24 comments

1. Jack RussellOctober 4, 2016 at 4:26 pm

   How many?

   Between 250-500 Australia-wide wouldn’t be too outrageous a guess I reckon … these entitled people have voracious appetites for public money and have spent decades perfecting and building the ‘legal’ siphon behind closed doors.

2. flohri1754October 4, 2016 at 4:49 pm

   I had no idea that either the Menzies or Chifley centres were at least partially funded by the Federal government! Thanks for the information …

   One would think that if a political party could not come up with enough money for its own primary think tank, perhaps that such think tank/s shouldn’t exist …..

3. diannaartOctober 4, 2016 at 5:25 pm

   I always wondered whether there are congenital problems with members of the LNP. Now I know they are, indeed, an incestuous cult of cronies.

4. johnlward010October 4, 2016 at 5:53 pm

   There is now clear evidence of fraud, misleading and deceptive conduct by members of Cabinet.
   This crookedness needs to be exposed.

   The sectional interests of our Government Ministers’ Corporate donors are taking precedence over the national interest, and the sustainability of financing for the Renewable Energy Industry.

   In 2015,Treasurer Joe Hockey and Finance Minister Mathias Cormann directed the Clean Energy Finance Corporation to exclude investments in household and small-scale solar from the $10 billion fund in the future.
   The draft investment mandate called for “mature and established clean energy technologies … including wind technology and household small-scale solar” to be excluded from the Corporation’s activities.

   Interestingly, the authority to make such changes can only come from the Parliament, not the Executive.

   The Executive cannot change an Act of Parliament. The Parliament also authorises the Executive Government to spend public money (not the other way around).

   Any change such as the revocation of a part and/or a new investment mandate to the CEFC Act 2012 may only be modified by amendments made, requested or agreed to by the Senate. Stephen Keim QC has provided advice to environmental groups about the Government’s ability to direct the CEFC.
   He said the Government had the power to put in place an investment mandate but it had to “tread a fairly thin line”.

   During 1998, American Petroleum Institute (API), the USA’s largest oil trade association (member companies include BP, Chevron, Conoco Phillips, Exxon-Mobil and Shell) planned a “roadmap” for a climate of deception, including a plan to have “average citizens” believe that the realities of climate science were vague and uncertain.

   Australians have been subject to fraudulent and misleading representations, regarding climate change over the past ten years by the people we elected.

   The direct effect of the CEFC ‘Responsible Ministers’ acting as de facto or shadow directors of the CEFC has been to create the perception that Australian policy support for clean energy is uncertain or diminished.

   These are the same negative outcomes envisaged by the American Petroleum Institute’s (API) 1998 campaign

   A third entity involved in this deception is the lobby group, the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA). The IPA was part of a conglomerate of like-minded groups that formed the Liberal Party in 1943-44 after the break-up of the United Australia Party.

   The policy agenda of the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) has been linked directly to LNP policy ever since.

   To put these linkages in context:
   The law frowns on the abuse of authority by any elected official i.e. to act with the intention to dishonestly gain a benefit for another person and/or cause detriment to another.
   This behaviour is defined in law as ‘Misfeasance’ In most cases, the essentials to bring an action of misfeasance in public office are; that the office-holder acted illegally, knew he/she was doing so, and knew or should reasonably have known that third parties would suffer loss as a result.

   The last Parliament (2013-2016) twice declined to allow the Executive’s Bill to Abolish the CEFC to become law.

   Subsequently, the Executive arm of Government had tried for two years to change the CEFC
   investment mandate

   Recently, while in caretaker mode, the LNP created a different investment mandate directive (in order to appear to the electors to have authority) to modify the intent of the CEFC Act, without returning to the Parliament (which BTW no longer existed).

   So apparently they were preparing to seek such an alteration to the CEFC Act in (the next) the 45th Parliament

   During the election campaign Prime Minister Turnbull by implication pass himself of as having the authority to redistribute $1billion from the Clean Energy Finance Corporation (CEFC) to fund his new Clean Energy Innovation Fund (CEIF).

   $1 billion was also set aside to finance a ‘Better Cities Fund’ announced two thirds of the way through the campaign.

   A further $1 billion ‘drawn from the “Green Bank ” to clean up the Barrier Reef ($0.6 Billion) is for jobs to deliver higher water quality in farm runoff in what looks like a subsidy to sugar/ethanol industry.

   $100 million was set aside to prevent the closure of the Steelworks in Whyalla SA.

   The University of Tasmania’s Northern Campus in Launceston received a pledge of $150 million to be extracted from the CEFC.

   These monies from CEFC are meant to wedge the ALP.
   Prime Minister Turnbull is saying to Tasmanians “you can have an expanded Northern Campus or a renewable energy industry, but you cannot have not both”.

   Malcolm promised money he cannot access, with the total pledged to date of $5.6 billion.

   Cabinet Ministers have conspired to remove all funds from the CEFC by pledging the total amount left in the CEFC account to other ‘good LNP causes’, in the final analysis there is no Funding available to catalyse the Renewable energy industry and investors will look elsewhere for the stability they prefer.

   At the same time Malcolm Turnbull is subsidising the fossil fuel industry with $24 billions of taxpayer funds That is the equivalent of $ 1,000 for every man, woman and child living in Australia.

   This includes exploration funding for Geoscience Australia and tax deductions for mining and petroleum exploration.
   That is why fossil fuel electricity is so cheap compared to renewables.

   Prime Minister Turnbull, Deputy Prime Minister Joyce, Former Prime Minister Abbott, Ministers Pyne, Hockey, Cormann and Hunt are attempting to persuade the public that the Cabinet can “re-purpose and re-direct the Act” without going back through the Parliament.

   These changes to the CEFC Act 2012 are yet to be legislated.

   Let’s consider the limits the Clean Energy Finance Corporation Act 2012 imposes on the responsible Minister’s mandate.

   Section 65: The responsible Ministers must not give a direction under subsection 64(1):

   (a) that has the purpose, or has or is likely to have the effect, of directly or indirectly requiring the Board to, or not to, make a particular investment; or

   (b) that is inconsistent with this Act (including the object of this Act).

   The object of The Clean Energy Finance Corporation Act (2012) is to facilitate increased flows of finance into the clean energy sector

   Joe Hockey and Mathias Cormann attempted to skirt around the law.
   Minister Hunt and Minister Cormann assert they have not directed the Board of the CEFC to stop financing roof top solar or land based wind farms. Greg hunt says his authority is inferred In the CEFC Act itself

   Minister Hunt and Minister Cormann assert they have not directed the Board of the CEFC to stop financing roof top solar or land based wind farms. Greg hunt says his authority is inferred In the CEFC Act itself. So let’s test that in court.

   The LNP and the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) are still using the same script and still following the American Petroleum Institute’s (API) line of climate deception.

   In a move away from API policy, in September 2014, Shell CEO Ben van Beurden in an interview with the Washington Post said:
   “Let me be very, very clear. For us, climate change is real and it’s a threat that we want to act on. We’re not aligning with sceptics” (Mufson 2014), Mufson is a director of Shell USA

   Fraudulent representation means making of a false statement about a material fact, with the knowledge that such statement is false, to another person with an intention that such other person to whom that statement is made must believe it as true and must act upon it resulting in an injury to the person to whom such false representation is made.

   Conclusion

   There are strong connections between the API and the IPA’s disinformation and the LNP campaign aims.

   The links are there. The wrongs have been done. Let us join together to promote public debate on this matter.

   http://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/4433/deceptive-and-misleading-conduct-by-corporations-t.aspx

   http://reneweconomy.com.au/2015/hockey-sets-impossible-targets-for-cefc-in-green-investments-62743

   http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/australias-renewable-energy-investment-grinds-to-a-halt-20150414-1mkn70.html

   http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/government-pulls-the-plug-on-household-solar-20150712-gian0u.html

   http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/RP9596

   AUDIO: CEFC seeks legal advice over Government mandates on wind and solar (Breakfast)

   http://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/fight-misinformation/climate-deception-dossiers-fossil-fuel-industry-memos – .V9fkLmURqEI

   http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-08/verrender-why-stop-at-the-mining-tax/5726276

   http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-07-13/government-accused-of-trying-to-shut-down-cefc-by-stealth/6614446

   https://ipa.org.au/library/publication/1345447840_document_be_like_gough.pdf

   http://www.austill.edu.au/journals/2011/i.html

   http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-07-12/government-lobbies-for-cefc-to-stop-wind-farm-funding/6613590

   https://www.evernote.com/shard/s706/nl/2147483647/b1f0c299-c76c-4e8e-9121-fc2054bbc328/

   http://reneweconomy.com.au/2016/turnbulls-sleight-of-hand-on-clean-energy-investment-63202

   http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/jun/20/how the coalition-is-using-clean-energy-financing-as-an-election-slush-fund-australia

   http://www.smh.com.au/comment/chicken-little-abbott-and-brandis-wrong-on-lawfare-20150821-gj4htj.html

   http://www.themercury.com.au/news/tasmania/libs-match-utas-funding-pledge/news-story/e4b625ce3aaf58402ede3543b703452e

   http://reneweconomy.com.au/2016/second-tasmania-basslink-will-need-at-least-1000mw-of-new-renewables-89558

   https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/aug/08/abbott-says-lobbyists-as-liberal-party-power-brokers-could-lead-to-corruption

   https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/19/clean-energy-finance-corp-could-sue

   http://www.cleanenergyfinancecorp.com.au/the-public-interest-disclosure-(pid)-scheme.aspx

   https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2012A00104

   https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/jul/12/coalition-bans-clean-energy-finance-corporation-wind-power-investment

   https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/jun/13/when-you-poke-the-coalitions-great-barrier-reef-rescue-mission-it-crumbles

   https://www.ucsusa.org/The-Climate-Deception-Dossiers.pdf

   http://www.lectlaw.com/def/f079.htm

   http://www.theenergycollective.com/gcooperrfa/227356/busting-big-oil-myths-renewable-fuel-standard-part-i

   http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-opinion/abbotts-climate-change-policy-is-bullshit-20091206-kdmb.html

   John Ward
   johnlward010@gmail.com

5. olddaveyOctober 4, 2016 at 6:15 pm

   It’s time that sponger Cater returned to England and took his nasty piece of work of a wife with him.
   The turd is always complaining about government payments to anyone he doesn’t like while his snout is firmly buried in the taxpayer funded trough.

6. flohri1754October 4, 2016 at 6:16 pm

   John L. Ward …. an amazing string of manipulations …..

7. Kaye LeeOctober 4, 2016 at 6:36 pm

   olddavey,

   The whole conservative side is terribly incestuous and I agree about Rebecca Weisser. They are as bad as the Hendersons.

   I really object to this funding. They also gave $92,088.70 to both the National Party equivalent, The Page Research Centre Limited, and something called the Green Institute which doesn’t seem to be up and running yet. With the four major parties dipping into this honey pot there is no chance of it being stopped.

8. diannaartOctober 4, 2016 at 6:37 pm

   “an amazing string of manipulations”

   I suspect John L Ward has only found a few threads in a tangle of lies and deception.

9. Jennifer Meyer-SmithOctober 4, 2016 at 6:40 pm

   Anything that either Andrew Robb or Brian Loughnane are involved in, should be seriously scrutinised and checked for its accountability. That means the Menzies Research Centre Ltd.

   Any shortcomings should then result in immediate cancellation of their “Charity” status which is presumably the reason why they can seek and be granted such funding.

10. Douglas PyeOctober 4, 2016 at 6:44 pm

    With respect may I submit this comment :- ” All of the above, and more, is the Australian version of simple Neo con Standard Procedure World Wide.(which I well know is no earth shattering revelation). ….. ‘They’ are NOT ‘missing the point’ ! …. ‘They’ are sharply focused on ‘Their’ point ….. which simply holds the Australian public in utter CONTEMPT for allowing them to ‘Rule’ !! …. make no mistake about it !!

    Apart from (and as well as) the above ….. $$ Money $$ rules Governments World Wide ….. without compunction ! …. pitilessly ! ….. In this current era we have a Millionaire as our Prime Minister ….( I think I just heard Mr. Chifley roll right over in his grave.)

    Understand me – if Mr. Turnbull and any of his ilk can assemble wealth that’s entirely their affair, ( given it’s fairly obtained) ….. which leads the mind to view the parlous situation where the word ” LEGAL” is utterly Bastardised ! … think Tax Havens for starters !

    I believe the time is nigh for the (my) ALP to shape itself into Fair Go mode and seek a ” Franchise ” to deflate / remove $$ Money $$ from the Governing system ….. does the system really serve the public when it simply funds LIES … the term ‘Spin’ is a lie in itself! …

    The government is no better than Big Business which spends huge money to ‘Reward’ top management and actually buy their conscience ! ….. conscience ?!! ….. more power to the ‘Whistle Blower’ entity!

    I love my sunburned Country …. and it’s flooding rains ….. may my Country again witness Common Decency prevailing! …..

11. Max GrossOctober 4, 2016 at 8:10 pm

    This brazen LNP klepotocracy really does believe it is untouchable. And yes, they do keep getting away with it, but god help anyone who blows a whistle! The AFP will be set loose like junkyard dogs.

12. helvityniOctober 4, 2016 at 8:12 pm

    oddavey, I’m with you, please send that little sourpuss Cater back to where he came from…

    Douglas Pye, I too wish for a return of the Oz before Howard, Abbott, Turnbull….

    The Southern Highland winds and rains were music to my ears before our dumb government started to blame the renewables for any freak storm most likely caused by the CC…which they seem to think is old wives’ tales…

13. Wayne TurnerOctober 4, 2016 at 8:17 pm

    Stop the waste.

14. wammmOctober 4, 2016 at 10:49 pm

    Spot on JMS if any ex-pollie needs a royal commission it is why robb erred at almost every level.of signing.
    But those rorts are but a fraction of the VET/TAFE and private education rorts since sept 2013..
    172 with access to government cash and only 43 unis(mid2014 – norton, grattan institute) wow with the history of 100s of of sucessfull pink batts getting no recognition but 4 rorters getting a royal commission. It is odds on this slack government has no interest in having any control over the habits of 172 CEOs in attracting students or the delivery of courses or, until complaints, any course outcomes.
    My darling was often at odds with pollies who had been lobbied by providers denied access until compliance but her boss backed her till he retired.
    She was eventually transferred and the ‘dodgy’ institutions got provisional access to overseas students and quietly, disappeared from view.

15. Kaye LeeOctober 5, 2016 at 6:42 am

    Speaking of rorts….

    Tony Abbott has updated his register of interests to declare a new role on the advisory board of the Ramsay Centre for Western Civilisation, established by the Paul Ramsay Foundation, a philanthropic organisation funded by the founder of Ramsay Health Care, a private hospital operator.

    Since 2004 Ramsay Holdings (the major shareholder in Ramsay Health Care), and Ramsay Health Care itself, have collectively donated more than $2 million to the Liberal and National parties. Ramsay Health Care has also donated $450,000 to the controversial Free Enterprise Foundation.

    They also get a lot of government contracts.

16. townsvilleblogOctober 5, 2016 at 9:02 am

    Kaye, thanks for shining a light on these activities I for one appreciate your hard work. You should be representing us in the federal parliament. As for Ramsay, I’d be interested to know how much income tax they have paid in the past 5 years, I’ll bet it’s not much. The way we are heading these tory bastards will have privatized every facet of government in Australia if they are allowed to cling to power for the full 3 years.

    In the area of Health we could be answering to Ramsay in future.

17. Arthur TarryOctober 5, 2016 at 9:35 am

    Will any of the issues mentioned in this article appear in the MSM – I suspect not. The AIMN is playing an increasingly important role in exposing the covert world of our political system. Hooray for AIMN. Bring on an Independent Commission for Corruption and Abuse of Power in Canberra.

18. Michael TaylorOctober 5, 2016 at 9:54 am

    Thank you, Arthur. Those were kind words that all the writers here would appreciate. I guess if we had a decent media in Australia then half of the political blogs wouldn’t exist. We’d all be writing about sport, TV shows or grandma’s famous recipes.

    Admittedly, most of what we write about it sourced from material in the public domain, but a lot of it never finds its way into the mainstream media. Or if it does, it is information that is rarely analysed.

19. Kaye LeeOctober 5, 2016 at 10:07 am

    Michael is right about this information being in the public domain. This article started from Wikipedia and the sources it linked to.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menzies_Research_Centre

    But apparently no-one thinks it’s a big enough deal to report on. I am pretty sure we could use our taxpayer dollars more productively. The four party think tanks were given a total of $674,735.60 this year in what appears to be an annual payment. How come we have to pay them to have ideas? We already pay the politicians and their staff and the public service departments and each party gets a big payout after the election dependent on votes received. I research stuff for free. Why can’t they? How many refuges would that money keep open? Or treatment centres for addicts? How many nurses could it employ?

20. Jennifer Meyer-SmithOctober 5, 2016 at 10:55 am

    Exactly, Kaye Lee.

    Ironical how everything they do, has a price tag but everything grassroots people are involved in, is exposed to repressive funding restrictions.

21. Kaye LeeOctober 5, 2016 at 11:06 am

    JMS,

    For the public it is user pays, for politicians it is the public who pay…for everything.

22. JohnOctober 5, 2016 at 2:56 pm

    John Ward’s comment is worth a post under its own byline.

23. RhondaOctober 6, 2016 at 3:10 pm

    I think they should be tanked. What a screaming rort

24. Laura JohnsonFebruary 28, 2017 at 2:59 pm

    the think tank gets paid by the government and then makes a donation to the government (scratches head)…. sounds like a money laundering scheme