Australia, New South Wales became the first state to accept that a lockdown policy coupled with a mass vaccination push, the stress being on the latter, would be necessary to cope with the ravages of the Delta variant. Eventually, the number of infections would fall, as they now seem to be doing. “What we need to do is all of us have to start accepting that we need to live with COVID because COVID would be around for three or four years,” the now departed Premier Gladys Berejiklian stated in September. But it was less a stance of wisdom than one of necessity, given the initially carefree approach of the Berejiklian government to staying open despite the dangers posed by new variants. “We have to live with the virus,” meant not having to say sorry.

Victoria followed, digesting a harsh reality that the virus, active and present, had ceased to be ineradicable. It had not been that long ago that the same government had proclaimed that it had “run the virus” into the ground like an unwanted invader. But Melbourne, the city lockdown for the longest period on this planet, went the way of Sydney, despite having more stringent measures in place. “We think there may be a number that is not zero but is low that we can contain,” Victoria’s Premier Daniel Andrews cryptically speculated. A debate was taking place on “a sweet spot that is not zero, but it’s not so high.” A stumbled slaying of the COVID Zero vision, but a slaying nonetheless.

Even as this was taking place, the true believers, largely untouched by the effects of the virus in the first place, continued to believe in a certain public health heaven. West Australian Premier Mark McGowan made clear his ambitions of keeping his state “unscathed” which prompted observations that West Australia might become a bastion of COVID-19 “secessionism”.

Recently, two countries also removed their names from one of the world’s shortest lists, reading COVID Zero its funeral rites. There was New Zealand’s Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, whose country had followed the elimination strategy for a year and a half, discarding it in full view of the press. In doing so, she used the word “transitioning”. “We’re transitioning from our current strategy to a new way of doing things,” she revealed to reporters earlier this month. “With Delta, the return to zero is incredibly difficult, and our restrictions alone are not enough to achieve that quickly. In fact, for this outbreak, it’s clear that long periods of heavy restrictions has not got us to zero cases.” Some imagery was in order: “What we have called a long tail feels more like a tentacle that has been incredibly hard to shake.”

There was Singapore, a model example of strict border controls despite being a global economic hub, a nation-state dedicated to firm contact tracing, social distancing and mask mandates. Having reached a vaccination rate in the populace of 80 per cent, the government was keen to move the small country towards a “living with COVID-19” strategy.

The co-chair of the COVID multi-ministry taskforce (MTF), Lawrence Wong, went so far on October 2 as to suggest that “sooner or later, many of us will end up catching the virus, but we will have zero or mild symptoms (and) recover from home after a few days.” While 98 percent of those catching the virus would not fall seriously ill, two percent probably would suffer severely. Wong also thought it important to say that the government was stabilising “our protocols [to] make sure the procedures are in place and build up the necessary capacity (in the health care system).”

It was telling that these words were coming from the finance minister, rather than a public health official of Spartan gravity and moral severity. In New South Wales, Dominic Perrottet, the new premier, till recently the state’s Treasurer, is an open-economy hawk in the face of the lockdown lobby. The pendulum is again swinging in pandemic health, and the citizens of the once COVID zero countries are being softened for tolerable mortality and acceptable risk.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

8 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Phil Pryor

    Will we see further outbreaks because of intemperate and stupid reversion to “normal” profiteering and business? Will we be cursing murderous Morrison the slow and lazy leaderless dud? How about profiteering Perrotet who replaced failed juggler Glad? How about the stinking, hiding, incompetent greghunt of a health minister, or was that illness and death? Listen only to AMA and health officer reports.

  2. king1394

    So much is hanging on the long term safety and effectiveness of the vaccine. Yes, maybe it will work like magic and no one will get severely ill if they are double vaxxed and of course we don’t mean those very old people or those with “underlying heath conditions” whatever they may be. We seem to think these are more serious than some level of obesity and various controlled conditions from high blood pressure to diabetes – are they?.

    Most of us have now accepted that COVID vaccination includes two jabs and a booster, and that is just in the first year. Meanwhile our Governments have been so keen to get us double-vaxxed, that the second jab is rushed through very quickly after the first. When Astra-Zenica first came out it was intended that there be a three month interval between jabs for the most effective results. How many of us have been allowed to actually follow this directive?

  3. BB

    The L/NP believe collateral damage and natural selection are good (cheap) ‘solutions’.
    They 1st set the example with the cruise ship Ruby Princess, followed by aged care.
    After all, it’s just a case of creative statistics and dodgy accounting, the L/NP’s forte.

  4. Ross

    Mr Kampmark writes that according to the Singaporean finance minister 2% of the population will ‘suffer seriously’. Ok then, let’s say 2% of those 2% will die. We will just assume he means of the total population in a 12 month period. That means Australia with a population of just under 26 million will suffer 10,400 Covid-19 related deaths per annum.
    That by the way is ten times the number of total road accident deaths Australia wide in 2020.

    Apart from the obvious zero, can anyone give an acceptable number of deaths per annum due to Covid-19 and for how long that number will be acceptable?
    Please show your working and don’t put what ever Rupert thinks.

    None of what we laughingly call our political leaders has, so anybody else care to have a crack at a tolerable mortality rate per annum?

  5. Max Gross

    Great. We will be free to attend all the funerals ahead

  6. Andrew J. Smith

    Interesting, plus the border control or closures conducted in a very sub-optimal and short term way e.g. no built for purpose quarantine facilities, multiple breaks in border Covid protection processes e.g. key personnel not masking at airports and related etc.

    One assumes the LNP govt. thought it would be over sooner, hence, the equivocation on behalf of business and libertarian ideologues for suboptimal responses, while upholding the existential border threat of foreign invasion that has been applied to refugees/immigrants forever…..

    In turn this has exposed a flawed vaccine procurement, logistics, delivery system and rates of fully vaccinated from central government which precludes Australia from following other nations successfully. The latter have been opening up with high vaccination rates and modest restrictions, with the public upholding the social contract, versus the Anglosphere (US, UK & Oz) radical right libertarian ideology precluding both state and societal cooperation.

    Think they are still tied up ideologically on this libertarian – nativist agitprop axis and hoping that Covid does not nobble past decades work to trash climate science, good government, health and society…..

  7. leefe

    The destruction of Covid Zero in New Zealand is, like the current situation in Victoria and Tasmania, thanks to Berejiklian et al buggering up the NSW response to Delta.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: