Opposition to continue recycling old policies, while the…

1 Apparently, after being soundly defeated at the election, the Coalition still…

Let's Stop This Woke Agenda In Our Schools...

Woke: adjective INFORMAL•US alert to injustice in society, especially racism. "we need…

Scrap the digital workhouse. An open letter to…

We know you are new in your job, Tony and face not…

Refugees and Changing Political Narratives

By Andrew Klein The challenges of the Global Refugee Crisis often appear unmet…

Overruling Roe v Wade: The International Dimension

American exceptionalism can be a dreary thing, and no more so than…

Our children still going hungry in Australia

So, as we all party at the removal of our very own…

Net 0 by 2050 – How big is…

By Newman Fergard Given Angus Taylor’s figures have at times been rubbery (ref:…

The difference between manners and civility

One of the promises the new Prime Minister made during the election…

«
»
Facebook

Election 2022 pledges on Science and Technology

Science & Technology Australia Media Release

Australia’s political parties and independent candidates at the 2022 election have pledged their support for science and technology investments in the next term.

Ahead of the 2022 Federal Election, Science & Technology Australia invited political parties and independent candidates to respond to the 10 election priorities of the science and technology sector.

The sector’s priorities identify major science and technology policy settings and investments needed for Australia to seize crucial opportunities for the country.

The Liberal National Coalition response highlighted an investment of “$93 billion in the science, research and innovation sectors…to support hundreds of thousands of highly-skilled Australian jobs to keep Australia strong and secure our economic future.”

“In these times of global uncertainty, the Morrison Government believes science and technology play an increasingly important role in making Australia more resilient, more competitive and more able to deliver jobs for Australians,” it said.

In its response, Labor said it “believed Australia can be a global STEM superpower” and vowed to work with industry and the research sector to lift Australia’s R&D investment “getting it closer to 3% of GDP achieved in other countries”.

The ALP also made clear its support to legislate the Australian Economic Accelerator as part of the University Research Commercialisation Action Plan.

“An Albanese Labor Government will prioritise science and technology with our comprehensive plan to create jobs, boost vital skills by investing in education and training, bring industry expertise back onshore and supercharge national productivity,” it said.

The Australian Greens advocate investing $17.8 billion in the science, research and innovation sector over a decade, alongside a commitment to put the country on a pathway to investing 4 per cent of GDP in science, research and innovation by 2030.

“Investing in science creates jobs, makes our economy stronger, and allows Australia to overcome the challenges we face as a nation,” the party said.

Key independents who responded included:

  • Zoe Daniel, whose team said she “is a strong supporter of STEM” and would be a strong advocate for stronger funding of the tertiary sector and science.
  • David Pocock, who said he would “advocate for more longer-term certainty in research investment … on par with other OECD countries” and “oppose undue ministerial interference in allocation of research grants and funding”.
  • Dr Monique Ryan, whose team said she was “strongly supportive of the aims of Science & Technology Australia to make Australia a STEM superpower” and boost both public and private investment in research commercialisation.
  • Allegra Spender, whose team said she “strongly supports” an aspiration to make Australia a global STEM superpower as a key part of her economic agenda – and wanted to seek deeper investments in R&D.
  • Zali Steggall, whose team highlighted her policy platform pledging to “support research and development” including boosting Australian Research Council funding – and bolstering STEM workforce skills training.
  • Kylea Tink, whose team said she wanted to see Australia in the top ten OECD nations for investment in R&D – including via research grants – and supports a review of funding to ensure “a vibrant scientific workforce at all levels”.
  • Andrew Wilkie MP, whose office declared his “strong agreement with each of the ten priorities.”

The full responses of the parties and candidates can be found here.

 

Science & Technology Australia is the nation’s peak body representing more than 90,000 scientists and technologists nationwide.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

 

 2,102 total views,  4 views today

5 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Douglas Pritchard

    I would dearly love to have some certainty over how much of our “hard fought for” wealth will be frittered away on “Carbon capture and storage”.
    If ever I have seen pie in the sky, this has to one of the greatest pieces of mischief that the LNP has handcuffed to, and like the elusive submarines, it is costing a bomb.
    It is not a viable concept.

  2. Albos Elbow

    The company getting all the money for “testing” carbon capture and storage is Chevron. Just another way for corrupt Fossil Fuel corporations and billionaires to get more of Australian taxpayers money, thanks to Scummo.

    Carbon Capture and Storage is a fairytale and the government knows it. It never has worked and never will work.

    Scummo and the Minister for Burning Fossil Fuels (Angus Taylor) have dreamt up yet another scheme to delay the introduction of renewable energy as long as possible and keep fossil fuels burning for as long as possible, while directing more of Australian taxpayers money to corrupt politicians, corrupt fossil fuel companies and corrupt greedy billionaires.

    Scummo goes hard for coal. Coal makes him cum. Enjoy!

  3. New England Cocky

    No R&D No Economic Future

  4. wam

    is there not an argument that coal already has “a myriad of other uses, including in cement production, carbon fibers and foams, medicines, tars, synthetic petroleum-based fuels…”(usa gov) and could have an even greater future other than ‘fuel’?
    The only positive thing pig iron bob did was fund the CSIRO.
    This body, despite the lack of support by the libs, since ming, has done many wonderful things:
    https://www.csiro.au/en/about/achievements/top-10
    and they could be instrumental in making Australia rich by creating new sources of renewable power.
    Sadly my brain is fixed greenhouse gases lead to a green house effect which is the earth killer.

  5. totaram

    All these promises become meaningless in the face of the refusal to give Jobkeeper to the University sector, which shed 1000’s of jobs during the pandemic. (Google the figures). Where will these new STEM workers come from?
    The coalition are bullshitting as usual, just quoting what the entire sector (education +science and tech +???) costs anyway.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page
%d bloggers like this: