Only the dumb get dumber

In June of 2007 at the height of one of the Victoria's…

Woe To You, ScoMo: The Bible, The Poor…

I have done this before: meeting Scott Morrison on his own biblical…

Perdaman: Santos’ latest attempt to sure up Narrabri…

By David C Paull  Last week in Narrabri, Santos signed a ‘heads of…

Oiling for War: The Houthi Attack on Abqaiq

The attack on the world’s largest oil processing facility at Abqaiq in…

Sanctioning harm under guise of religious freedom

When Attorney-General Christian Porter proposed to prioritise freedom of religion above all…

The growth of knowledge is getting away from…

By RosemaryJ36  When you look back over the last 400 to 500 years,…

An Open Letter to "The Left"

I am writing this letter to anyone who considers themselves as part…

Glad all over?

Is "One Million Dollar Woman" Liberal Party "gun" fund-raiser, Gladys Liu, a…

«
»
Facebook

Cancer Sucks

By 2353NM

It seems that most Australians have been affected in some way by cancer. The chances are you know a cancer survivor, remember someone who didn’t survive, have sympathy with someone undergoing treatment or have a friend or relative that knows someone who has been affected in some way.

One thing in cancer’s favour — it doesn’t discriminate. Regardless of your fame, wealth or power, you can be affected by cancer. Within Australia alone, there are at least four foundations (and if you know of others, please leave a comment below) that have been established by people using their fame to amass funding for services to alleviate cancer in some shape or form.

Former test cricketer Glenn McGrath lost his first wife to cancer some years ago. His McGrath Foundation funds a network of specialist nurses across Australia that supports and assists sufferers of breast cancer (who can be male by the way) through discussing treatments, talking about issues and just being there with understanding and concern for the sufferer and their loved ones.

Apart from hosting The Project on Channel 10, Carrie Bickmore is probably best known for donning a beanie in her acceptance speech when she won the Gold Logie in 2015. The beanie was worn in support of her late husband who died of brain cancer five years earlier. Her foundation, Carrie’s Beanies 4 Brain Cancer funds research into brain cancer and there is a link from their website to the research they have funded.

Olivia Newton-John, apart from being a well-known actor and singer is a cancer survivor. She fundraises for, as well as puts her name to, a cancer treatment and research centre known as the Olivia Newton-John Cancer Centre in conjunction with the Austin Hospital in Melbourne.

Samuel Johnson also won a Gold Logie through appearing in a number of Australian movies and television series. His life focus changed significantly after his sister was diagnosed with breast cancer and he pledged to raise $10 million for cancer research before he took another acting job. His foundation, Love your Sister, continues, although Johnson’s sister has since succumbed to her illness.

All the foundations above have details on their websites detailing how they assist cancer sufferers and their loved ones. All of the foundations will also accept website donations — which might be a good use for some of the Australian Government’s lower/middle-income tax rebate if you are fortunate enough to receive any of it. Needless to say, there is a significant amount of research being undertaken across the world to understand the root causes of cancer, treat the symptoms, find cures and ensure those afflicted have a reasonable quality of life while undergoing a (hopefully) successful treatment.

Some of the research into cancer and other diseases with high mortality such as mesothelioma is understanding personalised medicine. When you think about it, if you ever owned a 1960s Holden and took it in to a dealer and told them the oil light was on, they would go through a process of elimination to work out the issue. Even though each iteration of a particular vehicle model is supposed to be identical, there are differences in tolerances within the parts used in each individual vehicle, each vehicle is driven differently and there are other factors such as climate which ensure that different parts fail at different times. In the ’60s, the dealer’s first step might be to ensure the wire between the dashboard and the sensor unit was still connected, then ensuring the oil pump was working and so on until the problem was fixed. Like cars, humans are not genetically identical. In a similar way to troubleshooting a problem with an older car, cancer treatment has up until now been a process of elimination. If drug A doesn’t work on your particular version of cancer, try drug B and so on. The pity is by the time you get to drug D or E or F, whichever is effective in your individual case, there is a significant period of time that has elapsed between initial diagnosis and effective treatment. This isn’t the fault of anyone — the oncologists have been using the best information they had at the time.

Times change. The dealer would now download the diagnostic details from the on-board computer of a recent model Holden when you report the oil light stays on, then repair or replace the item indicated by the fault code. Personalised medicine is a process whereby some samples are taken from the person affected by the cancer and the individual’s treatment plan is determined to a large extent by the testing of the samples using research into the human genome. Unfortunately, the human body is far more complicated than the systems that make a Holden work so there is a need for more research and infrastructure before the personalised medicine concept is available to all.

Research into the uses and benefits of personalised medicine is occurring across the world. Some examples are the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute in Australia and the United Kingdom’s NHS.

At the same time as the Australian Government passes $158 Billion of tax cuts over the next five years have a guess how much was budgeted for research into personalised medicine addressing cancer and other high mortality illnesses over a similar period — only $15 million.

What do you think?

This article was originally published on The Political Sword.

For Facebook users, The Political Sword has a Facebook page:
Putting politicians and commentators to the verbal sword – ‘Like’ this page to receive notification on your timeline of anything they post.

There is also a personal Facebook page:
Ad Astra’s page – Send a friend request to interact there.

The Political Sword also has Twitter accounts where they can notify followers of new posts:
@1TPSTeam (The TPS Team account)
@Adastra5 (Ad Astra’s account)

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

6 comments

Login here Register here
  1. Keitha Granville

    Governments will never allocate enough to research for issues like this, even if they are directly affected. People with wealth have much better access to the latest drugs, the best treatments and the best doctors, they can afford to fly overseas for more options. Only when everyone has the same access might we get a better response from government. They are currently too busy making sure the wealthy retain all their wealth, no time for worrying about minor details like keeping people alive.

  2. New England Cocky

    People living in regional Australia have the least access to cancer treatment which is why the actions of John Barilaro, Leader of the NSW National$, in personally stopping NSW funding for the establishment of the Tamworth NSW Health Campus of the University of New England are apparently inexplicable.

    But wait ….. it is the National$ Party in NW NSW that is obfuscating and prevaricating about alleged water theft from the MDB environmental flows that has allowed a bumper cotton crop ….. in a no pump cotton growing season. The solution is straight forward. Mandate every pump in th MDB have a pump switch attached to a mobile telephone, as happens in Queensland, and then have the NSW government employ sufficient properly resourced licence inspectors to adequately patrol the pumps on a regular and irregular basis.

    Yet again there appears to be a pecuniary interest being given priority over the best interests of Australian voters, seemingly to protect the financial donations to the Nat$ for the benefit of the unelected political hacks who control pre-selection.

  3. Wobbley

    Unfortunately I was diagnosed with stage four aesophogeal cancer in June of last year and have undergone twelve chemotherapy cycles along with twenty radiation therapy rounds and at one stage the prognosis was nearly altered from palliative to curative. Again unfortunately the mongrel thing has become metastatic and am now facing a new round of chemo treatment as I now have at least seven tumours within my body. I cannot praise the oncology team in the public health system enough who have shown compassion and professionalism throughout my “ journey”. $15 million is a paltry amount considering this bastard of a thing is nearly at plague proportions and this government is hell bent on getting rid of us poor, sick, disabled and working class. I sometimes think it is a deliberate plan.

  4. Deidre Zanker

    I agree with Wobbley, the fed govt is trying to get rid of all poor people who are unable to slave their guts out to make the rich and greedy wealthier; while taking as much as possible from the poor and needy.

  5. ChristopherJ

    Thank you NM. Yes, we could be spending much more on public funded research. The private sector only interested in $s….

    Working on lymphoma, Wobbley.

    Australians are fortunate as some can’t even afford the diagnosis, let alone the treatment, so I feel lucky that we have medicare and so many good people working in the health care sector.

    Still, call me foily, but cancer has been very profitable for the sector, esp pharma, pathology and imaging – seen plenty of people who are on lifelong drugs to keep their cancers at bay.

    There are some very promising new treatments, immuno drugs and so on, but they too often emerge with a big price tag (patents and so on). So for people like me, we are still using the same chemo drugs that were first tried about 30 years ago. They work in many cases, so I feel blessed that I have hope.

    Thoughts to everyone touched by cancer.

  6. Wobbley

    Just an update re my unfortunate predicament, I just received a request for information regarding a disability pension I’ve applied for from centrestink, they want information from August to October by 20th September. Set up to fail!!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: