A Duty to Warn

By James Moore In 1960, a handsome young senator and war hero from…

Democracy - Is It Worth The Fight?

In light of recent elections, it's very tempting to look at the…

Fencing the Ocean: Australia’s Social Media Safety Bill

The Australian government is being run ragged in various quarters. When ragged,…

HECS Debt Forgiveness: Path to Free Education

By Denis Hay Description Explore why HECS debt forgiveness and reinstating free public education…

Implementation will be key to success of Aged…

Palliative Care Australia Media Release This week’s bipartisan support for the Aged Care…

Trump, AUKUS and Australia’s Dim Servitors

There is something enormously satisfying about seeing those in the war racket…

Expert alert: Misinformation bill before Australian Senate…

La Trobe University Media Release The Australian Senate is set to consider the…

Political Futures: Will Conservative Global Middle Powers Go…

By Denis Bright National elections in Germany and Australia in 2025 will test…

«
»
Facebook

Senate Splits On International Education Bill

Independent Tertiary Education Council Australia (ITECA) Media Release

Independent skills training and higher education providers delivering quality outcomes to international students express deep concern over the lack of clear direction in the Senate’s review of the Education Services for Overseas Students Amendment (Quality and Integrity) Bill 2024. The Independent Tertiary Education Council Australia (ITECA) says many members face a threat to their existence if the Bill passes in its current form and the Australian Government uses its newfound draconian powers without appropriate guardrails and oversight.

“There’s no doubt that this legislation will be disastrous for independent skills training and higher education providers, as well as Australia’s reputation as a welcoming destination for international students,” said Troy Williams, ITECA Chief Executive.

The Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee reviewed the proposed legislation, and their report highlights that the Bill is poorly considered and not presented in a form that should be passed, according to ITECA.

“It was great to see the federal Opposition, the Australian Greens, and cross-bench senators acknowledge the concerns of ITECA members in the report. Sadly, Australian Government Senators have put politics before good policy and ignored the views of quality tertiary education providers,” Mr Williams said.

The Bill, if passed in its present form, will pave the way for introducing international student caps that most damage independent Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) and higher education institutions.

“Despite the strong evidence provided to Senators by quality RTOs and higher education providers about the damage the proposed legislation will do to their institutions, the Australian Government looks set to proceed with a cavalier disregard for the employees in the sector that will lose their jobs,” Mr Williams said.

ITECA has endorsed the recommendations of the Australian Greens, calling on the Australian Government to withdraw the current Bill and begin a comprehensive consultation process with the tertiary education sector.

“The aim would be to develop a sustainable plan that supports the integrity of Australia’s migration and education systems, rather than pursuing what is rushed and reckless migration policy,” Mr Williams said.

In response to the ongoing concerns, ITECA has entered into crisis talks with its members, departmental officials, state and territory governments, plus stakeholders in the skills training and higher education sectors.

“These discussions seek to chart a path forward that mitigates the impact of the Bill on high-quality providers and their employees, ensuring that Australia’s international education system remains competitive and reputable,” Mr Williams said.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Queensland Futures: Can More Critical and Comprehensive News Reporting Assist in Delivering Political Miracles?

By Denis Bright

With the Queensland Government now in caretaker mode, time is running out for more communication about the priorities of a fourth term of government for Queensland Labor. Pre-polling voting commences on 14 October and continues for the last two weeks of the campaign. State Labor’s primary vote is still stuck on 30 percent in the most reliable polls.

There were no new major polling updates this morning on The Poll Bludger site. A global statewide polling result conceals the diversity of Labor’s support base from the 2020 state election of vast Labor regional heartlands, traditional inner-city seats with strong environmental agendas and outer metropolitan seats where cost-of-living politics is in the ascendency. In key marginal seats, the polling could be better or worse for Labor. Calling the result at this stage by the mainstream commercial media surely undermines democratic processes and makes a farce of the whole election campaign.

The recent allocation of LNP preferences to Labor over the Greens challenges the possibility of the Greens leap frogging from their two current state electorates of South Brisbane and Maiwar (formerly Indooroopilly) to adjacent seats like McConnel, Cooper and Moggill. There were similar possibilities in electorates to the east and south of South Brisbane and McConnel on both sides of the Brisbane River in LNP electorates like Everton, Clayfield and Chatsworth.

In Maiwar, the LNP is running a traditional campaign in support of David Crisafulli’s Tough on Crime Strategies.

 


Readers should also note the failure of the Brisbane City Council’s Management Company to turn on the existing floodlights at the Witton Barracks Community Centre.

The recent Freshwater Polling results show that the LNP’s campaign on the extent of community crime has hit the mark in shaping public opinion by swamping real debate on a fuller range of public issues (AFR 30 September 2024).

 


The Queensland Police are as tough on crime as any recent LNP Government.

On many indicators, Queensland crime rates are below those experienced under the LNP’s Campbell Newman Government.

The issue of comparative crime rates is complex. Numerous resources are available from Queensland Policy and from Treasury for further investigation by readers. Political points scoring on this issue is surely inappropriate when both sides of politics are united in their opposition to crime. There is a high degree of opportunism and sensationalism in the LNP’s approach which is ushering in the return of a bygone era in Queensland politics with its emphasis on Law and Order as a key policy priority.

Mainstream media outlets claim that Queensland is in the midst of a crime wave but in reality, there is a mixed picture of criminal activity as outlined by Police Minister Mark Ryan on 26 July 2024:

The latest crime statistics from the Queensland Police Service compare the financial year 2023/24 to financial year 2022/23.

The figures reveal a reduction in the rate of youth offences of 6.7%. In addition, the total number of unique youth offenders has reduced by 2% since last financial year and by 18% since 2012/13. The rate of unique youth offenders has reduced by 4% since last financial year and by a staggering 32% since 2012/13.

These annual statistics are underscored by a 9% statewide decrease in the number of unlawful entry offences committed by youth offenders and by a 9% statewide decrease in the number of unlawful use of a motor vehicle offences committed by youth offenders.

The statistics also show that the rate of all offences (inclusive of domestic violence flagged offences) by all offenders decreased by 0.1%.

Significantly, the rate of all offences (exclusive of domestic violence flagged offences) by all offenders decreased by 1.9%.

As a proportion of total offence rates, Domestic Violence offences continue to grow. For example, in relation to assault offences, in 2019-2020 Domestic Violence accounted for 24.4% of total assault offences, while in 2023-2024 it accounted for 56.9% of total assault offences.

It demonstrates the scale of domestic violence offending and how important it is that everyone in the community works together to stamp out this scourge on society.

The fact is that even one instance of offending is of concern, and that is why the government and police will never relent in targeting those who cause harm in the community.

Although law and order campaigns against criminal activity as proposed by David Crisafulli have overseas precedents, Queensland under an LNP government will take this state beyond the extreme measures trialled in some US states (Sourced from Gemini Google Bard):

  • Georgia: While the general age of criminal responsibility is 13, Georgia has provisions that allow children as young as 12 to be tried as adults for certain serious offenses.
  • North Carolina: In North Carolina, children aged 13 and older can be tried as adults for certain felony offenses, including murder and rape.
  • Texas: Texas allows 10-year-olds to be tried as adults in rare cases.

 

Tough on Crime Strategies in Texas itself coexist with high rates of crime by Queensland standards. But even in Texas, crime rates vary considerably (SafeHome Org: 15 August 2024). Crime deterrents across Texas have not contained crime rates in the troubled cities along the Gulf Coastline from the outskirts of Houston and Galveston to Corpus Christi and onto the Mexican Border.

 


High crime rates in Texas coexist with the reintroduction of the death penalty as a result of local far-right support for capital punishment with approval from US Supreme Court’s Gregg v Georgia Ruling in 1976. The sometimes-macabre details on Texan prison systems are available
online for interested readers.

The Appeal (3 February 2024) notes the widespread return of Tough on Crime Rhetoric in US Politics:

According to a Gallup poll released in November, for the first time in 20 years, the majority of Americans think the U.S. is “not tough enough” on crime. In a marked shift from the last time Gallup asked this question, 58 percent of respondents said they believe the criminal-legal system is too soft, up from 41 percent in 2020.

This change in public opinion coincides with growing fears about – allegedly – rising crime in the United States. In the 2022 midterms, most voters ranked violent crime among their top issues. And in late 2020, a Gallup poll found that perceptions of increased crime reached their highest levels since 1993.

A few years earlier, “tough on crime” policies seemed passé. In major cities, voters elected pro-reform prosecutors who ran on promises to reduce the use of cash bail and end prosecutions of low-level misdemeanours.

Deep-red states like Oklahoma and Louisiana enacted sweeping criminal justice reform legislation in 2016 and 2017, respectively.

Since 2020, however, punitive approaches to public safety have come back in style. Progressive prosecutors have left office in jurisdictions like San Francisco, Orlando, and St. Louis, ousted by voters and hostile state officials. Numerous states have enacted harsh new penalties for drug crimes and retail theft. Landmark victories for the reform movement, such as New York’s 2019 bail reform legislation, have been rolled back by the same legislators who initially passed them.

On the surface, this shift towards “tough on crime” policies and rhetoric may appear to be a natural response to voters’ growing concerns about public safety. But this simplistic narrative misses a more nuanced understanding of Americans’ complex and often contradictory attitudes toward the criminal-legal system. Not only are perceptions of crime out of whack with reality, but public opinion polls show that most voters still support efforts to reduce incarceration, increase police accountability, and invest in alternative approaches to public safety.

Saturating voters with warning about crime and nasty cards that blame Labor and the Greens for all cost-of-living problems from rents to housing prices and insurance bills is a real Machiavellian ploy to divert attention away from the real achievements of the Labor Government in Queensland over the past three terms since 2015. David Crisafulli’s Tough on Crime Rhetoric is short on details about the underlying causes of crime including the widening income divide and the exploitation of social alienation by social media networks.

In contrast, the current Social Media Summit has the imprimatur of the Albanese Government as well as the governments of NSW and SA. Queensland is not involved as our government is in caretaker mode:

The summit will bring together experts, policymakers, academics, young people, and community voices to discuss the positive and negative impacts of social media on people’s lives and how government can best support digital wellbeing.

The summit will help inform the design and delivery of a range of policies, programs and resources to address the challenges posed by social media.

Key focus areas of the Social Media Summit will be:

• Impacts of social media on children and young people’s wellbeing
• Online safety
• Social media’s role in disinformation and misinformation
• Addressing online hate and extremism
• How social media is changing the way government delivers services

Live stream

Keynote addresses and major panel discussions from day one of the summit in Sydney will be live streamed via this webpage from 9:30am – 5pm AEDT on Thursday, 10 October.

 


The strength of the Queensland economy is a good defence against the descent into criminality in the LNP’s Tough on Crime Rhetoric. In management of the economy, Labor’s record is exceptionally good.

The Queensland economy has moved from Potential Dire Straits with the injection of additional revenue from mineral royalties, stable support from the Albanese Government and windfall profits through the Queensland Investment Corporation (QIC) (https://www.qic.com/). The QIC’s real estate portfolio alone has built up $14.5 billion in assets under management since it was established under the Goss Labor Government in the 1990s (From the latest Annual Report):

“QIC has delivered a pre-tax profit of $127.1 million for 2022-23 against a target of $110.0 million. Total revenue for 2022-23 increased by $37.9 million to $654.5 million compared to 2021- 22, primarily due to increased investment management fees and property asset level service revenue.”

Eyewitness news services bring a measure of excitement into suburban and regional households with their coverage of specific criminal events which do not extend to the big overall picture of trends in criminal activity. The coverage always avoids emphasis on growing levels of corporate criminal corruption from tax evasion to support for highly prevalent illegal drug distribution or even anomalies in the management of nursing homes for the elderly which have been well covered in recent 7.30 Report segments. It is about scaring the Mamas and Papas.

Data transmitted by Metropole Property Strategists should allay these concerns. Many Brisbane suburbs are the safest locations in comparison to interstate metropolitan areas.

Every percentage point gain in Labor’s primary vote will save sitting members in the most marginal seats in both outer metropolitan and regional districts. Labor’s initially bad polling results have stabilized. Of course, I cannot guarantee that this will continue into the 30+ percent range. It is a wait and see game for the days ahead.

Twenty of Labor’s fifty-one current seats in a state parliament of ninety-three members are in the coastal zones from the Premier’s own electorate of Murrumba to the tip of Cape York in the Cook electorate.

Health Minister Shannon Fentiman made a commitment to extend Labor’s unfinished business in public health on today’s campaign trail. This repeats similar commitments about Labor’s unfinished policy agenda in earlier press statements (26 September 2024):

“Ensuring our hospitals are ready to serve their local communities now, and into the future is a priority for the Miles Government.

“That’s why we have invested over $14 billion in the Queensland Health Big build, to cater for this growth.

“These projects also mean our hardworking frontline nurses and doctors will be equipped with the support and resources they need to deliver world-class healthcare and improve the flow of patients through hospitals.

“It’s thanks to our progressive coal royalties tax that we are able to continue to invest in the services that matter most to Queenslanders.

“The LNP will not deliver a single new hospital bed for Queensland.

“And if their track record of savagely sacking 4,400 health workers is anything to go by, Queenslanders cannot trust a thing they say.

“Only Labor is doing what matters to build the facilities needed to ensure Queenslander’s can access worldclass healthcare close to home.

“Meanwhile, David Crisafulli, Ros Bates, and the LNP refuse to be upfront with Queenslanders about their plan for our health system. Last time they were in Government, they sacked 4,400 health workers and slashed $1.6 billion from the health budget.”

The strength of the Queensland economy is supported by efforts of the QIC which has sold its equity in the traffic management systems and car park at CampusParc at Ohio University in Columbus at twice the value of its purchase price for close to one billion dollars (Bloomberg Media 7 March 2024).

Ohio State University has more to offer Queenslanders than windfall profits on its parking and traffic management facilities. Within walking distance of CampusParc is the University’s iconic School of Communication where Professor Gerald Kosicki, Associate Professor Nicole Kraft and others have pioneered research over the years on the need for critical analysis from all academic perspectives on the opportunistic use of political spin of the style.

Students at the School of Communication at Ohio are trained to report on criminal activity as a social problem which can be exacerbated by journalistic repetition of that Tough on Crime Rhetoric (From the School of Communication 21 November 2022). Ohio State’s School of Communication partnered with the Ohio State University Police Department to conduct a mock crime scene, simulating breaking news.

“When news breaks, you don’t want that to be the first time you are covering breaking news,” said Nicole Kraft, associate professor – clinical. “We give them this opportunity to do it, to make mistakes, to be able to get evaluations on how they did and be able to build up the kind of muscle that they’re gonna need to do this in the field someday.”

Students reporting on the scene must think up, write and ask questions all at once. This on-the-spot interviewing challenges for young reporters, helping better prepare them for the real world.

“I think that feeling, that adrenaline rushing through my body was like something I’ve never felt before, so that was pretty exciting,” Jayla Van Horn, a third-year journalism student, said.

In contrast to this innovative training of journalism students at Ohio State, even Criminal Justice Web Sites in the USA can misuse application of their own Tough on Crime Rhetoric. Readers might take a look at the Death Row Information from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (Death Row Information (texas.gov) with its gruesome last statements from executed felons and even media liaisons with mainstream news reporting networks about forthcoming executions. There have been also six hundred executions in Texas by lethal injection since 1982. This emphasis on punishment has not contained the crime waves in urban centres along the Gulf Coast between the outskirts of Houston and nearby Galveston to Corpus Christi and the Mexican border. Media coverage of executions in Texas is a feature of mainstream news coverage:

 


In contrast to the grim reporting from Texas, last minute campaigning worked in the German State of Brandenburg to get the Social Democrats back into government on 24 September 2024 with a commitment to improved living standards and community services.

 


As in France on 7 July, a United Front was forged between the Social Democrats, the Greens and a newly formed Left Populist Party known locally as the Reason and Justice Party (BSW).

Labor’s agenda for should not be swamped by Tough on Crime rhetoric when these policies have bipartisan support. Both major parties are Tough on Crime but this commitment should not be at the expense of other policy agendas.

In every policy area, there are new opportunities for progressive change that combines old Labor traditions with new directions in affordable and sustainable living.

Imagine the opportunities for Queensland if Downer Rail at Maryborough became a new hub for hydrogen powered regional trains (Image: One H2 24 February 2024):

 


As the world looks for ways to reduce the impact of greenhouse gasses, the rise of hydrogen-powered trains is gaining momentum. The U.S., China, and Europe are driving this new technology, shaping the future of rail transportation.

In the United States, the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) just got its first hydrogen-powered trainset from Swiss-based Stadler. The two-car train will run on the 9-mile “Arrow” rail line in California and is set to go into service in 2024 after undergoing testing in Europe. California has a goal of making all its passenger trains 100% emissions-free by 2035, and this new train aligns with that mission.

China’s CRRC Changchun Railway Company and Chengdu Rail Transit have produced the country’s first hydrogen passenger train, specifically made for city environments. It is said to be the world’s fastest hydrogen-powered train to date, capable of reaching 100 mph (160 km/h). This train is part of China’s plan to grow its hydrogen energy sector and have 50,000 hydrogen fuel cell vehicles on the road by 2025.

Political miracles can happen. In the Brandenburg State election, good campaigning combined with an awareness of the consequences of the alternatives offered by far-right politicians brought a four percent increase in the local votes for the Social Democrats in the last week of the campaign.

From Potsdam in Brandenburg to Palardo, Pittsworth, Petrie and Piabla on the current Queensland campaign, commitment to the Light on the Hill will triumph over temporary phases of far-right opportunism. Better sooner than after another thirty-two-year phase of guided democracy and political corruption in the worst of the decades between 1957 and 1989.

For your interest, a short juxtaposition doco:

A Country Road: The Nationals: Joh Bjelke-Petersen

 

Denis Bright (pictured) is a financial member of the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA). Denis is committed to consensus-building in these difficult times. Your feedback from readers advances the cause of citizens’ journalism. Full names are not required when making comments. However, a valid email must be submitted if you decide to hit the Replies Button.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Urgent expansion of services needed for people with psychosocial disabilities at risk of homelessness

Homelessness Australia Media Release

October 10 2024 is World Homelessness Day and World Mental Health Day

A shocking number of Australians with psychosocial disabilities are struggling with unmet housing and support needs, prompting calls for an urgent expansion of services.

People with psychosocial disability, cognitive impairments and complex behaviours are among the fastest-growing groups of users of homelessness services. Major reviews indicate there are more than 100,000 people with psychosocial disability (8 per cent of NDIS participants) who have unmet housing or support needs. Meanwhile there are more than 20,000 people with multiple and complex needs experiencing persistent homelessness.

Of the 300,000 Australians with ‘persistent severe and complex psychosocial disabilities’, more than 31,000 are at risk of homelessness and have an unmet need for long-term housing. More than 2,000 are stuck in institutional care due to a lack of other options, while many are living in “unsuitable accommodation”.

“These individuals are disproportionately facing housing challenges, and are among the most vulnerable people in the community,” CEO of Homelessness Australia Kate Colvin said.

“Everyday, they face unsafe and exploitative living arrangements and homelessness, while being at risk of becoming repeat, long-term users of homelessness services due to a lack of appropriate solutions.”

These challenges lead vulnerable people to cycle between chronic homelessness, crisis accommodation, health and acute mental health services, correctional facilities and exploitative institutional-style settings. While this has tragic consequences for individuals and their families, it also impacts public health and safety.

On World Homelessness Day and World Mental Health Day, Homelessness Australia is calling for urgent action to expand safe and stable housing with support services for these vulnerable people.

The call comes as part of a push to implement proven models such as Housing First, which combines stable housing with support services to help vulnerable people remain safe and reduce reliance on public services.

Despite having a positive impact, these models remain underdeveloped across Australia. Every recent major Australian review into homelessness, mental health and disability has called for the expansion of housing to prevent chronic and repeat homelessness.

Homelessness Australia has indicated immediate opportunities to address the crisis. Key recommendations include:

  • Expand Housing First programs through a national agreement to provide long-term housing and support for people with complex needs.
  • Embed homelessness support within mental health units, institutional and correctional settings to prevent discharges into homelessness.
  • Expand mental health expertise within Specialist Homelessness Services to better respond to people with psychosocial disabilities.
  • Reform the NDIS to rapidly expand recovery-focused housing models and establish a national program to assist with tenancy sustainment for people with psychosocial disability.
  • Develop a Targeted Action Plan on Homelessness and Housing under the Australian Disability Strategy linked with the upcoming National Homelessness and Housing Plan.
  • Remove barriers to aged care for those who have experienced homelessness and are prematurely ageing.

“Without safe and supportive housing, people with psychosocial disabilities face tragic and preventable consequences such as repeated homelessness and interaction with correctional facilities,” Kate Colvin said.

“It is concerning that a country like Australia has hundreds of thousands of people with psychosocial disabilities without a safe space to live. This country has the capacity and now it is time to urgently address this crisis and invest in housing that promotes recovery and wellbeing, helping people rebuild their lives.”

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

LNP Government in Queensland: Dangers of Electing Them

By Denis Hay

Description

Explore the dangers of electing an LNP government in Queensland and the risks of job losses, corruption, and the misuse of public money.

Introduction

The upcoming Queensland elections offer voters a crucial choice – whether to continue a path of inclusive governance or risk electing a government marred by a track record of incompetence, corruption, and the misuse of public money. The Queensland elections bring to mind past failures, both at the federal level and in Queensland, when the LNP dismantled public services, sacked thousands of public servants, and prioritised corporate interests over public well-being.

In this article, we explore the Liberal National Party’s (LNP) historical missteps and show why electing them once again could threaten Queensland’s progress. By highlighting these dangers, we aim to give voters an informed perspective on the risks of repeating the LNP’s past mistakes.

The LNP’s Track Record of Incompetence and Mismanagement

1. LNP Federal Failures (2013-2022)

The LNP’s time in federal power between 2013 and 2022 was rife with corruption in LNP government and systemic incompetence. This period showed widespread examples of pork-barrelling, LNP misuse of public money, and ineffective governance.

Incompetence and Corruption

Sports Rorts Scandal: In the lead-up to the 2019 federal elections, the LNP was embroiled in the sports rorts scandal, in which public money was distributed unfairly to electorates favouring the government. Independent auditors found that political bias was significant in allocating these grants.

Robo-debt Scheme: One of the most notable examples of incompetence under the LNP government was the Robo-debt scheme. This unlawful debt recovery system wrongly targeted thousands of Australians, causing immense distress and financial hardship, leading to a class action lawsuit.

Pork-Barrelling and Public Money Misuse

The LNP’s approach to spending public money often prioritised political gains over public good:

In the lead-up to the 2022 election, the LNP approved billions of dollars in grants under dubious circumstances, many of which went to marginal electorates. This made the LNP’s misuse of public money a central issue.

JobKeeper: Although the JobKeeper scheme was meant to support workers during COVID-19, LNP governance allowed millions of dollars to flow to large companies that did not need financial aid. Many companies receiving these funds recorded profits and did not return the excess, raising serious questions about the government’s oversight.

These examples illustrate the LNP’s federal tenure as one defined by incompetence, wasteful spending, and a disregard for accountability. This same approach can be expected should they return to power in Queensland.

2. The Queensland LNP Government Legacy (2012-2015)

The LNP’s last stint in power in Queensland from 2012 to 2015 is still infamous for its draconian measures, most notably the mass sacking of public servants and a lack of investment in essential services.

Public Service Job Cuts

The LNP’s decision to sack 14,000 public servants led to widespread disruption across the state. This decision gutted critical sectors such as healthcare, education, and social services. As these departments struggled with fewer staff, the quality of services for Queenslanders diminished. Hospitals became overcrowded, waiting times increased, and schools faced staffing shortages.

LNP’s Promise of “No Forced Redundancies” – A Misleading Assurance

As part of their election campaign, the Queensland LNP has promised that there will be “no forced redundancies” in the public service if elected. While this might sound reassuring at first glance, it is crucial to understand that no forced redundancies do not equate to a complete guarantee that public servants will retain their jobs.

The Reality Behind “Voluntary” Redundancies

Voluntary Redundancy Schemes: In many cases, governments, including the LNP, have used voluntary redundancy schemes to downsize the public sector without explicitly forcing employees out. These redundancies are often offered at attractive rates, enticing public servants to leave their roles.

Impact on Public Services: While these redundancies are technically voluntary, the result is the same – fewer public servants. Essential departments such as health, education, and social services could again be left critically understaffed. The previous LNP government implemented similar strategies, resulting in a 14,000-person reduction in public service, even though not all were “forced.”

A Hollow Promise

The promise of no forced redundancies may seem like a commitment to protecting public sector jobs, but it opens the door for large-scale downsizing through “voluntary” means. In practice, this can lead to the same outcomes as forced redundancies: inadequate staffing levels, overworked employees, and a decline in the quality of public services for Queenslanders.

Understanding this distinction is crucial for voters. While the LNP may not force people out of their jobs, offering generous redundancy packages could still result in an under-resourced public sector undermining Queenslanders’ services.

Economic Mismanagement

The LNP implemented harsh austerity measures that created economic instability in Queensland. Despite justifying their cuts as necessary for balancing the budget, the government’s policies led to job losses, reduced public sector wages, and dampened local economies.

Privatisation of Public Services

During their term, the LNP explored privatising public assets, including energy and transportation. The public backlash against these measures was severe, as many Queenslanders understood the long-term consequences of privatising essential services—higher costs, poorer quality, and less accountability.

Voter Backlash in 2015

These actions were met with severe voter backlash in the 2015 Queensland elections, resulting in the LNP’s historic defeat. They lost half of their seats, proving Queenslanders rejected their harmful policies.

Why the LNP’s Return Could Spell Disaster for Queensland

3. LNP’s Approach to Public Money: Prioritising Politics Over People

The LNP has repeatedly shown that their approach to governing prioritises political gains over the public good. If re-elected in Queensland, they will likely continue their pattern of favouring corporate interests, using pork-barrelling to secure political victories, and mismanaging public money.

Pork-Barrelling: A Hallmark of LNP Governance

The LNP’s reliance on pork-barrelling means that public resources are often diverted to projects that serve political purposes rather than communities that genuinely need them. This tactic was heavily criticised during their federal tenure, and repeating such policies would undermine trust in Queensland’s democratic processes.

Potential for Further Job Cuts

One of the greatest fears of LNP’s return is their propensity to cut public sector jobs. With their history of slashing public servant roles to reduce costs, another LNP government in Queensland could leave thousands of workers unemployed, weakening the very services that citizens rely on.

Inadequate Investment in Essential Services

From health to education, the LNP’s earlier Queensland government focused on reducing costs at the expense of long-term investments in critical sectors. This prioritisation of short-term fiscal savings over sustained public service improvements could once again undermine Queenslanders’ quality of life.

Why Queensland Needs People-Focused Governance

4. What a Stable and Inclusive Government Should Prioritise

To avoid the repeat of the LNP’s incompetence, Queenslanders should seek a government that:

Invests in public services such as health and education.


Ensures job security for public servants who provide essential services.


Manages public money responsibly by ensuring that taxpayer dollars are used for the benefit of the community, not for political gains.

Building on Current Government Achievements

The current government in Queensland has made strides in reversing the damage caused by the LNP’s policies:

Restoring Jobs: After the mass sackings under the LNP, the current government has worked to restore jobs in essential public services.


Infrastructure Investments: Queensland has seen significant infrastructure improvements, particularly in health and education, due to the government’s investment in these critical areas.

5. A Vision for Queensland’s Future

Queensland’s future depends on electing a government that prioritises people over politics and values long-term investments in public services, infrastructure, and social equity. A government focused on sustainable development can ensure a prosperous future for all Queenslanders, free from the damaging austerity measures and cuts the LNP is known for.

6. Consider Independent Candidates and Smaller Parties Supporting Social Justice

While major parties like the LNP and Labor often dominate election discussions, it’s also essential to consider Independent candidates and smaller parties that advocate for social justice, fairness, and inclusivity. These candidates can offer fresh perspectives, untethered by the corporate interests or party lines that often influence larger political organizations.

Why Consider Independents and Smaller Parties?

Focus on People, Not Politics: Many Independent candidates and smaller parties focus on policies that directly benefit citizens, such as housing affordability, healthcare access, and environmental sustainability.

Social Justice Priorities: Parties such as The Greens, Animal Justice Party, or local Independent candidates often have platforms built around social justice, including fair wages, robust public services, and environmental protection.

Accountability and Transparency: Independent candidates aren’t bound by party politics, which often means they are more accountable to their constituents. They can push for reforms that align with public interests rather than being influenced by corporate donors.

How to Identify These Candidates

Research Platforms: Websites like Vote Easy allow you to compare candidates based on their policies, including those from smaller parties or independents. Look for candidates whose platforms align with social justice, environmental sustainability, and public service reform.

Support Local Voices: Many Independent candidates have deep ties to their communities and can bring a more localized, people-focused approach to government.

By considering Independents and smaller parties, you can vote for a candidate who reflects your values and champions the causes that matter most to everyday Queenslanders.

7. Using Vote Easy to Make an Informed Decision

In the lead-up to the Queensland elections, entering the voting booth with as much information as possible about your candidates is crucial. One helpful tool is Vote Easy, an online platform that enables voters to compare candidates in their electorate based on their policies, performance, and values.

How Vote Easy Works

Simple Candidate Comparison: Vote Easy allows you to check the candidates running in your electorate efficiently. You can compare their stances on critical issues such as healthcare, education, public services, and the environment.

Policy Information: For each candidate, you can access details about their proposed policies, previous voting history, and their party’s commitments.

Tailored to Your Electorate: After entering your address or postcode, Vote Easy will provide you with a list of the candidates in your specific electorate, ensuring that the information is highly relevant.

Benefits of Using Vote Easy

Make an Informed Decision: By reviewing the candidates before election day, you can make a well-thought-out decision without feeling rushed or pressured at the polling booth.

Neutral and Unbiased: Vote Easy provides impartial information, allowing you to decide based on facts rather than political spin or campaign ads.

Reduce Election Day Stress: Knowing who you will vote for ahead of time means you won’t be overwhelmed by last-minute decisions or long lines.

Using a tool like Vote Easy empowers you to take control of your vote and ensures you make a choice aligned with your values. Before heading to the polls, take a few minutes to visit Vote Easy and decide on the best candidate for your Queensland electorate.

Queensland voters, visit Vote Easy QLD 2024 State General Election to find candidates in your electorate, learn about their policies, and decide how to rank them on your ballot. You can even create your own custom ‘How-to-Vote’ card.

Conclusion

Electing an LNP government in Queensland poses significant risks. With a history of incompetence, corruption, and the misuse of public money, the LNP’s return could bring widespread job cuts, a decline in public services, and further economic mismanagement. Queensland needs a government that prioritises the well-being of its citizens, not one that sacrifices them for political gain.

Question for Readers

Do you believe Queensland should risk returning to the policies of the past, or should we push forward with a government that prioritises people and public services?

Call to Action

For more in-depth articles and insights into Australia’s political landscape, subscribe to our newsletter or visit our resources page to stay informed.

Does this article inspire you? Visit our ‘Reader Feedback‘ menu to share your thoughts and submit a testimonial. Help shape the conversation today!

Social Sharing

Share this article on your social media channels and connect with your friends and family to help spread the word about the risks of electing an LNP government in Queensland.

References:

Sports Rorts Scandal Audit Report

Robodebt Class Action Outcome

JobKeeper Profits in the Private Sector

 

This article was originally published on Social Justice Australia.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Migration, Pathway to Nation Building report released by the Migration Committee

Parliament of Australia Media Release

The Joint Standing Committee on Migration today released the Migration, Pathway to Nation Building report, signifying the end of an almost two-year long inquiry on Australia’s migration system by the Committee.

Committee Chair, Maria Vamvakinou MP, said ‘the Committee has conducted a comprehensive inquiry that has looked at virtually every aspect of the migration system with a view to complement the Government’s ongoing reform agenda to improve migration outcomes’. ‘Of central concern’, Ms Vamvakinou continued, ‘the Committee believes that migration policy must once again become a key lever for Australia’s nation building efforts, as it has been in the past’.

The report makes 73 recommendations. ‘Of priority’, Ms Vamvakinou said, ‘the Committee has recommended that a Department of Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs be re-established as a stand-alone department solely focused on delivering a migration system of world-class standard and ensuring that Australia remains a preferred destination for the world’s most talented migrants’.

‘The Committee has also recommended that an independent national research institute for migration policy studies be established to provide migration policy a basis in impartial and scholarly evidence going forward. Such research capacity within government has been sorely missed in recent years and will provide migration policy a solid foundation as we move into the decades to come’.

‘To ensure that new arrivals are fully integrated into Australian society and are empowered to maximise their and their families’ contributions to the nation, the Committee has recommended that settlement services be provided to all classes of migrant, irrespective of visa category, on the basis of need’.

‘As a matter of the utmost importance, the Committee gave detailed consideration to the issues surrounding regional migration. Ensuring that our regional, rural and remote areas share in the benefits that migration affords is vital for the ongoing prosperity of those areas. While the Committee has made 16 recommendations on improving the migration outcomes for Australia’s regions, it also concluded that a further dedicated inquiry on a specific regional migration priority topic was needed’.

The report provides recommendations on a wide array of matter, including, improving the visa application system; attracting and retaining skilled migration; better accounting for the skills and experience of secondary applicants; more effective recognition of migrants’ qualifications; improving outcomes for refugees and their families; and regional migration.

The read the full Migration, Pathway to Nation Building report, visit the Committee’s website.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Worst year for new home builds in over 10 years marks need for action on labour shortages

Experts at Master Builders Australia have warned that low apprenticeship numbers will worsen the nation’s housing crisis if action is not taken immediately.

The warning comes after new Australian Bureau of Statistics data revealed that 2023-24 was the worst year for home building in more than a decade, dropping 8.8 per cent to 158,690 new starts.

“Detached house starts fell by 10.1 per cent, while higher density commencements were down by 6.0 per cent,” said Master Builders Chief Economist Shane Garrett.

“If building continues at this pace, we’ll be in for less than 800,000 new home starts over the next five years.”

“This would mean a shortfall of over 400,000 homes compared with the National Housing Accord target.”

The data release, revealing a drop to numbers not seen since 2011-12, coincided with fresh data from the National Centre for Vocational Education Research which showed declines in apprenticeship numbers.

Apprenticeship completions fell 8.6 per cent from 24,545 in the year to March 2023 to 22,420 to March 2024. In the same period, apprenticeship commencements dropped 11.8 per cent from 47,110 to 41,520, and the number of apprentices in training declined 2.2 per cent from 124,280 to 121,530.

Master Builders Australia CEO Denita Wawn said the new data painted a concerning picture for Australia’s housing crisis.

“Today’s data releases aren’t unrelated. To bring Australia out of the housing crisis we need to drastically increase the supply of housing,” said Ms Wawn, “and we can’t do that while we’re simultaneously suffering through a labour shortage.”

“Low apprentice numbers reflect a shortage of skilled workers across all trades, and until we’re able to address the challenges facing the future of the workforce, we won’t be able to increase building activity and reduce the impact of supply conditions in the residential building market on Australia’s inflation problem.

“It’s no longer appropriate to call for a return to pre-Covid levels, we need more tradies now than we’ve ever had.

“We urgently need governments to look at solutions to increase the number of tradies, increase the number of apprentices, and help Australian builders increase supply so we can come out the other side of this housing crisis,” Ms Wawn concluded.

Master Builders Australia’s “Future of the Workforce: Building and Construction Industry” report, which highlights the growing need for action to increase the workforce. To read the full report click here.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

How Politicians Use Social Media to Control the Narrative

By Denis Hay

Description

Explore how Australian politicians control narratives on social media. Learn how citizens can demand real engagement for a more democratic society.

Introduction

In Australia, politicians have harnessed social media platforms, especially Facebook, to craft a carefully curated narrative. While these pages highlight “feel-good” photos and positive achievements, they rarely provide a space for citizens to voice their concerns or discuss pressing issues.

This deliberate control over political discourse restricts public engagement and diminishes the democratic process. In this article, we will explore the extent of this issue, its impact on public trust and political accountability, and how citizens can demand a more inclusive and transparent dialogue.

Politicians’ Use of Social Media to Control the Narrative

1. The Evolution of Political Engagement on Social Media

Social media has transformed how politicians engage with the public. Platforms like Facebook offer a direct channel to voters, bypassing traditional media filters. This shift allows politicians to promote their agenda without facing real-time scrutiny or opposing viewpoints.

In Australia, this trend is prevalent, with politicians using their pages to highlight accomplishments, share community events, and post personal anecdotes. However, the interaction often stops there – comments are restricted, posts are removed, and citizen posts are often not allowed, creating an echo chamber that amplifies the politician’s voice while silencing the publics.

2. Controlled Narratives and Limited Public Discourse

Politicians’ social media pages are not just for communication; they are strategic tools for controlling the narrative. By restricting public interaction, politicians prevent discussions on contentious issues like housing affordability, climate change, or government corruption from gaining visibility on their pages.

This practice not only stifles public debate but also distorts the political reality presented to followers, portraying an image of widespread support and satisfaction that may not reflect the broader community’s sentiments.

3. Public Relations Over Public Engagement

The focus on keeping a positive image often leads politicians to prioritize public relations over genuine engagement. Posts featuring community events, charity work, or family moments create a personable image but do little to address policy questions or voter concerns. When difficult issues arise, politicians may ignore critical comments or deflect with non-answers, further alienating voters who seek accountability and transparency.

4. The Erosion of Public Trust

This approach erodes public trust, as citizens feel their voices are ignored or marginalized. When politicians do not engage with tough questions or remove critical comments, it signals that they are more interested in preserving their image than in addressing real concerns. This can lead to increased cynicism and disengagement, with citizens feeling that their opinions do not matter in the political process.

5. Case Studies: Controlled Narratives in Action

Several examples illustrate this practice. For instance, during the 2020 bushfire crisis, many Australian politicians focused their social media posts on recovery efforts and community support, while avoiding discussions on the role of climate change or government preparedness.

Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, some politicians were quick to highlight vaccine rollouts and economic support while avoiding debates on border closures or quarantine failures. In both cases, public posts were often restricted, preventing citizens from raising critical questions or expressing dissatisfaction.

Why This Matters to Every Australian

1. The Impact on Democracy

When politicians use social media to control the narrative, it undermines the democratic process. Citizens rely on open communication channels to express their views, ask questions, and hold elected officials accountable. When these channels are restricted, it not only limits public discourse but also reduces the diversity of opinions in political debates, weakening democracy itself.

2. Amplification of Misinformation

By presenting a one-sided view of events, politicians can contribute to the spread of misinformation. Followers who only see positive posts may believe that the politician is universally supported or that there are no significant issues needing attention. This curated reality can mislead the public, especially those who rely solely on social media for political information.

3. Frustration and Disengagement

The inability to engage meaningfully with politicians on social media leads to frustration and disengagement. Citizens who feel ignored or silenced may become disillusioned with the political process, choosing not to vote or take part in community discussions. This disengagement can lead to a cycle where politicians feel less accountable to their constituents, further entrenching the problem.

Reclaiming Public Voice and Political Accountability

1. Organizing Online Campaigns

Citizens can use social media platforms themselves to organize campaigns that demand transparency and open dialogue from politicians. Hashtags like #LetUsSpeak and #PublicVoice can be used to unify voices and draw attention to the issue. Coordinating efforts across multiple platforms, including Twitter, Instagram, and independent forums, can amplify the message and put pressure on politicians to open their pages to public discourse.

2. Leverage Alternative Platforms for Open Dialogue

While mainstream social media platforms have their limitations, alternative platforms such as Reddit or specialized forums like Australian Politics on Reddit can serve as spaces for unmoderated discussion. These platforms allow for the free exchange of ideas and can become valuable resources for citizens looking to engage in meaningful political discourse without censorship.

3. Public Petitions and Media Engagement

Public petitions demanding that politicians allow citizen posts on their social media pages can be effective tools for raising awareness. Websites like Change.org and Parliament of Australia Petitions can be used to gather support. Engaging local media to report on these petitions can further amplify the call for more open political engagement. By highlighting the issue in news outlets, citizens can increase public pressure on politicians to change their social media policies.

4. Direct Engagement with Politicians

Although social media offers a convenient way to reach politicians, traditional methods of engagement should not be overlooked. Writing letters, making phone calls, and attending town hall meetings can be effective ways to raise concerns directly with representatives. Citizens can organize group meetings to present their demands collectively, making it harder for politicians to dismiss their concerns.

5. Advocating for Social Media Policy Changes

Social media companies have a role to play in ensuring that their platforms support democratic engagement. Citizens can advocate for changes in platform policies, such as requiring political pages to allow a minimum level of public interaction or providing transparency reports on comment deletions and restrictions.

Platforms like Facebook and X (formerly called Twitter) have mechanisms for sending feedback and requests for policy changes, which can be used to push for reforms that support open political dialogue.

6. Creating Community-Led Platforms

To counter the controlled narratives on politicians’ social media pages, communities can develop their own platforms for political discussion and accountability. These platforms, whether websites, podcasts, or YouTube channels, can offer spaces for in-depth discussions on policy issues and allow citizens to voice their concerns without fear of censorship.

7. Supporting Independent Journalism

The Role of Independent Journalism in Political Accountability

Independent journalism plays a critical role in exposing the truth and holding politicians accountable, especially when mainstream media often prioritizes corporate interests or political alliances.

In Australia, as in many other countries, mainstream media outlets may limit coverage of certain topics that challenge the status quo, or they may downplay controversial issues affecting powerful figures. Independent media, on the other hand, tends to focus more on investigative reporting, offering deeper insights into political, economic, and social issues without the constraints of corporate funding or political influence.

Independent journalists and smaller media outlets can dive into topics that might be ignored by larger news organizations. Their work shines a light on government policies, corporate interests, and other subjects that have a direct impact on citizens’ lives. Importantly, they can provide a platform for voices that are often marginalized, ensuring that the perspectives of ordinary Australians are heard.

Examples of Independent Journalism in Australia

Australia has a growing number of independent news outlets that prioritize transparency, fairness, and accountability. Some prominent examples include:

Michael West Media
(
https://michaelwest.com.au/): Known for investigative journalism, particularly on issues of government corruption, corporate tax avoidance, and media accountability.

Independent Australia (https://independentaustralia.net/): A progressive publication that focuses on social justice, democratic reform, and environmental issues.

The Saturday Paper (https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/): While having a more structured approach, it often covers in-depth stories on politics, culture, and society that are overlooked by mainstream media.

Australian Independent Media (https://theaimn.com/): The Australian Independent Media Network is a platform for public interest journalists to write and engage in an independent media environment, providing both news and opinion.

These outlets ensure that critical issues are reported and discussed, often filling the gaps left by larger media organizations. By doing so, they empower citizens with the information they need to hold their representatives accountable.

How Citizens Can Support Independent Media

Supporting independent journalism is not just about consuming content; it’s about actively contributing to its sustainability. Here’s how citizens can help:

Subscriptions and Donations:
Independent outlets often rely on subscriptions and reader donations to operate. By subscribing to their newsletters, buying digital or print subscriptions, or making small monthly donations, readers can directly support the work of these journalists. This financial support helps ensure that they can continue their investigative work without being influenced by corporate sponsors or political pressures.

Sharing and Amplifying Independent Work: Social media platforms are powerful tools for amplifying the reach of independent journalism. By sharing articles, reports, and investigative pieces from independent outlets, citizens can help raise awareness of critical issues. The more people share and discuss these stories, the more likely they are to reach a wider audience, leading to greater pressure on politicians and mainstream media to address these topics.

Engage with Journalists and Media Outlets: One of the strengths of independent journalism is its accessibility. Many independent journalists are open to feedback, suggestions, and even collaboration with their readers. By engaging with them through comments, emails, or social media, citizens can contribute to the reporting process and help shape the narrative around critical issues.

Support Investigative Projects: Many independent outlets run specific investigative projects that require more resources. For instance, platforms like GoFundMe or Patreon are often used by independent journalists to raise funds for in-depth investigations. Supporting these projects not only helps journalists dig deeper into important stories but also ensures that complex, long-form investigations – which are resource-intensive – can be completed.

Why Supporting Independent Media Matters

Independent journalism is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy. It ensures that politicians, corporations, and other powerful figures are held accountable for their actions. When citizens support independent journalism, they are contributing to a media landscape that values truth and transparency over profit or political gain.

Independent journalists often face significant challenges, from financial insecurity to legal threats, but with public support, they can continue to pursue stories that truly matter.

Moreover, independent media provides a diversity of perspectives. In a political environment where mainstream outlets may not challenge government narratives, independent journalists offer an alternative voice, one that can help foster informed public debate. This variety of viewpoints is essential for a vibrant democracy, as it allows citizens to make informed decisions based on a wide range of sources.

The Future of Independent Journalism in Australia

The future of independent journalism in Australia depends on citizen support. As digital platforms continue to dominate the media landscape, independent journalists face both opportunities and challenges. While social media and online platforms provide a space for independent voices to thrive, they also bring competition from clickbait-driven content and algorithmic biases that favour sensationalism over substance.

To ensure the longevity of independent journalism, there needs to be a cultural shift towards valuing quality over quantity. Citizens must recognize the importance of paying for good journalism, just as they would for other essential services. This cultural shift can be supported through education, raising awareness about the role of independent journalism in a functioning democracy, and encouraging younger generations to seek out and support diverse media sources.

How Independent Journalism Helps Reclaim Public Voices

One of the most important contributions of independent journalism is that it provides a platform for citizens to express their concerns and highlight issues that mainstream media might ignore. Whether it’s covering grassroots movements, marginalized communities, or controversial political decisions, independent journalists are often the ones bringing these stories to light.

By supporting independent journalism, citizens are indirectly ensuring that their voices, and the voices of those often left out of mainstream conversations, are heard.

In conclusion, supporting independent journalism is not just about access to news – it’s about empowering citizens, holding politicians accountable, and preserving democracy. By subscribing, donating, sharing, and engaging, citizens can help ensure that independent media continues to thrive, offering a crucial counterbalance to the controlled narratives often found in mainstream outlets.

Summary

Social media has become a powerful tool for politicians to control the narrative and limit public discourse. This practice undermines democratic engagement and contributes to public disillusionment.

By organizing campaigns, using alternative platforms, advocating for policy changes, and supporting independent journalism, citizens can demand a more transparent and inclusive political dialogue. Taking these steps will ensure that the voices of all Australians are heard, not just those of the political elite.

Question for Readers

Do you feel that Australian politicians are doing enough to engage with citizens on social media? How can we collectively push for more open and accountable political discourse?

Call to Action

If you believe in the importance of open political dialogue, join us in demanding transparency from our elected representatives. Share this article, take part in online campaigns, and support independent media that holds politicians accountable.

Social Sharing

Share this article with your network and let’s build a movement for more honest and open political engagement in Australia.

 

This article was originally published on Social Justice Australia.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Lebanon struggles to cope as over a million people flee Israel’s military invasion – Oxfam

Oxfam Australia Media Release

The Lebanese authorities, communities and humanitarian agencies are struggling to shelter and provide the necessities of life to over one million people fleeing Israel’s airstrikes and invasion to the south, Oxfam said today.

Oxfam is working with local partners in Lebanon and alongside other aid agencies as part of the government’s humanitarian response plan following Israel’s invasion of Southern Lebanon and aerial bombardment.

Oxfam assessments in shelters across Lebanon have found people most need mattresses, bedding, and cooking and sanitation items. Women also need sanitary pads, towels, and underwear. Oxfam and partners have started distributing some of this aid as well as water.

Gheith Bittar, Executive Director for Oxfam partner SHIFT – Social Innovation Hub, said more displaced people are arriving by the day and he fears shelters may buckle under the strain.

“The shelters are not ready to host the number of IDPs we are taking on and 629 are already full. They are public schools that are not equipped to be shelters and we are facing problems. For example, we don’t have hot water for showers. We will get to a point where we won’t be able to cope. Without funds, we cannot sustain our support to the shelters. The ground invasion will only increase the number of IDPs, and we have already seen an increase in the number of displaced people on a daily basis with the continuous bombardment. The situation will only get worse as winter approaches.

“People are coming to us traumatised. Most of them have lost their houses and relatives. Some of them were scared because of the scale of bombardment as they were fleeing, and many others because of their fear of the unknown coming to a new city. People are suffering, they have many, many, issues to think about.”

Oxfam says without a ceasefire the greenlight by Israel to a ground invasion in southern Lebanon will likely lead to a further escalation of the conflict and fighting, that will cause even more destruction of communities and inflame an already volatile region.

“The ground invasion and bombardment that includes Beirut and the southern suburbs will create a serious challenge for the humanitarian system in a few short days. People are being forced to flee with little to no notice, and often having to leave everything behind to shelters that are inadequate or sharing crowded homes with few essential supplies. None know when they can return. Without a ceasefire the number of people desperately in need will only grow, as will their needs. The shelter system is set to collapse if there is no peace on the horizon,” said Oxfam’s Lebanon Country Director, Bachir Ayoub.

“The needs of people in Lebanon who’ve been injured, traumatised and displaced, in fear of what the future might hold for them, are already huge. No other solution other than a ceasefire can alleviate the crisis they are facing,” Ayoub said.

There must be an end to this violence. All parties must stop fighting. We need safe space to get people the aid they need,” he said.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

The Pilgrim, Chapter 34

By James Moore

“Tell the truth. Sing with passion. Work with laughter. Love with heart. ‘Cause that’s all that matters in the end.” – Kris Kristofferson.

The only time I ever spoke to him in person I thought that his voice had the sound of rocks tumbling down a talus slide in a western mountain range. Poets and artists with the depth and capability of Kris Kristofferson are often not good interview subjects, however. Try asking Willie Nelson to explain where melodies come from. No time is available for them to refine complicated concepts into insightful phrases or understanding. They are compelled simply to talk with much the same facility as the mortals moved by their work.

“Listen,” Kristofferson told me. “I’ve been there. I was in the military. I know the destruction we can do, the people who will die, and it’s not usually in the name of freedom. It tends to be about something else. We’re making a big mistake if we go over there.”

I wondered why he was struggling to communicate. A man who had such a command of language offered a halting delivery and seemed to stare past me into a distance that was occupied by some disturbing vision. Maybe, he teetered a bit with faltering balance. I am not certain. There was no smell of alcohol, but there was always an abundance of methods for altering consciousness at the disposal of the famous and wealthy, and Kris was no stranger to that allure.

“What’s the importance of all this?” He seemed to have recaptured a train of thought that had evaded him for a minute. “Why do we have to tear up families, ours and theirs? It’s just about oil. Everybody knows that. Is that worth anyone’s son or daughter? Hell, no, and we all know that, too.”

Kristofferson that afternoon in Austin made me think again of a nine-year-old little girl up at Fort Hood. We had been reporting on departure ceremonies of troops saying good-bye to their families before boarding flights to Kuwait and a confrontation with Saddam Hussein. While American youth was gearing up for battle, and confronting their own mortality, the sons of Kuwaiti sheikhs were partying at Paris discos. No such facts landed in the U.S. media, though, and our soldiers were framed as heroes defending a small, mostly helpless ally, one, coincidentally, with lots of oil reserves. Without thinking, while we were recording video in the gymnasium where departing troops had gathered, I saw that little girl hug her daddy just before he walked away toward the giant airplane, and we approached her with the camera rolling as she sobbed.

“Do you know what’s happening?” I asked.
“Yes,” she said. “It’s a war. A stupid war.”
“Well, don’t you think the country needs your daddy?”
“No! I think I need my daddy.”

I felt horrible, and apologized, profusely, as the girl’s mother wrapped her arms around her crying child. The native emotional brilliance of the girl might have made her a character in one of Kristofferson’s songs. He clearly felt the same way about the father’s departure for war. In January of 1991, the Texas musician and songwriter had joined Willie Nelson and other artists at the Palmer Auditorium in Austin for a concert billed as, “Peace for All.” The elder Bush, George H.W., had warned a few weeks earlier in Waco that a failure to act and allow Iraq to invade Kuwait laid the predicate for what he described as “world war tomorrow.” Kris was not buying H.W.’s bullshit and was trying to broaden the resistance to the marketing of “Operation Desert Storm.” The fact that Kristofferson had served in the military as a helicopter pilot, was a graduate of West Point, and a Rhodes Scholar, made him the perfect anti-war partner for the more quotidian Willie.

We had been standing outside of Willie’s bus waiting for him or Kris to step out for an interview. I had been attending Willie’s Fourth of July concerts since the late seventies and had interviewed him several times. Kris, however, I had always wanted to meet, though I was not motivated by journalism; I just wanted to talk about writing and music, which were both enduring mysteries to me. A beer or two in a rundown roadside tavern would have been perfect. Instead, I had to ask him about politics and imperialism.

“One more thing, quickly,” I said. “You surely know enough about your home state to be aware this is a conservative as hell place and very supportive of the military. I assume you expect some criticism for doing this in the midst of what’s being considered almost a national emergency.”

“Goddamnit,” he said. “Nobody has more respect for our military than me, and my family. Damn sure nobody can question my patriotism, either. But what we are about to do is wrong, and I’ve got a conscience and a right to express it, regardless of what these politicians think, and that’s what we are all doing here today, hoping to stop this nonsense.”

His delivery was not fluid speech and I decided there were chemicals coursing through his brain. I might have been wrong but I found myself agonizing over this gifted and fortunate man’s circumstances. What did I know? Hell, I had wanted to be him. I had seen friends and acquaintances balancing on the edge of the emotional cracker during my two decades of TV journalism, and while wandering the country with my backpack, and I began to think of the opening monologue of Kristofferson’s great ballad, “To Beat the Devil.”

“A couple of years back I come across a great and wasted friend of mine in the hallway of a recording studio, and while he was reciting some poetry to me that he had written, I saw that he was about a step away from dyin’, and I couldn’t help but wonderin’ why.”

The description was of Johnny Cash, who fought his own demons with drugs, and was obviously not yet recovered during that encounter. Cash helped Kris launch his career after the determined Texan landed a helicopter in the backyard of Cash’s Nashville home to present him with tapes of songs he had written and recorded. The lyrics of that first album in 1970 caught my attention more than any music. There is not a musical cell in my frame but I love the sound of words properly arranged as if they, too, can deliver melodies. Although I had no record player in my college dormitory, I bought the eponymous album, “Kristofferson,” and let a friend on my floor, who had a turntable, take possession of the LP. We played “Me and Bobby McGee” and “Sunday Mornin’ Comin’ Down” to the point where everyone living along our hallway learned the lyrics.

 

 

Even in my youth, I thought “Bobby McGee” was a song suffused with immortality. The story seemed to define America, two lovers wandering the roads and rails trying to discover their country and each other. I wanted that life, writing and drifting, and I let Kristofferson become the thematic sound track of my dreams, and then my actions. When I met the girl who was to become my partner for life, Kris’ “Lovin’ Her Was Easier” frequently popped up when we were together as background music, and it still does. His songs, initially, were only marginally political, and I wondered if that was because he was considered “country,” a genre, during the Vietnam Era, which was certain to offer disdain to political protestors. Merle Haggard’s, “The Fightin’ Side of Me” seemed to express the sentiments of country music at that time.

“I read about some squirrely guy who claims he just don’t believe in fightin’,
An’ I wonder just how long the rest of us can count on bein’ free,
They love our milk an’ honey, but they preach about some other way of livin’,
When they’re runnin’ down my country, hoss,
They’re walkin’ on the fightin’ side of me.”

Never mind, though, that the Vietnam War had no more to do with American freedom than did the battle H.W. Bush was about to start in Kuwait. Kristofferson’s politics, a tad more progressive than Merle’s, began to emerge in his writing with songs like “Sandinista,” which was produced in 1986 during the U.S. backed Contra war in Nicaragua. The song contravened U.S. policy in the conflict and was undoubtedly penned as the songwriter, and the rest of America, was oblivious to the secret Iran Contra drugs and guns operations being managed by then Vice President H.W. Bush. “Sandinista,” Kristofferson sang, “You can hold your head up high. You have given back their Freedom. You have lived up to your name.”

Sitting in a conference room in Washington, D.C., as I was waiting for a copy of the “Tower Report” on the Iran Contra scandal, I found myself wondering if Kristofferson ever questioned his work’s focus. Music had power, of course, but was it politically influential enough to foster change? And if it could not, what was the point of political protest songs? Texas U.S. Senator John Tower’s report on the Iran Contra Scandal was little more than a whitewash that found the appropriate fall guy in Marine Oliver North and kept the responsibility for the scam away from H.W Bush, who had authorized the clandestine endeavor. The true evil actors in American politics always seem above the law. I got in a bit of trouble later that night in my live television broadcast back to Houston when I described Tower’s findings as, “A number two Mexican dinner with one taco missing.”

My sense was that Kristofferson was always at his political best with more nuanced lyricism. In his 1972, “Jesus Was A Capricorn,” he offered a subtle critique of hypocrisy and social intolerance by mocking how we often marginalize people who do not fit conventional profiles and might just look different. “Everybody’s gotta have somebody to look down on,” he wrote. “Who they can feel better than any time they please.” The song began with a bald concession that humans never seem to change, regardless of inspiring examples. “Jesus was a Capricorn, he ate organic foods, he believed in love and peace and everyone no shoes. Long hair beard and sandals and a funky bunch of friends, reckon they’d just nail him up if he came down again.”

 

 

When a soul can reduce the entirety of the human condition down to a few couplets, there seems no reason for the rest of us to bother writing. The urge to create, though, does not simply vanish. Kristofferson’s linguistic skills inspired writers like me even though we could have reasonably been intimidated. I have tried to write and think at the intersection of art and politics because I do not believe there is much in life that is unaffected by the political. His ability to make the poetic into the political only ensures his legend will grow over time. History will likely consider him the songwriting equal of Bob Dylan, and, to paraphrase Steve Earle’s praise of Townes Van Zandt, I’d stand on Guy Clark’s glass coffee table in my cowboy boots and shout that to the world. I have heard musicians say that their music comes through them, not from them, as if the universe were its source and they were the ciphers. I am inclined to think that might be true of Kristofferson’s lyrics, too.

All writers, of course, however they do it, are chasing the truth, and no one spoke better to the frustration and importance of that challenge than Kris in his song, “To Beat the Devil.” He describes being a musician down on his luck having an encounter with an old man in a bar, “cigarette smoke in the ceiling, saw dust on the floor,” who turns out to be the devil. Kristofferson agrees to give the man his guitar and listens as he sings a refrain that ought to echo down through the millennia for every sentient being on board our little green and blue rock.

“If you waste your time a talkin’ to the people who don’t listen to the things that you are sayin’, who do you think’s gonna hear? And if you should die explainin’ how the things that they complain about are things they could be changin’, who do you thinks gonna care? There were other lonely writers in a world turned deaf and blind who were crucified for what they tried to show. And their voices have been scattered by the swirling winds of time, but the truth remains and someone wants to know.”

Adios, Kris. I’m glad I was walking in the world the same time as you.

This article was originally published on Texas to the world.

James Moore is the New York Times bestselling author of “Bush’s Brain: How Karl Rove Made George W. Bush Presidential,” three other books on Bush and former Texas Governor Rick Perry, as well as two novels, and a biography entitled, “Give Back the Light,” on a famed eye surgeon and inventor. His newest book will be released mid- 2023. Mr. Moore has been honored with an Emmy from the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences for his documentary work and is a former TV news correspondent who has traveled extensively on every presidential campaign since 1976.

He has been a retained on-air political analyst for MSNBC and has appeared on Morning Edition on National Public Radio, NBC Nightly News, Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell, CBS Evening News, CNN, Real Time with Bill Maher, and Hardball with Chris Matthews, among numerous other programs. Mr. Moore’s written political and media analyses have been published at CNN, Boston Globe, L.A. Times, Guardian of London, Sunday Independent of London, Salon, Financial Times of London, Huffington Post, and numerous other outlets. He also appeared as an expert on presidential politics in the highest-grossing documentary film of all time, Fahrenheit 911, (not related to the film’s producer Michael Moore).

His other honors include the Dartmouth College National Media Award for Economic Understanding, the Edward R. Murrow Award from the Radio Television News Directors’ Association, the Individual Broadcast Achievement Award from the Texas Headliners Foundation, and a Gold Medal for Script Writing from the Houston International Film Festival. He was frequently named best reporter in Texas by the AP, UPI, and the Houston Press Club. The film produced from his book “Bush’s Brain” premiered at The Cannes Film Festival prior to a successful 30-city theater run in the U.S.

Mr. Moore has reported on the major stories and historical events of our time, which have ranged from Iran-Contra to the Waco standoff, the Oklahoma City bombing, the border immigration crisis, and other headlining events. His journalism has put him in Cuba, Central America, Mexico, Australia, Canada, the UK, and most of Europe, interviewing figures as diverse as Fidel Castro and Willie Nelson. He has been writing about Texas politics, culture, and history since 1975, and continues with political opinion pieces for CNN and regularly at his Substack newsletter: “Texas to the World.”

 

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Multiculturalism, flags and protests

By Maria Millers

To sin by silence, when we should protest,
Makes cowards out of men. The human race
Has climbed on protest. Had no voice been raised
Against injustice, ignorance, and lust,
The inquisition yet would serve the law,
And guillotines decide our least disputes.
The few who dare, must speak and speak again
To right the wrongs of many
(Excerpt from ‘Protest’ by EllaWheelerWilcox).

As I write it is one day before the anniversary of the brutal Hamas attack and hostage taking of Israelis on October 7th; a day etched in the minds not just Israelis but Jewish people across the world. But for Palestinians this too was the beginning of a year of death and destruction for those civilians living in Gaza.

As a multicultural society we are home to many of those from both sides who have been affected by what has happened.

Australia prides itself on being a successful multicultural society and indeed on many levels it has been one. But the events of the past year and the most recent escalation of conflict in the Middle East are testing the strength of our multiculturalism. And also our leaders.


The right to protest has always been the hallmark of a functioning democracy and peaceful protest should never become opportunities for political posturing and point scoring.


As Nobel Laureate and Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel wrote:

“There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.”

There have been ongoing protests from Australian Palestinians and as the anniversary of October 7th draws nearer critics raised the question of whether it is insensitive to hold vigils on a day which brings pain to a community where historical memories of past atrocities still reverberate.

At the same time we cannot ignore the pain of Palestinian Australians who have witnessed all year incredible loss of life and destruction of homes, hospitals, schools etc. in the land from which they have come and where many still have familial connections


Much of the debate has revolved around flags. Flags can be quite divisive, often representing national identity, cultural heritage and political ideologies. The meaning of a flag can vary significantly depending on your personal experiences and therefore can be a contentious symbol


There has been concern that the flag of Hezbollah has appeared at Palestinian rallies particularly since it’s a proscribed terrorist organization.


However, the decision to display the Israeli flag on the Sydney Opera House was met with mixed reactions and opinions on whether it was a mistake. For some, it was a show of solidarity with Israel, particularly during a time of conflict. Others viewed it as controversial, arguing that it politicized a cultural landmark and could be seen as dismissive of Palestinian perspectives or the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.


Ultimately whether it was a mistake depends on where you stand on using public symbols which may alienate and upset other affected citizens in our multicultural society and on one’s viewpoint regarding the appropriateness of using public symbols for political statements and the broader context of the ongoing conflict. The incident highlighted the sensitivities around national symbols and their implications in a multicultural society.


Some flags are universally reviled. The Swastika flag is a potent symbol of hate, representing the atrocities of the Holocaust and the broader impact of Nazi ideology, making it universally condemned. However, even flags like the Union Jack can also evoke feelings of colonialism and oppression in formerly colonized countries.


As we live on a globalized but increasingly fragile planet perhaps we should move towards an Earth Flag. One designed by John McConnell in 1969 features a view of Earth from space, with a dark blue background representing the cosmos. It symbolizes peace and unity among all people on the planet. These proposals aim to foster a sense of global citizenship and awareness, encouraging people to think beyond national borders. Of course we already have the United Nations Flag featuring a world map surrounded by olive branches, representing the nations of the world coming together to solve problems. Regrettably they have not been able to do so.


Perhaps it is poetry we should turn to in fostering a culture of respect and understanding to serve as bridges rather than barriers in a multicultural society. In the words of poet Denise Levertov:

A voice from the dark called out,
The poets must give us
imagination of peace, to oust the intense, familiar
imagination of disaster. Peace, not only
the absence of war.

And if despair for the world becomes too much, turn towards nature to find relief:

When despair for the world grows in me
and I wake in the night at the least sound
in fear of what my life and my children’s lives might be,
I go and lie down where the wood drake
rests in his beauty on the water, and the great heron feeds.
I come into the peace of wild things
who do not tax their lives with forethought
of grief. I come into the presence of still water.
And I feel above me the day-blind stars
waiting with their light. For a time
I rest in the grace of the world, and am free.
(The Peace of Wild Things by Wendell Berry).

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Political Manipulation: Reclaiming Critical Thinking

By Denis Hay

Description

Explore how political manipulation by vested interests exploits political decisions and Australia’s path to a more compassionate system through monetary sovereignty. #PoliticalAwareness #SocialJustice #CriticalThinking

Understanding Political Manipulation: How to Reclaim Critical Thinking

Introduction: The Crisis of Political Manipulation

In today’s complex world, political manipulation is rampant, affecting every aspect of our lives. Citizens are often swayed into making decisions that don’t align with their best interests. This phenomenon is not just a coincidence – it’s a calculated strategy by vested interests.

These powerful entities use media influence, disinformation, and emotional manipulation to cloud our judgment. Understanding this problem and how to counteract it is crucial for building a compassionate and ethical political system, especially in Australia, where monetary sovereignty offers unique opportunities for change.

This guide explores the anatomy of political manipulation, the psychological tactics used, and how citizens can reclaim their critical thinking. With Australia’s unique economic framework, we can use our monetary sovereignty to create a fairer and more transparent political landscape. Let’s dive into the problem, agitate its impact, and explore practical solutions.

Political Manipulation and Its Consequences

1. Defining Political Manipulation and Its Tactics

Political manipulation refers to the strategic use of information, emotions, and psychological tactics to influence public opinion and decision-making. Vested interests – corporations, media moguls, and political elites – employ these tactics to keep power and control. Common strategies include:

a) Media Framing: Controlling the narrative around political issues to shape public belief.

b) Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false or misleading information to confuse and mislead the public.


c) Fearmongering: Using fear to push certain policies or to discourage opposition.

Impact on Democratic Processes

When citizens are manipulated, the democratic process is compromised. Instead of making informed choices, people vote based on emotional reactions or misinformation. This can lead to:

a) Policies that Benefit the Few: Governments prioritizing corporate interests over public welfare.

b) Erosion of Trust: Citizens losing faith in democratic institutions and the political process.

c) Increased Polarisation: Divisive tactics that fragment societies, making it harder to achieve consensus.

2. Vested Interests and Their Role in Manipulation

Vested interests play a crucial role in shaping public discourse and policy. They include:

a) Corporate Entities: Industries such as mining, pharmaceuticals, and finance often lobby for policies that help them, even if they harm the public or environment.

b) Media Ownership: A few powerful individuals or corporations’ control much of the media, influencing which issues receive attention and how they are presented.


c) Political Elites: Politicians may act in the interests of their donors or personal gain rather than their constituents.

These groups use their resources to influence not just public opinion but also legislative outcomes. For example, the fossil fuel industry has historically lobbied against climate action, despite overwhelming scientific evidence of its necessity.

3. The Psychology Behind Avoiding Critical Thinking

Why do so many people fall for these tactics? Several psychological factors come into play:

a) Cognitive Dissonance: People prefer information that confirms their existing beliefs and avoid information that contradicts them, leading to a skewed understanding of issues.

b) Social Proof and Groupthink: When most people around you believe something, you are likely to accept it too, even if it’s false.


c) Emotional Manipulation: Politicians and media use emotional appeals – like fear, anger, or pride – to bypass rational thought and trigger immediate reactions.

These psychological barriers make it difficult for individuals to engage in critical thinking, especially when bombarded with overwhelming or conflicting information.

Intensifying the Relevance and Impact

4. The Human Cost of Political Manipulation

Political manipulation has severe consequences for individuals and society at large. It leads to:

a) Economic Inequality: Policies favouring the wealthy deepen the gap between rich and poor.

b) Environmental Degradation: Corporate influence can result in lax environmental regulations, worsening climate change.


c) Social Unrest: Manipulated narratives can stoke social divisions, leading to conflict and instability.

For example, in Australia, the influence of property developers has been linked to a lack of affordable housing, while misinformation around Indigenous issues has perpetuated inequality and social tension.

5. How Media Shapes Perception and Creates Echo Chambers

The media is a powerful tool in shaping public belief. With media consolidation, a few voices dominate the narrative, leading to a lack of diverse perspectives. This often results in:

a) Echo Chambers: People are exposed only to information that reinforces their beliefs, making it harder to consider alternative viewpoints.

b) Agenda-Setting: Media decides which issues are ‘important,’ often sidelining critical topics like poverty or healthcare in favour of sensational or divisive stories.

The result is a public that is misinformed or uninformed about crucial issues affecting their lives.

6. The Role of Education and Its Shortcomings

The education system plays a significant role in fostering or hindering critical thinking. Unfortunately, many educational institutions emphasize rote learning over analytical skills, leading to:

a) Lack of Media Literacy: Students are not taught how to critically evaluate information sources.

b) Underdeveloped Critical Thinking Skills: Without these skills, people are more susceptible to manipulation and less likely to challenge misinformation.

c) Economic Pressures: Financial insecurity limits people’s ability to engage deeply with political issues.

These shortcomings create a fertile ground for manipulation, as people lack the tools to critically assess the information they receive.

Reclaiming Critical Thinking and Empowering Citizens

7. Promoting Independent Media and Information Sources

One of the most effective ways to counter manipulation is by promoting independent media and diverse information sources. This can be done through:

a) Supporting Independent Journalism: Platforms like The Guardian, Michael West Media, Australian Independent Media Network (AIMN), Independent Australia, Pearls and Irritations, or The Conversation are just a few who offer in-depth, unbiased reporting that is crucial for informed decision-making.

b) Encouraging Critical Media Consumption: Teach people to question the sources of their information, look for multiple perspectives, and be wary of sensationalism.

8. Strengthening Education and Media Literacy

Reforming the education system to emphasize critical thinking and media literacy is essential. This involves:

a) Integrating Media Literacy into Curricula: Schools should teach students to identify biases, fact-check information, and understand the role of media in society.

b) Encouraging Analytical Thinking: Programs that promote debate, inquiry, and problem-solving can help students develop the skills needed to challenge misinformation.

9. Leveraging Australia’s Monetary Sovereignty for Social Good

Australia has a unique opportunity to reshape its political landscape by using its monetary sovereignty. Unlike households or businesses, the federal government can issue its currency, meaning it can fund public projects without needing to “find” money first. This can be used to:

a) Invest in Public Education and Healthcare: Ensure everyone has access to quality services that promote a well-informed, healthy society.

b) Support Independent Media and Research: Funding for independent journalism and research can help counteract the influence of vested interests.

c) Promote Public Housing and Infrastructure: Build infrastructure that helps all citizens, reducing the influence of developers on housing policy.

By understanding and using monetary sovereignty, Australia can create a fairer, more transparent political system that serves the public interest.

10. Encouraging Civic Engagement and Community Action

Building a resilient democracy requires active participation from its citizens. Strategies to promote civic engagement include:

a) Community Forums and Discussions: Create spaces for people to discuss political issues in an informed, respectful manner.

b) Support for Grassroots Movements: Empower local groups that advocate for transparency, social justice, and environmental sustainability.


c) Civic Education Programs: Educate citizens on their rights, the political process, and how they can effect change in their communities.

Certainly! Here’s a small section added under the subheading ”Civic Education Programs” focusing on how citizens can affect change in their community:

Civic Education Programs: How Citizens Can Affect Change in Their Community

Civic education empowers citizens to understand their rights, responsibilities, and the political process. By becoming more engaged and informed, individuals can actively participate in shaping their communities. Here are a few ways citizens can drive change:

a) Participate in Local Government: Attend council meetings, vote in local elections, and engage with representatives to voice concerns on community issues such as education, infrastructure, or healthcare.

b) Organize Grassroots Movements: Mobilize fellow citizens around key causes. Whether it’s advocating for environmental sustainability, social justice, or housing, grassroots movements can create significant political pressure and raise awareness.


c) Start or Join a Community Group: Collaboration amplifies efforts. Working with like-minded people on local initiatives, such as neighborhood clean-ups or food drives, strengthens community bonds and builds a shared sense of responsibility.


d) Educate and Empower Others: Lead or participate in workshops, discussion groups, or online forums to spread awareness on critical issues. Encouraging critical thinking and civic engagement in others creates a ripple effect that can lead to meaningful change.

By taking these actions, citizens can foster a more engaged and active community, influencing both local and broader political landscapes.

11. Personal Strategies for Enhancing Critical Thinking

Critical thinking is the backbone of informed decision-making. By enhancing your ability to analyse, evaluate, and question the information you consume, you can resist manipulation and make decisions aligned with your values and interests. Here are practical strategies for cultivating and improving critical thinking:

1. Question Everything

One of the most effective ways to develop critical thinking is to adopt a mindset of curiosity. Don’t take information at face value; instead, ask probing questions:

a) Who receives help from this information? Consider whether the person or entity sharing the information has something to gain.

b) What is the source? Is the information coming from a reliable, credible source, or is it unverified or biased?


c) Why am I being told this? Understanding the intent behind the information can help uncover hidden agendas.


d) Is there evidence? Check if the information is supported by verifiable facts, research, or data.

By constantly asking these questions, you engage more deeply with content and become less susceptible to emotional or manipulative appeals.

2. Diversify Your Information Sources

Relying on a single news outlet or source of information can create blind spots in your understanding of issues. To counteract this, actively seek out diverse perspectives:

Read from different political perspectives: Engage with news from both sides of the political spectrum to understand how different viewpoints shape the narrative.

Consume independent and alternative media: Many mainstream outlets are owned by large corporations with vested interests. Independent media often provide in-depth, investigative journalism that challenges the status quo.


Global news sources: Look beyond local or national news to understand how international perspectives frame global events. This can offer a broader and more balanced view of critical issues.

By diversifying your sources, you break free from echo chambers and develop a more well-rounded perspective on political and social issues.

3. Avoid Emotional Reactions

Emotional manipulation is a powerful tool used to cloud judgment and force snap decisions. Political messages are often designed to provoke anger, fear, or pride. While emotions are important, they can easily hijack rational thought. To counter this:

a) Pause before reacting: When you encounter information that provokes a strong emotional reaction, take a moment to breathe and analyse it objectively before responding.

b) Separate facts from emotions: Try to distinguish between the factual content of the information and the emotional appeal being used to convey it.


c) Think critically about emotional narratives: Ask yourself why certain emotions are being triggered. Is the information meant to inform, or is it manipulating you to take a specific action or adopt a certain belief?

By managing your emotional reactions, you can make more balanced, thoughtful decisions.

4. Practice Reflective Thinking

Reflective thinking involves stepping back and examining your own beliefs, assumptions, and biases. It allows you to critically assess how your firsthand experiences and preferences influence your judgment. Here’s how to incorporate reflective thinking:

a) Acknowledge your biases: Everyone has biases that shape how they interpret information. By acknowledging your biases, you can actively work to minimise their influence.

b) Evaluate past decisions: Reflect on past political or social decisions you’ve made. Were they based on reliable information? Did they align with your long-term values and interests?

c) Seek out opposing views: Deliberately read or engage with viewpoints that contradict your own. While this can be uncomfortable, it’s essential for developing a comprehensive understanding of complex issues.

Reflective thinking helps you build a mindset of humility and openness, both of which are crucial for critical thinking.

5. Fact-Check and Verify Information

In the age of misinformation, it is vital to verify the accuracy of the information you encounter. Misleading statistics, doctored images, and false claims can quickly spread across media platforms. To ensure you’re not falling for disinformation:

a) Use reputable fact-checking websites: Websites like FactCheck.org, Snopes, and PolitiFact provide reliable resources to verify the truthfulness of claims.

b) Cross-reference sources: Don’t rely on a single source for important information. Cross-check it against multiple reputable sources to confirm its accuracy.

c) Look for original sources: Whenever possible, trace claims back to their original research or data to evaluate them firsthand.

Fact-checking builds your credibility and helps prevent the spread of false information.

6. Engage in Constructive Debates

Engaging in conversations with others who have different viewpoints can sharpen your critical thinking skills. Rather than avoiding discussions about politics or controversial topics, view them as opportunities to test and refine your ideas.

a) Be respectful and open-minded: Approach debates with a willingness to listen and consider the other person’s perspective.

b) Ask clarifying questions: Don’t assume you understand the other person’s argument – ask for clarification and explore the reasoning behind their beliefs.

c) Be willing to change your mind: If presented with compelling evidence that challenges your beliefs, be open to rethinking your position.

Constructive debates enhance your understanding of issues and help you become more confident in your viewpoints.

7. Read Widely and Regularly

To cultivate a habit of critical thinking, make it a point to read a variety of materials regularly. Expand beyond political news into other domains of knowledge:

a) Books on critical thinking and logic: These will provide you with tools and frameworks to evaluate arguments and evidence.

b) Historical texts: Learning from history offers perspective on how political manipulation has been used in the past, helping you recognize similar patterns today.

c) Philosophy and ethics: These fields encourage deep thinking about the values and principles that should guide political and social decisions.

Reading widely ensures that you are intellectually engaged and continually learning, which is essential for staying informed in a complex world.

8. Cultivate Intellectual Humility

Critical thinking requires intellectual humility—the understanding that no one has all the answers, and that you are constantly learning. By acknowledging the limits of your knowledge, you open yourself up to added information and perspectives.

a) Be aware of cognitive biases: Understand that cognitive biases, such as overconfidence or the illusion of knowledge, can affect anyone, including yourself.

b) Stay curious: Instead of seeking certainty, stay curious and ask more questions. Be comfortable with complexity and ambiguity in political issues.

c) Learn from mistakes: If you realize you were wrong about something, don’t be afraid to admit it and learn from the experience.

Intellectual humility allows for growth, self-improvement, and a deeper understanding of complex political landscapes.

Conclusion: Empowering Yourself Through Critical Thinking

Enhancing your critical thinking is an ongoing journey that involves questioning, reflection, and learning. By adopting these strategies, you can protect yourself from political manipulation and make decisions that serve your long-term best interests.

More importantly, you can inspire others around you to think critically and engage meaningfully with the political process, creating a more informed and empowered society.

a) Question Everything: Encourage scepticism and curiosity. Don’t accept information at face value; ask who receives help from it and why.

b) Diversify Information Sources: Seek out a variety of news outlets, including those with different political perspectives.

c) Practice Reflective Thinking: Take time to consider the implications of your beliefs and how they align with your actions and values.

Summary: Reclaiming the Power of Thought in a Manipulated World

Political manipulation is a significant threat to democracy and social progress. By understanding how vested interests use media, psychology, and education to shape our thinking, we can take steps to reclaim our critical faculties. Solutions lie in promoting independent media, enhancing education, using Australia’s monetary sovereignty, and encouraging civic engagement. Together, we can build a more compassionate and ethical political system.

Question for Readers

What steps will you take to ensure that you are not influenced by political manipulation? How can you encourage others to think critically about the information they receive?

Call to Action

If you found this article insightful, explore more content on social justice and political awareness at Social Justice Australia. Share this article to help spread awareness about the importance of critical thinking in our political system.

Social Sharing and Hashtags

Share this article on your social media to spark discussions on political awareness and the importance of critical thinking!

 


This article was originally published on Social Justice Australia.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Queensland Futures: Massaging Labor’s Primary Vote

By Denis Bright

Labor’s Alternative Policy Direction can be packaged as an event in progress as the Queensland election campaign moves into a crucial stage. The Queensland economy has too moved from Potential Dire Straits with the injection of additional revenue from mineral royalties, stable support from the Albanese Government and windfall profits through the Queensland Investment Corporation (QIC). The QIC’s real estate portfolio alone has built up $14.5 billion in assets under management since it was first established under the Goss Labor Government in the 1990s (from the latest Annual Report):

QIC has delivered a pre-tax profit of $127.1 million for 2022-23 against a target of $110.0 million. Total revenue for 2022-23 increased by $37.9 million to $654.5 million compared to 2021- 22, primarily due to increased investment management fees and property asset level service revenue.

The Murdoch press with the support of commercial eyewitness television news services like Sky News offers voters a litany of bad news stories with an emphasis on violent criminal activity. This focus on criminality is not about tax evasion, illegal drug networks or corporate corruption. There have been unfortunate instances of this type of criminal activity but overall crime rates in Queenslandas measured in official police statistics and are usually on parity with those turbulent days of the Premier Campbell Newman (2012-15).

Police statistics show rates of crime in three areas (robbery, sexual offences and homicide).

Eyewitness news services bring a measure of excitement into suburban and regional households with their coverage of specific criminal events which do not extend to the big overall picture of trends in criminal activity. The coverage always avoids emphasis on growing levels of corporate criminal corruption from tax evasion to support for highly prevalent illegal drug distribution or even anomalies in the management of nursing homes for the elderly which have been well covered in recent 7.30 Report segments. It is about scaring the mamas and papas.

Data transmitted by Metropole Property Strategists should allay these concerns. Many Brisbane suburbs are the safest locations in comparison to interstate metropolitan areas.

David Crisafulli’s Little Blue Booklet initially gave no attention to the extent of mental illness, economic disadvantage and homelessness as underlying causes of criminality. Some of these scourges are related alcohol and drug abuse which has people prematurely aged at thirty years of age. The LNP has broadened its approach this week with a commitment to new mental health initiatives.

Here in Brisbane’s Inner West and Indooroopilly, I have mentioned before that the LNP chooses to leave places like Witton Barracks in darkness by the incompetence of the BCC’s preferred management company. Meanwhile brochures to outline David Crusafulli’s Touch on Crime Priorities are being delivered to local letterboxes in nearby homes and housing units.

Labor should be able to talk up its reformist and progressive agendas even at this stage in the current election campaign. Every percentage point gain in Labor’s primary vote will save sitting members in the most marginal seats in both outer metropolitan and regional districts. Thus far, the worst of Labor’s bad polling results have stabilized. Of course, I cannot guarantee that this will continue into the 30+ percent range. It is a wait and see game for the days ahead.

Here are some pragmatic transport initiatives for both metropolitan and regional areas.

In a game of electoral populism, voters are likely to respond positively to responsible reformist initiatives which consolidate the gains made by the introduction of 50 cent Translink fares on 5 August 2024. These transport initiatives would include:

  • Commitment to multifunctional Transport Oriented Development projects (TODs) supported by government but largely funded through public private partnerships which are already operational at places like Montague Markets in West End Brisbane. At this location, the housing units above the commercial precincts are largely for the middle-end of the housing market. Opportunities for government support for social housing and improved public transport connections in outer suburban and regional towns and cities with an emphasis on integrating rail and bus connections (Image: Brisbane Development):

 

  • The Goss Government in the 1990s commenced planning for high-speed tilt train services on coastal routes in Queensland and the luxury Spirit of the Outback sleeper train to Longreach with a bus connection to Winton. These initiatives are still operational although the Campbell Newman Government removed Motorail services for cars on the outback route. Thirty years later it is time to replace the Inlander and Westlander with units similar in style to the Prospector train in WA. Appropriate connecting buses should operate in the tourist season to some of Australia’s most iconic scenic spots along both the Savannah bus routes to Cairns and Darwin. Interstate destinations in NSW are within the reach of the Westlander operating as a higher speed inland service perhaps with an overnight break in Roma during the spring tourist season and a largely daylight service to Charleville at other for most of the year.

 

WA’s Prospector Service Covering 600 Kilometres in Seven Hours (TransWA)

  • Within outer Brisbane and nearby regional centres in South-East Queensland there are public transport blackspots to locations like Wide Bay and Toowoomba which should be served by the expansion of the Translink bus zones. Some suburbs on the Brisbane-Ipswich corridor have no public transport.
  • Investigation of a Mt. Isa to Darwin rail freight route with federal assistance to promote mineral and other exports through Darwin to avoid Reef transits. Locally, the federal LNP’s government owned Inland Rail Project lacks tangible connections to port facilities. The current terminus at Beaudesert is still one hundred kilometres from the Port of Brisbane.
  • Finally, the Campbell Newman Government stopped the commercialization of the Queensland Rail’s Travel Service which should be collecting commissions for online and counter bookings for accommodation, tours and even interstate rail, bus and air travel.
  • Replacing empty seats on long-distance rail services with concession fare rates for all classes of travel and booking links to connecting buses offered by existing and new commercial providers so that a state-ride public transport network re-emerges for the benefit of Queenslanders and local regional economies.

Labor’s agendas have never been very radical. However, communication about sustainable and just future policy directions must be reinvigorated. In juxtaposition, KAP and One Nation now operate on a unity ticket with a collective commitment to the priorities offered in That Little Blue Booklet which is being carried around by all LNP candidates at staged news presentations.

These policies are relics from a bygone and now discredited eras when Queensland conservatives were given too much of a mandate in landslide results over a century of infamy from the days of the Brisbane Tramway Strike of 1912 to the more recent temporary phase of Can-Do Politics (2012-15).

 

Denis Bright (pictured) is a financial member of the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA). Denis is committed to consensus-building in these difficult times. Your feedback from readers advances the cause of citizens’ journalism. Full names are not required when making comments. However, a valid email must be submitted if you decide to hit the Replies Button.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Queensland Futures: A LNP Landslide on 26 October 2024?

By Denis Bright

Clutching their Little Blue Book of Motherhood Statements in Those Right Priorities for Queensland’s Future, the state LNP candidates are all hoping for a landslide victory. The Murdoch press and its television outlets would love a return to the Joh era. Where David Crisafulli does offer a pragmatic policy, it should be favourably considered by the Miles Government out of respect for mainstream democratic processes and as a sign of even-handedness in leadership.

The Crisafulli initiative on a mental health facility to assist troubled youth in Central Queensland is of course a proposal in this category.

However, over the past century in Queensland, victory for Queensland conservatives has been full of nasty surprises. Time for a Change in 1957 repeated a similar positive mantra to that of Premier Arthur Moore. Soon, essential rail transport links to the Gold Coast were closed, married female teachers dismissed on 31 December from 1958 as a cost saving and unplanned urban sprawl became the buzz word against so-called Red Tape in a motorized Brisbane. These austerity savings were splurged on Queensland’s centenary celebrations in 1959 and the visit of Princess Alexandra. I recall that an old relative informed me that the Governor’s train was decorated and painted for a picnic in the woods in the late Premier Nicklin’s electorate.

In the prime years of my grandparents, Premier Arthur Moore rose from obscurity to fame at the 1929 state election on the eve of the Great Depression by strategies to free Queensanders from the so-called grip of the Labor Party over the previous fourteen years. There were promises of giving young people a chance and a better way under the banner of Country Party Conservatism as interpreted by the member for Aubigny in the Dalby district. The initial positivity of the 1929 campaign soon changed to more austerity, perks for the rural sector and use of the gerrymander to keep the conservatives in control of the Deep North.

The Moore ascendency which lasted just one term made inroads into the Labor Heartland in Queensland to consolidate gains made by Queensland conservatives in 1926. State seats like Brisbane, Bremer in Ipswich, Bowen, Maryborough, Mount Morgan and Fortitude Valley were now highly marginal after the 1929 election as Queensland conservatives took aim at Labor heartlands with populist jingles about happy times ahead.

In far-off Colombus, Ohio at Ohio State University, Emeritus Professor Gerald Kosicki at the School of Communication has pioneered research on the capacity of conservative populists to forge great victories by framing the political agenda with documents like The Right Priorities for Queensland’s Future with the support of mainstream media networks.

The current success of this style of campaigning shows up in the Freshwater Opinion Polling as published in the AFR (30 September 2024):

Premier Steven Miles is on track for a wipeout at next month’s Queensland state election, as the Liberal-National opposition opens a 12-point two-party-preferred lead, according to a new poll.

The latest Australian Financial Review-Freshwater Strategy survey shows Labor’s primary support has collapsed 10 points to 30 per cent since its third successive election victory in 2020 as Queenslanders struggle with cost-of-living and housing pressures, along with widespread fury ov handling crime.

The AFR report by Queensland correspondent James Hall offers a technicolor synopsis of the state of play in Queensland politics from the application of the Freshwater Strategic data:

 


In the words of the lyrics from Simon and Garfunkel of 1964 fame, Queenslanders’ concerns about crime fully assimilated as electoral concerns. Like the words of the prophets on those subway walls and tenement halls, the Miles Government has time in caretake mode to expunge this political graffiti in its own political communications.


The Queensland Government is already tough on crime. A lot of the perceived criminal activity is hearsay to scare the Mamas and the Papas:

 


A police badge can emerge when least expected through the immature application of Jack’s Law as noted by O’Brien Criminal & Civil Solicitors (2 September 2024):

So, the recent plan to expand Jack’s Law to include Queensland shopping centres, licensed premises, and entertainment venues has sparked a heated debate. This legislation, initially introduced to combat knife crime, has now broadened its scope. Now, it allows police to conduct warrantless searches using handheld metal detectors in more public areas.

While some hail it as necessary for public safety, others criticise it. Opponents say it potentially might be an overreach and infringement on civil liberties.

Jack’s Law was enacted in response to the tragic stabbing of 17-year-old Jack Beasley in 2019. The law initially allowed police to use metal detectors in designated Safe Night Precincts and public transport hubs to detect hidden weapons. Since its implementation, over five hundred weapons have been seized.

The expansion of Jack’s Law comes in the wake of several high-profile violent incidents. For example, the tragic Bondi Junction attack resulted in multiple fatalities. Similar events have intensified calls for broader police powers to prevent similar tragedies.

As a result, Queensland Premier Steven Miles emphasised the need for such measures. He stated: “Community safety is a key priority,” and highlighted the success of the law in confiscating dangerous weapons.

Each of the LNP’s chosen disciples applies The Right Priorities Document with some zeal as in the local state electorate of Maiwar in Brisbane’s Inner West in a seat which is held by Green MP, Michael Berkman (Image: LNP):

 


The sheer opportunism of the LNP’s Tough on Crime Rhetoric is revealed by the failure of the Brisbane City Council’s chosen Whitebox Management company to turn on the security lights adjacent to the refurbished Witton Barracks Community Centre which adjoins a popular park for drinking at nighttime. Both railway station staff and even the isolated employees at Whitebox have some fears about parking in this locality.

I have reported the matter to the Indooroopilly Police, Radio 4BC and all LNP representatives in this area. The Witton Barracks area still remains in darkness. The young constable who noted my complain at Indooroopilly Polce Station had completely good rapport with members of the public. Officious practices give the police and politicians always give authority a bad name.

Labor will always be tough on crime and responsive to progressive crime prevention. Much crime is embedded in disadvantage and mental health problems. Tackle these social structures and the battle against crime is well underway. There is little mention of the need to crackdown on sale of party drugs which contribute to premature ageing and those mental health problems which emerge later in life from the use of unknown substances.


The sources of corruption and wholesale tax avoidance as a contribution to budgetary problems is also absent from LNP communications (ABC News 8 November 2023). Readers can scroll the lists available on ABC News sites to see which corporate icons engage in horrible games with the ATO at great expense to the budgets of governments at all levels. Readers should check on which companies are on the tax avoidance shame list from ABC News in the latest and previous editions of the tax avoidance lists.


Our Queensland government does not overspend. The current budget is accompanied by a commitment to $23 billion in capital works in a $93 billion budget for 2024-25. David Crisafulli’s team opposed the increases in mineral royalties which keep the current budget in good shape.


In the traditions of Professor Kosicki’s communication research, the weighting given by the LNP to its tough on crime rhetoric is an attempt to jam out real issues of concern across the electorate which are related to disadvantage, mental health problems and cost-of-living issues. The real purpose of this populist rhetoric is to win government along the old precedents set by Arthur Moore, Joh and Campbell Newman who all hoped for political dynasties that could last for decades as in those dark years between 1970 and 1988 which ended in the criminal proceedings of the Fitzgerald Inquiry into public corruption.


The Freshwater Polling shows that the LNP’s framing and agenda setting of news is working:

 

 

The LNP’s rhetoric about crime is opportunistic and is devoid of real attention to the mafias behind the illegal drug trade, official corruption and tax avoidance on a grand scale.

The LNP’s Right Priorities are largely policy free zones. However, the Freshwater polling shows that the LNP rhetoric has gained traction. The electorate is responding as an echo chamber to the LNP rhetoric that is repeated in the mainstream media with quasi-professional zeal.


These political illusions can still be challenged in the campaign ahead so that Labor can campaign on the issues that really matter. If both mainstream parties want bipartisanship on some initiatives, that is good for leadership credibility on both sides.


And irony of ironies, back at Ohio State University in Columbus, the Queensland Investment Corporation (QIC) has sold its assets in CampusPrac and Traffic Management valued at $Aus 1 billion at a massive profit for Queensland taxpayers (Bloomberg 28 September 2023). Best wishes to our state from the cash flows being generated from the Northwestern Universities Parking Systems.


David Crisafulli should indeed his own errors of judgment in relation to that prior opposition to increases in mineral royalties and acknowledge that the Queensland economy is not in chaos.


The current campaign is not over. Every percentage gain in Labor’s primary vote saves Labor seats from the LNP landslide which is being fostered by the LNP’s Policy Free Zone in That Little Blue Book.

 

Denis Bright (pictured) is a financial member of the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA). Denis is committed to consensus-building in these difficult times. Your feedback from readers advances the cause of citizens’ journalism. Full names are not required when making comments. However, a valid email must be submitted if you decide to hit the Replies Button.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Sensor trial hopes to empower managers to monitor bushfire risk

Bushfires are one of Australia’s greatest challenges and are becoming more frequent and severe due to climate change.

Hazard reduction burns are used to reduce the likelihood and severity of bushfires, but the task of identifying suitable windows of opportunity for prescribed burns is an increasing challenge for fire management agencies due to shifting seasonality or a narrow window of opportunity.

Now scientists are trialling cost-effective sensors which will empower bushfire managers to efficiently monitor the moisture content of bushfire fuel in real time, therefore helping them to better identify prescribed burn opportunities and monitor fire risk.

The Real Time Fuel Moisture Monitoring Using Low-cost Internet of Things Devices project is being led by Dr Nicholas Wilson from the Bushfire Centre of Excellence at the Australian National University.

“Fire agencies currently monitor the moisture content of bushfire fuel using direct measurement, which often involves considerable travel time and results in limited location data,” Dr Wilson says.

“The ANU’s Bushfire Research Centre of Excellence has developed prototype low-cost devices for bushfire smoke detection which have temperature and relative humidity sensors that can estimate the moisture content of bushfire fuel in real time.

“These will be trialled as part of this project to better understand the challenges to their operational deployment, and how they can complement satellite derived fuel moisture monitoring.

Dr Wilson says while there are several solutions to this problem, cost and interpretation are consistent barriers to fire management agencies.

The project is a partnership with Western Sydney University, industry partner Indicium Dynamics, and government partners Forestry Corporation of NSW and ACT Parks & Conservation Service.

The co-investigator on the project is Associate Professor Rachael Nolan, a research scientist from the Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment at Western Sydney University.

The project received a NSW Smart Sensing Network Grand Challenges Fund grant earlier this year.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button

Conflict ‘deepens and amplifies’ gender inequality – new global survey

New global research involving over 10,000 children and young people from 10 countries has found that gender profoundly influences how conflict is experienced.

The study, by child rights and humanitarian INGO Plan International, offers in-depth insight into growing up in conflict, based on a survey and first-person accounts of 15- to 24-year-olds from countries including Sudan, Palestine, Ethiopia, Lebanon and Ukraine.

The research – which also includes over 100 in-depth interviews – shows how children and young people who live through conflict are robbed of their childhood, as fear and violence become their normal.

Girls and young women are more likely to experience sexual violence and assault in conflict settings – cited as a risk by more than one in four (27%) girls, and one in six (17%) boys.

They are also more likely to feel unsafe (39%) as a result of the relentless violence that comes with conflict compared to boys (36%).

In the interviews, deeply distressing accounts were shared of rape, and other forms of sexual violence in conflict, that girls and young women had experienced or witnessed. Interviewees emphasised the need for psychosocial and mental health support, which in some countries was very limited or non-existent.

More than one in three (38%) of all children and young people reported feeling unsafe, with 46% fearing that being shot was a risk, and 30% feeling they are at risk of airstrikes.

Almost half of the children and young people surveyed reported they had no, or very limited access to food (43%), with girls and young women more likely to struggle to access food and water. 44% of girls said they have no or very limited access to water, compared to 39% of boys, most likely as a result of pre-existing gender inequality.

Describing her experience of growing up in Sudan’s Darfur region, Dr. Elzahra Mohammed, Programme Lead – Primary and Sexual Reproductive Health for Plan International Sudan said:

“Every day we saw people dead or injured.”

“War is terrible, but I think for girls it is especially frightening. Even before the war, girls faced a kind of discrimination. But afterwards, the situation became very, very bad for us because young boys started to carry knives. When I became a doctor, I worked a lot with girls and young women who were abused in the war… I can understand what girls are going through.”

“It is important to acknowledge that girls are not affected the same way as boys – they need to be treated in a different way, they have different needs, both practically and emotionally.”

Girls and young women reported significantly higher levels of emotional stress indicators than boys and young men. 58% of girls and young women, compared to 49% of boys and young men, report continuous worrying and 58% of girls also say they are unable to sleep, versus 52% of boys.

Global evidence shows that it is common for girls and women to internalise their fears and anxieties and 44% of girls reported feeling hopeless, compared to 38% of boys.

Fatima, 23, currently trapped in Gaza, is surrounded by hunger, fear, death, and destruction every day. “Living in a conflict zone has an impact on young people that may last all our lives: it restricts our access to quality education, employment opportunities, and a safe environment. [We are] traumatised by witnessing violence and losing loved ones, and [this will] have long-term psychological effects.”

In the words of Dansha, 17, from Ethiopia: “The impact of the war is harsher on young females, and we have experienced so many challenges during those moments.”

“Many girls were raped during the war. In addition, compared to boys, we spend most of our time working in the house. This means there is a lot of burden on girls. Therefore, all these challenges bring depression among many young girls and most of these young girls have some sort of mental illness.”

Everyday life is turned on its head overnight when conflict erupts, as electricity and communication become hard to access, interaction with family and friends becomes restricted and schools close or become dangerous to get to. More than half (52%) of survey respondents reported missing out on their education as a result of the conflict in their country.

Lena, 17, remembers this experience well: living in conflict-ravaged Afghanistan as a young girl, her parents’ concerns for her safety meant she was unable to attend any form of primary schooling until she left the country.

Lena, who lives in regional Queensland, now campaigns for peace, equality and youth empowerment on global stages with Plan International, the UN, and other organisations. She was recently awarded Queensland’s Youth Citizen of the Year award.

“Girls living in conflict zones are often the most vulnerable, facing unimaginable barriers to education, safety, and basic human rights. As someone who has witnessed the impact of conflict, this report deeply resonates with me. It highlights the urgent need for global action to amplify their voices and acknowledge the harsh realities they endure, ensuring their stories and experiences are heard and acted upon,” she said.

The study found a staggering 17% of children surveyed had been asked to join an armed group, despite this being a grave violation of children’s rights and against International Humanitarian Law.

Boys were found to be at higher risk of being recruited into armed groups or forces, more than one in five boys (23%) had experienced this. 11% of girls were also found to have been targeted, we were told that girls included in armed conflict groups have been forced to work as cooks, spies or forced into marriage.

Survey respondents in Sudan were the most likely to have been approached by an armed group, followed closely by Mozambique and Ethiopia.

But the report also highlights the resilience young people living through war have, and theircourage in not only articulating their shattered dreams but their hopes and needs for the future. “We live day by day, finding solace in small joys and personal passions,” says Fatima in Gaza.

“Creating personal worlds, and engaging in activities we love, provides a temporary escape and a sense of normality. I take photos and write poetry. I want to be a photographer: holding onto hopes and dreams is a crucial part of survival. Despite the bleak circumstances, these dreams give us a reason to endure and push forward, even when the future seems uncertain.”

Plan International Australia CEO Susanne Legena, said:

“With the world less stable than it has been for generations, our annual State of the World’s Girls report for this year couldn’t come at a more critical time.

“Our research shows us the while the brutal impacts of war are felt by all people who experience it, regardless of gender, the experience itself does differ for girls and boys, young women and young men. Conflict and crisis deepen inequalities and set back any progress that had been made on equality. What the accounts and data show us is that girls pay a high price in conflict, particularly when it comes to gender- and sexual-based violence – this has to stop and is why peace and ceasefires are so desperately needed.

“The state of the world can feel overwhelming, but making a difference, and taking a stand against violence, doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Governments, donors and civil society can all play their part in bringing about peace – and so can everyone,” she said.

The report – titled ‘Still we dream: Girls and young people living through conflict’ is launched ahead of International Day of the Girl (IDG) on 11 October 2024. The day was set aside in the United Nations calendar in 2012 to celebrate and advocate for girls’ rights, following advocacy by Plan International, the world’s leading girls’ rights organisation.

The INGO is calling on donors, governments, and decision makers worldwide to take action for girls in conflict, including implementing immediate ceasefires, and commencing meaningful peace talks aimed at lasting peace, ensuring that girls and young people’s voice and specific needs are included.

Plan International also calls for all parties to conflict to immediately end and prevent all grave violations against children in conflict, including recruitment and use by armed forces and armed groups, killing and maiming, sexual violence, attacks on schools and hospitals, abductions, and denial of humanitarian access.

On IDG, Plan International Australia holds an annual International Day of the Girl Giving Day, and this year aims to raise $120,000 in 24 hours with the help of friends, allies and a telethon.

Everyday Plan supports girls living through crisis, protecting their rights, ensuring their safety, and celebrating their infinite potential. Proceeds of the Giving Day will go directly to girls and children in conflict, providing life-saving aid such as food, water, dignity kits and also the much-needed psycho-social support needed to commence healing.

 

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Your contribution to help with the running costs of this site will be gratefully accepted.

You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969

Donate Button