In Denial: Australia, Human Rights and Climate Change

When the complaint was lodged in May 2019, there was a sense…

Decum Fabulum: The Rider to the Sea

English, Italian, Latin ... in whatever language stories have come down to…

COVID-19: Where was it born: China, the United…

Continued from: COVID-19: Where was it born: China, the United States or…

Bias and balance

My parents only agreed on a very small number of issues. They…

One million jobless – unprecedented, and out of…

By William Olson  The Morrison government released its latest unemployment statistics on Thursday,…

Extreme Moderation in the Spittoon: Kamala Harris for…

The Vice Presidency has always gotten a degree of bad press in…

"Hey, Bill, your son's made a racist cartoon!"…

When a friend asked me why I'll read the Murdoch media if…

Mr Morrison - are you a sadist?

One issue which has been vividly revealed by the current crisis in…

«
»
Facebook

An Australian Outcry

By Jennifer Michels  

An Australian Outcry: Political Offices, Churches, Libraries and Grave Sites Destroyed.

With #BlackLivesMatter such a hot topic around the world I have not only been challenged in many of my views lately; I have dished out my fair share of opinion challenges myself during online debates. One of the points I often find myself referring to in these discussions is the topic of Aboriginal Land Rights. Pointedly, the injustices our Traditional Owners face when Sacred Sites, with such a huge impact to culture and our way of life, are damaged or destroyed.

Recently Rio Tinto caused significant damage to a Sacred Site in Western Australia. Juukan Gorge was said to be over 46 000 years old, containing a cave showing evidence of human habitation during the last Ice Age. Now while Rio Tinto has received widespread backlash for the damage to Juukan Gorge, BHP have received approval to destroy a further 40 sites, all with significant value to heritage, all within Western Australia.

I do not dispute the importance of the mining companies within Australia, but to allow this continued desecration of Sacred Sites is sacramental to the Aboriginal People. Our ties to land do not give us the same ownership our fellow citizens value; quite the contrary, our lands own us. They own us because we not only draw our life directly from the land and sea, our bodies have become the very dirt that is being exploded across what appears to be nothing more than barren, red earth.

Many only see minerals such as iron ore ready to be dug from the ground. To the First People of Australia there is a great deal more than meets the eye. For our People, this land holds our ancestor’s bones, record our histories, are the locations our laws were made and provides our places of worship; just to name a few! In other words, our Political Offices, Churches, Libraries, and our grave sites are being blown up to extend another mining operation or increase roads within Australia.

While these sites are damaged or destroyed Australia has a long line-up of buildings seen upon heritage lists. Buildings where paint colours cannot be changed; let alone see the buildings placed upon a list to be destroyed. These buildings are aspects of Australian history without the age and in many cases lacking the same combined significance as the Sacred Sites; not to mention the fact a building can be re-built. A cave used for thousands upon thousands of years cannot be recovered once it has been blown apart, nor can the history be recovered after the fact.

Mining companies within Australia have suggested electronically recording the sites proposed for destruction; however even my eight-year-old understands the difference between seeing something electronically and the value of viewing it with your own eyes. My son would not give up the ability to see an eclipse in person for the option of having them online instead, and I doubt anyone would be happy to see a horse or a dog only available via online means.

Would a church be better captured virtually to be prayed in? Can a library share the volume of knowledge via an online image of covers stacked upon shelves? Would recording family gravesites to only see them in an online fashion bring the same comforts to our souls?

Yet this can be considered by highly educated individuals as compensation for losing another place of worship, another burial ground, and generations upon generations of history; especially when significant portions were lost generations ago.

Herein lies a furthering of the difficulties for the Aboriginal People; religious beliefs are protected within Australia. They cannot be discriminated against without legal repercussions. Nor can the rights of the various religious beliefs be overruled or undermined in other professional undertakings. For example, an employer cannot insist an employee miss Sunday Mass as it is a protected right under Australian Law. Break down exactly what the term Dreamtime means, and it quite clearly fits into the category accepted around the world as religion. Dreamtime records the history of the First People. It explains the afterlife, defines laws and teaches social structures. If one were to look at the dictionary meaning of religion these topics are exactly what you will find. Yet the cultural and religious connections of the First People are not protected in the same manner. The rights of the religious beliefs held by Aboriginal People are not upheld under Australian laws like other religions are within this country.

Personally, I have come to believe the main reason for this relates directly to the minimal understanding of what the Dreamtime is. Those outside the communities, or Aboriginal family networks, are not regularly exposed to the spiritual beliefs or the connections to land and how they affect our afterlife; or in other words the First People’s many versions of Heaven.

When the term Dreamtime was made popular the Aboriginal Elders would have had a revolt on their hands had they described Dreamtime as religion, a result of Aboriginal history that has compounded this misunderstanding of culture and religion further. Religion is the word given to what was taught to the Stolen Generations, resulting in Dreamtime being referred to as culture instead of “many religious beliefs aligned in a similar fashion within a single ethnic group.” Because the Dreamtime of one Aboriginal Person is not the same as another Aboriginal Person. Each area of Aboriginal land has their own version of Dreamtime, their own individual Heaven. And you must die upon your own land to join the Elders and other ancestors of your family, meaning those forced from their homelands, those who die in another person’s land never see their loved ones again. They spend eternity without their siblings, never again to see childhood friends, their children cannot even share the same Heaven if they do not die upon the same lands.

If this was the way of your religious belief system, would you too raise your voice against an injustice to your loved ones when your communities were closed or you had been provided no choice but to leave your homes and the land you love so dearly?

Another reason for saving these Sacred Sites are the benefits lost to scientific communities around the world! Scientific communities that can give our society a much clearer understanding of our history. The scientific benefits have barely even scratched the surface to explain to the First People what their ancestors ate, where they hunted or how they lived. With the current finds surrounding Stonehenge the world has come alive with new talk inspired by history; including the recent discoveries in the Pilbara with the amazing find underwater. Imagine the ancient discoveries that could be found if more research were done into the past of this great country!

Imagine the benefits new information could provide the next generations seeking
employment or benefiting from scientific advancements. What about tracking where the Stolen Generations came from? Enough full genomes of our descendants could potentially reconnect families and finally heal the losses felt for generations. None of these things will come to pass if we continue destroying the Sacred Sites!

Considerations shown by the Australian Government since the introduction of Traditional Land Rights can be described as nothing short of lacking! How many times do amendments need to be put on the back burner by the very people elected to run these departments?

How many more election promises need to be broken before the changes we have asked for are considered, let alone made? How many times do the voices of the Traditional Owners need to be ignored before their objections are taken seriously? How much more of our history needs to disappear forever before more can finally be rediscovered? How much longer until the value of our history and culture can be understood for the enormity it really is?

I have often asked myself; “What if the heritage listed buildings were to suddenly become the target of approved destruction? Would my fellow citizens be so silent on the matter? If other religions beliefs were so blatantly discriminated against; would Aussies sit back in complacency? If significant political buildings were repetitively blown up, would our population turn a blind eye? If our combined historical records were so keenly targeted; would our society see high value to prevent such destruction? If churches were demolished across the country with such frequency, would the protests become a deafening roar?” Personally I think there would rightfully be an enormous outcry if any of these things were to become a reality for many other Australians; yet not enough are or have been actively seeking to prevent similar losses of significance to the Aboriginal People.

Aboriginal Elders have often sought advancements in areas such as tourism as a way of creating economic value within their communities; thus, becoming a benefit to the rest of Australian society. How many people travel the world for cultural value? How much do they spend? Tourism is widely accepted as one of Australia’s largest economies; yet vastly undervalued upon Aboriginal Lands!

Could the creation of real tourism in communities be valuable as a post-COVID recovery plan? How many new jobs could be created in building infrastructure? Would TAFE and other RTOs around the country benefit from teaching community members? What benefits would be generated by teaching the community members how to run their own businesses? How much of an injection could the Australian economy generate with a tourism industry dedicated to Aboriginal culture?

Appreciation for Aboriginal art, music and other cultural values has already spread the world over. Might opening these doors wider offset the losses felt by mining giants from denying the destruction of Sacred Sites? Please join your voice to the outcry and help our great country finally save our First Peoples’ Churches, Political Offices, Historical Libraries and Burial Grounds for future generations.

Like what we do at The AIMN?

You’ll like it even more knowing that your donation will help us to keep up the good fight.

Chuck in a few bucks and see just how far it goes!

Donate Button

6 comments

Login here Register here
  1. New England Cocky

    I am reminded of the incident about 1990 when a citizen disgruntled by the invasion of his property by a foreign owned corporate miner, took out a Mining Lease over NSW Government House property on Benelong Point Sydney Harbour. Naturally the bureaucrats disallowed such shenanigans and cancelled the lease, then prohibited further such actions by legislation.

    THe major problem with international miners is our Australias politicians who refuse to insist that all primary processing and indeed, secondary processing, occur in Australia, rather than elsewhere. Consequently, the real financial benefit of our natural resources, the jobs from this processing, is denied to our Australian voters with the majority of profits going off-shore to the foreign lovcated shareholders who contribute nothing to the benefit of Australian voters.

  2. wam

    Australians ‘all’ have been taught nothing worthwhile comes from Aborigines.
    Their culture, language and appearance will die out without the african negro throwbacks.
    the ‘nullius’ in the mind of the general public is alive and well.
    The christians take unbelievable pains to declare their jesus lives but cannot accept that a sacred site lives.
    Sadly such blind allegiance to a doctrine of love that spews so much hate is the hypocrisy of our social fabric.

  3. Jack sprat

    Rio Tinto has a track record on this kind of behavior .in Arizona aided and abetted by the late senator John McCain they are fighting to build giant copper mine on sacre Apache land (Box flat) . BHP involved as well .

  4. Terence Mills

    I have been following this issue quite closely and it is clear to me that the problem lies with state and federal legislation and to blame Rio Tinto is only partially addressing the issue.

    In 2013 Rio Tinto sought and obtained an approval under section 18 of WA’s state’s Aboriginal Heritage Act, for approval to mine and to bypass section 17 which makes it an offence to excavate, destroy, damage, conceal or in any way alter an Aboriginal site.

    Once the approval was granted under section 18, Traditional Owners cannot appeal it, only the owner of the land – such as a developer or holder of a mining lease – can make appeals.

    Since 2018, a review of the West Australian Aboriginal Heritage Act(1972) has been taking place.

    We are told that, due to COVID restrictions, the process was halted at the end of phase two of a four-phase process. The drafted legislation is yet to be released for the final round of consultation before the Draft Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Bill is introduced to parliament for consideration.

    Some Tradition Owners have since asked the state government to prevent further destruction and/or damage to other Aboriginal heritage sites across the state by putting a moratorium on all approvals granted under section 18 of the heritage act.

    WA State Aboriginal Affairs Minister Ben Wyatt, a man of aboriginal heritage and cousin of federal Indigenous affairs minister Ken Wyatt, rejected those calls because he said it would “cease activity that doesn’t have any contention”.

    Blaming Rio Tinto for what occurred is to ignore the neglect and malfeasance of state and federal governments and respective ministers need to be called to account .

  5. calculus witherspoon.

    It’s a system.

    At this point in evolution, a nasty, oligarchic system.

  6. tom baxter

    Everybody wants to own a new car, buy a new iphone, and have a big fat reverse cycle A/C unit in their home, but no one it seems wants to allow the mineral extraction required to make these products possible. The reason we don’t make them here or even refine our minerals here btw is because Australia’s high wages and taxes would add another 30% or so to the price of that iphone, and we would not be willing to pay that either.

    The planet is running out of resources, plain and simple. That is why we have to mine in places that used to be off-limits, that is why we are drilling for oil at the bottom of the ocean. Everyone complaining about these mineral ventures needs to give up the luxury items they provide and then see how opposed they are. Wake up and admit to your own complicity in all this or you’ll end up in a cognitive dissonance loop that will send you insane.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Return to home page
Scroll Up
%d bloggers like this: