Anzac and the Pageantry of Deception

On April 25, along Melbourne’s arterial Swanston Street, the military parade can…

Neoliberalism dreads an educated electorate

Those with a dedicated interest in maintaining the status quo fear education…

The HECS Hex

By Bert Hetebry A hex according to the Cambridge dictionary is ‘to put…

To Peacefully Petition

By James Moore “You don’t go on bended-knee to petition the official culture…

Israel’s Anti-UNRWA Campaign Falls Flat

The Israeli authorities, in their campaign of remorseless killing, doctoring and adjusting…

Major Immigration Protest Monday, Thomastown Vic

By Jane Salmon "Visa Amnesty, Permanent Residency, No Deportation After 11 Years”. Refugee…

Our Woke King Is A Marxist!

Even if one doesn’t frequent that cause of so much misinformation, social…

Semitic semantics

By Bert Hetebry Where did the term ‘Semitic’ come from and what did…

«
»
Facebook

Cannibalism, Conservatives and Lies: Australia’s Nemesis Story

Palace coups have become a seasonal tradition in Australian politics. Between 2007 and 2018, Australia had six prime ministers, four of whom were overthrown by their own parties, the first five never being allowed to complete their first term in office. In contrast, between 1983 and 2007, the country could count on the dry, solid stability of three leaders. The change of heart led to the irresistible description of Australia being “the coup capital of the democratic world.”

In the Westminster system of government, where the executive is drawn from the representative chamber, prime ministers are at the mercy of party hacks and factional gangsters. The party hacks, in turn, are terrified by the polls, the make-belief register of electoral emotion that psephologists pretend to decode.

As has been shown recently in the United Kingdom, and for a longer stretch in Australia, no ruling leader is safe from their sponsoring party, the shallow and insecure apparatchiks who, always worrying about the next election, will carve you up if needed to make way for a more viable, vote-getting successor. No principle is sacrosanct if it can be sacrificed in the name of victory, no policy worthwhile preserving. Every conceivable weapon of choice will be deployed when it comes to ousting the leader of the day. As for democratic sensibility: What of it?

Nemesis, a three-part documentary series running on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, deals with the conservative side of the country’s politics, the Liberal-National coalition. It should be seen alongside the Killing Season, which offered the Labor Party equivalent of ritual-killing and political cannibalism starring Australia’s current ambassador to Washington, Kevin Rudd, and its country’s first female prime minister, Julia Gillard. Both series leave viewers scratching their heads and wondering what all the murderous fuss was about.

For the three big figures in Nemesis, the fuss was ample, the disquiet loud. Tony Abbott, the doctrinaire pugilist Catholic, aggressively superb in opposition but raggedly estranged from the electorate in office; the suave, money-attuned Malcolm Turnbull, lawyer, merchant banker, the thinking suit suspected for not being ideological enough; and the least sympathetic of them all, that walking advertisement of treachery and mendacity, Scott Morrison.

With Abbott not participating in the series, we are left with the hammed-up Olympian wisdom of Turnbull, describing events with false detachment, and Morrison, his successor, who did as much to assist Turnbull as he did to oust him. (He who uses the dagger for you is bound to use it on you.) Morrison’s versions of events are much like that of the critic Mary McCarthy’s assessment of Lillian Hellman’s work: “every work she writes is a lie, including ‘and’ and ‘the’.”

Most depressing of all is the distinct lack of ideas in the field of battle. In politics, they shrivel before the glare of hatred, envy and fear. In these bouts of savaging, leaders are not sacrificed because of their vast hinterland of thought and wonder. They are not overthrown because one saw the numinous light, the other, despairing dark. They are sacrificed because they lost, in Abbott’s case, 30 Newspolls in a row, supposedly making them unelectable. They are removed – again, to take Abbott’s example – because they put their trust in a bullying advisor and confessor, such as the autocratic harridan Peta Credlin.

When ideas do bubble to the top of the torrid sewerage, they feature such gruesome policies as “Turn Back the Boats,” an Abbott favourite from 2013 that was, contrary to what Morrison claims, popular in its cruelty, a real vote getter. Voters can be convinced to do the goose step and stomp on the vulnerable if you give them reason to. By turning back boats heavy with asylum seekers and refugees, a cheap humanitarian sentiment could be massaged: at least they did not drown, even if they were to rot in sadistic enclaves in the Pacific.

A disturbing nugget from Abbott’s brief prime ministership (2013-2015) is thrown in. With the downing of Malaysian Airlines MH17 over Ukrainian territory by Russian separatists in July 2014, Abbott was aflame with aggressive vengeance. Of the 298 dead, 27 were Australians. While an officially cool version of Australian anger was offered by foreign minister, Julie Bishop, Abbott privately wanted the crash site overrun with Australian troops.

The military establishment of the day was alarmed. “I was concerned,” former army chief Sir Angus Houston stated, “that the military operation would be provocative, because the crash site was only a short distance from the Russian border, and already I was aware of a huge buildup of Russian forces on the border.” Houston’s effort at dissuading Abbott proved successful. “OK, Angus, I accept your advice,” the Australian PM responded. “It’ll be a police-led operation.”

Interestingly enough, the makers of the series omit a similar suggestion by Abbott in November 2014 that 3,500 Australian troops be sent to rescue Yazidis being butchered by zealots of the Islamic State (Daesh) on the desert sands of Iraq. There was not even a hint that US air support would be offered, nor participation from any other power. Again, the caution of military officialdom and good sense prevailed, though Abbott denies ever floating the idea.

In a peculiar way, those two suggestions, while coterminous with the fringes of lunacy, also showed a man of some principle, fanatical as it was. Muscular, masculine and misguided in his quixotic way, he was driven by a burning, messianic fire. But in his broader outlook, Abbott resembled a warrior of yesteryear, a repository of anachronisms, the latter exemplified by his daft decision to give the late Prince Philip a knighthood. If there was ever talk about the superiority of Western civilisation, he would be there to boast about it. Increasingly, even proudly tone deaf to the electorate, he lost his seat in the 2019 election to the independent Zali Steggall. In doing so, he unintentionally laid the seeds for disruptive change that would, in May 2022, see the greatest number of independents ever returned to Canberra.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

12 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Phil Pryor

    Long ago, we had real people in politics, some defective, but many driven to serve. Time went on, the perks and lurks increased, the flotsam, jetsam, shitsam and chucksum got more interested, as well, the Uni political ratbag youth but ageing badly. Even Lyons seems astounding against the repulsive Abbott; and Scullin, poor Joe, had promise, whereas Morrison had threats of cancerous fraud and failure. Look at the festering green scummers around Aukus, now they are out of the first line trough.

  2. LambsFry Simplex.

    I watched some of it and of them, I regard Abbott as the worst of them, an alarming thug. Morrison proved to be his protestant version- another crank.

    Turnbull, like most centrists when cornered, couldn’t resolve the contradictions inherent in his position- no way were the real reactionaries ever going to give him a break anyway.

    btw, sad when someone like Abetz demands a senate seat and return to parli.

  3. GL

    I don’t think I could stand watching a three part documentary about Psycho Macho, Timid Trembles and Smirko Smuggo. Putting up with them screwing the country over for nine years of them was bad enough.

  4. Kerri

    Abbott is frequently described as good/effective/talented/superb in his position as Opposition leader.
    Why does no one recognise that his destructive, nasty, base form of politics is pretty much what drove Australia down this long, cold, narrow tunnel of politics for politics sake and competitive races to the sewers in the first place?
    We need to get away from the “All right! Game on!” Sparring so relished by journalists and cheaper politicians whose claim is “to serve” stopping short of adding themself.
    That an important issue like a national day and the date it should be observed to be reduced to cheap, plastic flags and uncomfortable trashy “disposable” thongs is an international embarrassment!
    Genocide in Gaza. War in Ukraine. Floods. Fires. Extreme heat. Cyclones and storms worldwide and our great nation, the clever country, gets fed nationalistic tripe from an opposition leader trying to match Abbott in destructive power.
    So bloody petty.
    What future can we hope for?

  5. LambsFry Simplex.

    I agree, Kerri. He was only ever a vandal.

    Perhaps why the tabloids liked him.

  6. Harry Lime

    They didn’t call Abbott the Mad Monk for nothing…what a bizarre fuckwit…never left 1954.Turdball..the biggest nothing,pea hearted,self appointed, ‘smartest man in the room’. And fucking Morrison…If God is on his side, then God needs to change his religion…or see a good shrink.Worst period in Australian political history..apart from that execrable little c!%*t Howard.The stink is yet to abate.With that current dickwad, Domenut Dutton,it’s possible to imagine things could get worse .Is he Angry Anderson’s evil uncle?I really despair for my grandchildren.

  7. Andrew Smith

    Abbott has been claiming support for Ukraine messaging unchallenged by anyone, while he presents from safe space of Credlin at Sky and WSJ live event.

    However begs question, why is he embedded in an implicitly pro-Russian swamp in Hungary inc. working for &/or visiting Atlas Koch Network linked Danube Inst., Fox News favourite and CPAC’s anti-EU regime of PM ‘ mini Putin’ Orban?

  8. Fred

    Harry L: As for “that execrable little c!%*t Howard”, you have to give it to him for having more front than the great wall of China to come up with “core” and “non-core” promises, ”never ever” GST, taking us to war in Iraq and Afghanistan and then saying 20 years later “the ‘mission’ was not a failure, because it stopped further 9/11-style attacks on the West being launched from Afghanistan”. All the death and destruction, leaving our Afghan friends behind to be murdered and half the population treated as chattels – how are they successes?

  9. K

    I so must watch this before I comment!

  10. New England Cocky

    @ Fred: RE Little Johnnie Howard, the yet to be convicted alleged war criminal: HIs other great ”innovation” was the ”Headland Statement”, a sermon on the merits of whatever his ego came up with for the next vacuous press release.
    .
    However, astute readers will naturally recognise that that a ”headland” is a cliff over-looking the sea, also known as a ”bluff”.
    .
    And these ”Headland Statements” were indeed ”bluffs”, statements to distract the masses from the reality that his successive governments were NOT working for the best interests of Australian voters.
    .
    Howard’s come-uppance at the hands of former ABC journalist Maxine McKew was hard earned and well deserved, making Howard only the second Prim Monster to lose both government AND his electorate simultaneously.

  11. Centrelink customer

    Message for Senator Janet Rice

    Dear Senator Janet Rice,

    Last September, I emailed you a copy of a fake review decision from Services Australia. I repeat again that the review decision was made by an anonymous “delegate or authorised officer”, not an authorised review officer (required by law). Services Australia used the decision to force me into significant debts.

    Senator Janet Rice, I received only your automated email confirmation. Please, respond and hold Services Australis accountable.

  12. GL

    I do like the photo at the top of the article:

    Abbott: Gosh, I am so manly and macho and I can do up my own tie.
    Turnbull: Gee, I am so sophisticated and smart and I can do up my won ties.
    Smirko: Uh, er, I hope Jen is around just in case my tie comes loose. My brain hurts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 2 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Return to home page